Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (291)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (17)
- Environmental Law (16)
- International Law (11)
- Administrative Law (7)
-
- Law of the Sea (7)
- Land Use Law (6)
- Water Law (6)
- Property Law and Real Estate (4)
- Animal Law (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Natural Law (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1)
- Environmental Studies (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Keyword
-
- Salmon (6)
- Coastal zone management (3)
- Habitat restoration (3)
- Public trust doctrine (3)
- Contracts (2)
-
- Environmental policy (2)
- Fisheries (2)
- Fishery commission (2)
- Forest Practices Act (2)
- International Convention for the High Seas Fisheries of the North Pacific Ocean (2)
- Oil spills (2)
- Timber (2)
- Washington State (2)
- Water rights (2)
- 128 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1942) (1)
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- Article III standing (1)
- Clean energy (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Climate resilience (1)
- Community engagement (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Convention on Biological Diversity (1)
- Decarbonization (1)
- Deep sea thermal vents (1)
- Deepwater Horizon (1)
- Energy development (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environmental disasters (1)
- Environmental law; Treaty; Indigenous Rights; Appellate; Ninth Circuit; Health; Administrative Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington Law Review (70)
- Articles (25)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975)) (18)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) (17)
- Washington International Law Journal (17)
-
- Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976)) (14)
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979)) (13)
- Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy (11)
- Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) (11)
- United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) (9)
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. Moos, Docket No. 44401 (88 Wash. 2d 677 (June 9, 1976)) (8)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 07-35062, 07-35124, 07-35219 (573 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2009)) (8)
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967)) (7)
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979)) (7)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) (7)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996)) (7)
- Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 07-35061 (590 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2010)) (7)
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash. 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976)) (6)
- United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981)) (6)
- Washington v. United States, Northwest Steelheaders Council of Trout Unlimited v. United States, Washington Reef Net Owners Association v. United States, Docket Nos. 75-588, 75-592, 75-705 (423 U.S. 1086 (1976)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3999 (761 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1985)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 75-2835 and 76-1042 (573 F.2d 1118 (9th Cir. 1978)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 85-3908, 85-4009 (813 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1987)) (5)
- Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997)) (4)
- Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982)) (4)
- McCauley v. Makah Indian Tribe, Docket No. 9924, 128 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1942) (4)
- United States v. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000)) (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 403
Full-Text Articles in Natural Resources Law
Separate Brief Of Puyallup Tribe - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Tribal Appellees - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
State Of Washington's Response To Plaintiff- Appellants' Brief In Cause Nos. 74-2438, 2705, 2606 - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Answering Brief Of Intervenor-Appellant Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited To Brief Of Appellant Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Opening Brief - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Plaintiffs-Appellees Richard Sohappy - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellee Yakima Indian Nation - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenor-Appellee The Confederated Tribes Of The War Springs Reservation Of Oregon - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Nez Perce Tribe Of Idaho - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amicus Curiae State Of Oregon - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Opening Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenor-Appellant Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Appellants - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Appellant State Of Washington Opening Brief - Sohappy V. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Defendant-Intervenor, Washington Reef Net Owners Association - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellants Department Of Game And The State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellants Dept. Of Fisheries And The State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Amici Curiae - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 To 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))
No abstract provided.
Natural Resources, A. R. Lucas
Natural Resources, A. R. Lucas
Washington Law Review
A book review essay considering Natural Resources and Public Property Under the Canadian Constitution, by G.V. La Forest (1969).
