Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (18)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Water Law (4)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Environmental Law (3)
- Housing Law (3)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Taxation-State and Local (3)
- Agriculture Law (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Estates and Trusts (2)
- Family Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Land Use Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Torts (2)
- Agency (1)
- Keyword
-
- Property (4)
- Zoning (3)
- Community property (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Consumer Protection (2)
-
- Eminent domain (2)
- Housing (2)
- Property Law (2)
- Property taxation (2)
- Washington (2)
- Administrative (1)
- Alien Land Act (1)
- Article III standing (1)
- Asset (1)
- Biometric data (1)
- Bundle (1)
- Civil (1)
- Climate Law (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Consumer Law (1)
- Consumer data (1)
- Consumer's Property Rights (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Copyright constitution (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Copyright infringement remedy (1)
- Copyright remedy (1)
Articles 151 - 154 of 154
Full-Text Articles in Property Law and Real Estate
Rights Of A Vendee Under An Executory Forfeitable Contract For The Purchase Of Real Estate: A Further Word On The Washington Law, Alfred J. Schweppe
Rights Of A Vendee Under An Executory Forfeitable Contract For The Purchase Of Real Estate: A Further Word On The Washington Law, Alfred J. Schweppe
Washington Law Review
Almost two years have passed since the six-three decision in Ashford v. Reese, holding that in this state an executory forfeitable contract for the sale of real estate creates no title, legal or equitable, in the vendee. Since that time a Department of the Court has once reaffirmed the doctrine, and the legislature has initiated, but not consummated, an attempt to change the rule. It is not the purpose of this brief article to reiterate what has heretofore been discussed both in the opinions of the Court and in these pages; but merely, for the sake of completeness, to refer …
Protecting Real Estate Contract Purchases, Robert B. Porterfield
Protecting Real Estate Contract Purchases, Robert B. Porterfield
Washington Law Review
Many assignees of the vendors' interests in installment contracts for the sale of real estate suppose that the recording of the assignment protects them by giving constructive notice of their rights. The increasing amount of investment in real estate contracts makes it important to determine the best method for protecting the assignee. Our Supreme Court' has said that recording "is purely a creation of the statute", and since the recording of such assignments is not provided for by statute it would seem that no constructive notice follows from recording.
Rights And Estates Of Vendor And Vendee Under An Executory Contract For The Sale Of Real Property, P. John Lichty
Rights And Estates Of Vendor And Vendee Under An Executory Contract For The Sale Of Real Property, P. John Lichty
Washington Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dumpor's Case: Its Status, Robert S. Macfarlane
Dumpor's Case: Its Status, Robert S. Macfarlane
Washington Law Review
Dumpor's Case holds, according to the syllabus in Sir Edward Coke's Reports (4 Coke 119b) that "a condition in a lease that the lessee or his assigns shall not alien without the special license of the lessor, is determined by an alienation by licence, and no subsequent alienation is a breach of condition, nor does it give a right of entry to the lessor." The same case more properly titled "Dumpor v Symms" (Coke) or "Dumper v Syms" is reported by Sir George Croke (Croke's Eliz. 815) The head note there reads: "On a proviso that a lessee and his …