Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (721)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (296)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (167)
- Southern Methodist University (150)
-
- Santa Clara Law (145)
- University of Michigan Law School (111)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (90)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (90)
- DePaul University (82)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (75)
- Duke Law (71)
- American University Washington College of Law (60)
- BLR (48)
- Boston University School of Law (37)
- New York Law School (29)
- Marquette University Law School (24)
- Brooklyn Law School (23)
- Columbia Law School (21)
- University of Georgia School of Law (21)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (19)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (17)
- University of Washington School of Law (17)
- Pepperdine University (16)
- Fordham Law School (15)
- Georgetown University Law Center (15)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (15)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (14)
- University of Richmond (14)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (13)
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (141)
- Intellectual property (141)
- Technology (107)
- Patent law (98)
- Patents (96)
-
- Patent (88)
- Intellectual Property Law (82)
- Patents & Technology (62)
- Biotechnology (57)
- Artificial intelligence (52)
- Innovation (50)
- Science and Technology (50)
- AI (44)
- Copyright law (39)
- Intellectual Property (39)
- Law and Technology (38)
- IP (34)
- Internet (32)
- Software (31)
- Law (28)
- Research and development (28)
- Patentability (27)
- Privacy (27)
- Trademark (26)
- Computer Law (25)
- Bayh-Dole Act (22)
- Patent infringement (22)
- Pharmaceuticals (22)
- Generative AI (21)
- Science (21)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (548)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (272)
- Seattle University Law Review (198)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (146)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (143)
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (138)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (103)
- Faculty Scholarship (94)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (83)
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (82)
- Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet (75)
- IP Theory (68)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (64)
- Articles (55)
- ExpressO (48)
- UIC Law Review (27)
- Cardozo Law Review (23)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (22)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (21)
- Articles & Chapters (19)
- American University Law Review (18)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (18)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (17)
- Michigan Law Review (15)
- Faculty Works (14)
- Georgia Journal of Law & Technology (13)
- Michigan Technology Law Review (13)
- Other Publications (13)
- Law Faculty Publications (12)
- Publications (12)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2851 - 2854 of 2854
Full-Text Articles in Science and Technology Law
Patent Rights For Scientific Discoveries, By C. J. Hamsom, Alvin C. Johnson
Patent Rights For Scientific Discoveries, By C. J. Hamsom, Alvin C. Johnson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews, Edward S. Rogers, John Barker Waite
Book Reviews, Edward S. Rogers, John Barker Waite
Michigan Law Review
Patent Law. by John Barker Waite, Professor of Law in the University of Michigan Law School. Princeton University Press, x92o.
The Patentability Of A Principle Of Nature, John B. Waite
The Patentability Of A Principle Of Nature, John B. Waite
Articles
The extent to which courts will go in conceding patentability to a natural law, or principle of nature, is evidenced in the case of Minerals Separation Co. v. Hyde, 37 Sup. Ct. -, decided by the Supreme Court, December 11, 1916. It has always been more or less an axiom of patent law that the discovery of a principle of nature does not entitle the discoverer to a patent for it. The case usually thought of first as authority therefor, is that of Morton v. New York Eye Infirmary, 5 Blatch. 116, 2 Fisher 320. The patentees in that case …
Restrictions On The Use Of Patented Articles, Edward S. Rogers
Restrictions On The Use Of Patented Articles, Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
The case of Henry v. Dick recently decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, has occasioned considerable unfavorable comment in the public press. It seems to be the opinion of many that the decision lays down a new principle of law, particularly adaptable to the working of a monopoly, and that the public is, under the supposed new principle, exposed to a practically unlimited exploitation by any patentee. It is believed that neither of these contentions is correct.