Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Animal Sciences Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 38

Full-Text Articles in Animal Sciences

F758-Forage And Grain Testing Information Sheet, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

F758-Forage And Grain Testing Information Sheet, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W156-Clinical Mastitis Evaluation, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W156-Clinical Mastitis Evaluation, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W155-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Time Period, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W155-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Time Period, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W154-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Cow, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W154-Clinical Mastitis And Treatment Record By Cow, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W153-Forms Of Mastitis, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W153-Forms Of Mastitis, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W152-Estimating Losses Using Somatic Cell Counts, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W152-Estimating Losses Using Somatic Cell Counts, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W151-Bulk Tank Milk Quality Parameters, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W151-Bulk Tank Milk Quality Parameters, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Bacteria in milk, whether originating from the cow or from the environment, significantly impact the quality of dairy products and therefore consumer acceptance. Bacteria produce heatstable enzymes that can damage milk fat and milk protein. These enzymes are not affected by pasteurization and continue to cause damage in the final dairy product. High bacteria levels in raw milk result in off-flavors, bitter flavors, rancidity and reduced shelf life. The Pasteurized Milk Ordinance specifies safety standards of Grade A milk to protect public health, not to maximize product quality and shelf life. The PMO only sets limits on somatic cell count …


W150-Using Milk Somatic Cell Count Information, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W150-Using Milk Somatic Cell Count Information, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

The level of mastitis infection in a dairy herd can have a significant impact on herd profitability. Losses due to mastitis include decreased milk production, increased treatment costs, discarded milk, premature culling, death, decreased genetic potential, decreased reproductive performance, load rejection due to violation of somatic cell counts (SCC) or antibiotic residues and loss of milk quality premiums (3, 9, 12). Most producers easily relate clinical mastitis with these losses. However, subclinical (or hidden) mastitis may actually cause more losses in a herd than clinical mastitis. Since the animal does not exhibit typical symptoms of the disease, the problem is …


W149-Bulk Tank Milk Quality, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W149-Bulk Tank Milk Quality, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Who is responsible for the safety and quality of dairy products? Dairy producers? Processors? Retailers? Consumers? In fact, all of these parties – from farm to fork – share in this responsibility. What starts as a high-quality product on the farm can be ruined somewhere along this chain. However, a poor-quality, inferior raw product leaving the farm cannot be transformed into a safe and high-quality product for the consumer. Despite technical advances in milk processing, the safety and quality of dairy products is still determined on the farm. Pasteurization does provide a certain level of safety, but is not the …


W148-Milk Quality And The Tennessee Quality Milk Initiative, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W148-Milk Quality And The Tennessee Quality Milk Initiative, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

According to records, in 1995, there were more than 1300 dairy farms in Tennessee. In 2007, the number declined to fewer than 600 dairies (9). There are several reasons for this mass exodus from the dairy industry in Tennessee: low milk prices, shortages of qualified labor, high feed costs, high fertilizer costs, high fuel costs, etc. In addition, many dairy producers in Tennessee and in the Southern Region are at risk of losing their milk market due to below average milk quality. Milk quality continues to be a topic of intense debate in the dairy industry. Dairy producers in the …


W103- Closure & Rehabilitation Of Waste Storage Facilities, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W103- Closure & Rehabilitation Of Waste Storage Facilities, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W098-Annual Report Template, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W098-Annual Report Template, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W097-Permit Termination Template, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W097-Permit Termination Template, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W096-Name Of Persons And Or Firms Removing Litter, Manure And/Or Process Wastewater From Cafos, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Apr 2010

W096-Name Of Persons And Or Firms Removing Litter, Manure And/Or Process Wastewater From Cafos, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W095-Agreement For The Removal Of Litter, Manure And/Or Process Wastewater From A Cafo, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W095-Agreement For The Removal Of Litter, Manure And/Or Process Wastewater From A Cafo, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W094-Tennessee Phosphorus Risk Index, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W094-Tennessee Phosphorus Risk Index, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

In a waterbody, P is required for algae growth. In most waterbodies, the limited supply of P limits algae growth. Large amounts of P promote rapid growth of large amounts of algae or algae "blooms." This excess algae damages aquatic habitats by reducing sunlight penetration, reducing dissolved oxygen levels and promoting the growth of a toxic form of microscopic marine life. In short, it can result in fish kills, reduce aesthetic value and could make the water less desirable for livestock watering. An example of actions taken to prevent P enrichment of surface water is the lowering of phosphate levels …


W093-Procedures For Manure And Litter Sampling, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W093-Procedures For Manure And Litter Sampling, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Nutrient composition of manure varies with a number of factors, including animal type, bedding, ration, storage and handling, environmental conditions, field application method, age of manure, timing of sampling and sampling technique. This variability makes book values (or averages) an unreliable source for determining application rates of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Each livestock production operation and manure management system is unique, and an individual farm’s manure analysis can vary from average values by 50 percent or more. Testing manure may better indicate how animal management and other factors actually affect nutrient contents and will allow for more accurate calculation of …


W092-Terminating A Permit, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W092-Terminating A Permit, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

A CAFO covered under a general permit must notify the TDEC when the CAFO is no longer in operation. The TDEC retains the right to deny termination of coverage until receipt of the necessary notice and information from the permittee.

