Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Land Use Law (99)
- State and Local Government Law (47)
- Constitutional Law (42)
- Environmental Law (41)
- Natural Resources Law (18)
-
- Administrative Law (16)
- Legislation (16)
- Law and Society (15)
- Housing Law (14)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (13)
- Environmental Sciences (12)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (12)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (11)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (10)
- Water Law (10)
- Water Resource Management (10)
- Energy and Utilities Law (8)
- Environmental Policy (8)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (8)
- Law and Economics (7)
- Natural Resource Economics (7)
- Architecture (6)
- Life Sciences (6)
- Urban Studies and Planning (6)
- Agriculture Law (5)
- Biodiversity (5)
- Courts (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (13)
- University of Maine School of Law (13)
- Seattle University School of Law (11)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
-
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (10)
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- Pace University (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Cal Poly Humboldt (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Suffolk University (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- BLR (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Maine Law Review (11)
- Seattle University Law Review (11)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (10)
- Scholarly Works (7)
-
- Articles (6)
- Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal (6)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (4)
- Articles & Chapters (3)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (3)
- Publications (3)
- Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works (3)
- Susie Van Kirk Papers (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (2)
- U.S. Supreme Court Briefs (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (2)
- Water and Growth in the West (Summer Conference, June 7-9) (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 161
Full-Text Articles in Property Law and Real Estate
Slides: Groundwater Declines, Climate Change And Approaches To Adaptation, Katharine Jacobs
Slides: Groundwater Declines, Climate Change And Approaches To Adaptation, Katharine Jacobs
Western Water Law, Policy and Management: Ripples, Currents, and New Channels for Inquiry (Martz Summer Conference, June 3-5)
Presenter: Katharine Jacobs, Director of the Arizona Water Institute, University of Arizona
37 slides
Land Virtues, Eduardo M. Peñalver
Land Virtues, Eduardo M. Peñalver
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
This article has two goals. First, I explore some of the descriptive and normative shortcomings of traditional law and economics discussions of the ownership and use of land. These market-centered approaches struggle in different ways with features of land that distinguish it from other "commodities." The complexity of land - its intrinsic complexity, but even more importantly the complex ways in which human beings interact with it - undermines the notion that owners will focus on a single value, such as wealth, in making decisions about their land. Adding to the equation land's "memory," by which I mean the combined …
The Stubborn Incoherence Of Regulatory Takings, Mark Fenster
The Stubborn Incoherence Of Regulatory Takings, Mark Fenster
UF Law Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. was met with restrained but largely appreciative notice by commentators. Lingle declared that the Takings Clause affirmatively protects property owners by awarding them compensation for regulations that impose the functional equivalent of a condemnation of their property. The regulatory takings doctrine thus differs from the substantive due process doctrine, which instead reviews the validity of a regulation and offers as its remedy the invalidation of an offending government action. Clearing the underbrush that had grown in nearly a century of Supreme Court precedent, the Court appeared to have made …
Supreme Neglect Of Text And History, William Michael Treanor
Supreme Neglect Of Text And History, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews Supreme Neglect: How to Revive Constitutional Protection for Private Property by Richard A. Epstein (2008).
In Supreme Neglect, Professor Richard Epstein has produced a clear and elegant synthesis for the general reader of his lifetime of thinking about the Takings Clause and, more broadly, about the role of property in our constitutional system. Appealing to both history and constitutional text, Epstein argues that the Takings Clause bars government regulations that diminish the value of private property (with the exception of a highly constrained category of police power regulations). This essay shows that neither the text of the …
Kelo V. City Of New London And The Prospects For Development After A Natural Disaster, Carol N. Brown
Kelo V. City Of New London And The Prospects For Development After A Natural Disaster, Carol N. Brown
Law Faculty Publications
The tension between private property rights, human rights, and community are at an all time high in many parts of the world. Social and political changes along with the pressures of globalization call for a new look at the role of private property and its place within the framework of democratic societies.This book addresses the current status of eminent domain and takings law jurisprudence. The focus is the relationship between private property, individual rights and community. The work covers a variety of points of view with respect to the legal, economic, and socio-legal aspects of property and of takings law, …
Federalism And Natural Resources Policy [Outline], Robert L. Fischman
Federalism And Natural Resources Policy [Outline], Robert L. Fischman
The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
2 pages.
