Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (71)
- Computer Law (13)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (9)
- Evidence (8)
- Computer Sciences (7)
-
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (6)
- Privacy Law (6)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Internet Law (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Courts (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Air and Space Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Keyword
-
- Patents & Technology (70)
- Technology (8)
- Artificial Intelligence (6)
- Media & Communications (4)
- Computer Law (3)
-
- Due process of law (3)
- ECommerce & Business (3)
- Electronic evidence (3)
- Health & Biotechnology (3)
- Internet Law (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Artificial intelligence (2)
- Artificial intelligence--Law and legislation (2)
- CyberCrime (2)
- Cybersecurity (2)
- EDiscovery (2)
- Evidence (Law) (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
- International (2)
- Law--Study and teaching (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Patent laws and legislation (2)
- Patent practice (2)
- Patent suits (2)
- Risk assessment (2)
- Technology and law (2)
- AI (1)
- Administration of criminal justice (1)
- Admissible evidence (1)
- Agency (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 123 of 123
Full-Text Articles in Science and Technology Law
Who’S Afraid Of Amazon.Com V. Barnesandnoble.Com?, Stephen Dirksen, Kyle Grimshaw, Michael Hostetler, Ian Jinkerson, Michael Kim
Who’S Afraid Of Amazon.Com V. Barnesandnoble.Com?, Stephen Dirksen, Kyle Grimshaw, Michael Hostetler, Ian Jinkerson, Michael Kim
Duke Law & Technology Review
On October 2, 2000, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard the appeal in the case of Amazon.com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble.com, Inc. This appeal revolves around the alleged infringement by Barnesandnoble.com of a one-click web-shopping system patented by Amazon.com. The one-click system is among a series of recent controversial "business method" patents. According to some, business methods are legitimate inventions that deserve the protection of the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). According to others, business methods are unworthy of patent protection and may inhibit innovation in e-commerce. The outcome of this case has been widely anticipated by …
Deutsche Telekom And Voicestream Merger: Charting A New Regulatory Course, Aaron Futch, Yemi Giwa, Andrew Grimmig, Kisa Mlela, Amy Richardson
Deutsche Telekom And Voicestream Merger: Charting A New Regulatory Course, Aaron Futch, Yemi Giwa, Andrew Grimmig, Kisa Mlela, Amy Richardson
Duke Law & Technology Review
On July 24, 2000, the German telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom AG (Deutche Telekom) agreed to purchase the Bellvue, Washington based VoiceStream Wireless Corporation (VoiceStream) for over $50 billion. Although the merger may ultimately fall through, the response generated by the proposed merger indicates the future for deals between US and foreign-owned telecommunications companies. With the increasing globalization of the world's telecommunications markets, the Deutche Telekom deal represents the first time that a company dominated by a foreign government has attempted to purchase an American corporation. The signatories of the Basic Telecommunications Agreement, an agreement among World Trade Organization (WTO) members …
The Lithotripsy Game In North Carolina: A New Technology Under Regulation And Deregulation, Clark C. Havighurst, Robert S. Mcdonough
The Lithotripsy Game In North Carolina: A New Technology Under Regulation And Deregulation, Clark C. Havighurst, Robert S. Mcdonough
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.