Military, War, and Peace Commons^™

Plea Bargaining In The United States Military, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

This article offers a primer on plea bargaining in the U.S. military justice system. American military justice is like criminal justice in the rest of the country in that the lion’s share of cases are plea bargained. But there are key differences between military and civilian plea bargaining. First, a central factor of negotiations in military plea bargaining is whether the accused will keep his or her job. Second, the military has a wider range of disposition options than traditional penal sanctions, including nonjudicial punishment and administrative sanctions. Finally, the military seemingly permits more discretion and offers less binding guidance …

Institutional And Procedural Aspects Of Military Justice, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

The U.S. military justice system exists to “promote justice, to deter misconduct, to facilitate appropriate accountability, to assist in maintaining good order and discipline in the armed forces, to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the military establishment, and thereby to strengthen the national security of the United States.” It provides for disciplinary and penal sanctions of U.S. military members anywhere in the world. Given the size of the U.S. military and the scope of its operations around the world, the military justice system plays a consequential role in accountability for core international crimes, also known as atrocity crimes. The U.S. …

Discipline And Punishment, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

Armed forces must be disciplined, but two bodies of international law relating to military discipline are in tension. On the one hand, international humanitarian law requires armed forces to employ robust disciplinary measures to deter and address military misconduct. On the other hand, some international human rights law scholars recently singled out military disciplinary measures as insufficiently protective of soldiers from unfair treatment. Advocates of this new approach proposed to remedy disciplinary unfairness by permitting soldiers to opt out of disciplinary proceedings and elect military criminal trials instead. This Article critically examines four of the underlying assumptions of this new …

The Birth Of Modern International Criminal Law: The International Military Tribunal At Nuremberg, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (IMT), the most famous and arguably most important international criminal trial in human history, almost did not occur. In fact, it might even be an accident of history that the most senior perpetrators of the Nazi regime’s atrocities eventually faced the courtroom instead of summary execution. That their fate was decided by rights over might has shaped the world; helped birth the fields of international criminal law and international human rights law; and become the starting point for conversations about international law, transitional justice, genocide, and human rights.

The Prohibition Of Force Is The First Principle Of International Humanitarian Law, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

This article tracks the decline of respect for the prohibition of force, IHL, and human rights law. At the same time, it will clarify the inter-relationship of the three bodies of international law relevant to armed conflict. The article also considers why presidents first began to “abandon peace.” The evidence indicates that a major reason involves the influence of realist political theory. Realism asserts that national security is attained by amassing and demonstrating superior military capability. A president who follows the theory will defy the law against the use of force. Following realism is also at odds with the empirical …

The Reality Of Lawful And Unlawful Militaryorders, Frank Rosenblatt, Colby Vokey

Journal Articles

Much of the recent discussion about military orders has been simplistic: Is a given order lawful or unlawful? The reality is that military members more regularly face dilemmas about questionable orders. In many of these cases, resolving the question lawfulness isn’t the main point.

The Green Wall Of Silence, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

This chapter contemplates the “Green Wall of Silence” through several examples. In Iraq, following the detainee abuse scandal at the U.S. military operated prison in Abu Ghraib in 2004, military officials announced that the abuse was the result of just a “few bad apples,” reaching this conclusion through a series of investigations that chilled or blocked witnesses from revealing actual truths, and avoided examining the role of higher-level officials who contributed to the abuses. In Afghanistan, military leaders lauded U.S. Army Corporal Pat Tillman for his conduct in a heroic firefight with the enemy, but concealed from the public the …

Different Spanks For Different Ranks: A Critical Appraisal Of Character Evidence In Courts-Martial, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

This chapter explores character evidence in the U.S. military’s court-martial system. Courts-martial, unlike civilian criminal trials, permit defendants to present evidence of their own good character even when the character trait is not pertinent to the charged offenses. This derogation has been cheered by some as giving military defendants an extra tool to fight back in a system that may be stacked against them. But concerns about expansive use of character evidence soon became apparent: it tends to distort and confuse the issues in trial, and disproportionately benefits only high-status defendants. For all its good intentions, liberalized military character evidence …

A Comparative Law Analysis Of The Military Justice Systems Of Poland And The United States Of America, Frank Rosenblatt, Szymon Kulmaszewski

Journal Articles

Most authors agree that "military justice" does not have a clearly defined normative definition. Nevertheless, the term is anchored in the area of institutionalized activities of a military organization (armed forces) and for this reason it functions in the language of both legal science and military science. The text presents a synthetic outline of the history of military justice in Poland and in the U.S. Underlying the assumptions of the military justice system, such as the need to exercise jurisdiction over military persons, and the need to handle military cases within the framework of separated, common features can be discerned. …

Prosecuting Wagner Group War Crimes At The International Criminal Court? A Procedural Perspective, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

We address, hypothetically, three significant issues that the ICC must consider: (1) Should the Prosecutor open a new preliminary examination solely dedicated to the alleged war crimes of the Wagner Group, (2) the possibility of plea bargaining and its compatibility with the ICC practice and procedures, , and (3) the admissibility in the Trial Chamber of what may be purloined documentary and digital evidence.

