Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Estates and Trusts (147)
- Contracts (142)
- Torts (115)
- Constitutional Law (107)
- State and Local Government Law (89)
-
- Evidence (75)
- Bankruptcy Law (71)
- Banking and Finance Law (68)
- Family Law (57)
- Insurance Law (55)
- Land Use Law (51)
- Tax Law (48)
- Criminal Law (47)
- Transportation Law (45)
- Common Law (39)
- Securities Law (35)
- Jurisdiction (32)
- Commercial Law (31)
- Litigation (31)
- Agency (27)
- Courts (26)
- Labor and Employment Law (26)
- Legal History (25)
- Legal Remedies (23)
- Legislation (21)
- Supreme Court of the United States (21)
- Election Law (20)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (20)
- Keyword
-
- Michigan (51)
- Conveyances (27)
- Land (25)
- Property (22)
- Liability (20)
-
- Mortgages (20)
- Conveyance (18)
- Foreclosures (17)
- Fifth Amendment (16)
- New York (16)
- Intent (15)
- Negligence (15)
- Property rights (14)
- Rent (14)
- Lease (13)
- Obligations (13)
- Ownership (13)
- Compensation (12)
- Due process (12)
- Easements (12)
- Eminent domain (12)
- Foreclosure (12)
- Liens (12)
- Private property (12)
- Title (12)
- Alienation (11)
- Equity (11)
- Rule against perpetuities (11)
- California (10)
- Deed (10)
- Publication Year
Articles 571 - 600 of 747
Full-Text Articles in Property Law and Real Estate
Easements-Creation By Implied Reservation
Easements-Creation By Implied Reservation
Michigan Law Review
The owner oi a tract of land subdivided it into five lots and saved a twelve-foot strip for a driveway along the rear of each, making the lots accessible from a side street. The plaintiff and the defendant were purchasers of two of these lots. Some time after the sale of the defendant acquired all the original owner's interest in the driveway by a quitclaim deed and immediately began to erect a garage on the drive, thus preventing the plaintiff from using it. Held, that an easement arose by implied grant and that the plaintiff was, therefore, entitled to …
Land Title Registration-Effect Of Registration Of Forged Deed And Transfer To Bona Fide Purchaser Under Torrens Act
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs, purchasers of land previously brought under Illinois Torrens Act, delivered certificate of title to party under agreement to sell, who forged deed to himself, had certificate issued in his name, and then conveyed to defendants who were good faith purchasers for value. Plaintiffs informed registrar of the forgery after the defendants had bought, and demanded cancellation of the deeds and certificates, and the reissue of a certificate to themselves. The registrar refused, and this petition was brought to compel such action. Held, plaintiffs having voluntarily bought land brought under Torrens system, there was a waiver of any constitutional …
Conflict Of Laws Treatment Of Interpretation And Construction Of Deeds In Reference To Covenants, Raymond J. Hellman
Conflict Of Laws Treatment Of Interpretation And Construction Of Deeds In Reference To Covenants, Raymond J. Hellman
Michigan Law Review
It is submitted that the terms "interpretation" and "construction" and the verbs "interpret" and "construe" should be used with distinct significations. There are two types of problems with reference to which these terms are used, often ambiguously and unclearly. In one type of problem a question is presented and sought to be answered as to what someone actually or apparently intended. There is an effort to reach a result which was actually desired even though the data tending to show this may be of limited utility. In the other type of problem it is recognized or realized either that there …
Mortgages-Foreclosure-Default In Interest
Mortgages-Foreclosure-Default In Interest
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was a mortgagee of certain real property. A clause in the mortgage provided that the whole amount should become due after default for twenty days in the payment of any installment of interest. Through an arithmetical error of its clerk, the defendant corporation, owner of the equity of redemption, paid $401.87 less than the amount of interest due on one installment. The total interest due was $4621.56. The clerk discovered the error and notified the mortgagee that it would be corrected as soon as the president of the corporation, who alone was authorized to sign checks, returned from Europe. …
Reformation Of Instruments-Mistake Of Facts Underlying Intention
Reformation Of Instruments-Mistake Of Facts Underlying Intention
Michigan Law Review
A debtor determined to mortgage all his property for the benefit of several creditors. His son, commissioned to draw the instrument, was informed that a note to the plaintiff, indorsed by the debtor, would be taken care of by the party primarily liable. So he intentionally omitted the plaintiff's note from the mortgage executed to the other creditors. The note was never paid. After foreclosure of the mortgage, leaving no surplus, the plaintiff sought reformation of the mortgage so as to be included as mortgagee, claiming that the debtor's intention to secure all bank creditors was not executed through mistake …
Aerial Navigation
Michigan Law Review
With the rapid increase of the use of the air by airplanes and other craft, courts are bound to be called upon frequently to determine the rights and liabilities of the owners and operators of aircraft with reference to other persons in various positions. It is probable that, as was found to be true in the cases of other new devices, the principles of the common law are sufficiently elastic and adaptable to determine the settlement of most, if not all, of the controversies.
