Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (202)
- Cornell University Law School (30)
- University of Michigan Law School (28)
- Brooklyn Law School (17)
- UIC School of Law (13)
-
- BLR (11)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- University of Georgia School of Law (7)
- University of Kentucky (6)
- University of Missouri School of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- University of Denver (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- West Virginia University (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Keyword
-
- Torts (34)
- Products liability (28)
- Negligence (22)
- Liability (21)
- Product liability (19)
-
- Consumer protection (18)
- Law (17)
- Strict liability (16)
- Consumer Protection Law (15)
- Consumers (12)
- Manufacturers (12)
- Tort (12)
- Products Liability (11)
- Regulation (11)
- Artificial intelligence (10)
- Consumer expectations test (10)
- Contracts (10)
- Damages (10)
- RAD (10)
- Restatement (Third) of Torts Products Liability (10)
- Personal injury (9)
- AI (8)
- Data (8)
- Harm (8)
- Privacy (8)
- Reasonable alternative design (8)
- Safety (8)
- Technology (8)
- Casebook (7)
- Commercial law (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (200)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (29)
- Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Michigan Law Review (14)
- ExpressO (11)
-
- UIC Law Review (11)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Articles (6)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (6)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (5)
- West Virginia Law Review (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Kentucky Law Journal (4)
- Other Publications (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Fordham Law Review (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Georgia Law Review (3)
- Journal of Law and Policy (3)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 446
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Mandatory Recall Authority: A Sensible And Minimalist Approach To Improving Food Safety, Michael T. Roberts
Mandatory Recall Authority: A Sensible And Minimalist Approach To Improving Food Safety, Michael T. Roberts
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
The Increasing Acceptance Of The Restatement (Third) Risk Utility Analysis In Design Defect Claims, Cami Perkins
The Increasing Acceptance Of The Restatement (Third) Risk Utility Analysis In Design Defect Claims, Cami Perkins
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Separations, Blow-Outs, And Fallout: A Treadise On The Regulatory Aftermath Of The Ford-Firestone Tire Recall, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1073 (2004), Kevin M. Mcdonald
Separations, Blow-Outs, And Fallout: A Treadise On The Regulatory Aftermath Of The Ford-Firestone Tire Recall, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1073 (2004), Kevin M. Mcdonald
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Expectations Of Consumers, Douglas A. Kysar
The Expectations Of Consumers, Douglas A. Kysar
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In the few years following promulgation of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, several courts have reaffirmed their allegiance to the consumer expectations test for product design defect liability, while rejecting the Restatement's contrary recommendation to adopt a design defect test that focuses primarily on technical features regarding the risk and utility of alternative product designs. In this Article, Professor Kysar reviews the post-Third Restatement decisions, identifying within them a common failure to articulate a coherent, independent doctrinal role for the consumer expectations test, despite the courts' clearly expressed desire to do so. In Kysar's view, courts adhering to …
Consumer Expectations' Last Hope: A Response To Professor Kysar, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Consumer Expectations' Last Hope: A Response To Professor Kysar, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The authors agree with Professor Kysar that the current version of the consumer expectations test for design defectiveness is an amorphous, unprincipled misreading of section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. And they agree that most courts apply risk-utility balancing in determining design defectiveness. But they disagree with Kysar's proposal to supplement risk-utility balancing with a reinvigorated consumer expectations test based on expert testimony regarding what consumers actually expect in the way of design safety. Judicial reliance on such testimony would be susceptible to result-oriented manipulation by litigants, would not guide manufacturers in making sensible design choices, would pressure …
Mass Toxic Tort Litigation And Class Action Rule Reform In The United States, Jason L. Betts
Mass Toxic Tort Litigation And Class Action Rule Reform In The United States, Jason L. Betts
ExpressO
The paper advances the proposition that mass toxic tort litigation has been the predominant driver of class action rule reform in the Unites States. Through three distinct phases of proposals to reform Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the judicial and academic attitude to the certification of mass toxic torts has influenced the reform debate in radically different ways – initially by providing the catalyst for efforts to reform Rule 23; then as a dampener against significant reforms to Rule 23 in the wake of mass toxic tort “settlement-only” classes; and ultimately as an explanation for the …
Products Liability Harmonization: A Uniform Standard, Rebecca Korzec
Products Liability Harmonization: A Uniform Standard, Rebecca Korzec
All Faculty Scholarship
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather than the national level. For example, Australia and Canada, which share a common-law heritage with the United States, have federal tort systems. The United States approach may be appropriate in some tort settings, such as in the premises liability or motor vehicle accident context (not involving a claim of products liability), where the state rule’s impact remains within that state’s geographical boundaries. Unlike the simple 'fender-bender', which occurs within the borders of one state, the typical product is manufactured and marketed nationally or internationally. …
Ethics Of Enterprise Liability In Product Design And Marketing Litigation, James A. Henderson Jr.
Ethics Of Enterprise Liability In Product Design And Marketing Litigation, James A. Henderson Jr.