"Robert L. Fischman, Indiana University School of Law–Bloomington"
"Outline of Presentation"
Law Casebook Description And Table Of Contents: Constitutional Environmental And Natural Resources Law [Outline], Jim May, Robin Craig
Law Casebook Description And Table Of Contents: Constitutional Environmental And Natural Resources Law [Outline], Jim May, Robin Craig
The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
6 pages.
"James May, Widener University School of Law" -- Agenda
Local Property Law: Adjusting The Scale Of Property Protection, Christopher Serkin
Local Property Law: Adjusting The Scale Of Property Protection, Christopher Serkin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Article proposes that local governments should be able to decide for themselves how to protect private property, and then be held to that choice as if it were a local constitutional pre-commitment. Specifically, the Article proposes state enabling legislation to create a mechanism for local pre-commitments around the most contested takings and land use issues, like the meaning of public use, the extent of just compensation, the diminution of value that triggers compensation, and others. The resulting local variation in property regimes would allow consumers - homeowners, developers, and any other property owners - to select the property protection …
The Takings Clause, Version 2005: The Legal Process Of Constitutional Property Rights, Mark Fenster
The Takings Clause, Version 2005: The Legal Process Of Constitutional Property Rights, Mark Fenster
UF Law Faculty Publications
The search for coherence in takings jurisprudence has resulted in a multitude of theories but no consensus. Each theory -- whether based on conceptions of common law property rights or constitutional conceptions of justice, or based on utility, natural law, or communitarian or republican conceptions of the good --offers significant insight into the vexing legal, political, and normative issues that judicial enforcement of the Takings Clause raises. But no single theory of property or of constitutional limits on state regulation and expropriation has proven capable either of satisfactorily rationalizing existing takings law or of persuading the courts or the theory's …
Back To The Future: Is Form-Based Code An Efficacious Tool For Shaping Modern Civic Life?, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Back To The Future: Is Form-Based Code An Efficacious Tool For Shaping Modern Civic Life?, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Publications
This Essay serves as a critique of the New Urbanism in general and of form-based code in particular as a tool of the New Urbanism. It may be true that form-based code offers more flexibility than traditional zoning schemes and thus may offer some respite from acknowledged ills such as social and racial divisions created by exclusionary zoning and other tools, and from the relative inutility of single or limited use districts. However, I will argue that these benefits are eclipsed by some of the problems of form-based code. Form-based code is frequently hailed as a back to the future …
Real Estate Law, Paul H. Davenport, Lindsey H. Dobbs
Real Estate Law, Paul H. Davenport, Lindsey H. Dobbs
University of Richmond Law Review
This article surveys significant cases concerning real property law decided by the Supreme Court of Virginia between the spring of 2004 and the spring of 2006. This article also details significant legislative changes flowing from the 2005 and 2006 Virginia General Assembly sessions.
The Takings Clause, Version 2005: The Legal Process Of Constitutional Property Rights, Mark Fenster
The Takings Clause, Version 2005: The Legal Process Of Constitutional Property Rights, Mark Fenster
ExpressO
The three takings decisions that the Supreme Court issued at the end of its October 2004 Term marked a stunning reversal of the Court’s efforts the past three decades to use the Takings Clause to define a set of constitutional property rights. The regulatory takings doctrine, which once loomed as a significant threat to the modern regulatory state, now appears after Lingle v. Chevron to be a relatively tame, if complicated, check on exceptional instances of regulatory abuse. At the same time, the Public Use Clause, formerly an inconsequential limitation on the state’s eminent domain authority, now appears ripe for …
Takings Cases In The October 2004 Term (Symposium: The Seventeenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Takings Cases In The October 2004 Term (Symposium: The Seventeenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Regulating Land Use In A Constitutional Shadow: The Institutional Contexts Of Exactions, Mark Fenster
Regulating Land Use In A Constitutional Shadow: The Institutional Contexts Of Exactions, Mark Fenster
UF Law Faculty Publications
The regulatory takings doctrine, the Supreme Court declared in Lingle v. Chevron, concerns the effects of a regulation on the incidents of property ownership. It serves as a constitutional protection against regulations that impose the functional equivalent to a classic taking of private property (an appropriation by the state or an ouster), and it requires compensation for owners who are subject to such regulations. Just as significant as declaring what the regulatory takings doctrine is, theCourt in Lingle also declared what it is not: it is not a judicial check onthe validity or reasonableness of a regulation that …
Listening To All The Voices, Old And New: The Evolution Of Land Ownership In The Modern West, Charles Wilkinson
Listening To All The Voices, Old And New: The Evolution Of Land Ownership In The Modern West, Charles Wilkinson
Publications
No abstract provided.