Quasi-Contracts-Dutiful Intervention-Discharge Of Public Officer's Duty
Quasi-Contracts-Dutiful Intervention-Discharge Of Public Officer's Duty
Michigan Law Review
By statute in Montana the boards of county commissioners were ordered to cause such highways as were necessary for the public welfare to be "laid out, recorded, opened" and maintained. A highway was laid out through the plaintiff's land in 1903, but the county commissioners refused to continue constructing it though requested to do so by the plaintiff, instead compelling him to remove the fences on his property. His entire land being thus thrown open to the public, he constructed the road himself in 1926, with the knowledge of the commissioners, who on its completion immediately accepted it but refused …
Landlord And Tenant-Equitable Remedies Of Landlord-Adequacy Of Remedy By Re-Entry
Landlord And Tenant-Equitable Remedies Of Landlord-Adequacy Of Remedy By Re-Entry
Michigan Law Review
Defendant held plaintiff's land under a year-to-year lease, which provided that plaintiff or his agents should have the right to enter in the fall to plow for future crops, with the general right of re-entry for breach of conditions. The term was to end on March 1. In the preceding September, defendant refused to allow plaintiff's new tenant to enter for plowing. The plaintiff asked for an injunction against this interference. Held, there was an adequate remedy at law by exercising the right of re-entry in connection with an action of forcible entry and detainer. Vance v. Sumner (Neb. …
Aliens-Right To Hold Propsrty-Effect Of Statutes
Aliens-Right To Hold Propsrty-Effect Of Statutes
Michigan Law Review
An alien testator devised land to her son, which property was seized during the World War by the defendant Alien Property Custodian as belonging to an alien enemy. Von Zedtwitz v. Sutherland, 58 App. D. C. 153, 26 F.(2d) 525. The plaintiffs sued the son in Kentucky, where part of the land was located, and the Alien Property Custodian in this suit to recover the property on the theory that after the eight-year period which the laws of Kentucky allowed the alien heir in which to dispose of the realty, the title vested in them as next of kin …
Trusts-Apportionment Of Extraordinary Dividend From Sale Of Property By Realty Company Between Life Tenant And Remainderman
Michigan Law Review
After death of the testator, leaving his wife shares in a realty company as part of the residue of his estate in trust to receive the rents, profits, and income of the same for her natural life, the company sold the greater portion of its property and declared a cash dividend of 100 per cent. Held, that it belonged to the remainderman and not the life beneficiary. In re Jackson's Will, 239 N. Y. S. 362.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Mortgages - Equity Jurisdiction - Personal Decrees Against The Mortgagor
Mortgages - Equity Jurisdiction - Personal Decrees Against The Mortgagor
Michigan Law Review
The Michigan supreme court recently held that the jurisdiction of equity in proceedings for the foreclosure of mortgages is governed by statute, and that equity can only render a personal decree against the mortgagor where the statute expressly permits it. This view, if correct, must be recognized as an exception to the well settled doctrine that a court of equity which has obtained jurisdiction of a controversy on any ground or for any purpose, may retain such jurisdiction for the purpose of administering complete relief. Michigan has repeatedly affirmed this general doctrine.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Descent And Distribution-Status And Inheritance Rights Of Adopted Child
Descent And Distribution-Status And Inheritance Rights Of Adopted Child
Michigan Law Review
