Securities Law Commons^™

How Active Cftc Enforcement Could Benefit Crypto, Carol R. Goforth

Pace Law Review

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) crypto enforcement rose to record levels in 2023, prompting applause from some observers and criticism from others. In fact, the CFTC’s enforcement agenda is not out of step with other federal agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has also been incredibly active in the crypto industry. It might seem that this is bad news for crypto, given that both the CFTC and SEC have been angling to become the primary regulator for these new assets. In reality, proof that the CFTC is active in enforcing the law against crypto entrepreneurs and …

Shadow Banking And Securities Law, Gabriel V. Rauterberg, Jeffery Yufeng Zhang

Articles

Shadow banking may be the single greatest challenge facing financial regulation. Financial institutions that function like banks, but fall outside the scope of banking regulation—aptly termed “shadow banks”—were at the heart of the Global Financial Crisis and most episodes of serious financial stress since then. Scholars have largely focused on one response to this problem: extending traditional banking regulation to shadow banks. Yet more than fifteen years after the crisis, major regulatory efforts along this route have stalled.

In this Article, we explore the uneasy case for greater regulation of shadow banking through a different route—securities law. Our first contribution …

Shadow Investment Companies, William A. Birdthistle, Gabriel Rauterberg, Jeffery Y. Zhang

Faculty Scholarship

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to track the value of fiat currency, most commonly the U.S. dollar. Over the past decade, they have grown from a niche innovation into the primary gateway between crypto markets and the traditional financial system, with daily trading volumes exceeding $100 billion. Despite their scale and centrality, stablecoin issuers occupy an uncertain and increasingly contested regulatory space.

This Article argues that the largest stablecoin issuers — such as Circle and Tether— are best understood not as banks or payments firms, but as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940. As a matter of statutory …

Shadow Banking And Securities Law, Gabriel Rauterberg, Jeffery Y. Zhang

Faculty Scholarship

Shadow banking may be the single greatest challenge facing financial regulation. Financial institutions that function like banks, but fall outside the scope of banking regulation — aptly termed “shadow banks” — were at the heart of the Global Financial Crisis and most episodes of serious financial stress since then. Scholars have largely focused on one response to this problem: extending traditional banking regulation to shadow banks. Yet more than fifteen years after the crisis, major regulatory efforts along this route have stalled.

In this Article, we explore the uneasy case for greater regulation of shadow banking through a different route …

I Am Become Meme, Manipulator Of Markets: An Analysis Of Elon Musk’S Tweets Under The Anti-Manipulation Provisions Of U.S. Securities Laws, Noah Schottenbauer

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology

No abstract provided.

Registration As Consent: Patching Jarkesy's Hole In Sec Enforcement, Alexander I. Platt

Notre Dame Law Review Reflection

In SEC v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court held that whenever the SEC seeks to impose monetary penalties on enforcement targets for securities fraud, it must proceed in federal court and not its own administrative forum. Many observers predict this will significantly impact SEC enforcement.

But not necessarily. A simple legal patch might repair the hole Jarkesy opened up: parties who register with the SEC may thereby consent to its administrative jurisdiction. (Because Jarkesy and the funds he managed were not registered, his case did not resolve the issue.)

This Essay shows how registration may constitute consent to SEC administrative …

Cutting Through The Gordian Knot: It’S Time To Revise Rule 17d-1 Under The Investment Company Act Of 1940, Jack W. Murphy

Catholic University Law Review

This article reviews the legislative and administrative history of Section 17(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 17d-1 under that Section, which broadly prohibit any affiliated person or principal underwriter of a mutual fund or other registered investment company (a “Fund”) or any affiliated person of such a person or underwriter, from participating in a joint transaction with the Fund unless an application regarding the transaction has been filed with and approved by the SEC. The author maintains that the Rule’s scope is far broader than what is necessary to achieve the statutory purpose of protecting Funds …

Preempting Paradigms: Nsmia, Esg Investing, And The Search For Market Integration, Robert T. Hill