Six Myths About Kelo: Kelo V. City Of New London, Thomas W. Merrill
Six Myths About Kelo: Kelo V. City Of New London, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005), is unique in the modem annals of law in terms of the negative response it has evoked. The initial reaction by lawyers familiar with the case was one of lack of surprise. Within days, however, Internet bloggers, television commentators, and neighbors talking over backyard fences decided that Keio was an outrage. Even Justice Stevens sought to distance himself from his own majority opinion, declaring in a speech to a bar association that he thought the outcome was "unwise," and that he would not have supported it if he were …
The American Transformation Of Waste Doctrine: A Pluralist Interpretation, Jedediah S. Purdy
The American Transformation Of Waste Doctrine: A Pluralist Interpretation, Jedediah S. Purdy
Faculty Scholarship
This Article draws on an episode of nineteenth-century American doctrinal history to develop a pluralist approach to explaining changes in property law. It addresses the question: What causes account for the development of property regimes across time? The courts' answer emerges from examination of nineteenth-century American reform of the law of waste, which governs the changes tenants may make in the estates they occupy. A line of state supreme court cases, beginning in 1810, transformed the doctrine from the strict rule of English common law to a flexible standard. Economic analysis helps to explain the change; the full story, however, …
U.S. Supreme Court’S 2004 Term Includes Significant Land Use Decisions With A Trilogy Of Takings Cases, Patricia E. Salkin
U.S. Supreme Court’S 2004 Term Includes Significant Land Use Decisions With A Trilogy Of Takings Cases, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Michigan Supreme Court Overturns Landmark Eminent Domain Case, Patricia E. Salkin
Michigan Supreme Court Overturns Landmark Eminent Domain Case, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Irresponsible Legislating: Reeling In The Aftermath Of Kelo, Patricia E. Salkin
Irresponsible Legislating: Reeling In The Aftermath Of Kelo, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Back To The Future Of Conservation: Changing Perceptions Of Property Rights & Environmental Protection, Jonathan H. Adler
Back To The Future Of Conservation: Changing Perceptions Of Property Rights & Environmental Protection, Jonathan H. Adler
Faculty Publications
Some environmental scholars and policymakers have been particularly critical of classical liberal conceptions of private property on both theoretical and practical grounds, suggesting that traditional notions of property rights are incompatible with the demands of environmental protection. Perceiving an environmental crisis borne from Lockean conceptions of property and capitalism, many environmental thinkers came to view the legal protection of private property as an obstacle to environmental sustainability. As a result, the development of command-and-control regulation in the 1960s and 1970s was influenced by the ecological critique of private property.
In recent years, however, the perception of private property's role in …
Takings Formalism And Regulatory Formulas: Exactions And The Consequences Of Clarity, Mark Fenster
Takings Formalism And Regulatory Formulas: Exactions And The Consequences Of Clarity, Mark Fenster
UF Law Faculty Publications
A vocal minority of the U.S. Supreme Court recently announced its suspicion that lower courts and state and local administrative agencies are systematically ignoring constitutional rules intended to limit, through heightened judicial review, exactions as a land use regulatory tool. This article argues that the Court's suspicions are well founded but that blame for judicial and administrative noncompliance lies with the Court's bifurcated approach to the Takings Clause.