Al In International Humanitarian Law: Distinction And Accountability, Frank Rosenblatt, Ira Rushing

Journal Articles

With the advent of recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, national militaries have become some of the earliest and most enthusiastic adopters. India, for instance, announced in 2022 the formation of an Artificial Intelligence Military Council along with substantial funding for related initiatives. 1 Many other nations, including the United States and China, have similarly pursued military applications of AI with gusto. Much ink has been spilt over ethical issues and concerns with AI. We concern ourselves here specifically with some specific implications of military AI in the field of international humanitarian law, also known as the law of …

The Relationship Between International Criminal Tribunals And National Militaries, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

This article studies the possibilities and perils of international criminal tribunals collaborating with national military forces to support the investigation and prosecution of international crimes. It does so through a case study of Bosnia-Herzegovina in 2002, where a multinational military peacekeeping coalition called Stabilisation Force (SFOR) headquartered in Sarajevo supported the work of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague. Through that case study, the article extracts larger lessons potentially applicable to other post-conflict scenarios involving both military forces and international courts. Some ways that militaries and tribunals can work together are familiar, such as …

Mother Drone, Mother Nature: The Griffon Vulture And Israel’S Military, Irus Braverman

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

Nonjudicial Punishment, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

In the civilian world, the dispensation of punishment is reserved for judicial tribunals. Not so in the military justice systems of the United States and other nations. There, nonlawyer military leaders administer so-called “nonjudicial punishment” to address minor offenses in the ranks. Nonjudicial punishment, despite a long and sometimes bloody history, has survived efforts to modernize military justice. In fact, it has flourished: today it is the predominant form of military justice in the United States, outnumbering courts-martial nearly twenty to one. This Article analyzes the features and purposes of this unique punishment regime. The Article argues that nonjudicial punishment …

Brief Of Amici Curiae - Sissel V. Wormuth, Frank Rosenblatt, Eugene R. Fidell

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

Brief Of War Powers Scholars As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioner - Torres V Texas Dps, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

Congress’ war powers are, and always have been, both great and vast. To say this is not to elide the fundamental principle of our constitutional system that the federal government is one of only limited, enumerated powers. In most respects, the federal government’s powers are indeed less capacious than the police powers enjoyed by the several states. But things are different when it comes to war. War is what made, and remade, the Nation. Without the ability to wage war effectively, the Nation could not endure.

Action Pénale Et Action Disciplinaire: The Origins And Current Activities Of The Criminal And Disciplinary Law Committee Of The International Society For Military Law And The Law Of War, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

The pinnacle events of the International Society for Military Law and the Law of War (ISMLLW, or Society) are the Congresses. Occurring triennially, the Congresses are the Society’s largest meetings and academic exchanges. The Congresses usually attract hundreds of participants – especially military legal officers, academics, and government officials – from countries around the world. The Congresses, more than any other fora, have grown to become the places to ‘see and be seen’ and to exchange ideas on military law and the law of war.

Understating The Double-Standard On The Use Of Force, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

In the days following the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, (1) international law organization leaders issued unprecedented statements of condemnation. (2) No other world event has led to so many consistent expressions from these groups respecting a violation of international law. The occasion merited the response. Russia's invasion was only the second time a member of the United Nations has attempted to conquer and eliminate another UN member since the adoption of the UN Charter in 1945. The first time was in August 1990, when Iraq invaded Kuwait. (3) At that time, the world …

March To Justice, Frank Rosenblatt, Navdeep Singh

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

El Dilema Democrático De La Refrendación Directa De Los Acuerdos De Paz [The Democratic Dilemma Of The Popular Ratification Of Peace Agreements], Jorge Luis Fabra-Zamora

Journal Articles

En este ensayo se explora el “dilema democrático” que surge en la refrendación directa de los acuerdos de paz, es decir, en las consultas adelantadas para que la ciudadanía apruebe o rechace el convenio alcanzado por las partes para la terminación de un conflicto. El dilema presenta dos cuernos, por un lado, es necesario que la comunidad afectada por el acuerdo lo refrende para su legitimidad y viabilidad, y por el otro lado, que los mecanismos democráticos de consulta directa tienen serias dificultades para adelantar tal refrendación. El objetivo principal de este estudio es proporcionar una caracterización del dilema que …

