State and Local Government Law Commons^™

Microgrids For Micro-Communities: Reducing The Energy Burden In Rural Areas, Julie C. Michalski

Michigan Technology Law Review

Rural communities currently face some of the highest energy costs and lowest reliability in the country, due in part to long transmission distances and low population densities. The North American Supergrid (“NAS”) has been proposed as a solution for increased grid stability, resiliency, and renewable generation with decreased carbon emissions and energy cost across the lower 48 states. Although the NAS could help with these energy goals, it is likely that benefits of the NAS would bypass many rural or isolated communities outside of the transmission step-down points. As the NAS will not help rural communities, states can take regulatory …

Antitrust And Consumer Protection, Leslie Sara Hyman, Matthew J. Mcgowan

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Bankruptcy, The Honorable Harlin D. Hale, Emma L. Persson

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure: Pre-Trial & Trial, Amanda Sotak, Timothy A. Daniels, Amber D. Reece

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure: Confessions, Searches, And Seizures, Elizabeth G. Rozacky, The Honorable Michael E. Keasler

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Family Law, Anna K. Teller, Donald E. Teller Jr.

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Oil, Gas, And Mineral Law, Richard F. Brown

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Insurance Law, J. Price Collins, Blake H. Crawford, Conor J. Mccall

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Real Property, J. Richard White, Amanda Grainger, G. Roland Love

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Securities Regulation, George Lee Flint Jr.

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Professional Liability, Evan A. Kirkham, Cara D. Little, Hayden M. Baker

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Survey Of Recent Mandamus Decisions Of The Texas Supreme Court, The Honorable Douglas S. Lang, Rachel A. Campbell

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Partnership Law, Matthew Schindel, Jeff Dorrill, Troy Christensen, Aubrey Edkins, Haley King

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Understanding The Complicated Landscape Of Civil War Monuments, Jessica Owley, Jess Phelps

Articles

This essay examines the controversy regarding confederate monuments and attempts to contextualize this debate within the current preservation framework. While much attention has been paid to this topic over the past year, particularly with regard to "public" monuments, such discussion has generally failed to recognize the varied and complicated property law layers involved which can fundamentally change the legal requirements for modification or removal. We propose a spectrum or framework for assessing these resources ranging from public to private, and we explore the messy space in-between these poles where most monuments actually fall. By highlighting these categories, we provide an …

Tribal Sovereignty And Online Gaming: Fantasy Sports Offer Tribes What Other Games Do Not, Cody Wilson

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Is State Preemption Weakening The Authoritarian Resilience Of Local Government In The United States?, Julian C. Juergensmeyer, Andrew F. Prater

Faculty Publications By Year

In many countries in the world today democratic institutions and ideals seem threatened. Due process, equal protection, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to vote, and other democratic ideals are deeply ingrained in US culture and government. Traditionally, the federal government is thought to be the guardian of these rights, ensuring that state governments adhere to the rule of law established by our written constitution. Similarly, state governments are thought to uphold these democratic ideals vis a vis local governments. The American system of checks and balances and separation of powers and the resulting interplay between the …

A Positive First Step, But Maryland’S New “Evidence Of Other Sexually Assaultive Behavior” Statute Does Not Go Far Enough: Why Maryland Should Allow Relevant Evidence Of A Defendant’S Sexually Assaultive Behavior To Be Admissible In Court In All Sex Crimes Cases – Similar To The Federal Rules Of Evidence 413 And 414, Sameerah Mickey

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: State V. Syed, Justin Ellis

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Arbitration, John Allen Chalk Sr.

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Intellectual Property Law, David Mccombs, Phillip B. Philbin, Brett Bostrom, Katharyn Zagorin

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Franchise Law, Deborah S. Coldwell, Sally Dahlstrom, Iris Gibson, Taylor Rex Robertson

SMU Annual Texas Survey

No abstract provided.

