Military, War, and Peace Commons^™

Mos Americanus Or Common Law In Partibus Infidelium, Peter Goodrich

Articles

No abstract provided.

Contested Spaces During Transition: Regime Change In Myanmar And Its Implications For Women, Amy Barrow

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

This article examines recent political and legal developments in Myanmar to promote and protect Buddhism and their implications for women. Myanmar is currently undergoing political regime change. While periods of transition often present an opportunity to contest stereotypical gender roles and discriminatory cultural practices, a rise in Buddhist ethno-nationalism risks undermining women's "spaces" in society. Drawing on qualitative research interviews with members of civil society and other actors in Yangon, this article discusses the accelerated development of laws on the protection of race and religion alongside the parallel development of Myanmar's first law specifically addressing violence against women, to explore …

Panel Ii: Balancing National Security And Transparency In Government Data Collection, Nate Cardozo, Mariko Hirose, Jonathan Manes, Ira Rubinstein, Christopher Wolf

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Using Force Against The "Weapons Of The Weak": Examining A Chemical-Biological Weapons Usage Criterion For Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention Under The Responsibility To Protect, Andrew M. Bell

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The civil war in Syria has demonstrated the international community's inability to act to protect civilians caught in mass atrocities during cases of U.N. Security Council deadlock, with permanent member vetoes presenting a significant legal obstacle to international humanitarian intervention.

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) construct, created in response to the NATO intervention in Kosovo, was originally designed to overcome such Security Council paralysis by transforming the debate from the "right" of states to intervene to the "responsibility" of the entire international community to protect civilians as well as open the door to legitimate unilateral humanitarian intervention in cases of …

From Villa Grimaldi To Guantánamo Bay: Remedying Human Rights Abuses In Chile And The United States, Nadia Shamsi

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the effectiveness of transitional justice mechanisms in addressing human rights abuses, using Chile's experience under Augusto Pinochet as a model. It critiques the U.S. for failing to adopt similar approaches to accountability, particularly in addressing abuses at Guantanamo Bay and other detention centers. The analysis highlights the importance of combining truth commissions, criminal prosecutions, and reparations to achieve justice and promote democratic transition. It argues that the U.S. must align its domestic practices with the international human rights standards it promotes.

Torture Warrants, Self-Defense, And Necessity, Fritz Allhoff

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines four potential legal justifications for interrogational torture—civil disobedience, torture warrants, self-defense, and necessity defense. It argues that the necessity defense is the most appropriate legal framework for justifying torture in extreme scenarios, such as the "ticking timebomb" case, while emphasizing that legal justifications do not equate to moral endorsement. The analysis critiques other mechanisms, like torture warrants, for their potential to facilitate abuse, and highlights the necessity defense's ability to balance accountability and extreme exigency.

The Political Question Doctrine In Private Military Company Liability Cases: Defining Claims To Ensure Accountability, Joelle D. Keypour

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that the political question doctrine should be narrowly applied to private military companies (PMCs) to ensure accountability while preserving the separation of powers. It critiques the inconsistent application of the Baker v. Carr six-factor test in PMC cases, which often shields these entities from liability. The proposed solution is a dual classification system for claims—distinguishing between commercial-related and combat-related activities—to provide clarity and prevent abuse of the doctrine. This approach aims to balance judicial oversight with respect for executive authority in sensitive military matters.

Contested States And The Rights And Obligations Of The Jus Ad Bellum, Christian Henderson

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the rights and obligations of contested states under the jus ad bellum, arguing that these entities, despite lacking widespread recognition as states, should be considered international legal persons. It challenges the traditional state-only conception of international personality and advocates for a recognition-based approach, which would extend the prohibition of the use of force and the right to self-defense to contested states. The analysis highlights the complexities and contradictions in applying these principles, particularly regarding collective self-defense, and suggests that a pragmatic interpretation could balance international peace and security with the legal protection of contested states.

