Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Richmond Law Review

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year

Articles 91 - 108 of 108

Full-Text Articles in Torts

Parental Immunity- Its Effect On Vicarious Liability Jan 1970

Parental Immunity- Its Effect On Vicarious Liability

University of Richmond Law Review

Parental immunity prohibits a child from instituting a suit against his parent for a personal tort. However, when a child has sustained injury as a result of his parent's tortious act committed in the course of his employment, and the child seeks recovery against his parent's employer under the doctrine of respondeat superior, the majority of jurisdictions feel that this immunity is purely personal and should not be extended to the employer.


Recent Decisions Jan 1970

Recent Decisions

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a summary of the case law that was decided in 1970.


Recent Legislation Jan 1970

Recent Legislation

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a list of the recent legislation from 1970.


Recent Decisions Jan 1969

Recent Decisions

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a summary of the case law from 1969.


Recovery For Negligently Caused Emotional Trauma Resulting From Fear For The Safety Of Another Jan 1969

Recovery For Negligently Caused Emotional Trauma Resulting From Fear For The Safety Of Another

University of Richmond Law Review

Recovery for emotional trauma has progressed slowly in the century since Lord Wensleydale uttered the above words. The courts have been reluctant to recognize the interest in emotional tranquility both when the interference has been intentional and when it has been negligent.


Basic Protection And The Future Of Negligence Law, Robert E. Keeton Jan 1968

Basic Protection And The Future Of Negligence Law, Robert E. Keeton

University of Richmond Law Review

Coming to full flower only in the nineteenth century,' negligence law is still a tender young plant among the hardy redwoods of legal history. Yet the jeopardy in which it stands is due not to its youth but to its aging inflexibility-to its failure to adapt to the era of the automobile. This is not to say that its end is at hand. Rather, a future of some kind for negligence law seems assured. The questions in doubt are what kind and for how long. The surest way of causing it to be inglorious and brief is to continue to …


Recent Legislation Jan 1968

Recent Legislation

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a summary of the legislation that came out in 1968.


Recent Cases Jan 1967

Recent Cases

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a summary of the case law from 1967.


Perpetuities, Privity And Professional Liability, D. Orville Lahy Jan 1966

Perpetuities, Privity And Professional Liability, D. Orville Lahy

University of Richmond Law Review

As the number of malpractice cases against members of all professions continues to increase, it seems appropriate to review several new developments which may be of considerable importance to the practicing lawyer with respect to his professional liability. The time has come to approach this delicate subject with some plain language about property law and the portentous responsibility of the legal profession in the context of the rule against perpetuities.


The "Attractive Nuisance Doctrine" In Virginia, William T. Muse Jan 1965

The "Attractive Nuisance Doctrine" In Virginia, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

Children deem it their prerogative to roam wherever they please. In particular, they have a tendency to wander on other people's land and meddle with anything they find there. In doing so they frequently get hurt. The problem of the liability of occupiers of land for such injuries has taken up much of the time of American courts in the last one hundred years and has resulted in many published decisions. The trial courts in Virginia have devoted much thought and time to this problem, and since 1887 twelve cases have been heard and decided by the Supreme Court of …


Recent Cases Jan 1965

Recent Cases

University of Richmond Law Review

This is a summary of the case law from 1965.


Recent Cases Jan 1964

Recent Cases

University of Richmond Law Review

This article is a summary of the case law that occurred in 1964.


Fusion Of Libel And Slander-- Quaere, M. Ray Doubles Jan 1964

Fusion Of Libel And Slander-- Quaere, M. Ray Doubles

University of Richmond Law Review

Are certain written publications which were libelous per se at common law, still actionable as such in Virginia today under a count in common law libel?


Recent Cases Jan 1963

Recent Cases

University of Richmond Law Review

This article provides a list of the recent cases and their summaries for the year of 1963.


Basis Of Liability For Blasting In Virginia, William T. Muse Jan 1962

Basis Of Liability For Blasting In Virginia, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

In this period of prosperity more private capital is avail- able for construction of all kinds. Also, vast sums of public funds are being appropriated for all types of construction, particularly highway construction. For example, the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways alone will involve the construction of 41,000 miles of highway, and is designed to connect and serve all major urban centers in the United ,States. It is probably the largest peacetime engineering project ever undertaken by man. An estimated three-fourths of a million parcels of land, approximately 1,500,000 acres, will be condemned for highway right-of-way over the …


Notable Legislation Of 1962, Harry L. Snead Jr. Jan 1962

Notable Legislation Of 1962, Harry L. Snead Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

Unless otherwise indicated, the statutes and amendments noted below will be effective on June 29, 1962. All code refer- ences are to the 1950 Code of Virginia.


Virginia's New Last Clear Chance Doctrine, William T. Muse Jan 1959

Virginia's New Last Clear Chance Doctrine, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

Rule # 1. Where the injured person has negligently placed himself in a situation of peril from which he is physically unable to remove himself, the defendant is liable if he saw, or should have seen, him [and realized, or ought to have realized, his peril] in time to avert the accident by using reasonable care. 'Rule # 2. Where the plainfiff has negligently placed himself in a situation of peril from which he is physically able to remove himself, but is unconscious of his peril, the defendant is liable only if he saw the plaintiff and realized, or ought …


Negligence Per Se And The Virginia Motor Vehicle Code, William T. Muse Jan 1958

Negligence Per Se And The Virginia Motor Vehicle Code, William T. Muse

University of Richmond Law Review

Wigmore, writing in 1911, said: "The general question... whether an injury caused by the defendant while violating a [criminal] statute is actionable per se is a troublesome one, open to much argument, and not yet settled by any generally accepted principle."