Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (291)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (17)
- Environmental Law (16)
- International Law (11)
- Administrative Law (7)
-
- Law of the Sea (7)
- Land Use Law (6)
- Water Law (6)
- Property Law and Real Estate (4)
- Animal Law (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Natural Law (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1)
- Environmental Studies (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Keyword
-
- Salmon (6)
- Coastal zone management (3)
- Habitat restoration (3)
- Public trust doctrine (3)
- Contracts (2)
-
- Environmental policy (2)
- Fisheries (2)
- Fishery commission (2)
- Forest Practices Act (2)
- International Convention for the High Seas Fisheries of the North Pacific Ocean (2)
- Oil spills (2)
- Timber (2)
- Washington State (2)
- Water rights (2)
- 128 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1942) (1)
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- Article III standing (1)
- Clean energy (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Climate resilience (1)
- Community engagement (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Convention on Biological Diversity (1)
- Decarbonization (1)
- Deep sea thermal vents (1)
- Deepwater Horizon (1)
- Energy development (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environmental disasters (1)
- Environmental law; Treaty; Indigenous Rights; Appellate; Ninth Circuit; Health; Administrative Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington Law Review (70)
- Articles (25)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975)) (18)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) (17)
- Washington International Law Journal (17)
-
- Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976)) (14)
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, Docket Nos. 77-983, 78-119, 78-139 (443 U.S. 658 (1979)) (13)
- Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy (11)
- Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) (11)
- United States v. Baker, Docket Nos. 80-1085, 80-1086, 80-1088, 80-1116, 80-1117, 80-1118, 80-1206, 80-1219, 80-1208, 80-1205, 80-1214 (641 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1981)) (9)
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. Moos, Docket No. 44401 (88 Wash. 2d 677 (June 9, 1976)) (8)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 07-35062, 07-35124, 07-35219 (573 F.3d 701 (9th Cir. 2009)) (8)
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 38611 (70 Wash. 2d 245 (Jan. 1967)) (7)
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. United States District Court, Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, 77-3655 (605 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1979)) (7)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) (7)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996)) (7)
- Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 07-35061 (590 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2010)) (7)
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash. 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976)) (6)
- United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 81-3111 (694 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1982)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. Nos. 79-4447, 79-4472 (641 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir. 1981)) (6)
- Washington v. United States, Northwest Steelheaders Council of Trout Unlimited v. United States, Washington Reef Net Owners Association v. United States, Docket Nos. 75-588, 75-592, 75-705 (423 U.S. 1086 (1976)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3999 (761 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1985)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 75-2835 and 76-1042 (573 F.2d 1118 (9th Cir. 1978)) (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 85-3908, 85-4009 (813 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1987)) (5)
- Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997)) (4)
- Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982)) (4)
- McCauley v. Makah Indian Tribe, Docket No. 9924, 128 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1942) (4)
- United States v. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Docket No. 99-35960 (235 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 2000)) (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 403
Full-Text Articles in Natural Resources Law
Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants Puget Sound Shellfish Growers And Opposition Brief To Plaintiffs' Cross-Appeal - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Defendant/Appellant 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners ("Upow") - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Protecting And Promoting Wildlife And Habitat On State And Private Land In Washington's Arid Interior, Gregory A. Hicks
Protecting And Promoting Wildlife And Habitat On State And Private Land In Washington's Arid Interior, Gregory A. Hicks
Articles
The object of this paper is to describe efforts now under way in the interior uplands of Washington State's Columbia Plain to restore and protect upland wildlife habitat and wildlife species in a busy and intensively used agricultural and range landscape. It is a landscape of greatly diminished ecological integrity, dominated by private land holdings, and where the remaining public lands are recovering from earlier periods of farming or grazing or still dedicated to productive use under lease or permit. Recent ecosystem assessments make clear that there are few areas of the Columbia Plain's original grass and shrub land which …
