State and Local Government Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0605: Blaze Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-280

Appeal No. 0604: John & Gladys Spillman V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-267

Appeal No. 0608: Creighton Machine Co. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-12

Appeal No. 0606: Paul M. Letwen V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-277

A Contract-Enhancing Norm Limiting Federal Preemption Of Presumptively State Domains, Nim Razook

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

Oregon Trial Practice, Oregon Law Institute, William Gaylord, Robert A. Shlachter, Janet Lee Hoffman, Robert J. Neuberger, Billy M. Sime, Gregory R. Mowe, David B. Markowitz, Bruce C. Hamlin

Oregon Law Institute, 1997

Course Materials from the April 11, 1997 Program in Portland

Derivative Securities: Governmental Entities As End Users, Bankrupts And Other Big Losers, Robert C. Downs, Lenora J. Fowler

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0581: Roger Blodgett V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-28

Appeal No. 0579: Raymond Branham V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 95-49

Appeal No. 0594: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-206

Advancing Education Through Education Clauses Of State Constitutions, Robert M. Jensen False

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0551: John G. Oliver V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 93-336

Appeal No. 0588: Lor-San Oil Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-152

Appeal No. 0598: Halwell Company (Bt Energy Corporation) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-209

Appeal No. 0599: Charlebois Energy Production V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-245

Appeal No. 0597: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-208

Appeal No. 0596: Hanley Hardin V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 96-215

Appeal No. 0595: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-199

Appeal No. 0593: Bt Energy Corporation (Halwell Co.) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 96-197 and 96-209

Appeal No. 0600: Olney Friends School, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-254

Real Estate Issues For Government Lawyers, Oregon Law Institute, Alan K. Brickley, Ian K. Whitlock, Paul Nolte, John M. Junkin, Jillian R. Bruce, Stephanie Smythe, Pete Kasting

Oregon Law Institute, 1997

Course Materials from the January 30, 1997 Program in Portland

At Loggerheads : The State Of Maine And The Wabanaki : Final Report Of The Task Force On Tribal-State Relations, Maine Indian Tribal-State Commission

Maine Collection

At Loggerheads : The State of Maine and the Wabanaki : Final Report of the Task Force on Tribal-State Relations.

Maine Indian Tribal-State Commission. Task Force on Tribal-State Relations.

Hallowell, Me., 1997.

Contents: Prologue / Task Force on Tribal-State Relations / Executive Summary / A.Overview / B.Recommendations / C.The Maine Indian Claims Settlement / D.The Maine Indian Tribal-State Commission / E.Findings and Analysis / Appendices

State And Federal Constitutional Law Developments, Rosalie Levinson

Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The 1996 Revised Florida Administrative Procedure Act: A Survey Of Major Provisions Affecting Florida Agencies, Jim Rossi

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Legislative Checks On Rulemaking Under Florida's New Apa, F. Scott Boyd

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Loosening The Chains That Bind: The New Variance And Waiver Provision In Florida's Administrative Procedure Act, Donna E. Blanton, Robert M. Rhodes

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Use Tax Collection On Internet Purchases: Should The Mail Order Industry Serve As A Model, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 203 (1997), Steven J. Forte

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

Federal intervention is necessary to grant states the authority to collect state sales and use tax from Internet vendors who sell goods within their boundaries but reside elsewhere. With such federal intervention, local retailers, who must charge state use and sales tax to their customers, can compete more fairly with Internet vendors. In addition, state governments can access a large and growing revenue source. Under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, a vendor must have a physical presence on a state before a state can require the vendor to collect and remit sales and use tax. In addition, …

Every Category Of Provider: Hindsight Is 20/20 Vision, Melanie K. Curtice

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment contends that if the "Every Category of Provider" statute had been properly limited, as intended and not as interpreted, it would not have met its ultimate fate of ERISA preemption. In order to show how this public interest legislation could remain in effect and provide at least minimal statutory support for consumer choice, an overview of Washington state health care reform, ERISA preemption, and the federal district court decision preempting the statute is necessary. In Part I, this Comment provides a brief history of the "Every Category of Provider" statute and the Bulletin. Part II contains a summary …

Interstate Dialogue In State Constitutional Law, Patrick L. Baude

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Death Penalty And The Decline Of Liberalism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 321 (1997), John R. Macarthur

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.