Military, War, and Peace Commons^™

The New Civil Disturbance Regulations: The Threat Of Military Intervention, David E. Engdahl

Indiana Law Journal

SYMPOSIUM:

The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls

The Control Of Military Organizations In A Democratic Society: Some Thoughts Concerning The Role Of Social Scientists, Maurice Garnier

Indiana Law Journal

SYMPOSIUM:

The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls

The New "Problem Soldier"- Dissenter In The Ranks, Howard J. De Nike

Indiana Law Journal

SYMPOSIUM:

The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls

No Tunes Of Glory: America's Military In The Aftermath Of Vietnam (Seven Book Reviews), John P. Lovell

Indiana Law Journal

Seven book reviews from the symposium, The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls.

Reflections On The Senate Investigation Of Army Surveillance, Lawrence M. Baskir

Indiana Law Journal

SYMPOSIUM:

The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls

Civilian Control: New Perspectives For New Problems, Adam Yarmolinsky

Indiana Law Journal

SYMPOSIUM:

The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls

Legal Inadequacies And Doctrinal Restraints In Controlling The Military, Edward F. Sherman

Indiana Law Journal

SYMPOSIUM:

The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls

"Time Of War" And The War Powers Resolution, Terry Moorehead Dworkin

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Book Review. A Special Kind Of Justice, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

America And Reconsruction, Thomas B. Grier

IUSTITIA

Reconstruction has variously been termed "repressive. . . uncivilized" and "a sordid time" as well as "a noble experiment." Reflected in those judgments of the era is the dispute over the effects of Reconstruction. To be more correct, one might say that there has been much conjecture in determining what, in fact, Reconstruction was. Questioned also has been the role of the black man during the period; much of what he did, or was responsible for, has, like Reconstruction itself, been subject to many and varied accounts and evaluations. The intent of this paper is to examine several volumes concerned …

Military Justice Without Military Control, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Military Juries: Constitutional Analysis And The Need For Reform, Joseph Remcho

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Constitutionality Of Direct Federal Military Conscription, Harrop A. Freeman

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Congressional Proposals For Reform Of Military Law, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

The current political and constitutional controversy surrounding military justice has resulted in considerable legislative activity. In the following article, Professor Sherman compares the Bayh, Bennett, Hatfield, Price, and Whalen proposed amendments to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and offers his assessment of the need for change.

The Military Courts And Servicemen's First Amendment Rights, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Welsh Reaffirms Seeger: From A Remarkable Feat Of Judicial Surgery To A Lobotomy, Theodore F. Denno

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Public Employment, Antiwar Protest And Preinduction Review, Robert M. O'Neil

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Nonproliferation Treaty And Peaceful Uses Of Nuclear Explosives, Thomas Ehrlich

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Civilianization Of Military Law, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Judicial Review Of Military Determinations And The Exhaustion Of Remedies Requirement, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Review Of Selective Service Reclassifications, Robert M. O'Neil

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Harvey Says Military Draft To Cut Enrollment

William Harvey (1966-1971)

No abstract provided.

The Right To Competent Counsel In Special Courts Martial, Edward F. Sherman

Articles by Maurer Faculty

The special court martial is the intermediate court of the Armed Forces, with jurisdiction over any noncapital offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Counsel in special court martial cases need not be lawyers, and in fact few of them are in special courts martial of the Army and the Navy. Mr. Sherman argues that the time has come to change this practice and ensure that servicemen are always represented by competent lawyers at such trials.

Report On The Military Rule And The Greek Universities, A. A. Fatouros

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Veterans' Benefits, Judicial Review, And The Constitutional Problems Of Positive Government, Frederick Davis

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutionality Of Special Military Court-Martial Where Defense Counsel Is Not A Lawyer (Recent Developments), John T. Baker

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The War Crimes Trial: A Second Look, Robert L. Birmingham

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Surprise Attack: Crime At Pearl Harbor And Now, James J. Robinson

Articles by Maurer Faculty

In this issue, one of the United States Counsel at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial examines the legal and historical background of that trial which took place in Japan following World War II. Judge Robinson centers his discussion around the little-known provisions of the Convention Relative to the Opening of Hostilities, which was signed at The Hague in 1907. One of the primary purposes of that convention was to outlaw surprise attack such as that committed by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor. The first part of Judge Robinson's article appears in this issue; the second and concluding portion will be …

Man, The State And War, By Kenneth N. Waltz, Francis J. Schneider

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Surprise Attack: Crime At Pearl Harbor And Now (Part Ii), James J. Robinson

Articles by Maurer Faculty

This is the concluding portion of Judge Robinson's discussion of the Convention Relative to the Opening of Hostilities, signed at The Hague in 1907 (the "Third Hague Convention"), and its impact upon the 1948 Tokyo war crimes trial. Judge Robinson was United States counsel and naval legal officer in charge of the Pearl Harbor phase and other parts of the Tokyo trial. The first portion of his article appeared in the September issue of the Journal, beginning at page 973.