Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (64)
- Constitutional Law (45)
- Legal History (35)
- Legislation (31)
- Jurisdiction (20)
-
- National Security Law (19)
- Law and Economics (17)
- Administrative Law (16)
- Courts (15)
- President/Executive Department (15)
- Contracts (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (13)
- International Humanitarian Law (13)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (12)
- Legal Writing and Research (12)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Labor and Employment Law (10)
- Government Contracts (9)
- State and Local Government Law (9)
- Rule of Law (8)
- Supreme Court of the United States (8)
- Insurance Law (7)
- Litigation (7)
- Science and Technology Law (7)
- Tax Law (7)
- Conflict of Laws (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Keyword
-
- World War II (28)
- World War I (24)
- Book reviews (16)
- Germany (16)
- Armed conflicts (13)
-
- War (12)
- History (11)
- Treaties (9)
- Armed forces (8)
- England (8)
- League of Nations (8)
- English law (7)
- Habeas corpus (7)
- Uniform Code of Military Justice (7)
- War crimes (7)
- Wars (7)
- Authority (6)
- Constitution (6)
- Disarmament (6)
- International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (6)
- Japan (6)
- Martial law (6)
- Soviet Union (6)
- Terrorism (6)
- Alien Property Custodian (5)
- Congress (5)
- Emergency Price Control Act (5)
- Fifth Amendment (5)
- Laws of war (5)
- Office of Price Administration (5)
Articles 31 - 60 of 278
Full-Text Articles in Military, War, and Peace
The New Leviathan, Dennis Patterson
The New Leviathan, Dennis Patterson
Michigan Law Review
Reputation in any field is an elusive phenomenon: part notoriety, part honor, part fame, part critical assessment. Even in legal scholarship it has an uneven, unpredictable quality. It is hard to imagine a book by a law professor that has had more immediate impact on world leaders than Philip Bobbitt's The Shield of Achilles. Much of the national-security strategy devised by the U.S. administration after the September 11 attacks expresses ideas Bobbitt conceived long before; and from a different point on the political spectrum is the Archbishop of Canterbury, whose televised nationwide address in January explicitly took the book as …
A Little Rebellion Now And Then Is A Good Thing, James Forman Jr.
A Little Rebellion Now And Then Is A Good Thing, James Forman Jr.
Michigan Law Review
What do George Washington and Eldridge Cleaver have in common? Or John Brown and Mahatma Gandhi? The Stern Gang and the Palestine Liberation Organization? Jefferson Davis and Eugene Debs? In Rebels with a Cause: The Minds and Morality of Political Offenders, Nicholas Kittrie says they are all political offenders - men and women who, "professing loyalty to a divine or higher law, to the call of individual conscience, or to the imperatives of some perceived public good, have challenged the legitimacy and authority of the institutions of their governments" (p. 6). Kittrie sets out to study the whole lot: "Civil …
When Interests Diverge, Robert S. Chang, Peter Kwan
When Interests Diverge, Robert S. Chang, Peter Kwan
Michigan Law Review
In her recent book Cold War Civil Rights, Professor Mary L. Dudziak, sets forth "to explore the impact of Cold War foreign affairs on U.S. civil rights reform" (p. 14). Tracing "the emergence, the development, and the decline of Cold War foreign affairs as a factor in influencing civil rights policy" (p. 17), she draws "together Cold War history and civil rights history" (pp. 14-15), two areas that are usually treated as distinct subjects of inquiry. In mixing the two together, she shows that "the borders of U.S. history are not easily maintained." Perhaps it is fitting that the field …
Those Who Remember The Past May Not Be Condemned To Repeat It, Stephan Landsman
Those Who Remember The Past May Not Be Condemned To Repeat It, Stephan Landsman
Michigan Law Review
In The Hague, Slobodan Milosevic is on trial for crimes committed in Bosnia, Kosovo and Croatia; in Arusha, Tanzania, Jean Paul Akayasu, a Rwandan bourgmestre, was convicted of genocide; in London, Augusto Pinochet was detained and adjudged amenable to an arrest warrant issued by a Spanish magistrate for acts of torture carried out in Chile; in Belgium, a Hutu Roman Catholic former mother superior was convicted of complicity in the Rwandan genocide; and in Rome a treaty was signed commencing the process that will result in the creation of the International Criminal Court ("ICC"). All these events underscore the startling …
The Second Amendment: Structure, History, And Constitutional Change, David Yassky
The Second Amendment: Structure, History, And Constitutional Change, David Yassky
Michigan Law Review
A fierce debate about the Second Amendment has been percolating in academia for two decades, and has now bubbled through to the courts. The question at the heart of this debate is whether the Amendment restricts the government's ability to regulate the private possession of firearms. Since at least 1939 - when the Supreme Court decided United States v. Miller, its only decision squarely addressing the scope of the right to "keep and bear Arms" - the answer to that question has been an unqualified "no." Courts have brushed aside Second Amendment challenges to gun control legislation, reading the Amendment …
Word Games, War Games, Diane H. Mazur
Word Games, War Games, Diane H. Mazur
Michigan Law Review
In 1993, the country's interest in the issue of military service by gay citizens escalated to a level that can only be described as a national obsession, and "obsession" is by no means too strong a term. The subject of gay servicemembers was debated within all three branches of government, all ranks of the military, and all walks of civilian life.1 The issue of military service by gay citizens became a line in the sand, a cultural standoff on issues as sensitive and disparate as sexuality, patriotism, civil rights, and civic obligation. Janet Halley2 returns to that time of obsession …
War Crimes And The Limits Of Legalism, Gary Jonathan Bass
