Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Torts Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal History

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 451 - 456 of 456

Full-Text Articles in Torts

Torts In English And American Conflict Of Laws: The Role Of The Forum, S. I. Shuman, S. Prevezer May 1958

Torts In English And American Conflict Of Laws: The Role Of The Forum, S. I. Shuman, S. Prevezer

Michigan Law Review

''Private international law owes its existence to the fact that there are in the world a number of separate territorial systems of law that differ greatly from each other in the rules by which they regulate the various legal relations arising in daily life." Where the systems are those of member states of a federal union, there should be less difference in their laws than where they are those of sovereign nations divided by strong cultural, social and political barriers. Interstate conflicts and international conflicts are likely to give rise to somewhat different considerations and rules, and it is surely …

Go to article

Gratuitous Promises-A New Writ?, Warren L. Shattuck Apr 1937

Gratuitous Promises-A New Writ?, Warren L. Shattuck

Michigan Law Review

Under the early common law, the fact situations which presented actionable wrongs were limited in number and stereotyped into various writs which issued from the Lord Chancellor. Only as new writs were devised by him was it possible for new fact situations to achieve the dignity of justiciability and so raise legal rights and duties. But with the liberalization of pleading the recognition of new legal rights and duties became a judicial function. In consequence, the constant struggle of new fact patterns for a place in the law is now principally waged before the courts. In this struggle some fail, …

Go to article

Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper May 1932

Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper

Michigan Law Review

As a logical matter there seem to be two possible schemes of legal liability. The first one may be stated as follows: One may be liable for all consequences of all of his acts. While it has been suggested that this was the principle of the mediaeval law, it has been pointed out by Professor Winfield that such was never literally the case. Under this principle, as he has shown, everyone would be in jail except for these reasons: no one could legally put anyone else in jail, no one could legally keep anyone else in jail, and no one …

Go to article

Torts-Imputed Negligence-Common Enterprise Mar 1928

Torts-Imputed Negligence-Common Enterprise

Michigan Law Review

The Supreme Court of Iowa has recently held that a family group engaged in a pleasure ride was a "common enterprise which no one had any particular right to control" and negligence on the part of the driver might be imputed to the other occupants of the car, barring recovery for an injury caused by the concurring negligence of the driver and the defendant. This, to say the least, is an expansion of the generally accepted doctrine of imputed negligence in America.

Go to article

The Early Liability Of A Bailee, Norman F. Arterburn Mar 1927

The Early Liability Of A Bailee, Norman F. Arterburn

Michigan Law Review

All discussion of the origin of the absolute liability of a common carrier of goods naturally harks back to the earliest conception of a bailment and its related remedies. We have had two diametrically opposed views urged as to the first liability of the ordinary bailee. Justice Holmes and numerous other authorities take the view that the liability in the' first instance was absolute in the case of all bailees. Professor Beale is the exponent of the opposing view, that such liability was qualified to such an extent that it amounted in fact, only to negligence liability. An interpretation of …

Go to article

Book Reviews Jan 1925

Book Reviews

Michigan Law Review

A collection of book reviews by multiple authors.

Go to article

First Prev