Securities Law Commons^™

Clawing Back Fraudulent Profits—Investor Protection Or Regulatory Overreach: The Disgorgement Dilemma In Securities Law, Jessica Sun

The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law

This comment explores the legal complexities surrounding the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) use of disgorgement as an enforcement tool, specifically addressing the tension between investor protection and regulatory overreach. Sun examines the evolution of disgorgement from a court-created equitable remedy to a power formally codified by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2021, while highlighting the significant limitations imposed by Supreme Court rulings in Kokesh v. SEC and Liu v. SEC. The comment centers on a current circuit split between the Second Circuit’s decision in SEC v. Govil—which requires a showing of "pecuniary harm" to victims before awarding disgorgement—and …

"Tuah Much To Handle": Why The Current Oversight On Cryptocurrency Is Insufficient, Adam Gross

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sec Committee Approves Ai Recommendations Drafted By Indiana Law Faculty Member Alvin Velazquez, Maurer School Of Law - Indiana University

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee (IAC) Friday (Dec. 5) approved new recommendations urging public companies to provide clearer, more consistent information about how they use artificial intelligence. The recommendations passed with strong support: 14 votes in favor, two abstentions, and two against.

The proposal, drafted by Indiana University Maurer School of Law Professor Alvin Velazquez, responds to the rapid rise of AI across corporate America and widespread investor concern that current disclosures are confusing, inconsistent, or overly promotional.

Amending Regulation D’S Accredited-Investor Definition To Allow Natural Persons To Opt Out Of Unwanted Regulatory Protections, John Orcutt

Law Faculty Scholarship

Everyone can invest in the heavily regulated registered (or public) securities market, but the more lightly regulated unregistered securities markets are more restricted. The most important unregistered securities market for capital-raising purposes is Rule 506 of Regulation D, which has grown to become the United States’ largest capital-raising market. Far more capital is raised each year in Rule 506 offerings than registered offerings, and the Rule 506 market is where many of the country’s highest-growth (and highest-return) entrepreneurial companies sell their securities. But most Americans are excluded from investing in the Rule 506 market because it is fundamentally restricted to …

Capital Formation, The Sec, And Accredited Investors, Neal F. Newman, Lawrence J. Trautman, Brian Elzweig

Faculty Scholarship

Protecting the investing public, while simultaneously facilitating the efficient flow of capital needed by all new and growing businesses continues as a primary responsibility of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Enhancing the capital formation process is a necessary step in the creation of jobs and growth of any economy. Central to the SEC’s regulatory schematic is the proposition that some particularly sophisticated and wealthy investors require less protection than those with less knowledge, experience, and resources. During December 2023, for just the third time, the SEC staff issued a report examining the status of the natural person accredited …

Guide To Sec And Business Open Source Corporate Intelligence, Lawrence J. Trautman, Brian Elzweig, Neal F. Newman

Faculty Scholarship

An agency of the U.S. intelligence community observes, "The explosion of open source intelligence (OSINT) in recent years has transformed how governments and people around the world consume and process information about society and global issues." It is likely that "We all use open-source and probably don't even realize it, but we also use it for different reasons. You might use open-source information to do a credibility check and to find out more about the person selling you something on Facebook marketplace." Others "may research someone… met on a dating app or before hiring someone for a job." Every use …

Regulatory Personhood: The Elixir For Redundancy Between The Sec And The Pcaob, Sarah J. Williams

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Article analyzes enforcement activity against public company auditors during the agencies’ coexistence for the purpose of unmasking the alleged villainous duplication, budgetary waste, and agency in-fighting that was purportedly created by Congress when it endowed the PCAOB with enforcement powers already existing in the SEC’s arsenal. The Article examines enforcement cases brought by the SEC and the PCAOB against accounting firms and accountants associated with such firms that relate to poor performance in conducting public company audits during the period in which both agencies were in existence. Such research bears upon the effectiveness of the current system of …

