Military, War, and Peace Commons^™

Book Review Of The Law Of War, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

International Law And The United States' Air Operation Against Libya, Christopher J. Greenwood

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Helping Those Who Help The Sojourner Among Us: Viable Defenses For Members Of The Sanctuary Movement, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 135 (1987), Barbara A. Sherry

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of The Palestine Problem In International Law And World Order, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Judicial Failure To Enforce Human Rights Legislation: An Alternative Analysis Of Crockett V. Reagan, Mark P. Gibney

NYLS Journal of Human Rights

No abstract provided.

Conscientious Objection To Service In The South African Defence Force As A Ground For Political Asylum In The United States, Dominic Holzhaus

NYLS Journal of Human Rights

No abstract provided.

Banning The Bomb: Law And Its Limits, Lori Fisler Damrosch

Faculty Scholarship

We can all agree with the contributors to this volume that nuclear weapons present the threat of unimaginable devastation that could bring an end to civilization and even to life on this planet. The grim calculations and stark images come back again and again, but they cannot be repeated too often: over 50,000 weapons in the United States and Soviet arsenals, each with a destructive force dwarfing the explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki; radiation effects producing indescribable suffering and death; environmental damage that defies quantification or prediction; the specter of nuclear winter rendering the earth uninhabitable. No rational being can …

Collective Security Treaties And The Ability Of Allies To Limit The Movement Of United States' Military Forces - New Zealand's Nuclear Ban, Ricky K. Jones

Penn State International Law Review (1982 - 2011)

Using the ANZUS Treaty as an example, this comment will determine the extent of a state's ability to limit the movements of the military forces of an ally in the face of a collective security agreement that appears to contemplate the mobilization of military forces in preparation for the exercise of the defensive rights of both the state and the ally. The comment will begin by giving some background on the general nature of collective security treaties. It will also describe the events that led up to the signing of the ANZUS Treaty. In the next section the rules of …

The Kahan Report, Ariel Sharon And The Sabra-Shatilla Massacres In Lebanon: Responsibility Under International Law For Massacres Of Civilian Populations, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Action Specific Human Rights Legislation For El Salvador, Kenneth Anderson

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

This law journal note dating from the Central American civil wars of the 1980's discusses ways in which the US Congress could impose detailed action requirements related to human rights as a condition of continuing US military assistance to the government of El Salvador.

The Christian Peace Ethic And The Doctrine Of Just War From The Point Of View Of International Law, Jost Delbruck, Klaus Dicke

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Soviet Prisoners In The Afghan Conflict, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

The Crisis In Arms Control, Harold K. Jacobson

Michigan Law Review

There is general agreement among observers of contemporary international affairs, and national and international officials from all sides, that there is a serious crisis in arms control. As of January 1984, the Soviet Union had broken off two major arms control negotiations: the Intermediate- Range Nuclear Force Talks (INF) and the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START). Negotiations in the United Nations Conference on Disarmament (CD) on a variety of arms control issues were stalemated. The United States was engaged in a large-scale military build up, and there was no sign that the Soviet Union would abate the extensive military programs …

The Right Of States To Use Armed Force, Oscar Schachter

Michigan Law Review

When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. States accepted the obligation to settle all disputes by peaceful means and to refrain from the use or threat of use of force in their international relations. Only two exceptions were expressly allowed: force used in self-defense when an armed attack occurs, and armed action authorized by the UN Security Council as an enforcement measure. These provisions were seen by most observers as the heart of the Charter. and the most important principles of contemporary international law. They have been reaffirmed over and over …

Human Rights In The Middle East, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Arab-Israeli Conflict, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Bravo's Fallout: International Law And Nuclear Pollution In The Pacific, Seth Forman

North Carolina Central Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ironies Of Intervention, Milner S. Ball

Scholarly Works

I have detected in our deliberations this afternoon two ironies. The first is this: the dissentient receive more protection as enemies than as citizens. As we have heard today, there is greater opportunity for the assimilation of humanitarian law if the sides engaged in internal conflict are regarded as combatants and not as fellow citizens. With the application of the law of armed conflict comes the prospect that the opponents may observe some degree of mutual respect. Such dignity as the law accords thus becomes a function of formalized hostility rather than of civil affection, of open distrust rather than …

A Message Of Hope, Dean Rusk

Scholarly Works

So I would hope, based upon the extraordinarily interesting discussion that we have had here during this Colloquium, that we try to follow it up a bit and not be too discouraged about the modesty of certain things that might be done, but see if we cannot find some way to encapsulate, surround, isolate these internal violence situations so that they do not contribute to those great struggles which could end us all.