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
American courts talk as though they are imposing strict enterprise liability on product manufacturers, but in truth they do so only with respect to manufacturing defects. In product design and marketing litigation, manufacturers' liability is based on fault. The reason why strict liability is inappropriate for the generic product hazards associated with design and marketing is that, in sharp contrast to manufacturing defects, the conditions necessary for insurance to function are not satisfied. Users and consumers control generic product risks to a sufficiently great extent that any insurance scheme based on strict enterprise liability would be destroyed by combinations of …
E.R.I.S.A. Subrogation As Interpreted Within The Seventh Circuit - A Roadmap For Managing First Dollar Recovery, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 765 (2002), Gregory Pitts
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are You My Parent? Are You My Child? The Role Of Genetics And Race In Defining Relationships After Reproductive Technological Mistakes, 5 Depaul J. Health Care L. 15 (2002), Raizel Liebler
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Imagine that you are a married woman who wants to have a genetically related child with your husband. Your doctor tells you that you are infertile, and therefore you and your husband go to XYZ fertility clinic to receive in vitro treatment. You have your eggs harvested, your husband supplies sperm, and ten embryos are created. Five embryos are implanted in your uterus and five are frozen and kept by the fertility clinic for your later use. You successfully conceive and give birth to twins. You notice that the children you give birth to are of a different race than …
Product Liability: A Commentary On The Liability Of Suppliers Of Component Parts And Raw Materials, David A. Fischer
Product Liability: A Commentary On The Liability Of Suppliers Of Component Parts And Raw Materials, David A. Fischer
Faculty Publications
The liability of suppliers of raw materials and component parts for harm caused by the product into which the materials have been incorporated poses difficult questions. When the raw material or component part is clearly defective, there is no question that the supplier is liable. Thus, where an ingredient in processed food is contaminated or where a truck tire has a flaw that causes a blowout, the supplier of the ingredient or the tire is liable. The difficult questions arise where the components are not inherently defective, but the finished product is defective because it lacks a safety feature or …
Drug Designs Are Different, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Drug Designs Are Different, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Web Of Manipulation: The Learned Intermediary Doctrine And Direct-To-Consumer Advertising On The World Wide Web, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 97 (2001), April L. Foreman
Web Of Manipulation: The Learned Intermediary Doctrine And Direct-To-Consumer Advertising On The World Wide Web, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 97 (2001), April L. Foreman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Praise Of The Treatise Writer: Law's Special Knowledge, Ellen M. Bublick
In Praise Of The Treatise Writer: Law's Special Knowledge, Ellen M. Bublick
Seattle University Law Review
Dobbs, the author of the foremost treatise on tort law, and Hayden, the author of a number of thought provoking articles, have written a book with a clear structure—one that carefully and methodically elucidates the doctrinal framework of state tort law. The book also addresses problems in tort theory and practice and outlines major supplements and alternatives to existing tort remedies.
Teaching Torts By Integrating Ethical, Skills, Policy And Real-World Issues, And Using Varied Pedagogical Techniques: Reflections On Using The Henderson, Pearson And Siliciano Casebook, Lynn M. Daggett
Seattle University Law Review
In brief, the Henderson, Pearson, and Siliciano casebook includes materials on ethics, problems and other skill-based activities, a diverse set of ideological perspectives presented in a non-preachy way, and addresses numerous real-world issues and concerns. The casebook also lends itself to the variety of teaching and active learning methods I employ in my Torts classes.
The Wide World Of Torts: Reviewing Franklin & Rabin's Tort Law And Alternatives, Bernard W. Bell
The Wide World Of Torts: Reviewing Franklin & Rabin's Tort Law And Alternatives, Bernard W. Bell
Seattle University Law Review
In several respects, Franklin and Rabin's casebook provides a wonderful and effective vehicle for teaching torts, particularly to first-year students. The book develops important overarching themes while effectively presenting a wide variety of specific tort doctrines. The book also offers professors opportunities to sharpen students' legal abilities. In Part I of this review, I will discuss the first case in Franklin and Rabin's book and explain its usefulness in introducing several themes that both are critical to understanding tort law and assume a prominent place throughout the casebook. In Part II, I will focus on Franklin and Rabin's treatment of …
Epsteinian Torts: Richard A. Epstein, Cases And Materials On Torts, Allison H. Eid
Epsteinian Torts: Richard A. Epstein, Cases And Materials On Torts, Allison H. Eid
Seattle University Law Review
A fascinating aspect of Epstein's scholarly work is his exploration of the apparent tension between libertarian principles and utilitarian thought—an exploration that comes alive in his casebook. To Epstein, these two competing principles often coalesce to yield a single "correct" answer to a problem. In other words, the answer that arises from a desire to protect a pre-determined set of individual rights-for example, private property rights, or the right of personal autonomy often produces an outcome that is also beneficial to the overall common good. Some scholars have critiqued Epstein's work by suggesting that there is more disharmony than harmony …
When Torts Is More Than A Series Of Accidents: Epstein On Torts, Victor Flatt
When Torts Is More Than A Series Of Accidents: Epstein On Torts, Victor Flatt
Seattle University Law Review
By using the Epstein book, the students learn the basics of torts in a way that is not frustrating, but in which they are still challenged by legal theory and pushed to think. Coupled with the interest and entertainment that are behind the choice of cases, I find the Epstein book to be very appropriate for our students. Of course, no book will fit everyone's needs or styles of teaching. But if you can determine what it is you wish to emphasize, both substantively and doctrinally, you can use this information to assist in selection. If, like me, you want …