War Crimes And The Limits Of Legalism, Gary Jonathan Bass
Michigan Law Review
In April 1945, Sir John Simon, Britain's Lord Chancellor, drew up a memorandum that was the last gasp in the diplomatic struggle against Nuremberg. Under American pressure, and despite British objections, the Allies were poised to agree to put the Axis leadership on trial for war crimes. In the kind of magnificent understatement that the British government could sometimes inadvertently achieve, it was entitled "The Argument for Summary Process against Hitler & Co." The memorandum was a series of arguments to be used by the British delegation at the San Francisco conference in a last-ditch effort to win over the …
Rush To Closure: Lessons Of The Tadić Judgment, Jose E. Alvarez
Rush To Closure: Lessons Of The Tadić Judgment, Jose E. Alvarez
Michigan Law Review
In 1993 and 1994, following allegations of mass atrocities, including systematic killings, rapes, and other horrific forms of violence in Rwanda and the territories of the former Yugoslavia, two ad hoc international war crimes tribunals were established to prosecute individuals for grave violations of international humanitarian law, including genocide. As might be expected, advocates for the creation of these entities - the first international courts to prosecute individuals under international law since the trials at Nuremberg and Tokyo after World War II - aspired to grand goals inspired by, but extending far beyond, the pedestrian aims of ordinary criminal prosecutions. …
Did Military Justice Fail Or Prevail?, Robinson O. Everett
Did Military Justice Fail Or Prevail?, Robinson O. Everett
Michigan Law Review
The subject of war crimes is now receiving significant attention. On March 13, 1998, the United States Senate, by a vote of 93-0, adopted a resolution urging the President to call on the- United Nations to create a tribunal to indict and try Saddam Hussein for his "crimes against humanity." In the recent past, United Nations tribunals have tried crimes against humanity perpetrated in the former Yugoslavia and in Rwanda. With Administration backing, Congress has also recently enacted legislation intended to confer jurisdiction on the federal district courts to try certain war crimes of which American nationals are perpetrators or …
War Powers: An Essay On John Hart Ely's War And Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons Of Vietnam And Its Aftermath, Philip Bobbitt
War Powers: An Essay On John Hart Ely's War And Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons Of Vietnam And Its Aftermath, Philip Bobbitt
Michigan Law Review
A Review of War and Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and its Aftermath by John Hart Ely
Executive Detention In Time Of War, Richard A. Posner
Executive Detention In Time Of War, Richard A. Posner
Michigan Law Review
A Review of In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention Without Trial in Wartime Britain by A.W. Brian Simpson
Palestine And Israel: A Challenge To Justice, James E. Hopenfeld
Palestine And Israel: A Challenge To Justice, James E. Hopenfeld
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice by John Quigley
Meanness As Racial Ideology, Derrick Bell
Meanness As Racial Ideology, Derrick Bell
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Port Chicago Mutiny: The Story of the Largest Mutiny Trial in U.S. History by Robert L. Allen
International Law: Process And Prospect, Linda A. Shoemaker
International Law: Process And Prospect, Linda A. Shoemaker
Michigan Law Review
A Review of International Law: Process and Prospect by Anthony D'Amato
The Triumph Of Justice, Stephan Landsman
The Triumph Of Justice, Stephan Landsman
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Affair: The Case of Alfred Dreyfus
Apocalypse Now?, Richard L. Marcus
Apocalypse Now?, Richard L. Marcus
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Agent Orange on Trial: Mass Toxic Disasters in the Courts by Peter H. Schuck
The Right Of States To Use Armed Force, Oscar Schachter
The Right Of States To Use Armed Force, Oscar Schachter
Michigan Law Review
When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. States accepted the obligation to settle all disputes by peaceful means and to refrain from the use or threat of use of force in their international relations. Only two exceptions were expressly allowed: force used in self-defense when an armed attack occurs, and armed action authorized by the UN Security Council as an enforcement measure. These provisions were seen by most observers as the heart of the Charter. and the most important principles of contemporary international law. They have been reaffirmed over and over …
The Crisis In Arms Control, Harold K. Jacobson
The Crisis In Arms Control, Harold K. Jacobson
Michigan Law Review
There is general agreement among observers of contemporary international affairs, and national and international officials from all sides, that there is a serious crisis in arms control. As of January 1984, the Soviet Union had broken off two major arms control negotiations: the Intermediate- Range Nuclear Force Talks (INF) and the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START). Negotiations in the United Nations Conference on Disarmament (CD) on a variety of arms control issues were stalemated. The United States was engaged in a large-scale military build up, and there was no sign that the Soviet Union would abate the extensive military programs …
Justice At War: The Story Of The Japanese American Internment Cases, Michigan Law Review
Justice At War: The Story Of The Japanese American Internment Cases, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases by Peter Irons
A Republic, If You Can Keep It, Daniel N. Hoffman
A Republic, If You Can Keep It, Daniel N. Hoffman
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Undeclared War: Twilight Zone of Constitutional Power by Edward Keynes and The War-Making Powers of the President: Constitutional and International Law Aspects by Ann Van Wynen Thomas and A.J. Thomas, Jr.
