Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- National Security Law (129)
- International Law (29)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (24)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (21)
- Political Science (20)
-
- Human Rights Law (17)
- Defense and Security Studies (16)
- International Relations (13)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (13)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Law and Politics (11)
- President/Executive Department (11)
- Terrorism Studies (10)
- American Politics (9)
- Arts and Humanities (8)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (8)
- Criminal Law (8)
- History (8)
- International and Area Studies (8)
- First Amendment (6)
- International Humanitarian Law (6)
- International Trade Law (6)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Air and Space Law (5)
- Courts (5)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Environmental Law (5)
- Institution
-
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (56)
- University of Denver (10)
- Duke Law (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
-
- U.S. Naval War College (5)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Purdue University (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- US Army War College (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Montclair State University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Portland State University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- William Mitchell Law Review (55)
- Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (10)
- International Law Studies (5)
- Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present) (4)
-
- University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review (4)
- American University National Security Law Brief (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- Publications (2)
- San Diego International Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- American University International Law Review (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 151
Full-Text Articles in Military, War, and Peace
Disclosure’S Effects: Wikileaks And Transparency, Mark Fenster
Disclosure’S Effects: Wikileaks And Transparency, Mark Fenster
UF Law Faculty Publications
Constitutional, criminal, and administrative laws regulating government transparency, and the theories that support them, rest on the assumption that the disclosure of information has transformative effects: disclosure can inform, enlighten, and energize the public, or it can create great harm and stymie government operations. To resolve disputes over difficult cases, transparency laws and theories typically balance disclosure’s beneficial effects against its harmful ones—what I have described as transparency’s balance. WikiLeaks and its vigilante approach to massive document leaks challenge the underlying assumption about disclosure’s effects in two ways. First, WikiLeaks’ ability to receive and distribute leaked information cheaply, quickly, and …
A Whole Lot Of Substance Or A Whole Lot Of Rhetoric? A Perspective On A Whole-Of-Government Approach To Security Challenges, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
A Whole Lot Of Substance Or A Whole Lot Of Rhetoric? A Perspective On A Whole-Of-Government Approach To Security Challenges, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Government Secrets, National Security And Freedom Of The Press: The Ability Of The United States To Prosecute Julian Assange, Heather M. Lacey
Government Secrets, National Security And Freedom Of The Press: The Ability Of The United States To Prosecute Julian Assange, Heather M. Lacey
University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Eric Jensen
Responses To The Ten Questions, Eric Jensen
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Tung Yin
Responses To The Ten Questions, Tung Yin
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, John Cary Sims
Responses To The Ten Questions, John Cary Sims
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, John B. Quigley
Responses To The Ten Questions, John B. Quigley
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not Reading Means Losing: The National Security Cost Of Ignoring Osama Bin Laden's Words, Michael Scheuer
Not Reading Means Losing: The National Security Cost Of Ignoring Osama Bin Laden's Words, Michael Scheuer
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Donald W. Jackson On Prisoners Of America’S Wars: From The Early Republic To Guantanamo. By Stephanie Carvin. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. 336pp., Donald W. Jackson
Donald W. Jackson On Prisoners Of America’S Wars: From The Early Republic To Guantanamo. By Stephanie Carvin. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. 336pp., Donald W. Jackson
Human Rights & Human Welfare
A review of:
Prisoners of America’s Wars: From the Early Republic to Guantanamo. By Stephanie Carvin. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. 336pp.
How We Lost The High-Tech War Of 2020: A Warning From The Future, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
How We Lost The High-Tech War Of 2020: A Warning From The Future, Charles J. Dunlap Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Timothy Lynch
Responses To The Ten Questions, Timothy Lynch
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Richard L. Russell
Responses To The Ten Questions, Richard L. Russell
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Jeffrey Kahn
Responses To The Ten Questions, Jeffrey Kahn
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert Knowles
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert Knowles
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Responses To The Ten Questions, Mary Ellen O'Connell
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Wayne Mccormack
Responses To The Ten Questions, Wayne Mccormack
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Paul R. Pillar
Responses To The Ten Questions, Paul R. Pillar
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Gregory S. Mcneal
Responses To The Ten Questions, Gregory S. Mcneal
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Joshua L. Dratel
Responses To The Ten Questions, Joshua L. Dratel
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, John Ip
Responses To The Ten Questions, John Ip
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, John T. Parry
Responses To The Ten Questions, John T. Parry
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreign Public Opinion And National Security, Dakota S. Rudesill
Foreign Public Opinion And National Security, Dakota S. Rudesill
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
National Security Policy And Ratification Of The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Winston P. Nagan, Erin K. Slemmens
National Security Policy And Ratification Of The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, Winston P. Nagan, Erin K. Slemmens
UF Law Faculty Publications
While no legal obstacles prevent the U.S. Senate's reconsideration of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), lingering doubts (about the effectiveness of the international treaty) and partisan politics (founded upon outdated ideologies of national sovereignty) may again foreclose the opportunity for the United States to lead a just and thorough regime of international arms control. By closely examining the U.S. Senate's previous rejection (and, by implication, the nation's non-ratification) of the CTBT, we assess the political process that failed to realize the security values now imperative to U.S. national defense. To this appraisal, we join analysis of the contemporary law, policy, …
Looking Forward, Backward, Or Just Away?, Chandra Lekha Sriram
Looking Forward, Backward, Or Just Away?, Chandra Lekha Sriram
Human Rights & Human Welfare
The declassification and leaking of the so-called “torture memos” only supplements much which was already publicly well-known, but has offered a fresh opportunity to frankly debate American values, in particular its commitment to the rule of law, its own constitution, and international human rights and humanitarian law obligations to which it has committed itself, and which the Supreme Court has confirmed are part of domestic law. It is a shame, therefore, that the debate has been so stunted, diverted by the red herring of Dick Cheney’s rantings, and the apparent willingness of a segment of the population to accept, first, …
Let Us Not Become The Evil We Deplore, Rebecca Otis
Let Us Not Become The Evil We Deplore, Rebecca Otis
Human Rights & Human Welfare
On 14 September 2001, Representative Barbara Lee (CA-D) voted against the House bill that granted President Bush the authority to use force in response to the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. As the sole person to vote against the bill (by a margin of 420-1), Lee was roundly vilified as a “traitor,” a “coward, and even a “communist.” Later that day, as the only voice of dissent on the House floor, Lee delivered a speech to justify her position. Famously, she said to the elected representatives of our country, “As we act, let us not become …