The adoption of the children of another person is said to have been unknown to the common law. In re Johnson, 98 Cal. 531; Morrison v. Sessions, 70 Mich. 297, 14 Am. St. Rep. 500. However, the status of adopted children is one of very ancient origin, existing in Biblical times, Romans 8:15; 9:4:, and was developed to a high degree by the Greeks and Romans. Provisions for child adoption were incorporated in the Code of Justinian, SANDERS, JUSTINIAN; Am. ed. 103 et seq., and took their place in the jurisprudence of all countries in which the civil …
Wills-Trusts-Unprobated Will Opposed To A Forged Will Fraudulently Probated
Wills-Trusts-Unprobated Will Opposed To A Forged Will Fraudulently Probated
Michigan Law Review
We have now grown accustomed to certain principles which, at the time that they were enunciated, must have been thought anomalous. The comparatively recent case of Winder v Scholey, his oral promise to hold for another, might be declared a trustee ex maleficio, although he was guilty of no actual fraud when he made the promise. A fortiori, it would seem that actual fraud on the part of the devisee should lead to the same result, and such has been the fact for many years. In the case of deeds, however, actual fraud and a subsequent breach …
Constitutional Law-Eminent Domain-Judcial Review By Certiorari
Constitutional Law-Eminent Domain-Judcial Review By Certiorari
Michigan Law Review
In a previous number of this volume the holding of the supreme court of Michigan was discussed wherein sections 1 and 2, article 13, of the constitution of 1908 were held to make necessity as well as compensation a judicial question in eminent domain cases. Accordingly, in that case, the court held that the feature of the statute (P. A. 1925, No. 352) authorizing the state highway commissioner to make a conclusive determination of necessity, without notice and hearing to the landowner, and without judicial review, was unconstitutional.
Tort Liability Of A Landlord, Raymond Harrison Harkrider
Tort Liability Of A Landlord, Raymond Harrison Harkrider
Michigan Law Review
The discussion thus far has dealt with the tort liability of a landlord for failing to perform some duty owed by him to persons upon the demised premises. There remains to be considered the tort liability of a landlord who fails to perform some duty owed by him to persons not upon the demised premises. The majority of the people composing this class are users of property adjoining that of the landlord. The cases dealing with the landlord's duties to persons upon the demised premises should always be distinguished from those dealing with his duties to persons using adjoining property. …
The Corporation Sole
Michigan Law Review
In the recent case of Reid v. Barry, the Florida court stirred among the bones of common law relics to invoke the aid of the corporation sole doctrine, coming to the conclusion that the Roman Catholic Bishop of St. Augustine was a sole corporation, capable of holding property by succession. The ancient learning on this anomalous but useful corporate entity is to be found in Blackstone, Coke, and Grant ; the few reported cases that have appeared since the days of these commentators have in general confirmed what they said. Maitland in delving into its history said; "An ecclesiastical …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Tort Liability Of A Landlord, Raymond Harrison Harkrider
Tort Liability Of A Landlord, Raymond Harrison Harkrider
Michigan Law Review
At Common Law. According to the rules of the common law a landlord is under no legal duty to repair the demised premises during the term unless he expressly agrees to do so. It therefore may be stated, as a general rule, that he is liable neither to the tenant nor to the tenant's invitees for injuries caused by the premises falling into a state of disrepair during the term.
