Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (84)
- Health Law and Policy (63)
- Litigation (31)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (14)
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (12)
- Evidence (10)
- Legal Remedies (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Courts (7)
- European Law (7)
- Insurance Law (7)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Legislation (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Civil Law (4)
- Health and Medical Administration (4)
- Medical Specialties (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- International Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Public Health (3)
- Asian Studies (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Institution
-
- Cleveland State University (22)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (21)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (16)
- West Virginia University (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
-
- Pepperdine University (9)
- The University of Akron (9)
- University of Maine School of Law (8)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Southern Methodist University (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Association of American Law Schools (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- Singapore Management University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cleveland State Law Review (18)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (16)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (15)
- West Virginia Law Review (12)
- Akron Law Review (9)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Maine Law Review (8)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (6)
- Articles (5)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (5)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (5)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Florida State University Law Review (3)
- Journal of Law and Health (3)
- Maryland Law Review (3)
- Oklahoma Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Journal of Legal Education (2)
- Louisiana Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 198 of 198
Full-Text Articles in Medical Jurisprudence
Res Ipsa Loquitur In Medical Malpractice, Rudolf F. Binder
Res Ipsa Loquitur In Medical Malpractice, Rudolf F. Binder
Cleveland State Law Review
The "Cloak of Protection encompassing the physician in the practice of his profession" is no longer to be taken for granted. Recent decisions in Alaska, California, Louisiana, Oregon, and Wisconsin have swept aside the traditional limitations in the use of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. They impose all but strict liability upon the medical profession for mistakes occurring during treatment or surgery.
Torts--Effect Of A Release Of An Original Tort Feasor Upon The Malpractice Of Attending Physician, Louis S. Southworth Ii
Torts--Effect Of A Release Of An Original Tort Feasor Upon The Malpractice Of Attending Physician, Louis S. Southworth Ii
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evidence--Medical Malpractice--Expert Testimony Of Defendant Physician When Called As Adverse Witness, K. Paul Davis
Evidence--Medical Malpractice--Expert Testimony Of Defendant Physician When Called As Adverse Witness, K. Paul Davis
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Statutes Of Limitations And Undiscovered Malpractice, Stanley Sacks
Statutes Of Limitations And Undiscovered Malpractice, Stanley Sacks
Cleveland State Law Review
A number of general legal problems have arisen out of malpractice actions and applicable statutes of limitations. Thus, the fact that there is a choice as to which event starts limitations running against the malpractice actions, either the physician's wrongful act or omission, or when such act or omission resulted in injury, is as naturally susceptible of varying judicial interpretation as the myriad of other legal situations. The situation that too often fosters injustice and thereby demands immediate and appropriate action, whether legislative or judicial, is that predicament where the wrongful act of a medical practitioner results in injury, but …
The Conspiracy Of Silence: Physician's View, Carl E. Wasmuth
The Conspiracy Of Silence: Physician's View, Carl E. Wasmuth
Cleveland State Law Review
To many a physican, law suits, courts, and occasionally law- yers themselves are anathema. Schooled in the sciences, his life is dedicated to the practice of medicine. He is a man of conviction and of purpose. He is articulate and even at times loqua- cious. These qualities would lead one to believe that the physician would be well equipped, quite willing, and capable of appearing as an expert witness in a court of law. Quite to the contrary, the physician most generally is unwilling to be a legal witness. In fact, the entire subject of law suits often is repugnant …
How To Handle An Anesthesia Injury Case, Albert Averbach
How To Handle An Anesthesia Injury Case, Albert Averbach
Cleveland State Law Review
The criteria of competence of the trial lawyer handling a medical malpractice case is, does he have at least as much if not more knowledge of the practice and procedure involved in the case than the defendant physician. In no place is this more true than in the field of anesthesiology. This is not, of course, to suggest that the attorney can compete with the physician in practical experience. But, it is to propose that many valid anesthesia malpractice cases result in nonsuits and that plaintiff's verdicts which are overturned on appeal are almost invariably lost due to insufficient evidence, …
Conspiracy Of Silence, Richard M. Markus
Conspiracy Of Silence, Richard M. Markus
Cleveland State Law Review
The requirement that independent expert medical testimony establish the proper standard of care and the defendant's failure to meet that standard imposes an almost insurmountable obstacle in many cases. The so-called conspiracy of silence has been recognized, as a matter of judicial notice, by courts in New Jersey, California, and elsewhere. The use of that phrase to describe the unavailability of medical witnesses has particularly dramatic force which impresses a court and jury. However, no apt phrase could detract from the reality of this practical problem which faces an attorney representing a client seeking damages from a physician for professional …
Is It Error To Discuss Conspiracy Of Silence In A Malpractice Trial, Robert L. Starks
Is It Error To Discuss Conspiracy Of Silence In A Malpractice Trial, Robert L. Starks
Cleveland State Law Review
There is a need in most malpractice suits to impress the jury with the operation and effect of the conspiracy of silence,and in most jurisdictions, to do so would apparently not, and certainly should not, result in reversible error if done in a reasonable and temperate manner.
