Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- First Amendment (46)
- Constitutional Law (45)
- Law and Society (19)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (14)
- Human Rights Law (13)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- International Law (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Law and Politics (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Education Law (6)
- Conflict of Laws (5)
- Courts (5)
- Labor and Employment Law (5)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Health Law and Policy (4)
- Judges (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Family Law (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Religion (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (33)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
- University of Richmond (9)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
-
- Boston University School of Law (5)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- University of the Pacific (4)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Religion (32)
- First Amendment (17)
- Religious freedom (13)
- Constitutional law (10)
- Establishment Clause (10)
-
- Establishment clause (9)
- Freedom of religion (9)
- Religious liberty (9)
- First amendment (7)
- Constitution (6)
- Free Exercise Clause (6)
- Jewish Law (6)
- Judaism (6)
- Free exercise (5)
- Islam (5)
- Jewish law (5)
- Law (5)
- Levinson (5)
- Pluralism (5)
- Separation of church and state (5)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Dual Sovereignty (4)
- Islamic law (4)
- RFRA (4)
- Religious (4)
- Secular law (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Andrew Koppelman (3)
- Christianity (3)
- Church (3)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (33)
- Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- Working Paper Series (5)
-
- McGeorge Law Review (4)
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Law Student Publications (2)
- Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest (2)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Indonesia Law Review (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 127
Full-Text Articles in Religion Law
Lessons For Religious Liberty Litigation From Kentucky, Jennifer Anglim Kreder
Lessons For Religious Liberty Litigation From Kentucky, Jennifer Anglim Kreder
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Government Disapproval Of Religion, Jay Wexler
Government Disapproval Of Religion, Jay Wexler
BYU Law Review
The Supreme Court's "endorsement test" for evaluating the constitutionality of government sponsored symbols, displays, and messages regarding religion is notoriously controversial and has engendered enormous scholarly attention. In addition to government "endorsement" of religion, however, the test also prohibits the government from sending a message of "disapproval" of religion. The disapproval side of the endorsement test has not been subject to almost any scholarly discussion, which is not surprising given that until recently the courts have had no reason to entertain, much less sustain, challenges to alleged government disapproval of religion. In the last few years, however, due to a …
Faith, Freedom, And Us Foreign Policy: Avoiding The Proverbial Clash Of Civilizations In East And Southeast Asia, Eugene K. B. Tan
Faith, Freedom, And Us Foreign Policy: Avoiding The Proverbial Clash Of Civilizations In East And Southeast Asia, Eugene K. B. Tan
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, the primary weakness of US foreign policy, particularly in Southeast Asia which is home to the largest Muslim community in the world, was that it was driven by concerns over archipelagic Southeast Asia as the “second front” in the “global war against terror.” Military warfare and coercive legislation and enforcement are grossly inadequate in winning the hearts and minds of a community. Religion-wise, Asia is not a tabula rosa. Many religions have long co-existed in Asia. The virtues of religious freedom are not alien to Asia but need nurturing given the dominant imperatives of …
Religions As Sovereigns: Why Religion Is "Special", Elizabeth Clark
Religions As Sovereigns: Why Religion Is "Special", Elizabeth Clark
Faculty Scholarship
Commentators increasingly challenge religion’s privileged legal status, arguing that it is not “special” or distinct from other associations or philosophical or conscientious claims. I propose that religion is “special” because it functions metaphorically as a legal sovereign, asserting supreme authority over a realm of human life. Under a religion-as-sovereign theory, religious freedom can be understood as at least partial deference to a religious sovereign in a system of shared or overlapping sovereignty. This Article suggests that federalism, which also involves shared sovereignty, can provide a useful heuristic device for examining religious freedom. Specifically, the Article examines a range of federalism …
Piercing The Religious Veil Of The So-Called Cults , Joey Peter Moore
Piercing The Religious Veil Of The So-Called Cults , Joey Peter Moore
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Government Entanglement With Religion: What Degree Of Proof Is Required? , Lee Boothby
Government Entanglement With Religion: What Degree Of Proof Is Required? , Lee Boothby
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Religion" And "Religious Institutions" Under The First Amendment , Sharon L. Worthing
"Religion" And "Religious Institutions" Under The First Amendment , Sharon L. Worthing
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Government's Role In The "Purification" Of Religious Organizations, Robert L. Toms, Lisa A. Runquist
The Government's Role In The "Purification" Of Religious Organizations, Robert L. Toms, Lisa A. Runquist
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Heffron V. International Society For Krishna Consciousness Inc.: A Restrictive Constitutional View Of The Proselytizing Rights Of Religious Organizations , Michael M. Greenburg
Heffron V. International Society For Krishna Consciousness Inc.: A Restrictive Constitutional View Of The Proselytizing Rights Of Religious Organizations , Michael M. Greenburg
Pepperdine Law Review
The persistent efforts of religious organizations to reach their public have consistently been met with governmental limitation due to the often conflicting interests of public order, and free speech and expression. Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. represents the Court's latest redefinition of the extent of permissible limitations upon the activities of these groups. The author examines the decision in light of the traditional criteria for permissible time, place, and manner restrictions upon free speech and evaluates the Court's implementation of these restrictions with respect to the activities of the Krishna group. The impact of the decision upon …
A New Standard Of Review In Free Exercise Cases: Thomas V. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment & Security Division, Lynn Mccutchen Gardner
A New Standard Of Review In Free Exercise Cases: Thomas V. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment & Security Division, Lynn Mccutchen Gardner
Pepperdine Law Review
In Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, the United States Supreme Court was called upon to clarify the appropriate level of review to be applied in cases which examine the first amendment right to free exercise of religion. The Court ruled that the "compelling state interest" test is the proper standard to be used. The Court also accorded first amendment protection to beliefs which are not shared by other members of a religious group and which are instead the unique interpretation of an individual member and not acceptable, logical, consistent or comprehensible to others.