Equity-Bill To Remove Cloud From Title
Equity-Bill To Remove Cloud From Title
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff who was holder of a long term lease on the land and buildings in Chicago known as the Auditorium found that its plans for rebuilding so as to secure a return commensurate with its investment were seriously interfered with by the defendant lessors who took the position that wrecking the old building would constitute such waste as would work a forfeiture of the lease. The publicity of these claims, made the financial underwriters insist on a settlement of them before advances were made. Under this posture of affairs, the plaintiff filed a bill in the United States District Court …
Liability Of Landowner To Pedestrians-Negligence-Independent Contractor
Liability Of Landowner To Pedestrians-Negligence-Independent Contractor
Michigan Law Review
Two recent cases present interesting situations involving the liability of a landowner for injuries to pedestrians occasioned by falling street signs.
Mortgages-Sale Under Trust Deed Mortgage For Inadequate Price-Effect
Mortgages-Sale Under Trust Deed Mortgage For Inadequate Price-Effect
Michigan Law Review
The defendant, administrator of the estate of the mortgagee, bought the mortgaged property at the foreclosure sale for one thousand dollars. He bought for himself and not for the estate. He sold the property to a third party for three thousand five hundred dollars. The plaintiff mortgagor brought this suit to compel the defendant to account for the two thousand five hundred dollar difference between the price he paid for the property, and the amount he received for it, allowing a credit for the amount still due on the plaintiff's note-two thousand dollars. Held, where, as in this case, …
A Re-Interpretation Of Gee V. Pritchard
A Re-Interpretation Of Gee V. Pritchard
Michigan Law Review
It has been said that the office and jurisdiction of equity unless enlarged by express statute are limited to the protection of rights of property. This doctrine, often repeated, has been so severely criticized and so strained in its application that one is inclined to doubt that it has appreciable vigor at the present time. Yet to borrow the phrase in which a learned writer disposed of another of equity's hoary errors, "though we may observe that the rule is dying, it is unfortunately not yet a corpse; and the difficulty is that no lawyer knows when it will be …
Intoxicating Liquors-Rights Of Innocent Owner Under Statutory Forfeiture Of Automobile
Intoxicating Liquors-Rights Of Innocent Owner Under Statutory Forfeiture Of Automobile
Michigan Law Review
One Harve Townsend pleaded guilty to the charge of transporting intoxicating liquor in an automobile. A statute in South Dakota provided that in such cases the automobile or other vehicle used for such transportation should be forfeited, and, "unless good cause is shown to the contrary by the owner," it should be sold by the sheriff of the county and the funds paid to the county treasurer after the deduction of all expenses. The appellant had a valid chattel mortgage on said automobile, and claimed that it had a prior right to the proceeds of the sale of said automobile …
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Contracts-Risk Of Loss Between Vendor And Purchaser In Land Contract
Contracts-Risk Of Loss Between Vendor And Purchaser In Land Contract
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff entered into a contract to sell his grocery business to the defendant for a specified amount, part payment to be by way of the conveyance of a house and lot owned by the defendant, the title to pass upon payment by the plaintiff of certain outstanding debts of the grocery business. Subsequent to the execution of the contract, but before conveyance of the house and lot and while the defendant was still in possession, the house was destroyed by fire and the plaintiff sues to have $2,500 substituted, that amount being the agreed valuation at which the property was …
Insurance-Effect Of Mortgage Foreclosure Clause
Insurance-Effect Of Mortgage Foreclosure Clause
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, the mortgagee, applied for insurance on the mortgaged property in his own name and only consented to the policy being made in the name of the mortgagor with "loss-payable" rider in his favor upon representation of the insurance agent that it was the only form of policy the company used and would accomplish the same result. In the body of the policy there was a clause rendering the policy void upon foreclosure of the mortgage. At the time of issuance of the policy, the debt was overdue and the insurance company had knowledge of this fact. Held, the …