How Active Cftc Enforcement Could Benefit Crypto, Carol R. Goforth

Pace Law Review

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) crypto enforcement rose to record levels in 2023, prompting applause from some observers and criticism from others. In fact, the CFTC’s enforcement agenda is not out of step with other federal agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has also been incredibly active in the crypto industry. It might seem that this is bad news for crypto, given that both the CFTC and SEC have been angling to become the primary regulator for these new assets. In reality, proof that the CFTC is active in enforcing the law against crypto entrepreneurs and …

Preempting Paradigms: Nsmia, Esg Investing, And The Search For Market Integration, Robert T. Hill

Catholic University Law Review

This Comment evaluates the recent lawsuit filed by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) against the Missouri Secretary of State, alleging violations of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act (NSMIA), Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and commercial free speech. NSMIA significantly altered the regulatory landscape by preempting certain aspects of state securities laws, aiming to streamline regulations and foster national uniformity in securities markets. However, this federal preemption presents a complex dilemma when addressing the surge in ESG investing, where investors prioritize financial returns and social and environmental impacts. Accordingly, this Comment examines the interplay …

Money Market Funds: Comparison Of Regulations In The United States And European Union, Stephen T. Cohen, Austin G. Mccomb

Catholic University Law Review

Money market funds have proven to be a highly successful financial product, both in the United States and Europe. These funds have offered investors a competitive, short-term market rate of return, while providing diversification of investments and daily liquidity. Notwithstanding (or, perhaps, in spite of) money market funds’ popularity beginning in the late 1970s and early 1980s, money market funds have been subject to a complex set of regulations and intense focus by global regulators, particularly those in the United States and European Union. This regulatory scrutiny was particularly acute following the 2008 financial crisis and, more recently, after the …

Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones

Seattle University Law Review

For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.

This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …

National Security Issues Arising In Anticorruption Enforcement, Anthony J. Lewis, Aisling O'Shea

American University National Security Law Brief

The overlap between national security and corruption has long been recognized; however, the government’s views on the nature of the overlap have shifted over time. For instance, in June 2021, the Biden administration announced an initiative to combat corruption as a core national security interest. The administration ordered a review by fifteen government agencies and offices, including the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Then, in February 2025, the Trump administration declared that “overexpansive and unpredictable” enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (“FCPA”) “actively harms American competitiveness and, therefore, national security.” …

Unflexed Muscle: Sec Enforcement And Officer Sox 302 Certifications, Marc I. Steinberg, A.B. Steinberg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

This article represents the first work to analyze the Securities and Exchange Commission’s neglect in its enforcement of the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO) Sarbanes-Oxley certification requirement. The article addresses the appropriate construction of the statute’s reach, the enforcement proceedings instituted by the SEC under this provision, and the Commission’s failure to fulfill its legislative directive to enforce this statute and Rule 13a-14 promulgated thereunder. In its implementation of the CEO and CFO certification requirement, the SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions during over a two-decade period. Its enforcement with respect to CEOs and CFOs …

Regulatory Personhood: The Elixir For Redundancy Between The Sec And The Pcaob, Sarah Williams

Faculty Scholarly Works

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB” or “Board”) is a quasi-governmental regulatory agency created by Congress in 2002 in response to revelations of widespread financial fraud at major public companies. Since its creation, the agency has experienced significant challenges. Litigants have challenged its constitutionality, the Trump administration challenged its very existence, and legislation was introduced in 2021 to transfer its responsibilities to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Proposals to eradicate the Board asserted vague concerns about the redundancy of its responsibilities with those of the SEC, and alleged resultant monetary waste. This Article, written in 2022, provides …

Beyond Jarkesy: Rethinking The Role Of Administrative Law Judges In Sec Administrative Proceedings, Mark T. Uyeda, Jaime Marinaro

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

Amending Regulation D'S Accredited-Investor Definition To Allow Natural Persons To Opt Out Of Unwanted Regulatory Protections, John L. Orcutt

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

Shareholder Activism & Unconstitutionally Compelled Speech, Steven J. Cleveland

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

Insider Trading & Unconstitutionally Complelled Speech, Steven J. Cleveland

Faculty Articles

The Supreme Court has recently weaponized the First Amendment to invalidate economic regulations. Consequently, the Court’s current analytical framework risks invalidating as unconstitutional certain speech compelled by Congress and the SEC to combat insider trading.