Catholic University Law Review

This Comment evaluates the recent lawsuit filed by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) against the Missouri Secretary of State, alleging violations of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act (NSMIA), Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), and commercial free speech. NSMIA significantly altered the regulatory landscape by preempting certain aspects of state securities laws, aiming to streamline regulations and foster national uniformity in securities markets. However, this federal preemption presents a complex dilemma when addressing the surge in ESG investing, where investors prioritize financial returns and social and environmental impacts. Accordingly, this Comment examines the interplay …

Money Market Funds: Comparison Of Regulations In The United States And European Union, Stephen T. Cohen, Austin G. Mccomb

Catholic University Law Review

Money market funds have proven to be a highly successful financial product, both in the United States and Europe. These funds have offered investors a competitive, short-term market rate of return, while providing diversification of investments and daily liquidity. Notwithstanding (or, perhaps, in spite of) money market funds’ popularity beginning in the late 1970s and early 1980s, money market funds have been subject to a complex set of regulations and intense focus by global regulators, particularly those in the United States and European Union. This regulatory scrutiny was particularly acute following the 2008 financial crisis and, more recently, after the …

Introduction—Corporate And Securities Law Responses To Climate Change: Law And Political Economy Perspectives, Sarah C. Haan, Faith Stevelman

Scholarly Articles

This introductory essay has two parts. First, we address differences between the Law and Economics perspective and the Law and Political Economy (LPE) perspective on business and securities law and climate change. For example, an LPE approach—with its concern for discerning winners and losers and how power operates through law—rejects the facile separation of public and private law concerns. LPE repudiates the common notion that business law is and should solely be about maximizing shareholder wealth, with all else falling to government ex post. Indeed, elsewhere we have written about this as a misleading and harmful “separate spheres” conceit (Stevelman …

Deficiencies In The Judicial Classification Of Cryptocurrencies Indicating The Need For Legislative Alternatives, Ethan Johnson

Journal of Legislation

The cryptocurrency industry is desperate for regulatory clarification, which would stabilize and secure cryptocurrency and, ultimately, promote increased investment. How the United States ultimately chooses to pursue cryptocurrency regulation has massive implications for future investment and the development of this technology. Disagreement over how to classify cryptocurrency under the investment contract test created in SEC v. Howey, including the recent Second Circuit split, has led to calls for resolving legislation. Cryptocurrency legislation has recently been passed by the European Union, and there are currently proposals for legislation before Congress in the United States.

This Note considers the context surrounding …

Mandatory Public Reason-Giving In Corporate Governance, Sarah C. Haan

Scholarly Articles

Since the late 1970s, corporate governance law has incorporated a growing number of mandates that require corporate boards to explain to their shareholders the reasons behind their decision-making. These mandates do more than merely require boards to disclose certain decisions. They compel boards to publicly state why they have made a particular choice.

Public reason-giving is a core democratic value that recognizes the accountability of a representative body to its constituents. It provides a basis for constituents to assess the quality of leaders’ decision-making and to engage with that decision-making in effective ways. In corporations, public reason-giving facilitates the shareholder’s …

Corporate Governance Speech, Sarah C. Haan

Scholarly Articles

The State has always regulated the intra-firm communications that make corporate governance possible, most commonly by mandating disclosures of information by a corporation to its shareholders. Some such laws are labeled “securities regulation,” but securities regulation is a broad category that extends to speech by actors who are outside the corporate enterprise as well. Also, the conventional securities regulation category does not capture all such laws; other examples, including information forcing mandates, can be found in state corporate law. This Article uses the term “corporate governance speech” to describe the communications among shareholders, directors, and officers through which corporate governance …

National Security Issues Arising In Anticorruption Enforcement, Anthony J. Lewis, Aisling O'Shea

