Securities Law Commons^™

Closing A Loophole: Insider Trading In Standardized Options, Steve Thel

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This article is a Commentary on a previous Note published in the Fordham Urban Law Journal (Note, Insiders, Options and the Fiduciary Principle: A Rule 10b-5 Loophole, 16 Fordham Urb. L.J. 295 (1988)). The Note argued that the Supreme Court has expressly endorsed only one theory of insider trading liability, in Chiarella v. United States. By the simple expedient of trading options on common stock rather than the common stock itself, an insider can escape Rule 10b-5 liability under Chiarella.

A Study Of Mexico's Capital Markets And Securities Regulation, Samuel Wolff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Article will analyze Mexico's capital markets and regulations, primarily from an empirical point of view. The discussion will begin with an overview of the Mexican financial and legal systems to provide a context for the analysis of the market and the law. The essay will then discuss the Mexican securities market, including history, participants and characteristics. Finally, Mexico's Ley del Mercado de Valores ("Securities Market Law") will be analyzed." The objective of the study is to increase understanding of the Mexican market by Mexicans and foreigners alike. The study should be useful to policymakers in Mexico and other developing …

Seminar On Securities Law, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law, James A. Kegley, H. Alexander Campbell, Gary L. Stage, Ralston W. Steenrod, James C. Strode, Robert P. Ross, Gerald R. Martin, C. Christopher Trower, Willburt D. Ham, Ronda S. Paul, Rodger A. Marting, Oscar N. Persons, Francesca Marciniak, O. Wayne Davis, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.

Continuing Legal Education Materials

Materials from the UK/CLE Seminar on Securities Law held February 14-15, 1986.

Randall V. B.J. Loftsgaarden, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Federal Regulation Of Tender Offers: Does It Depend Upon Nondisclosure?, Carole Silver

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Schreiber V. Burlington Northern, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Lowe V. Securites And Exchange Commission, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. V. Berner, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Materiality, Law Reform, And Regulation By Prosecution, Michael Rosenzweig

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Regulation by Prosecution: The Securities & Exchange Commission Versus Corporate America by Roberta S. Karmel

Rulemaking Under Section 14(E) Of The Exchange Act: The Sec Exceeds Its Reach In Attempting To Pull The Plug On Multiple Pro Ration Pools, David J. White

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Recent Development first considers the problems that gave rise to the adoption of revised rule 14d-8, the rationale that three members of the Commission articulated in support of the rule,' and the rationale of the two members who opposed it. The Recent Development then examines two judicial decisions, one that considers the validity of the current tender offer practices under the Williams Act and rule 14d-8'8 and another that analyzes the rule making authority of the SEC under sections 14(e) and 23(a) of the Exchange Act. Relying primarily upon congressional hearings and debates,' the Recent Development next discusses the …

A Banker's Adventures In Brokerland: Looking Through Glass-Steagall At Discount Brokerage Services, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Several banks have recently entered or announced their intention to enter the discount brokerage business, and the Federal Reserve Board is considering a rule listing discount brokerage as an acceptable bank holding company activity. The securities industry has contested this entry, asserting that the Glass-Steagall Act requires separation between investment and commercial banking. Though the Act does mandate some division between the two lines of business, this Note argues that bank discount brokerage services do not violate the Act. Part I examines the competing "accommodation" and "agency" interpretations of the relevant statutory sections, concluding that the agency interpretation, which permits …

Herman & Mclean V. Huddleston, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

The Sec And The Public Interest, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The SEC and the Public Interest by Susan M. Phillips and J. Richard Zecher

The Economics Of Corporation Law And Securities Regulation, Larry E. Ribstein, C. Paul Rogers

Vanderbilt Law Review

To evaluate this book as a teaching tool one must consider several questions. First, of what value is an economic analysis of law? Second, should one consider economics in a corporations or securities law course? Third, does this book offer a worthwhile approach to bringing economics into the corporate law curriculum? Last, how well has this approach been executed in the book? It may be a bit late to ponder the value of an economic analysis of the law. Economic legal theorists are both extending and deepening the thinking about economics' role in facilitating an understanding of law. This new …

Edgar V. Mite Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Implied Private Remedies Under Federal Statutes: Neither A Death Knell Nor A Moratorium--Civil Rights, Securities Regulation, And Beyond, Thomas L. Hazen

Vanderbilt Law Review

The part of this Article that follows contains an examination of the implication process as it has developed in the federal courts.As will be seen, the Supreme Court has gone through a cyclical pattern of expansion and contraction in implying remedies with respect to a wide range of substantive areas. Accordingly, it is not possible to glean a single unified theory from the sixty-five years of Supreme Court activity. There are, however, a number of recurring themes, and it is possible to view all of the diverse approaches as part of a loosely defined pattern that was formulated into a …