Preserving Religious Freedom, Dallin H. Oaks
Preserving Religious Freedom, Dallin H. Oaks
Vol. 3: Religious Conviction
This address was given at Chapman University School of Law in Orange, California, on February 4, 2011.
The Constitutional Issues Surrounding The Science-Religion Conflict In Public Schools: The Anti-Evolution Controversy, Michael M. Greenburg
The Constitutional Issues Surrounding The Science-Religion Conflict In Public Schools: The Anti-Evolution Controversy, Michael M. Greenburg
Pepperdine Law Review
Since the infamous Scopes trial the matter of the constitutional validity of the "anti-evolution" laws has plagued both legal scholars and school administrators. The courts have generally invalidated legislation which bans outright the teaching of evolution in public schools, but with the advent of the "balanced treatment" acts, a revival of this litigation has begun. The author examines the constitutional analysis utilized by the courts in dealing with the "anti-evolution" and "balanced treatment" acts and provides an historical perspective of the first amendment to question the Court's response to the issue.
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Pepperdine Law Review
Justice Hugo L. Black served on the United States Supreme Court over a period of thirty-four years, encompassing Supreme Court terms from 1937 to 1971. During this period, the subject of the constitutional limitations of the freedom of religion was increasingly subjected to intense social pressures. Justice Black figured prominently in the development of constitutional law as the Supreme Court attempted to give meaning to the establishment and free exercise clause of the first amendment. He wrote the majority opinions which dealt with the establishment clause in the Everson, McCulloin, Engel and Torcaso cases. Yet, on later occasions, Justice Black …
Marsh V. Chambers: The Supreme Court Takes A New Look At The Establishment Clause, Diane L. Walker
Marsh V. Chambers: The Supreme Court Takes A New Look At The Establishment Clause, Diane L. Walker
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Observations On The Establishment Clause, William French Smith
Some Observations On The Establishment Clause, William French Smith
Pepperdine Law Review
As evidenced by current interpretations of the establishment clause, lower federal court decisions indicate an increased tendency of hostility toward religion. In this article, Attorney General William French Smith surveys the history of the establishment clause and Supreme Court decisions regarding religious issues. Attorney General Smith then notes the recent success of the Reagan Administration's efforts, through amicus curiae briefs, to advocate an interpretation of the establishment clause which permits the states to take an attitude of benevolent neutrality toward religion. The article then concludes that such a position is both historically and judicially sound.
Bad Moon Rising: The Sharia Law Bans, Bradford J. Kelley
Bad Moon Rising: The Sharia Law Bans, Bradford J. Kelley
Louisiana Law Review
The article presents information on the Sharia Law, an Islamic religious law, and other foreign laws in the U.S. courts. It discusses that whether prohibition should be applied to the Sharia Law. It mentions about the impact of this Law in the countries like the U.S. and Great Britain. It informs about the efforts made by the U.S. state legislative to stop use of Sharia Law.