Brief For The United States, Appellee/Cross-Appellant - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellee/Cross-Appellant Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Amicus Curiae State Of Oregon In Support Of Appellant - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Edward Knudson, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Ernest Summers - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants Adkins, Et Al. - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants Puget Sound Shellfish Growers - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenor-Defendant/Appellant 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners ("Upow") - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Intervenors-Defendants/Appellants "Private Owners" - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Appellants' Reply Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellee-Plantiff Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Appellants Washington Harvest Divers Association - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
State's Response Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Plaintiff/Appellee Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellant's Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee United States Of America - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
The Sea Of Okhotsk Peanut Hole: How The United Nations Draft Agreement On Straddling Stocks Might Preserve The Pollack Fishery, Jon K. Goltz
The Sea Of Okhotsk Peanut Hole: How The United Nations Draft Agreement On Straddling Stocks Might Preserve The Pollack Fishery, Jon K. Goltz
Washington International Law Journal
The enclave of international waters in the central Sea of Okhotsk, called the "peanut hole," is surrounded by the 200 mile Exclusive Economic Zone ("EEZ") of the Russian Federation. Since 1991, distant water fishing nations ("DWFNs") have been fishing in the peanut hole in a manner that Russia claims is detrimental to the straddling pollack fish stock that exists both in Russia's EEZ and in the enclave. To prevent destruction of the pollack fishery, Russia imposed a moratorium on all fishing in the enclave; the moratorium is not universally observed. The United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly …
A Primer On Public Land Law, Marla E. Mansfield
A Primer On Public Land Law, Marla E. Mansfield
Washington Law Review
This article will examine the major missions and jurisdictions of the main federal land management systems, namely the public domain, the national forests, national parks, wildlife refuges, and wilderness areas. To introduce this examination, the constitutional provisions which justify the governing statutes will be explored. Additionally, as a prelude to the specific statutory mandates, this Article will review the system of reservations, withdrawals, and classifications. Preemption doctrine also will be addressed because states often desire to regulate activities on federal lands. Finally, the Article will distinguish between multiple use and dominant use.
From Conflict To Cooperation: Fishery Relations In The Sea Of Japan, Tsuneo Akaha
From Conflict To Cooperation: Fishery Relations In The Sea Of Japan, Tsuneo Akaha
Washington International Law Journal
This article traces the postwar experiences of Japan, the most important fishing nation of the Japan Sea region, in establishing and expanding fishery relations with the Soviet Union/Russia, South Korea, and North Korea. The gradual shift from conflict to cooperation in the exploitation and management of fishery resources shows that pragmatic cooperation among the countries involved has been made possible by their willingness to accommodate mutual economic interests on an increasingly reciprocal basis. International law, particularly the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, and the legal norms and principles it embodies have aided the parties in arriving at …
The Public Trust Doctrine And Coastal Zone Management In Washington State, Ralph W. Johnson, Craighton Goeppele, David Jansen, Rachael Paschal
The Public Trust Doctrine And Coastal Zone Management In Washington State, Ralph W. Johnson, Craighton Goeppele, David Jansen, Rachael Paschal
Articles
The public trust doctrine is an ancient doctrine that has recently emerged as a powerful tool to protect the public interest in tidelands and shorelands. Created and developed by the judiciary, the doctrine's principles have found their way into several of Washington's regulatory statutes, such as the Shoreline Management Act and the Aquatic Lands Act. This Article traces the development of the doctrine in Washington, and explains the relation between the state's police power and the public trust doctrine. This Article also sets forth the current contours of the public trust doctrine in Washington, and charts potential future developments of …
Applying U.S. Law To Halt Deforestation In Southeastern Myanmar: A Survey Of Potential Strategies, Douglas J. Kelso
Applying U.S. Law To Halt Deforestation In Southeastern Myanmar: A Survey Of Potential Strategies, Douglas J. Kelso
Washington International Law Journal
As the twentieth century draws to a close, the threat posed by environmental degradation grows increasingly apparent. Climatic change, ozone depletion, hazardous wastes, and numerous other ecological concerns gain growing prominence in national and international policy debates. Environmental degradation causes the loss of valuable atmospheric, hydrological, geological, and biological resources. In terms of resource depletion, the rapid destruction of tropical rain forests poses one of the greatest ecological threats to our planet today. This paper proposes that proper application of United States law might discourage tropical deforestation abroad, using the nation of Myanmar (formerly Burma) as an example.