All Party Oireachtas Committee On The Constitution Ninth Progress Report, Tom Dunne
All Party Oireachtas Committee On The Constitution Ninth Progress Report, Tom Dunne
Reports
Ireland, like many other countries with high rates of economic growth, is urbanising rapidly. There has been considerable emphasis on planning for this through the National Development Plan, the National Spatial Strategy, development guidelines and other measures. Through these the state intends that a proper planning process will lead growth rather than leaving it to market forces to drive development in what are regarded as undesirable directions. The latter it is feared will lead to unsuitable social, economic or physical outcomes. Unintended results have flowed from the implementation, or flawed implementation of many of these policies and have given rise …
Ordering (And Order In) The City, Nicole Stelle Garnett
Ordering (And Order In) The City, Nicole Stelle Garnett
Journal Articles
Over the past two decades, the broken windows hypothesis by George Kelling and James Q. Wilson has revolutionized thinking about urban policy. This now-familiar theory is that uncorrected manifestations of disorder, even minor ones like broken windows, signal a breakdown in the social order that accelerates neighborhood decline. The response to this theory has been a proliferation of policies focusing on public order. Largely missing from the academic debate about these developments is a discussion of the complex and important role of property regulation in order-maintenance efforts. This Article attempts to fill that property law gap in the public-order puzzle …
Takings Formalism And Regulatory Formulas: Exactions And The Consequences Of Clarity, Mark Fenster
Takings Formalism And Regulatory Formulas: Exactions And The Consequences Of Clarity, Mark Fenster
ExpressO
A vocal minority of the U.S. Supreme Court recently announced its suspicion that lower courts and state and local administrative agencies are systematically ignoring constitutional rules intended to limit, through heightened judicial review, exactions as a land use regulatory tool. Exactions are the concessions local governments require of property owners as conditions for the issuance of the entitlements that enable the intensified use of real property. In two cases decided over the past two decades, Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994), the Court has established under the Takings Clause a logic and metrics …
Real Estate And Land Use Law, John V. Cogbill Iii, D. Brennen Keene
Real Estate And Land Use Law, John V. Cogbill Iii, D. Brennen Keene
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court Hands Two Big Wins To Municipal Governments In 2001-2002 Term, Patricia E. Salkin
U.S. Supreme Court Hands Two Big Wins To Municipal Governments In 2001-2002 Term, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Zoning Churches: Washington State Constitutional Limitations On The Application Of Land Use Regulations To Religious Buildings, Darren E. Carnell
Zoning Churches: Washington State Constitutional Limitations On The Application Of Land Use Regulations To Religious Buildings, Darren E. Carnell
Seattle University Law Review
This Article traces a path to various land use regulatory approaches that should survive scrutiny under the Washington State Constitution. Part I outlines the legal history of challenges to the application of zoning regulations to church buildings; Part I also describes the contexts in which such disputes presently arise. Part II introduces the Washington State Constitution's provision regarding the free exercise of religion and describes the limited body of case law that has applied this provision in the land use context. Part III considers the role of federal case law in interpreting the free exercise clause of the Washington State …
Religious Land Use Jurisprudence: The Negative Ramifications For Religious Activities In Washington After Open Door Baptist Church V. Clark County, Beth Prieve
Seattle University Law Review
Part II of this Note provides a history of religious land use jurisprudence in Washington. This part addresses growth management laws generally, and where these laws cross paths with constitutional guarantees of the free exercise of religion. Part III focuses on the Washington Supreme Court's Open Door decision, separately addressing both the majority opinion and the dissent. Part IV illustrates how the Washington Supreme Court misapplied Washington's religious freedom test in Open Door and significantly shifted religious land use jurisprudence. Part IV further discusses how this shift may include Washington's adoption of the lower federal standard and elaborates upon the …
Brief For Respondents, Palazzolo V. Rhode Island Ex. Rel. Tavares, No. 99-2047 (U.S. Jan. 3, 2001), Richard J. Lazarus
Brief For Respondents, Palazzolo V. Rhode Island Ex. Rel. Tavares, No. 99-2047 (U.S. Jan. 3, 2001), Richard J. Lazarus
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.