The Bush Administration And The Office Of Legal Counsel (Olc) Torture Memos: A Content Analysis Of The Response Of The Academic Legal Community, Arthur H. Garrison

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article critically examines the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) torture memos authored by John Yoo and Jay Bybee in 2002, which were intended to justify interrogation techniques such as waterboarding post-9/11. These memos have been widely criticized for undermining human rights and international law, and for compromising the OLC's role in providing impartial legal advice. The memos' perceived advocacy for White House policies rather than objective analysis led to ethical breaches and procedural shortcomings, ultimately resulting in their withdrawal. The article emphasizes the crucial role of ethical standards and independence in legal institutions to prevent such abuses and maintain …

Revisiting "Special Needs" Theory Via Airport Searches, Alexander A. Reinert

Articles

Controversy has raged since the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) introduced Advanced Imaging Technology, capable of producing detailed images of travelers' bodies, and "enhanced" pat frisks as part of everyday airport travel. In the face of challenges in the courts and in public discourse, the TSA has justified the heightened security measures as a necessary means to prevent terrorist attacks. The purpose of this Essay is to situate the Fourth Amendment implications of the new regime within a broader historical context. Most germane, after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) introduced sweeping new screening of air travelers in the 1960s and 1970s …

Heroism, Valor, And Deceit: False Claims Of Military Awards And The First Amendment, Robert J. Juge Iii

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

Rick Duncan always wanted to serve his country. His military career started at the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis. As a Marine Corps Captain, he served with distinction as a Nuclear Missile Launch Officer. Serving at the Pentagon during the 9/11 attacks, he quickly volunteered for a combat tour in Iraq. While commanding a Marine Battalion in Fallujah, he was struck by a roadside bomb, which resulted in permanent brain trauma and cost him his finger, forcing him to return home. After receiving a Silver Star and a Purple Heart for his gallantry, he refused to give up. If …

From Start To Finish: A Historical Review Of Nuclear Arms Control Treaties And Starting Over With The New Start, Lisa M. Schenck, Robert A. Youmans

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Defending America Against Chinese Cyber Espionage Through The Use Of Active Defenses, Alexander Melnitzky

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that cyber espionage, particularly by China, poses a significant threat to U.S. national security and should be treated as a national security issue rather than solely a criminal matter. It advocates for the use of active defenses as a legal and justified response, asserting that such measures align with international law and the principles of jus ad bellum and jus in bello.

Beyond Foreign Policy: A Fresh Look At Cross-Cultural Negotiations And Dispute Resolution Based On The India-United States Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations, Sukhsimranjit Singh

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This paper has three goals: first, to study the negotiation of CTBT from Indian and U.S. perspectives; second, to analyze the influence of culture on the processes and outcomes of nuclear negotiations; and third, to provide an approach that would have produced a better result in the CTBT negotiations, and which could be used with more success in future bilateral and multi-lateral negotiations. The approach and lessons from my analysis can also be applied towards other cross-cultural disputes, especially to those that involve national culture. I conclude that the CTBT negotiation between India and the U.S. (among other nations) was …

Revisiting Single Color Trademarks In Fashion After Louboutin, Danielle E. Gorman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Protecting Single Color Trademarks In Fashion After Louboutin, Danielle E. Gorman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Stealing Bacardi's Thunder: Why The Patent And Trademark Office Should Stop Registering Stolen Trademarks Now, Sarah L. Farhadian

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Copyright Law And The Management Of J.D. Salinger's Literary Estate, Kate O'Neill

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Have Truth And Reconciliation Commissions Helped Remediate Human Rights Violations Against Women? A Feminist Analysis Of The Past And Formula For The Future, Margaret (Peggy) Maisel

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article argues that Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRCs) have largely failed to adequately address human rights violations against women due to their male-centered frameworks, which prioritize public sphere violations over private sphere abuses. While some TRCs, such as those in Sierra Leone and Peru, have made strides in incorporating gender considerations, others, like the South African TRC, have excluded women's experiences, perpetuating gender inequality. The article advocates for a gender-inclusive approach to ensure women's voices and violations are integral to reconciliation processes, emphasizing the need to address both civil-political and economic-social rights.

The Kiyemba Paradox: Creating A Judicial Framework To Eradicate Indefinite, Unlawful Executive Detentions, Samuel Chow

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the Supreme Court's evolving role in reviewing detentions related to national security, particularly focusing on the writ of habeas corpus. It argues that while the Court has expanded habeas protections, significant limitations remain, especially in ordering release into the United States. The author contends that for habeas to be meaningful, courts must have the authority to grant "functional release," balancing individual liberty against executive powers. The analysis highlights key cases like Boumediene v. Bush, Munaf v. Geren, and Kiyemba v. Obama, which reveal the challenges in preventing indefinite detentions and the need for clearer …

Child Soldiers And The Duty Of Nations To Protect Children From Participation In Armed Conflict, Luz E. Nagle

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article advocates for enhanced international cooperation and stricter enforcement mechanisms to protect child soldiers, emphasizing the need to address both legal and societal challenges to end their exploitation in conflicts.