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
We analyze various factors that influence judicial decisions in cases involving Free Exercise Clause or religious accommodation claims and decided by lower federal courts. Religious liberty claims, including those moored in the Free Exercise Clause, typically generate particularly difficult questions about how best to structure the sometimes contentious relation between the religious faithful and the sovereign government. Such difficult questions arise frequently in and are often framed by litigation. Our analyses include all digested Free Exercise and religious accommodation claim decisions by federal court of appeals and district court judges from 1996 through 2005. As it relates to one key …
Public Policy Against Religion: Doubting Thomas , Richard H. Seeburger
Public Policy Against Religion: Doubting Thomas , Richard H. Seeburger
Pepperdine Law Review
In free exercise cases, the Supreme Court has adopted a least restrictive alternative test in an attempt to maximize protection for religiously motivated practices. Because the least restrictive alternative test only considers the importance of the governmental interest and the availability of alternative means to accomplish those interests, thereby ignoring the importance of the burdened religious activity to the individual and the degree of burden on religious activity, all religious interests are treated equally when asserted against a governmental interest. Under such an inflexible and brittle test, the Supreme Court has recently denied religious claims which had previously been recognized. …
Clergy Malpractice: Making Clergy Accountable To A Lower Power, Lawrence M. Burek
Clergy Malpractice: Making Clergy Accountable To A Lower Power, Lawrence M. Burek
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Religious Apartheid: Affording Equal Treatment For Student-Initiated Religious Expression In Public Schools , John W. Whitehead
Avoiding Religious Apartheid: Affording Equal Treatment For Student-Initiated Religious Expression In Public Schools , John W. Whitehead
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Theism, Naturalism, And Liberalism: John Stuart Mill And The “Final Inexplicability” Of The Self, John Lawrence Hill
Theism, Naturalism, And Liberalism: John Stuart Mill And The “Final Inexplicability” Of The Self, John Lawrence Hill
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Teach And Persuade, Sherman J. Clark
Saving The First Amendment From Itself: Relief From The Sherman Act Against The Rabbinic Cartels, Barak D. Richman
Saving The First Amendment From Itself: Relief From The Sherman Act Against The Rabbinic Cartels, Barak D. Richman
Pepperdine Law Review
America’s rabbis currently structure their employment market with rules that flagrantly violate the Sherman Act. The consequences of these rules, in addition to the predictable economic outcomes of inflated wages for rabbis and restricted consumer freedoms for the congregations that employ them, meaningfully hinder Jewish communities from seeking their preferred spiritual leader. Although the First Amendment cannot combat against this privately-orchestrated (yet paradigmatic) restriction on religious expression, the Sherman Act can. Ironically, however, the rabbinic organizations implementing the restrictive policies claim that the First Amendment immunizes them from Sherman Act scrutiny, thereby claiming the First Amendment empowers them to do …
Blame It On Catholic Bishop: The Question Of Nlrb Jurisdiction Over Religious Colleges And Universities, Susan J. Stabile
Blame It On Catholic Bishop: The Question Of Nlrb Jurisdiction Over Religious Colleges And Universities, Susan J. Stabile
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seeking An Islamic Reflective Equilibrium: A Response To Abdullahi A. An-Na'im’S Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective, Mohammad H. Fadel
Seeking An Islamic Reflective Equilibrium: A Response To Abdullahi A. An-Na'im’S Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective, Mohammad H. Fadel
Pepperdine Law Review
Professor 'Abdallahi Na'im argues that there can be no conflict between religion and the state because religion and politics are part of different normative orders, and thus it is not conceivable that a conflict can arise between them. I argue that Na'im's solution to the problematic relationship of religion to state shares the same conceptual terrain as separationism in American constitutional law, a position which has grown increasingly untenable as a result of the increasing religious pluralism in the United States and the expansion of the government into areas of life in a manner that would have been inconceivable even …
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
The Endorsement Test Is Alive And Well: A Cause For Celebration And Sorrow, Mark Strasser
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective, Abdullahi A. An-Na'im
Complementary, Not Competing, Claims Of Law And Religion: An Islamic Perspective, Abdullahi A. An-Na'im
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Priority Of Law: A Response To Michael Stokes Paulsen, Eugene Volokh
The Priority Of Law: A Response To Michael Stokes Paulsen, Eugene Volokh
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman, Richard W. Garnett
Neutrality And The Good Of Religious Freedom: An Appreciative Response To Professor Koppelman, Richard W. Garnett
Pepperdine Law Review
This paper is a short response to an address, “And I Don’t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in American Law,” delivered by Prof. Andrew Koppelman at a conference, “The Competing Claims of Law and Religion: Who Should Influence Whom?”, which was held at Pepperdine University in February of 2012. In this response, it is suggested – among other things – that “American religious neutrality” is, as Koppelman argues, “coherent and attractive” because and to the extent that it is not neutral with respect to the goal and good of religious freedom. Religious freedom, in the American tradition, is not …