American University National Security Law Brief

The overlap between national security and corruption has long been recognized; however, the government’s views on the nature of the overlap have shifted over time. For instance, in June 2021, the Biden administration announced an initiative to combat corruption as a core national security interest. The administration ordered a review by fifteen government agencies and offices, including the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Then, in February 2025, the Trump administration declared that “overexpansive and unpredictable” enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (“FCPA”) “actively harms American competitiveness and, therefore, national security.” …

Through A Glass Darkly: How Securities Disclosures Give A Distorted View Of The Economy, Gerald F. Davis

Seattle University Law Review

Our understanding of the American economy often relies on stylized facts derived from mandatory disclosures by listed corporations. Data vendors like Standard & Poor’s vacuum up 10Ks and proxy statements into databases, and scholars distill these into tentative maps. This may have been adequate for a postwar economy centered on asset-heavy manufacturers, but it is increasingly out of step with an information-based economy. Companies listed on the stock market are fewer in number and less representative than they were, light in tangible assets and people, and heavy on IP. Basic facts such as what industry they are in are increasingly …

Opening Wall Street To Main Street: A Proposed Framework For Expanding Private Equity To The Public, Willis Huynh

Brooklyn Law Review

Private equity has become one of the most powerful engines of the modern economy, yet its gates remain closed to the vast majority of Americans. Under current federal securities laws, access to private funds is reserved for “accredited investors” and “qualified purchasers,” wealth-based categories that exclude most American households. This Note argues that these thresholds no longer serve as reliable proxies for sophistication and instead entrench economic inequality by reserving the highest-yielding asset class for the already wealthy. Tracing the development of private equity from its venture-capital roots through the SEC’s recent regulatory efforts—including the vacated 2023 Private Fund Rules—this …

Solving The Proxy Advisory Problem: Minimum Regulation For Maximum Competition, Dominic P. Keilty

Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review

The proxy advisory industry is often criticized on two primary accounts: the lack of accountability for informational accuracy in the development of voting standards and the conflicts of interest faced by advisors when they make proxy voting recommendations on issuers to which they have previously provided corporate governance consulting services. The industry has also been accused of having “anemic” levels of competition, since only two advisors command a vast majority of the market share. While much has been written about curtailing the prevalence and effects of proxy advisor conflicts of interest through increased regulation, the regulatory route toward increased informational …

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents

Corporate Scenarios: Drawing Lessons From History, Madison Condon

Seattle University Law Review

As corporations are increasingly pressed to reveal information about their exposure to climate-related risks, they are often asked to undertake and disclose the outcome of “scenario analysis.” In this exercise, corporations, including financial institutions, examine how their business would fare under different pathways the future may take. One oft-used scenario, for example, is the International Energy Agency’s “Net-Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Energy Sector.” This Essay presents a history of the use of scenarios as a corporate planning tool, particularly in the oil industry, arguing that it is key for understanding our present moment and the role of …

Shareholder Expression In A Time Of Heightened Political Tension, Aaron A. Dhir

Seattle University Law Review

In this article, I provide context for my forthcoming research project on shareholder proposals and racial equity audits. Since the murder of George Floyd in May of 2020, progressive shareholder actors have increasingly used the proposal mechanism to advance diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice-related goals. These proposals have frequently gone beyond requesting the usual corporate fare of diversity trainings, intersectionality workshops, affinity groups, etc. Instead, a more ambitious type of proposal asks corporate America to conduct racial equity audits, defined as “an independent, objective and holistic analysis of a company’s policies, practices, products, services and efforts to combat systemic racism …

Corporate Governance Speech, Sarah C. Haan

Seattle University Law Review

The State has always regulated the intra-firm communications that make corporate governance possible, most commonly by mandating disclosures of information by a corporation to its shareholders. Some such laws are labeled “securities regulation,” but securities regulation is a broad category that extends to speech by actors who are outside the corporate enterprise as well. Also, the conventional securities regulation category does not capture all such laws; other examples, including informationforcing mandates, can be found in state corporate law. This Article uses the term “corporate governance speech” to describe the communications among shareholders, directors, and officers through which corporate governance is …

