Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Land Use Law (265)
- Legislation (255)
- Housing Law (244)
- Securities Law (236)
- Environmental Law (230)
-
- Constitutional Law (229)
- Administrative Law (226)
- Law and Society (218)
- Consumer Protection Law (215)
- Intellectual Property Law (215)
- Other Law (215)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (214)
- Law and Economics (214)
- Natural Resources Law (214)
- Criminal Law (213)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (213)
- Legal Remedies (213)
- Science and Technology Law (213)
- Banking and Finance Law (212)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (212)
- Energy and Utilities Law (212)
- Human Rights Law (212)
- Legal History (212)
- Privacy Law (212)
- Commercial Law (211)
- Criminal Procedure (211)
- Family Law (211)
- Health Law and Policy (211)
- Keyword
-
- Growth Management Act (13)
- Growth management (12)
- Law (12)
- Property law (12)
- Land use (11)
-
- Property (9)
- Zoning (9)
- Washington (8)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Constitution (6)
- ESG (6)
- Regulation (6)
- Development regulation (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Housing (5)
- Seattle University (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Washington State (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Property Law (4)
- Public health (4)
- SEC (4)
- Takings (4)
- Technology (4)
- Washington state (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 332 of 332
Full-Text Articles in Property Law and Real Estate
Enforceability Of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government In Washington, Stephen Phillabaum
Enforceability Of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government In Washington, Stephen Phillabaum
Seattle University Law Review
Washington courts are free to enforce publicland use servitudes. Of the elements required for a servitude to run with the land, form, notice, and touch and concern on the burden side do not bar running. Only the touch and concern element applied on the benefit side is a potential bar. Washington conceivably could allow public land use servitudes to run with the land by following the minority position of not requiring touch and concern on the benefit side. A less stringent theory, however, is available to enforce public land use servitudes. Washington has not adopted a rule that public servitudes …
Equitable Conversion In Washington: The Doctrine That Dares Not Speak Its Name, George R. Nock, John A. Strait, John W. Weaver
Equitable Conversion In Washington: The Doctrine That Dares Not Speak Its Name, George R. Nock, John A. Strait, John W. Weaver
Seattle University Law Review
Since the 1925 decision of Ashford v. Reese, Washington has had the distinction of being the only American jurisdiction totally, albeit implicitly, to reject the doctrine of equitable conversion. Ashford was overruled in 1977, in a remarkable opinion which simultaneously, and explicitly, rejected the doctrine of equitable conversion, thus maintaining Washington's unique status with respect to that doctrine. But the opinion failed to provide a substitute for either the rule of Ashford or the contrary doctrine of equitable conversion, both of which it emphatically abjured. The result is an unbroken line of Washington cases consistent with only one rule of …