The government may compel speech to combat fraud, and many courts and commentators view insider trading as a fraud against the counterparty to the insider’s trade. Today, the government primarily resorts to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its implementing regulations, including Rule 10b-5, to combat insider trading. Those regulations prohibit deceptive conduct and do not directly compel speech. Interestingly, in …

Should We Watch The Watcher Or The Watched? The Transparency Debate In Auditor Regulation, Sarah Williams

Faculty Scholarship

Federal law has mandated the use of outside auditors by public companies since 1934. For much of that time, the audit industry watched itself. It monitored audit quality and decided how to address auditor misconduct. In 2002, Congress created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB” or “Board”) to watch the auditors. The legislation designed a regulatory scheme that presumed audit performance could be improved through an open and cooperative relationship between the regulator and the regulated audit firm. Congress created accountability for the agency by mandating that it disclose its oversight activities to the public (an approach characterized as …

The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min

Seattle University Law Review

The Essay examines how recent developments in insider trading regulations and whistleblower reward programs can lead to unintended and counterproductive results of discouraging employees from using internal reporting channels within corporate compliance programs. While the presence of a robust and well-functioning corporate compliance program is a critical factor both in mitigating the level of public enforcement actions against companies and in protecting corporate managers from liability in private litigation, these programs often provide little incentive for employees to report potential misconduct internally.

Corporate compliance programs are designed to promote the upward information flow within the company, which is essential for …

New, Derivative: Third-Party Litigation Finance And Derivatives Regulation, Martin Flores

Washington and Lee Law Review Online

Litigation finance is globally abundant and largely unregulated in the United States. The mechanics behind third-party litigation finance are simple: The funder fronts litigation costs in exchange for a promised share of the proceeds if the litigant succeeds. While the normative debate about the value of these contracts in society endures, the litigation finance industry has new players in hedge funds and other opaque investment firms seeking high returns from risky litigation. Many scholars agree on whether to regulate these third-party litigation finance firms. The key debate rages on how to rein in an unbridled industry.

To add to this …

The Crypto Revolution: A Comparative Analysis Of Crypto Regulation In The United States And The European Union, Joseph Galasso

Touro Law Review

Cryptocurrency is something that many people have heard of, but few truly understand the totality of it. From its emergence to the present form, cryptocurrency has become an innovative technology which has changed the way in which we use money. As seen time and time again, where there comes new technology comes governmental authorities introducing new laws to regulate these emerging industries. The aim of these laws and regulations is to protect consumers, but it is imperative not to overregulate the industry. The goal of regulation is to allow consumers to enjoy the benefits of the industry; however, one cannot …

Shedding Light On Climate Risk In 2025: Upcoming Debates About The Sec's Climate Disclosure Rule, Andrew Bernstein, Cynthia Hanawalt, Lisa E. Sachs, Chloe Field

Sabin Center for Climate Change Law

What will happen to the SEC’s March 2024 climate disclosure rule under the new U.S. federal administration? This paper seeks to contribute to the upcoming debates on this question after the 2024 election. Setting aside ideological considerations, this paper contends with novel questions of implementation and enforcement that the SEC will face in 2025, as it establishes climate disclosure policies under anticipated new leadership. Aided by an in-depth survey of existing climate reporting, the report discusses how companies are likely to determine what climate information is and is not material to their businesses and financial performance, and whether some companies …

The Shortseller Enrichment Commission? Whistleblowers, Activist Short Sellers, And The New Privatization Of Public Enforcement, Alexander I. Platt

Washington Law Review

Two developments have transformed the detection of corporate fraud in the last decade: the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Whistleblower Bounty Program (WBP) and the rise of activist short sellers. The WBP offers up financial bounties to individuals who bring forward actionable information about securities fraud. Activist shorts conduct due diligence to identify overvalued public companies, take short positions, reveal the negative information, and then enjoy trading profits if and when the stock tanks. Considered separately, these institutions are widely regarded as socially valuable innovations that help deter fraud.