Introduction To Panel I, Gabriel M. Wilner

Scholarly Works

The work of this panel is to sort out the theories and arguments on the obligations of individual states, as distinguished from the international or regional community of states acting under the rules of an international organization, in dealing with internal conflicts in other states. Are states assisted in determining their obligations by existing standards of international law? The panel will wish to address itself to the central question of the content of international law standards on intervention. In doing so it may also wish to offer some definition of "internal conflict" and discuss the ramifications of the passage from …

Gradations Of Intervention In Internal Conflicts, Louis B. Sohn

Scholarly Works

I promised to suggest a definition. It is a very modest one, simply trying to apply the language of article 51 of the Charter about self-defense to the problem of military intervention. It might be desirable to have at least a rule which would say: "No military invention by one state in the internal armed conflicts in another state is permissible except in an extreme emergency requiring instant response and subject to imimediate termination of such emergency action on the request of the United Nations or an appropriate regional organization."

Introduction To Panel Iii: Regional And Other International Organizations Responses To Internal Conflict, Louis B. Sohn

Scholarly Works

The United Nations has been trying to do three different things. First, the United Nations had to develop the basic principles of intervention. Most of them were borrowed from the Charter of the Organization of American States, especially those on intervention, but they went much further concerning the limitations on help to guerrillas and the problems of interference by various means. The United Nations Declaration on Friendly Relations, the Declaration on Inadmissibility of Intervention, and several other documents have been broadening or clarifying the law on the subject over the last 20 years. Second, as noted previously, the United Nations …

Chemical And Biological Warfare: Focus On Asia, Lee D. Klein

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Note concludes that (1) the Geneva Protocol of 1925 and the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972 provide conventional restraints upon the use of lethal or seriously injurious CBWs; (2) modern treaties, customs, judicial decisions, and writings form a public international law norm that imposes a legal restraint limiting the use of lethal or seriously injurious CBWs and binding all states regardless of their acceptance of conventional prohibitions; and (3) the law of war today is characterized more accurately as the "law of armed conflict," because it must of necessity apply to conflicts that are not purely interstate. Before discussing …

The Freedom Of Civilians Of Enemy Nationality To Depart From Territory Controlled By A Hostile Belligerent, Walter L. Williams Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Command Criminal Responsibility: A Plea For A Workable Standard, William G. Eckhardt

Faculty Works

A major revision of the law of war is in process. The unusual timing of historical and political events requires Americans to seek a practical articulation of the standard of behavior expected of their combat commanders. The purpose of this article is to constructively participate in that search.

The cornerstone of military professionalism is professional conduct on the battlefield. The articulation of that professional conduct, in addition to underscoring the legitimacy of the honorable profession of arms, would shield commanders from untutored, politically motivated allega­tions of war crimes and, more importantly, would allow the teaching of expected conduct and thus …

The Israeli Aerial Attack Of June 7, 1981 Upon The Iraqi Nuclear Reactor: Aggression Or Self-Defense?, W. Thomas Mallison, Sally V. Mallison

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

On June 7, 1981, the State of Israel conducted an aerial attack on the Iraqi nuclear reactor known as Tamuz I located near Baghdad. The attack was carried out by F15 and F16 aircraft supplied by the United States. The reactor was damaged severely and three Iraqi civilians and one French technician were killed. On June 8 Israel announced the attack and described it as an act of legitimate self-defense, claiming Iraq planned to construct nuclear weapons. On the same day the Republic of Iraq requested an urgent meeting of the United Nations Security Council to consider what it described …

International Traffic In Arms -- Legal And Political Aspects Of A Long Neglected Problem Of Arms Control And Disarmament, Jost Delbruck

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Marine Mineral Resources: National Security And National Jurisdiction, Robert A. Frosch

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Yamashita, Nuremberg And Vietnam: Command Responsibility Reappraised, Franklin A. Hart

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

The Position Of Individuals In International Law, Herbert W. Briggs

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.