Understanding State Agency Independence, Miriam Seifter

Michigan Law Review

Conflicts about the independence of executive branch officials are brewing across the states. Governors vie with separately elected executive officials for policy control; attorneys general and governors spar over who speaks for the state in litigation, and legislatures seek to alter governors’ influence over independent state commissions. These disputes over intrastate authority have weighty policy implications both within states and beyond them, on topics from election administration and energy markets to healthcare and welfare. The disputes also reveal a blind spot. At the federal level, scholars have long analyzed the meaning and effects of agency independence—a dialogue that has deepened …

The New Housing Segregation: The Jim Crow Effects Of Crime-Free Housing Ordinances, Deborah N. Archer

Michigan Law Review

America is profoundly segregated along racial lines. We attend separate schools, live in separate neighborhoods, attend different churches, and shop at different stores. This rigid racial segregation results in social, economic, and resource inequality, with White communities of opportunity on the one hand and many communities of color without access to quality schools, jobs, transportation, or health care on the other. Many people view this as an unfortunate fact of life, or as a relic of legal systems long since overturned and beyond the reach of current legal process. But this is not true. On the contrary, the law continues …

Home Rule In Ohio: General Laws, Conflicts, And The Failure Of The Courts To Protect The Ohio Constitution, Matthew Mahoney

Cleveland State Law Review

The Home Rule Amendment to Ohio’s Constitution vest with municipalities the power to legislate on issues of most concern to that locality. Ideally, the concept of home rule creates shared powers between the state and the municipality. However, in Ohio, such is not the case. Instead, the state has almost complete control despite the home rule constitutional amendment. Although home rule is complicated historically and practically with many working parts between the legislature and the municipality, what is clear is that the courts play a substantial role in the doctrine’s application. The court’s role is difficulty considering the competing interests, …

A New Era In Juvenile Sentencing: Why Montgomery, Adolescent Neuroscience, And A Shift In The National Conversation Point Toward A Need For Measure 11 Reform, Joshua Olmsted

Lewis & Clark Law Review

In 1994, Oregon voters passed Ballot Measure 11, a mandatory minimum sentencing scheme that imposes long inflexible sentences for a plethora of serious crimes. In addition to establishing mandatory minimum sentences, Measure 11 dramatically re-shaped the landscape of the juvenile justice system by mandating transfer to adult court for youth between 15 and 17 years old, charged with any Measure 11 offense, even if they are eventually convicted of a lesser offense. In recent years, there has been a push to rethink the way that we evaluate and treat juvenile offenders. Evolving Supreme Court jurisprudence, along with new research into …

A Hybrid Approach To Marijuana Federalism, Susan F. Mandiberg

Lewis & Clark Law Review

With the evident indulgence of the United States Department of Justice, states are jumping on the bandwagon of legalizing medicinal and recreational marijuana even though marijuana use is criminalized under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. The possibility that the federal government will at some point decriminalize marijuana use poses a challenge for the construction of a regulatory framework. In short, how should the states and the federal government divide regulatory responsibilities?

There has been significant academic discussion about possible regulatory frameworks to address this issue. Drawing upon existing federalism schemes in the environmental and natural resource area, this Article reviews …

State Standing And Cooperative Federalism, Ernest A. Young

Faculty Scholarship

State lawsuits challenging federal policy generally encounter arguments that the states lack standing to sue, either under Article III’s “case or controversy” clause or under various prudential standing doctrines. These arguments have often taken novel forms—such as claims that states’ injuries are “self-inflicted” or offset by other benefits of federal policies—that have few precedents or analogs in the standing jurisprudence governing suits by private individuals. The United States has taken the position, in other words, that states should have special disabilities in filing lawsuits that would not apply to ordinary litigants. Likewise, prominent academics have argued that uniquely narrow standing …

The Ethical (Or Not So Ethical) Story Behind Your Bar Of Chocolate: The Untold Tale Of A Distressed Ghanaian Farmer, Nadia Ayensah

Augustana Center for the Study of Ethics Essay Contest

In a time where the ethics of business dealings have become a key factor in the likelihood of the success of that venture due to globalization, it is important to start considering those ventures that are so popular, but whose inner working are rarely heard of. This paper analyzes the history and process of cocoa production in Ghana. It looks at the status quo with regards to the social and economic standing of Ghanaian Cocoa farmers as opposed to the earnings made by cocoa processing companies. With the statistics derived, the paper then considers who is to take responsibility for …

Waiving Federal Sovereign Immunity In Original Actions Between States, Sandra B. Zellmer

Faculty Law Review Articles

There are tremendous disparities between high stakes original actions between states before the US. Supreme Court, where there is no waiver of federal sovereign immunity, and other types of cases in the lower courts, where a plethora of immunity waivers allow states and other parties to seek relief from the federal government for Fifth Amendment takings, unlawful agency action, and tort claims. Federal actions or omissions are often at the heart of the dispute, and federal involvement may be crucial for purposes of providing an equitable remedy to the state parties, but there is no reliable mechanism for bringing the …