Torts Commons^™

The Mdl Revolution And Consumer Legal Funding, Ronen Avraham, Lynn A. Baker, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

Third-party consumer legal funding, where financial companies advance money on a nonrecourse basis to assist individual plaintiffs with living expenses, is an increasingly popular and controversial part of American litigation. And consumers with mass tort claims pending in Multi-District Litigations (MDLs) constitute the fastest growing sector of those seeking assistance from this billion-dollar funding industry. Policy makers, mass tort plaintiffs' lawyers, and scholars have increasingly raised concerns about exorbitant interest rates and have called for regulations to protect vulnerable consumers from “predatory lending.” To date, however, the policy debate has largely relied on anecdotes and speculation because flinders have not …

Tort Law And Civil Recourse, Mark A. Geistfeld

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Recognizing Wrongs. by John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky.

Strict Liability And Sick Building Syndrome: Defining A Building As A Product Under Restatement (Second) Of Torts, Section 402a, David Reisman

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

Sara's Offspring: Some First Principles For Superfund Reform In The 1990s, Robert F. Blomquist

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

How To Save The National Priorities List From The D.C. Circuit--And Itself, John S. Applegate

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

After 3550 Stevens Creek Associates V. Barclays Bank: Will Response Costs For Asbestos Removal Be Permitted Under Cercla?, Jennifer G. Marwitz

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

The Challenge Of Latent Physical Effects Of Toxic Substances: The Next Step In The Evolution Of Toxic Torts, Kathleen A. O'Nan

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

Kentucky's New Nuisance Statute, John S. Palmore

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

Disrupting Frivolous Defenses, Thomas D. Russell

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Judge Milton I. Shadur was a disrupter of frivolous defenses. In 2018, Judge Shadur died at the age of 93 after 37 years as a judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Sua sponte, Judge Shadur reviewed civil answers, and disrupted the pleading of frivolous defenses. Sua Sponte Shadur—as some lawyers called him—rejected answers that departed from or ignored Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In 2001, Judge Shadur issued an Appendix to an order in State Farm v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276 (N.D. Ill. 2001) with his expectations regarding how …

The Elastics Of Snap Removal: An Empirical Case Study Of Textualism, Thomas O. Main, Jeffrey W. Stempel, David Mcclure

Cleveland State Law Review

This Article reports the findings of an empirical study of textualism as applied by federal judges interpreting the statute that permits removal of diversity cases from state to federal court. The “snap removal” provision in the statute is particularly interesting because its application forces judges into one of two interpretive camps—which are fairly extreme versions of textualism and purposivism, respectively. We studied characteristics of cases and judges to find predictors of textualist outcomes. In this Article, we offer a narrative discussion of key variables, and we detail the results of our logistic regression analysis. The most salient predictive variable was …

Incentivized Torts: An Empirical Analysis, J. Shahar Dillbary, Cherie Metcalf, Brock Stoddard

Northwestern University Law Review

Courts and scholars assume that group causation theories deter wrongdoers. This Article empirically tests, and rejects, this assumption, using a series of incentivized laboratory experiments. Contrary to common belief and theory, data from over 200 subjects show that group liability can encourage tortious behavior and incentivize individuals to act with as many tortfeasors as possible. We find that subjects can be just as likely to commit a tort under a liability regime as they would be when facing no tort liability. Group liability can also incentivize a tort by making subjects perceive it as fairer to victims and society. These …

Who Will Be Liable For Medical Malpractice In The Future? How The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Medicine Will Shape Medical Tort Law, Scott J. Schwelkart

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

No abstract provided.

Conflict Of Laws For The Age Of Cybertorts: A Game Theoretic Study Of Corporate Profiteering From Choice Of Law Loopholes And Interstate Torts, Yunsieg P. Kim

BYU Law Review

This Article identifies a choice of law loophole that corporations can exploit to commit interstate torts against individuals without paying damages by inducing victims to sue in a state where they are guaranteed to lose. The Second Restatement effectively requires plaintiffs bringing interstate tort claims to allege which state has the most significant relationship to their injury, because most federal courts rely on plaintiffs allegations to choose a state law for the purpose of resolving motions to dismiss. However, when torts are committed over state lines (for example, over the internet), plaintiffs can be misinformed or misled as to where …

Directional Drilling, Subsurface Trespass, And Conversion, John D. Mckinnis

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

The Measure Of Damages For Mineral Trespass--A Kentucky Perspective, Kelly Mark Easton

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

Privileging Opinion, Denigrating Discourse: How The Law Of Defamation Incentivizes News Talk-Show Hyperbole, Clay Calvert

Pepperdine Law Review

This Article examines how defamation law promotes a culture of hyperbole and exaggeration on television news talk shows at the expense of more meaningful dialogue and discourse. The Article uses the 2020 federal court rulings in McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC and Herring Networks, Inc. v. Maddow as analytical springboards to address this problem. In both cases, judges dismissed defamation claims stemming from comments made by well-known talk-show hosts—Fox News’s Tucker Carlson in McDougal and MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in Herring Networks—on the ground that their remarks would not be understood by viewers as factual assertions. In concluding that Carlson’s …

Hylin V. United States: Can The Mine Safety And Health Administration Do No Wrong?, Patrick G. Byrne

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

Athens News Matters: Cyber Abuse And Intimate Partner Violence, Thomas E. Kadri

Popular Media

No abstract provided.

Island Creek V. Rodgers And Mine Subsidence Liability, S. Michele Manning

Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law

No abstract provided.