China's Maritime Law Enforcement Activities In The South China Sea, Diane Desierto

Journal Articles

China, one of the territorial and maritime claimants of the South China Sea, declared in April 2020 that it had created two new administrative districts in the South China Sea:

Xisha district, covering the Paracel Islands and Macclesfield Bank, and Nansha district covering the Spartly [sic] Islands .... The new administrative districts are to be under the authority of the local government in Sansha, a city located on Woody Island which is administratively part of Hainan province. The Xisha district will be based in Sansha while the Nansha district will operate from Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratlys.

Sansha City …

Preliminary Hearings In The United States Military, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

In the United States military justice system, cases cannot proceed to the most serious criminal forum, the general court-martial, unless they are first subject to a preliminary hearing pursuant to Article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).2 Given its status as a jurisdictional threshold, Article 32 plays a consequential role in shaping which cases go forward to trial and which ones fall by the wayside to lesser forms of disposition

Preliminary Examination In The United States Military: Quality Control And Reform, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

This chapter considers the process of preliminary examination used by the United States (‘US’) military during its extended missions in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001.

The Internationalists: How A Radical Plan To Outlaw War Remade The World, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

Mary Ellen O'Connell researches and writes in the areas of international law and the use of force and international legal theory. She provides a thorough review of The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World, Oona A. Hathaway and Scott J. Shapiro (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2017), wherein the authors investigate the investigate the history, nature, and impact of the international legal prohibition on the use of force, focusing on the Kellogg-Briand Pact.

Why Federal Courts Apply The Law Of Nations Even Though It Is Not The Supreme Law Of The Land, Anthony J. Bellia Jr., Bradford R. Clark

Journal Articles

We are grateful to the judges and scholars who participated in this Symposium examining our book, The Law of Nations and the United States Constitution. One of our goals in writing this book was to reinvigorate and advance the debate over the role of customary international law in U.S. courts. The papers in this Symposium advance this debate by deepening understandings of how the Constitution interacts with customary international law. Our goal in this Article is to address two questions raised by this Symposium that go to the heart of the status of the law of nations under the Constitution. …

"Other Than Honorable" Discrimination, Marcy L. Karin

Journal Articles

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) is the most comprehensive federal civil rights law that exists related to the workplace. Its goal is to help people who serve in the military reintegrate back into civilian work and remain attached to the workforce. It does so by offering a mix of anti-discrimination protection and labor standards. Despite the promise of robust reemployment rights and post-service assistance, Congress has excluded people with a certain “character of service,” including those with “other than honorable” separations, from these protections. This statutory exclusion has a disparate impact on people with service-connected disabilities, …

Interpreting Force Authorization, Scott Sullivan

Journal Articles

This Article presents a theory of authorizations for the use of military force (AUMFs) that reconciles separation of power failures in the current interpretive model. Existing doctrine applies the same text-driven models of statutory interpretation to AUMFs that are utilized with all other legal instruments. However, the conditions at birth, objectives, and expected impacts underlying military force authorizations differ dramatically from typical legislation. AUMFs are focused but temporary corrective interventions intended to change the underlying facts that prompted their passage. This Article examines historical practice and utilizes institutionalist principles to develop a theory of AUMF decay that eschews text in …

Awakening Self-Interest: American Military Justice In Afghanistan And Iraq, Frank Rosenblatt

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.

21st Century Arms Control Challenges: Drones, Cyber Weapons, Killer Robots, And Wmds, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

The world faces tough arms control challenges from preventing the development and use of weapons of mass destruction to regulating the new weapons of the computer revolution. This article considers what works in arms control. Using military force in violation of international law to destroy nuclear facilities, to stop weapons shipments, or to punish the use of prohibited weapons typically fails. Diplomacy paired with lawful counter-measures has the superior track record. Reviving the art of diplomacy and re-committing to authentic international law will pay dividends in peace and security.

The Just War Tradition And International Law Against War: The Myth Of Discordant Doctrines, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

The international law regulating resort to armed force, still known by the Latin phrase, the jus ad bellum, forms a principal substantive subfield of international law, along with human rights law, international environmental law, and international economic law. Among theologians, philosophers, and political scientists, just war theory is a major topic of study. Nevertheless, only a minority of scholars and practitioners know both jus ad bellum and just war theory well. Lack of knowledge has led to the erroneous view that the two areas are in conflict. This article responds to this misapprehension, explaining the deep compatibility of international law …