Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (18)
- Litigation (14)
- Food and Drug Law (12)
- Law and Economics (12)
- Legal Remedies (11)
-
- Consumer Protection Law (10)
- Law and Society (9)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (8)
- Environmental Law (8)
- Evidence (8)
- Insurance Law (8)
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Legislation (8)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Internet Law (7)
- State and Local Government Law (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Civil Law (6)
- Commercial Law (6)
- Contracts (6)
- Economics (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Communications Law (5)
- Conflict of Laws (5)
- Courts (5)
- Institution
-
- BLR (25)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (24)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Duke Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Campbell University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Torts (59)
- Cost analysis (21)
- Guido Calabresi (21)
- Law and Economics (11)
- Tort reform (8)
-
- Products Liability (7)
- Causation (6)
- Remedies (6)
- Corrective justice (5)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Courts (4)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (4)
- Damages (4)
- Economics (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Liability (4)
- Mass torts (4)
- Medical malpractice (4)
- Politics (4)
- Punitive damages (4)
- Tort law (4)
- Assumption of risk (3)
- Class actions (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Conflict of laws (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Corporations (3)
- Publication
-
- Maryland Law Review (21)
- ExpressO (19)
- Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series (5)
-
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (5)
- Articles (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Campbell Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Law & Economics Working Papers Archive: 2003-2009 (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- William Mitchell Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Buffalo Environmental Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 156 of 156
Full-Text Articles in Torts
A Rejoinder To The Rejoinder To On The Theory Class's Theories Of Asbestos Litigation, Lester Brickman
A Rejoinder To The Rejoinder To On The Theory Class's Theories Of Asbestos Litigation, Lester Brickman
Articles
The article, authored by Lester Brickman, serves as a rebuttal to Professor Charles Silver's rejoinder, which criticized Brickman's original article on asbestos litigation. Brickman defends his assertions regarding Silver's undisclosed retention by the law firm Baron & Budd to defend the controversial Script Memo, arguing that this nondisclosure breaches academic ethics. He also clarifies his stance on the role of attorney William Skepnek and reiterates his scholarly focus on legal ethics, particularly the issues surrounding contingency fees and their potential for overcharging clients. Brickman emphasizes the importance of academic integrity and the necessity of exposing ethical abuses in the legal …
Who Are Those Guys? An Empirical Examination Of Medical Malpractice Plaintiffs’ Attorneys, Thomas B. Metzloff, Catherine T. Harris, Ralph A. Peeples
Who Are Those Guys? An Empirical Examination Of Medical Malpractice Plaintiffs’ Attorneys, Thomas B. Metzloff, Catherine T. Harris, Ralph A. Peeples
Faculty Scholarship
Abstract not available
An Analysis Of The Effect Of A Loser-Pays Rule On The Decisions Of An American Litigant, Jaime Leigh Loos
An Analysis Of The Effect Of A Loser-Pays Rule On The Decisions Of An American Litigant, Jaime Leigh Loos
Honors Program Theses
Decisions made by litigants often do not reflect those most beneficial to society. A rule goveming fee allocation in tort cases should encourage meritorious suits and discourage frivolous suits. America is one of the only countries in the world that does not use a loser-pays rule to assign legal costs. Employing a loser-pays rule could make the legal system more efficient and more equitable. The effect of a loser-pays rule is analyzed by economic theory and empirical evidence, while considering possible limitations of the rule. A carefully applied system of loser-pays may positively affect the U.S. legal system.
Organizational Misconduct: Beyond The Principal-Agent Model, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Organizational Misconduct: Beyond The Principal-Agent Model, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Faculty Scholarship
This article demonstrates that, at least since the adoption of the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines in 1991, the United States legal regime has been moving away from a system of strict vicarious liability toward a system of duty-based organizational liability. Under this system, organizational liability for agent misconduct is dependant on whether or not the organization has exercised due care to avoid the harm in question, rather than under traditional agency principles of respondeat superior. Courts and agencies typically evaluate the level of care exercised by the organization by inquiring whether the organization had in place internal compliance structures ostensibly designed …
Using Liability Rules To Stimulate Local Innovation In Developing Countries: Application To Traditional Knowledge, Jerome H. Reichman, Tracey Lewis
Using Liability Rules To Stimulate Local Innovation In Developing Countries: Application To Traditional Knowledge, Jerome H. Reichman, Tracey Lewis
Faculty Scholarship
When economists speak of an underlying legal structure that imposes an "absolute permission" requirement on access to, and use of, knowledge goods protected by intellectual property rights (IPRs), they typically have in mind the domestic patent and copyright laws. Under these and related intellectual property regimes, one cannot normally make use of a protected invention or creative work of authorship for specified purposes and for limited periods of time without prior authorization of the rights holder, typically in the form of a license.
When economists speak of liability rules, in contrast, they envision an underlying legal structure that permits third …
Common Law Disclosure Duties And The Sin Of Omission: Testing The Meta-Theories, Kimberly S. Krawiec, Kathryn Zeiler
Common Law Disclosure Duties And The Sin Of Omission: Testing The Meta-Theories, Kimberly S. Krawiec, Kathryn Zeiler
Faculty Scholarship
Since ancient times, legal scholars have explored the vexing question of when and what a contracting party must disclose to her counterparty, even in the absence of explicit misleading statements. This fascination has culminated in a set of claims regarding which factors drive courts to impose disclosure duties on informed parties. Most of these claims are based on analysis of a small number of non-randomly selected cases and have not been tested systematically. This article represents the first attempt to systematically test a number of these claims using data coded from 466 case decisions spanning over a wide array of …