Occupied Or Not: The Question Of Gaza's Legal Status After The Israeli Disengagement, Solon Solomon

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

In September 2005, Israel withdrew its army and dismantled all of its settlements in the Gaza Strip, claiming that Gaza's occupation had come to an end. Yet Israel did retain control over Gaza's border crossings, aerial and water space; leading to claims by the Palestinian side as well as some international scholars that the Israeli occupation had not come to an end. The following note will examine these arguments and will take the position that the current status of the Gaza Strip is a sui generis one, where positive law, applied in globo, cannot provide an adequate approach. As …

Can We Find And Stop The "Jihad Janes"?, Diane Webber

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the challenges faced by the United States and the United Kingdom in identifying and preventing homegrown terrorism, despite their advanced surveillance tools and legal frameworks. It highlights the limitations of current surveillance laws, such as the gap in U.S. Title III law, and the need for a more preventive approach to counterterrorism. The analysis underscores the tension between privacy rights and national security, emphasizing the difficulty in balancing these interests effectively.

A Lesson From The Holocaust Restitution Movement For Armenians: Generate Momentum To Secure Restitution, Vartges Saroyan

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note proceeds in five parts. Part I provides a historical background of the events prior to and during the Armenian Genocide, and the claims arising out of the Genocide. Part II discusses the status of Genocide restitution and the roadblocks that continue to prevent widespread recovery. Part III explains the timeline of the Holocaust restitution movement and how advocates for restitution were finally able to have some success. Part IV proposes that Genocide-era claims be sought not only by filing lawsuits, but also by creating momentum through negotiation and other principles of ADR. Part V concludes by reiterating the …

Comparison And Analysis Of Korea And Japan Status Of Forces Agreements And Their Implications For Iraq's Sofa, Jiyoung Cha

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note examines the tension between protecting U.S. military personnel's rights and respecting host nations' sovereignty through Status of Forces Agreements (SOFAs), focusing on cases from Korea, Japan, and Iraq. It argues that while SOFAs are designed to protect U.S. soldiers, they often infringe on host countries' sovereignty, leading to diplomatic tensions. The analysis highlights the imbalance in SOFAs, favoring the U.S. and undermining host nations' sovereignty, as perceived by citizens and governments. The author suggests that the U.S. needs to adjust its SOFA approach to avoid diplomatic tensions, recommending a more balanced jurisdictional framework.

Why Do States That Oppose Nuclear Proliferation Resist New Nonproliferation Obligations?: Three Logics Of Nonproliferation Decision-Making, Andrew Grotto

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

Why do states that oppose nuclear proliferation resist initiatives to strengthen the nonproliferation regime? There is virtually universal support for the basic principle of nonproliferation - all countries but four are states-party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Yet enthusiasm among NPT parties for proposals to strengthen the nonproliferation regime varies widely even as new challenges highlight dangerous gaps in the regime.

There is something approaching consensus among scholars and policy-makers that many states resist proposals to strengthen the nonproliferation end of the NPT bargain largely because America and other nuclear-weapon states haven't made satisfactory progress towards nuclear disarmament. I suggest …

War, Peace, And The Landscape Of The Inka Heartland, Terence N. D'Altroy, Darryl A. Wilkinson

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that the conservation of cultural heritage in the Inka imperial heartland must move beyond the protection of discrete archaeological sites to encompass the broader landscape, which includes intangible elements such as social memory, power dynamics, and historical narratives. The authors advocate for a holistic approach to heritage management that integrates the physical environment with the cultural and historical contexts that give landscapes their significance.

A License To Kill: America's Balance Of War Powers And The Flaws Of The War Powers Resolution, Michael Mandel

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The War Powers Resolution, enacted to balance executive and legislative war powers, has struggled with effectiveness due to judicial non-intervention and executive discretion, as seen in cases like Crockett v. Reagan and deployments such as Grenada, highlighting the need for reform.

From The Chair, Lela P. Love

Articles

No abstract provided.

Evidence Gained From Torture: Wishful Thinking, Checkability, And Extreme Circumstances, James Franklin

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article argues that while torture is morally abhorrent, its effectiveness in extracting reliable information should be evaluated separately from ethical considerations. It contends that torture can yield reliable information when the extracted details can be independently verified, challenging the common assumption that torture universally leads to false confessions. The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the factual reliability of torture-derived evidence before addressing its legal admissibility.