Recreation, Fish, Wildlife And The Public Land Law Review Commission, Ralph W. Johnson
Recreation, Fish, Wildlife And The Public Land Law Review Commission, Ralph W. Johnson
Articles
Scanning the entire Report of the Public Land Law Review Commission (One Third of the Nation's Land: A Report to the President and to the Congress (1970) will make a back country hiker swallow twice, call his congressman to quash the Report, and head for the hinterland for one last look before the loggers, miners, golfers, farmers, and house builders arrive. Although the Report does not say so in so many words it ends up as a kind of potpourri, where everyone gets something. It attempts to say all things to all people, to suggest that everyone will be gainers-that …
Federal Organization For Control Of Weather Modification, Ralph W. Johnson
Federal Organization For Control Of Weather Modification, Ralph W. Johnson
Articles
This article is designed to explore the optimal institutional structures that might be adopted by the federal government to manage weather modification. Should all federal weather modification activities be managed by a new department? Should these activities be carried out by one of the existing mission agencies, or by a new one? Should the various weather modification functions of research, operations, data collection, monitoring, coordination, comprehensive planning, project review, regulation, licensing, and indemnification all be carried by one federal agency, or should they be scattered among a variety of agencies? Should some be assigned to new entities not yet created? …
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Washington Law Review
On December 26, 1854, the Treaty of Medicine Creek was concluded between the United States and nine western Washington Indian tribes. The Indians ceded to the United States all rights in a large portion of their tribal lands, but reserved the "right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens of the Territory." Whatever the representatives of the United States or the Indian chiefs meant by this clause has been lost in antiquity. It is certain that they could not have foreseen the acrimony or the legal battles that it would …
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Regulation Of Treaty Indian Fishing, Anon
Washington Law Review
On December 26, 1854, the Treaty of Medicine Creek was concluded between the United States and nine western Washington Indian tribes. The Indians ceded to the United States all rights in a large portion of their tribal lands, but reserved the "right of taking fish, at all usual and accustomed grounds and stations ... in common with all citizens of the Territory." Whatever the representatives of the United States or the Indian chiefs meant by this clause has been lost in antiquity. It is certain that they could not have foreseen the acrimony or the legal battles that it would …
The Japan-United States Salmon Conflict, Ralph W. Johnson
The Japan-United States Salmon Conflict, Ralph W. Johnson
Washington Law Review
The United States, Canada, and Japan signed the International Convention for the High Seas Fisheries of the North Pacific Ocean [hereinafter cited as Tripartite Treaty] on May 9, 1952, 11 days after the effective date of the Japanese Peace Treaty. This fisheries Treaty became effective June 12, 1953. It initiated the "abstention" principle whereby Japan agreed to abstain from fishing stocks of North American spawned salmon when the Commission, created in the treaty, was satisfied that the United States and Canada were taking the "maximum sustainable yield"' of those stocks, when it was demonstrated that United States and Canadian fishermen …
The Abstention Principle And Its Relation To The Evolving International Law Of The Seas, Soji Yamamoto
The Abstention Principle And Its Relation To The Evolving International Law Of The Seas, Soji Yamamoto
Washington Law Review
It should be our task to objectively determine whether the abstention principle embodied in the Tripartite Treaty rationalizes the conservation of ocean resources in view of the historic development or transmutation of the concept of fishery rights under the international law of the seas. In order to do so, we must examine both the abstention principle and the historical development of fishery rights. Ultimately, this necessitates discussion of the consistency or lack thereof between the Tripartite Treaty and the Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas. The validity of the abstention principle must be …
Japan And International Conventions Relating To North Pacific Fisheries, Shigeru Oda
Japan And International Conventions Relating To North Pacific Fisheries, Shigeru Oda
Washington Law Review
This paper will begin with a treatment of the North Pacific Fisheries Convention of 1952. After exploring this treaty and the abstention formula embodied in it, a study of the Northwest Pacific Fisheries Convention of 1956 and the formula incorporated therein will be undertaken. After studying the 1952 and 1956 Conventions, the paper will proceed to examine the recent fisheries agreement of 1965 between Japan and the Republic of Korea. This last agreement contains an idea of equal sharing of high seas fish resources among the nations concerned.
New Uses Of International Law In The North Pacific, Douglas M. Johnston
New Uses Of International Law In The North Pacific, Douglas M. Johnston
Washington Law Review
Since all marine fisheries are either shared or shareable and constitute a renewable resource, broad policy problems of fishery use, both by "have" and "have not" fishing states, always have an international aspect and involve considerations of both development and conservation. In few areas of international law is the challenge to our reason and imagination so acute; and seldom do jurists so obviously require the services of the natural sciences. Yet fishery science, now engaging a small but growing number of specialists from biology and related disciplines, is still unable to provide an adequate factual basis for the sophisticated articulation …
Aspects Of Internal Decision-Making Processes In Intergovernmental Fishery Commissions, William T. Burke
Aspects Of Internal Decision-Making Processes In Intergovernmental Fishery Commissions, William T. Burke
Washington Law Review
The purpose of this paper is to examine certain aspects of the decision-making processes of intergovernmental institutions established for regulating interactions in the exploitation of ocean fisheries. The aspects selected are those denominated as internal constitutional arrangements; embracing, more specifically, the grant of capacity to the group, membership provisions, structure, objectives, and distribution of certain authority functions within the commissions. Very little attention is devoted to the external decision-making process involving the fishery commissions with other participants, including members and other public or private entities which a more comprehensive study would embrace. Fortunately, in light of anticipated developments in world …
Some Japanese Far-Sea Fisheries, Fukuzo Nagasaki
Some Japanese Far-Sea Fisheries, Fukuzo Nagasaki
Washington Law Review
This paper briefly describes some of the Japanese far-sea fisheries in the Pacific Ocean which are now of international concern. This includes some of the Japanese salmon fisheries (including some classified in the off-shore fishery), the kingcrab fishery and the bottomfish fishery in the northern North Pacific, and the tuna fishery in the Pacific Ocean. Brief remarks are also made on recent conditions of the major stocks.