But, it turns out, they are not fully separate. Activist shorts have …

Velazquez Named To Sec Investor Advisory Committee, James Owsley Boyd

Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog)

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced today (Sept. 10) six new members—including an associate professor from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law—to fill vacancies on its Investor Advisory Committee.

Prof. Alvin Velazquez, who joined the Indiana Law faculty this summer, is one of only two members of academia newly appointed to the committee. The committee advises the SEC on regulatory priorities and initiatives to protect investors and promote the integrity of the U.S. securities markets.

A Look Back In Time: Analyzing The Success And Value Of The 2014 Amendments To Rule 2a-7 And Reporting On Form N-Cr In Light Of The March 2020 Market Events, Jocelyn Near

Catholic University Law Review

Money market funds have frequently been a target of regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Perhaps the most expansive regulation came as a response to the 2008 financial crisis, in which the Reserve Primary Fund “broke the buck.” The SEC’s misguided 2014 reforms exacerbated the inherent risks of money market funds, including the risk of runs and first mover advantage, particularly with the implementation of Form N-CR. Form N-CR requires a money market fund to publicly report when various events occur, including when a retail or government money market fund’s current net asset value per share deviates downward …

Disclosure, Greenwashing, And The Future Of Esg Litigation, Barbara Ballan, Jason J. Czarnezki

Washington and Lee Law Review

The Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) disclosure movement is expanding both voluntarily, as businesses choose to disclose this information, and mandatorily, as government agencies impose disclosure requirements. As ESG disclosure expands, so do the litigation risks. “Greenwashing” refers to presenting false or misleading environmental or sustainability (i.e., “green”) qualities of products, services, or practices. Businesses may greenwash consumers as well as investors with false and misleading ESG disclosures in advertising, securities filings, or other public statements activating greenwashing litigation from investors and consumers. This Article addresses (1) the laws and regulations that cover consumer and securities greenwashing litigation, (2) how …

Jarkesy V. Sec: Are Federal Courts Pushing The U.S. Toward The Next Financial Crisis?, Jennifer Hill

Pepperdine Law Review

In the wake of both the Great Depression and the Financial Crisis of 2008, Congress established and expanded the powers of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As part of this expansion, the SEC in-house administrative proceedings, designed to adjudicate SEC violations before the SEC’s administrative law judges (ALJs), were born. These in-house proceedings have faced multiple constitutional attacks in the past decade. In the most recent iteration of such challenges, Jarkesy v. SEC, the Fifth Circuit held that the SEC’s in-house proceedings were unconstitutional on three grounds: (1) the in-house proceedings deprived petitioners of their constitutional right to jury …

Q&A: A Conversation With Sec Commissioner Hester Peirce, Hester M. Peirce

Arkansas Law Review

A Conversation with SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce

Making Money Green: A Proposal For A Sustainable Stock Exchange, Mary Grace Thurmon

Utah Law Student Scholarship

Investors crave sustainable business data as a lucrative indicator of long-term business success, yet this demand is not being met by current environmental, social, and corporate governance (“ESG”) investment portfolios, voluntary business disclosure reports, or the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) climate-related rule proposal. Instead, an alternative, voluntary stock exchange premising entry upon satisfaction of industry-specific ESG prerequisites, would directly connect investors with the sustainable investments they desire without requiring them to interpret dense scientific data and decipher which companies exercise positive business practices.

This Article demonstrates that creating an alternative stock exchange for trading solely sustainable businesses would provide …