Dark Accounting Matter, Colleen Honigsberg

Seattle University Law Review

Physicists calculate that approximately 85% of the matter in the universe is composed of “dark matter” that “does not absorb, reflect, or emit electromagnetic radiation and is therefore difficult to detect.” The S&P 500 currently trades at a price-to-book value of 4.2, suggesting that book value accounts for less than 20% of the S&P 500’s market value. The remaining 80% appears nowhere in these firms’ balance sheets—it is invisible to contemporary accounting techniques and constitutes “dark accounting matter.”

Some “dark accounting matter” is composed of factors commonly described as components of “ESG.” Human capital, for example, is an intangible asset …

The Employees’ Dilemma: Balancing Internal Reporting, Whistleblowing, And Insider Trading Risks, Geeyoung Min

Seattle University Law Review

The Essay examines how recent developments in insider trading regulations and whistleblower reward programs can lead to unintended and counterproductive results of discouraging employees from using internal reporting channels within corporate compliance programs. While the presence of a robust and well-functioning corporate compliance program is a critical factor both in mitigating the level of public enforcement actions against companies and in protecting corporate managers from liability in private litigation, these programs often provide little incentive for employees to report potential misconduct internally.

Corporate compliance programs are designed to promote the upward information flow within the company, which is essential for …

How The Antidiscrimination Law Of Commercial Transactions Really Works, Helen Norton

Seattle University Law Review

A variety of businesses now cite 303 Creative when seeking First Amendment protection for their refusal to serve certain customers based on those customers’ protected class status. How this litigation will play out remains to be seen. But future courts need not, and should not, repeat the 303 Creative Court’s misunderstanding of how the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions actually works.

Part I of this Essay explains the Court’s longstanding understanding of the antidiscrimination law of commercial transactions, and then describes the Court’s failure to engage with this precedent in 303 Creative. Part II then identifies the 303 Creative decision’s …

Regulatory Personhood: The Elixir For Redundancy Between The Sec And The Pcaob, Sarah Williams

Faculty Scholarly Works

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB” or “Board”) is a quasi-governmental regulatory agency created by Congress in 2002 in response to revelations of widespread financial fraud at major public companies. Since its creation, the agency has experienced significant challenges. Litigants have challenged its constitutionality, the Trump administration challenged its very existence, and legislation was introduced in 2021 to transfer its responsibilities to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Proposals to eradicate the Board asserted vague concerns about the redundancy of its responsibilities with those of the SEC, and alleged resultant monetary waste. This Article, written in 2022, provides …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Voting Matters: Materiality Considerations And The Shareholder Vote, Renee M. Jones

Seattle University Law Review

For the shareholder franchise to have meaning, shareholders must have access to relevant information to inform their voting decisions. The securities laws’ disclosure requirements play an essential role in informing the shareholder vote.

This Essay focuses on the question of the materiality of information in the context of shareholder voting. It addresses the question of whether ESG-related information is material, positioning the materiality inquiry within the context of shareholders’ voting decisions. It explores the definition of materiality with a focus on the “reasonable investor” concept embedded within the definition. The Essay argues that the implicit expectations of many commentators that …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead

Understanding The Big Three’S Wavering Support Of Environmental And Social Shareholder Proposals, Jeff Schwartz, Jefferson Jensen

Seattle University Law Review

Because of their substantial equity portfolios, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street (the Big 3) are central players in corporate governance. It is, therefore, critical to understand how they vote. One puzzle is that their support for shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters appears to waiver. In 2020, for instance, BlackRock supported 11.1% of environmental proposals at S&P 500 firms. In 2021, it seemingly reversed course, supporting 55.2%. It then flipped again, supporting 32.1% in 2022. Such statistics suggest that the Big 3 are constantly changing their views on these topics. This Article seeks to better understand whether this is …

Volume 48 Masthead, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Volume 48 Masthead