A Review Of Torts And Compensation: Personal Accountability And Social Responsibility For Injury, Susan M. Gilles
A Review Of Torts And Compensation: Personal Accountability And Social Responsibility For Injury, Susan M. Gilles
Seattle University Law Review
I will review my selection of Dobbs and Hayden's Torts And Compensation, Personal Accountability And Social Responsibility For Injury (hereinafter "the Dobbs casebook") for use in my year-long first-year torts class. My review will focus on the third edition and will note changes made in the fourth edition, which came out recently. My hope is to tell you a little about the Dobbs casebook and a little about why I thought it would suit my incoming first-year students and my style of teaching. When selecting a casebook I have four main concerns: What is the coverage? Does the casebook employ …
Torts Teaching: From Basic Training To Legal-Process Theory: Dominick Vetri, Tort Law And Practice, Joseph A. Page
Torts Teaching: From Basic Training To Legal-Process Theory: Dominick Vetri, Tort Law And Practice, Joseph A. Page
Seattle University Law Review
It was in the course of my meanderings through the torts-casebook landscape that I came upon Professor Dominick Vetri's entry in the field. The quality that first attracted me was the way it fashioned a user-friendly introduction to the study of law, to the uniqueness of the common law, and to the centrality of process. The book demonstrated an unusual sensitivity to the bewilderment of beginners and made a special effort to anticipate their needs and concerns. Yet what made Vetri's approach particularly intriguing was that it managed to play not only to nervous neophytes, but also to students in …
Product-Related Risk And Cognitive Biases: The Shortcomings Of Enterprise Liability, James A. Henderson Jr., Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
Product-Related Risk And Cognitive Biases: The Shortcomings Of Enterprise Liability, James A. Henderson Jr., Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Products liability law has witnessed a long debate over whether manufacturers should be held strictly liable for the injuries that products cause. Recently, some have argued that psychological research on human judgment supports adopting a regime of strict enterprise liability for injuries caused by product design. These new proponents of enterprise liability argue that the current system, in which manufacturer liability for product design turns on the manufacturer's negligence, allows manufacturers to induce consumers into undertaking inefficiently dangerous levels or types of consumption. In this paper we argue that the new proponents of enterprise liability have: (1) not provided any …
Intuition And Technology In Product Design Litigation: An Essay On Proximate Causation, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Intuition And Technology In Product Design Litigation: An Essay On Proximate Causation, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Cigar Warnings: Proceed With Caution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 521 (2000), Patricia A. Davidson
Cigar Warnings: Proceed With Caution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 521 (2000), Patricia A. Davidson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ftc Unfairness: An Essay, Stephen Calkins
Ftc Unfairness: An Essay, Stephen Calkins
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The Products Liability Restatement In The Courts: An Initial Assessment, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
The Products Liability Restatement In The Courts: An Initial Assessment, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Direct-To-Consumer Advertising Of Prescription Drugs: After A Decade Of Speculation, Courts Consider Another Exception To The Learned Intermediary Rule, Mae Joanne Rosok
Direct-To-Consumer Advertising Of Prescription Drugs: After A Decade Of Speculation, Courts Consider Another Exception To The Learned Intermediary Rule, Mae Joanne Rosok
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will explore whether Washington courts should recognize direct-to-consumer advertising as an exception to the learned intermediary rule. With the ultimate goal of advocating the best protection for the consumer, the discussion will suggest that Washington courts should not create an exception. A review of other exceptions to the learned intermediary rule does not support abandoning the doctrine when a drug company advertises its product directly to consumers. Nevertheless, advertising does affect consumer purchases and does influence consumer choices, and drug companies should accept the responsibility to present balanced information. This responsibility should encompass more than meeting the minimum …
Product Design Liability In Orgeon And The New Restatement, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Product Design Liability In Orgeon And The New Restatement, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
When Is Property Intellectual: The Leveraging Problem Essays, Mark R. Patterson
When Is Property Intellectual: The Leveraging Problem Essays, Mark R. Patterson
Faculty Scholarship
Patents and copyrights protect inventions and expression; they do not protect products. This distinction, I argue in this essay, is a key to the antitrust problem of the "leveraging" of intellectual property. In a typical leveraging case, the manufacturer of a durable good, like a copier or computer, refuses to sell replacement parts for its equipment unless the purchaser also hires the manufacturer to service the equipment. Such a practice can be illegal under antitrust law, but when the leveraging products-in this example, replacement parts-are protected by patent or copyright, the manufacturer will often claim that the leveraging is a …
What Europe, Japan, And Other Countries Can Learn From The New American Restatement Of Products Liability, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
What Europe, Japan, And Other Countries Can Learn From The New American Restatement Of Products Liability, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Achieving Consensus On Defective Product Design, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Achieving Consensus On Defective Product Design, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.