CAFO operators should remember that a closure/rehabilitation plan for the waste system was submitted as part of the original permitting process. That closure plan should have met NRCS standards and addressed the maintenance of the facility until proper closure is completed within 360 days. The TDEC may not consider the CAFO closed or terminate the permit until the closure plan …


W091-Annual Report, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W091-Annual Report, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

All CAFOs must submit an annual report to TDEC and TDA between January 1 and February 15.


W090-Recordkeeping, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W090-Recordkeeping, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Recordkeeping is an essential component of a CAFO permit. A producer must keep records current to satisfy the requirements of the regulations. Additionally, without current records, inspectors cannot determine and producers cannot prove the nutrient Management plan (NMP) has been implemented as approved. All records required by the regulation must be maintained for five years, and must be made available to TDEC or EPA upon request.


W089-Discharge Events, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W089-Discharge Events, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

All wastewater discharges from a CAFO to waters of the state of Tennessee are prohibited. For existing CAFOs, new dairy CAFOs and new cattle CAFOs, an exception will be made when either chronic or catastrophic rainfall events cause an overflow from a facility properly designed, constructed, maintained and operated to contain all process wastewater from the operation (such as wash water, parlor water, watering system overflow, etc.), plus all runoff from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event. For new swine and poultry CAFOs, the exception will be made if the facility was properly designed, constructed, maintained and operated to contain all …


W088-Cafo Inspections, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W088-Cafo Inspections, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

As a condition of the permit, the producer must allow personnel from the TDEC or the U.S. EPA to inspect the regulated CAFO. They are required to present their credentials and will only inspect a facility “at reasonable times.” This does not mean that they may only inspect the facility at the owner’s convenience. It simply means that most inspections will be conducted during normal business hours. Large CAFOs are required to undergo a yearly inspection at a minimum. Medium CAFOs may be inspected less often.


W087-New Construction On Cafos And Construction Of New Cafos, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W087-New Construction On Cafos And Construction Of New Cafos, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

Any liquid waste management system that is constructed, modified, repaired or placed into operation after April 13, 2006 must be designed, constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with final design plans and specifications that meet or exceed standards in the NRCS Field Office Technical Guide and other guidelines as accepted by the Departments of Environment and Conservation, or Agriculture.


W086-Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W086-Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

A Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP) is a group of conservation practices and management activities that will ensure both production and natural resource protection goals are achieved. A CNMP will contain actions that address water quality criteria for the feedlot, production area and land on which the manure will be applied. It addresses natural resource concerns dealing with soil erosion, manure and organic by-products, and their potential impacts on water quality.


W084-Transferring Manure, Litter Or Wastewater To A Third Party, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W084-Transferring Manure, Litter Or Wastewater To A Third Party, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W085-Nutrient Management Plans, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W085-Nutrient Management Plans, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

All Large CAFOs with dry litter operations, all Medium CAFOs and all designated CAFOs are required to develop, submit for state approval, implement and keep on site a site-specific Nutrient Management Plan (NMP). These NMPs are very different than the plans previously required by regulations. They are extensive and focus on many aspects of livestock operations, from application of manure to conservation practices.


W083-No Potential To Discharge Determination, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W083-No Potential To Discharge Determination, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

AFO that does not land apply manure, litter or process wastewater may request that it be determined to have no potential to discharge. If approved, the CAFO would not have to be permitted. In Tennessee, the only type of operation that could potentially meet the “No Potential to Discharge” requirements would be poultry operations that have covered litter storage and remove all litter from their operation. Any CAFO that land applies litter, manure or wastewater cannot meet the requirements. Dairy and swine operations typically do not remove all waste and wastewater from their operation because of the enormous expense of …


W082-Permit Requirements For The Swine Industry, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W082-Permit Requirements For The Swine Industry, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

No abstract provided.


W081-Permit Requirements For The Poultry Industry, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W081-Permit Requirements For The Poultry Industry, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

On February 12, 2003, the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) published new concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) regulations designed to protect or restore water quality. EPA provided the option of adopting the national EPA CAFO regulations, or states could develop and implement their own regulations. Tennessee chose to develop and implement CAFO regulations that fit Tennessee’s animal production and water quality situations. In August 2004, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) issued the final CAFO regulations for poultry operations.

TDEC has defined a CAFO as an animal-feeding operation (AFO) if animals are confined for at least 45 days in …


W080-Permit Requirements For Tennessee's Dairy Industry, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service Apr 2010

W080-Permit Requirements For Tennessee's Dairy Industry, The University Of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service

Animals/Livestock

The new CAFO rules, published February 12, 2003 in the Federal Register, were adopted within the authority of the 1972 Clean Water Act to address changes in the animal production industries. EPA’s revisions make the new regulations more effective in protecting or restoring water quality. They are more inclusive of certain sectors of the CAFO industries; removed several permitting exemptions; reflect a greater focus on land application; and emphasize accountability, inspections and recordkeeping. (Adapted from the Livestock and Poultry Environmental Stewardship Factsheet Series.)

The Tennessee regulations and permits come under the authority of the Tennessee Department of Environment …