Steadman V. Security And Exchange Commission (Sec), Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Rubin V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

The Sec And Corporate Disclosure: Regulation In Search Of A Purpose, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Book Notice about The SEC and Corporate Disclosure: Regulation in Search of a Purpose by Homer Kripke

Aaron V. Securities And Exchange Commission (Sec), Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Corruption And The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Of 1977, Fredric Bryan Lesser

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article first discusses the business activities and competing interests which prompted congressional action. Part II analyzes the FCPA and attempts to solve the ambiguities inherent in the criminalization provisions, thereby clarifying which activities are proscribed by the FCPA and what is meant by the Act's corruption requirement. Finally, Part III examines the possibilities for multinational agreements prohibiting bribery.

Recent Decisions, Thomas L. Raleigh, Iii, Jay W. Mccann

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Jurisdiction--Application of Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens Justified when Defendant Consents to Jurisdiction of a Non-United States Forum

Thomas L. Raleigh, III

Securities Regulation--Extraterritorial Application of Antifraud Provisions--Allegation of Deception of Foreign Fundholders by Foreign Directors Insufficient to Invoke Jurisdiction of the Securities Laws

Jay W. McCann

United States V. Naftalin, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Rule 10b-6: Options Trading By Participants In A Distribution, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

After briefly discussing the history of options trading, this Note argues that where participants in a distribution trade options, the potential for abuse is sufficient to warrant regulation of this activity. It then evaluates existing statutes and SEC rules that seek to prevent similar abuses and concludes that language in some of these provisions -- particularly rule 10b-6 -- can be construed to prohibit participants in a distribution from engaging in certain put and call transactions that might manipulate the price of the security being distributed.

Recent Cases, Sara P. Walsh, Don B. Cannada, Frances L. Adams, William T. Luedke, Iv

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Procedure - Appellate Jurisdiction - Orders Denying Disqualification of Counsel on Ethical Grounds Are Not Final Decisions Subject to Immediate Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Sara Porter Walsh

Petitioner,' an applicant for a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broadcasting license, sought interlocutory review of a Commission order' denying a motion to disqualify the law firm that had represented competitor RKO for thirty years. Petitioner alleged that participation by the firm, which included an attorney who was chairman of the FCC while RKO's application was under consideration, constituted a violation of Canons Five and Nine' of the ABA Code of …

Standing Under Rule 10b-5 After Blue Chip Stamps, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The purpose of this Note is to analyze the opinion in Blue Chip and to ascertain the content of the Birnbaum rule as it exists today. It will first discuss the opinion of the Court in Blue Chip itself and delineate the primary policy considerations upon which the majority focused. It will then apply these policy considerations to the major categories of case law that have arisen subsequent to Birnbaum and analyze the validity of this case law in light of Blue Chip.

Foreign Bribes And The Securities Acts' Disclosure Requirements, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require most major corporations to disclose to investors all material information concerning company operations. Although they were not intended to regulate the conduct of business, these disclosure obligations can have a deterrent effect upon improper corporate activities. The recent revelation that a significant number of corporations have been making bribes and similar payments abroad has created interest in the feasibility of employing the disclosure requirements to curtail this practice. This Note will show that, despite recent pressures for change, the Securities and Exchange Commission has continued to view …

A Framework For The Allocation Of Prevention Resources With A Specific Application To Insider Trading, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note enumerates and analyzes the three principal forces that induce individuals to abide by societal laws. These forces, or elements of effective prevention, are then combined to form a framework of general deterrence that both identifies the areas in which society can introduce resources into the prevention plan and explains in a general manner what the effect of particular expenditures will be. In the final section of the Note, the framework is applied to a specific prohibited activity-insider trading in securities-to exemplify its utility in determining more effective applications of prevention resources.

A Reconsideration Of The Stock Market Exception To The Dissenting Shareholder's Right Of Appraisal, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note engages in such a reassessment. It contends, first, that appraisal has not been an unreasonable burden on corporations and that adjustments in the appraisal procedure can eliminate remaining inequities. Next, it asserts that the stock market exception inadequately protects the dissenting shareholder, since a market might, for a variety of reasons, price a shareholder's stock at less than its intrinsic value. Finally, this Note concludes that an appraisal procedure with modifications, and not the stock market exception, reflects the appropriate balance of corporate and shareholder interests.

Controlling Administrative Sanctions, Fredrich H. Thomforde Jr.

Michigan Law Review

This Article will consider some of the possibilities for controlling and guiding the SEC's discretion to impose sanctions upon broker-dealers. Although it is limited to an examination of the Commission's practice and a discussion of possibilities for reform, the analysis contains obvious implications for any agency with the power to impose sanctions.