The Conduct Of Just And Limited War, Michigan Law Review
The Conduct Of Just And Limited War, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Conduct of Just and Limited War by William V. O'Brien
Intramilitary Immunity And Constitutional Torts, Michigan Law Review
Intramilitary Immunity And Constitutional Torts, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the reasoning underlying these conflicting approaches and concludes that a general rule of qualified immunity, which more fully protects the constitutional rights of members of the armed forces, is also consistent with the legitimate needs of the military establishment. Part I demonstrates that courts considering the scope of immunity in constitutional tort cases cannot rely blindly upon the rules and policies applicable in nonconstitutional cases, but must also accommodate the constitutional interests. Part II applies this principle to cases involving military officers. It argues in Section A that Feres v. United States does not support an absolute …
Normative And Policy Restraints On War, William V. O'Brien
Normative And Policy Restraints On War, William V. O'Brien
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict edited by Michael Howard, and Humanitarian Politics: The International Committee of the Red Cross by David P. Forsythe
To Set The Law In Motion: The Freedmen's Bureau And The Legal Rights Of Blacks, 1865-1868, Michigan Law Review
To Set The Law In Motion: The Freedmen's Bureau And The Legal Rights Of Blacks, 1865-1868, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of To Set the Law in Motion: The Freedmen's Bureau and the Legal Rights of Blacks, 1865-1868 by Donald G. Nieman
From Feres To Stencel: Should Military Personnel Have Access To Ftca Recovery, Michigan Law Review
From Feres To Stencel: Should Military Personnel Have Access To Ftca Recovery, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note reevaluates the Feres doctrine in light of legal developments of the past three decades. It concludes that the FTCA should be extended to military claims. It discusses the arguments that military claims will burden vital government functions and shows that the exception to liability under the present FTCA, particularly the exception for "discretionary actions" by government employees, would adequately protect all legitimate military interests.
The Soviet-American Arms Race: A European Perspective, J. David Singer
The Soviet-American Arms Race: A European Perspective, J. David Singer
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Game of Disarmament: How the U.S. & Russia Run the Arms Race by Alva Myrdal
Highway To Armageddon, Bernhard G. Bechhoefer
Highway To Armageddon, Bernhard G. Bechhoefer
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Nuclear Weapons and World Politics: Alternatives for the Future by David G. Compert, Michael Madelbaum, Richard L. Warwin, and John H. Burton
The Schneiderman Case: An Inside View Of The Roosevelt Court, Jeffrey F. Liss
The Schneiderman Case: An Inside View Of The Roosevelt Court, Jeffrey F. Liss
Michigan Law Review
Only rarely in the study of Supreme Court history do events, personalities, records, and historical sources converge to afford an intimate view of that institution. Schneiderman v. United States, in its own right an important decision in the field of denaturalization law, provides such an opportunity. The manuscript collections of the major adversaries on the Court are well-preserved, and a surviving major figure from among the parties to ·the litigation has provided personal insight into the intricacies of the case.
Post-Conviction Review In The Federal Courts For The Service-Member Not In Custody, Michigan Law Review
Post-Conviction Review In The Federal Courts For The Service-Member Not In Custody, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the availability of nonhabeas federal court review for those convicted by courts-martial. Part I discusses the function of such review and suggests a scope of review that would serve that function without unduly burdening the federal courts; Part II sketches the evolution of nonhabeas review and analyzes the jurisdictional problems surrounding its present status; Part III recommends statutory and judicial changes to make the review of courts-martial more equitable and efficient.
A Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel Under Article 15 Of The Uniform Code Of Military Justice, Michigan Law Review
A Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel Under Article 15 Of The Uniform Code Of Military Justice, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) enables a commanding officer to sentence a service member who has committed a minor infraction to thirty days of correctional custody. The article 15 proceeding offers few procedural safeguards; among the protections lacking is the right to counsel. This Note will consider whether the failure of the military to provide counsel at an article 15 proceeding is consistent with the sixth amendment, which provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence." The Note first will discuss …