Three Deft Kicks To The Problem Of Cyberbullying, Anita Bernstein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Assumption Of Risk In Consumer Contracts And The Distraction Of Unconscionability, Zahra Takhshid

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

For years, courts have struggled to determine when to enforce exculpatory clauses that would prevent personal injury victims from availing themselves of tort remedies under the doctrine of express assumption of risk. In the past, when courts declined to enforce these clauses, they did so on the ground that enforcing such a waiver for the activities in question was “against public policy.” Recently, however, many courts have addressed the issue through the contract doctrine of “unconscionability.” This change in focus has subtly but importantly altered the enforceability inquiry by emphasizing the conditions under which the plaintiff agreed to the contract, …

Beware Of Strangers Bearing Gifts, Anthony J. Sebok

Online Publications

A familiar rhetorical trope in modern advocacy is: “Imagine if visitors from outer space were observing x; how would they describe it?” The payoff of this exercise is to get the audience to see that the view proposed by the speaker, while superficially unfamiliar, is actually more perceptive than the conventional understanding of the practice at issue. The subtext is that only with the benefit of insights gleaned from a great distance (or an unusual perspective) can those immersed in a practice truly understand it.

Privacy Losses As Wrongful Gains, Bernard Chao

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Perhaps nowhere has the pace of technology placed more pressure on the law than in the area of data privacy. Huge data breaches fill our headlines. Companies often violate their own privacy policies by selling customer data, or by using the information in ways that fall outside their policy. Yet, even when there is indisputable misconduct, the law generally does not hold these companies accountable. That is because traditional legal claims are poorly suited for handling privacy losses.

Contract claims fail when privacy policies are not considered contractual obligations. Misrepresentation claims cannot succeed when customers never read and rely on …

Frivolous Defenses, Thomas D. Russell

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

This article is about civil procedure, torts, insurance, litigation, and professional ethics. This is an empirical piece with data drawn from a sample of 356 answers to 298 complaints in car crash lawsuits to identify various ways that, I argue, insurance defense lawyers evade the rules of civil procedure and, frankly, act unprofessionally.

The empirical center of this piece examines 356 answers in car crash personal injury cases in Colorado’s district courts. First, I situate these cases within dispute pyramid elements including the total number of miles-traveled within Colorado and also with respect to the volume of civil litigation.

The …

An Introductory Study On The Challenges Of Artificial Intelligence In Tort Law, Zahra Takhshid

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are creating a promising future in tech innovations. From early cancer detection apps to autonomous vehicles, possibilities seem to be endless. Yet, with such technology, harm is also bound to follow. In such instances, the issue of tort liability begs our attention. Who should bear reasonability in case of an accident? When is an injury foreseeable? Such questions in negligence law will require a different perspective when one is dealing with an accident arisen out of the implementation of AI. Should tort law take the route of products liability law? Or will traditional negligence …

Defenses To The Tort Of Negligence: A Comparative Study Of The Iranian And The U.S. Legal Systems, Laya Joneydi, Zahra Takhshid

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Tortfeasors are entitled to defend themselves against liability claims. In the United States tort system, in addition to general defenses, common law rules have recognized special affirmative defenses for tortfeasors based upon plaintiff's carelessness that has contributed to the injury. The two defenses at study in this article are contributory negligence and comparative fault. In this article, we introduce the defense within a new structure that is compatible with the Iranian legal system. This article contributes to the academic tort law literature in Iran by proposing the recognition of such a rubric in the Iranian tort system. In a comprehensive …

Why Do The Poor Not Have A Constitutional Right To File Civil Claims In Court Under Their First Amendment Right To Petition The Government For A Redress Of Grievances?, Henry Rose

Seattle University Law Review

Since 1963, the United States Supreme Court has recognized a constitutional right for American groups, organizations, and persons to pursue civil litigation under the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. However, in three cases involving poor plaintiffs decided by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s—Boddie v. Connecticut,2 United States v. Kras,3 and Ortwein v. Schwab4—the Supreme Court rejected arguments that all persons have a constitutional right to access courts to pursue their civil legal claims.5 In the latter two cases, Kras and Ortwein, the Supreme Court concluded that poor persons were properly barred from …

Reconstructing Malice In The Law Of Punitive Damages, Marc O. Degirolami

Scholarly Articles

Punitive damages present two related puzzles. One concerns their object. If they are punitive, their object is to punish tortfeasors. If they are damages, their object is to compensate tort victims. If they are both, the problem is to reconcile these different objects in applying them. A second puzzle involves their subject. Punitive damages are awarded for egregious wrongdoing. But the nature of that egregiousness is nebulous and contested, implicating many poorly understood terms. The two puzzles are connected, because the subject of punitive damages will inform their object. Once we know the type of wrongfulness that punitive damages deal …

Making Preconception Tort Theory Crisper, Mark Strasser

Marquette Law Review

More and more individuals seeking to expand their families make use of

someone else’s gametes to help create a child. Unsurprisingly, those

considering the use of donated or purchased gametes often seek reassurance

that the use of those gametes will not create an increased risk that a child

thereby produced will have a severe disease. Sometimes, because of negligence

or recklessness, gametes are used that result in children having severe disease

where that outcome would have been avoided though the use of reasonable

care. Regrettably, courts addressing whether liability may be imposed in such

cases have sometimes misunderstood and misapplied …

The Burdens Of All: Progressive Origins Of Accident Cost Socialization In Tort Law, 1870-1920, Joseph A. Ranney

Marquette Law Review

Scholars who have studied the Progressive Movement’s contributions to

American law have paid little attention to its impact on tort law. This Article

helps fill the gap by examining the ways in which Progressivism shaped the rise

of employer liability law, workers compensation, and comparative negligence

during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. The Article places

these reforms within the broader social history of American tort law—a

gradual, often tortuous transition from free-labor beliefs that the law should

encourage personal responsibility and economic growth above all else to a

realization that injuries are an unavoidable cost of economic modernization,

accompanied by …