Statute Of Limitations In Malpractice Actions, Ernest A. Cieslinski
Statute Of Limitations In Malpractice Actions, Ernest A. Cieslinski
Cleveland State Law Review
The ill-treated patient has sought redress for medical malpractice by actions that sound in tort, in contract, or in fraud. As with other actions, the underlying policy of "peace and repose" of all statutes of limitations dictates that these actions be timely. In Ohio, for example, the time limit for an action for malpractice is one year.
Defense Against Res Ipsa In Medical Malpractice, Howard M. Rossen
Defense Against Res Ipsa In Medical Malpractice, Howard M. Rossen
Cleveland State Law Review
In a res ipsa loquitur case the injured party is deemed in no position to explain the cause, while the party charged may begin a position to show himself free from negligence. If the plaintiff has equal or superior means of information, the doctrine does not apply. The question is really one of duty on the part of the defendant. Res ipsa loquitur leads only to a possible (not mandatory) inference that the defendant has not complied with his duty to use skill and care, and is not in itself proof that he was under a specific duty. This question …
Res Ipsa Loquitur In Malpractice Cases In Canada, John H. Harland
Res Ipsa Loquitur In Malpractice Cases In Canada, John H. Harland
Cleveland State Law Review
We do not intend here to advocate or condemn application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in malpractice cases, but simply to indicate the cases where it was or was not applied, relying where possible on direct quotation from the judgments.
Malpractice Used As A Hospital Defense, Carl H. Miller
Malpractice Used As A Hospital Defense, Carl H. Miller
Cleveland State Law Review
Hospital immunity in negligence and other torts of agents and employees is disappearing steadily. The course of decisions in many states has been consistently in the direction of elimination of "charitable" immunity of hospitals. Seeking another line of defense, hospital administrators have re-examined the parties generally involved in a medical negligence action-patient, physician and hospital. Hospital administrators realized quickly that in order to remain free from general negligence liability, the main onus of tort responsibility would have to be shifted to the physician (or even the nurse) whenever and wherever possible.
Torts - Obstruction Of A Civil Action - Coercion By A Medical Association To Preclude Availability Of Expert Testimony In A Medical Malpractice Action, William Y. Webb
Torts - Obstruction Of A Civil Action - Coercion By A Medical Association To Preclude Availability Of Expert Testimony In A Medical Malpractice Action, William Y. Webb
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff approached nine physicians in an attempt to secure an expert witness for a medical malpractice action. All nine refused, allegedly as a result of threats by the county medical association to expel them and cause a cancellation of their malpractice liability insurance if they testified. The association's actions stemmed from a finding by its "malpractice committee" that the malpractice defendant had not been negligent. Plaintiff then brought this action against the association to recover compensatory and punitive damages for obstruction of a civil action. On appeal from an order granting a motion for nonsuit, held, affirmed. No cause …
Modern Techniques In The Preparation And Trial Of A Medical Malpractice Suit, Fitz-Gerald Ames Sr
Modern Techniques In The Preparation And Trial Of A Medical Malpractice Suit, Fitz-Gerald Ames Sr
Vanderbilt Law Review
Though it is true that in malpractice suits more than in any other type of litigation, the plaintiff must have a strong case on the merits, it is equally important and almost a necessity in most malpractice cases that patient's counsel carefully and thoroughly condition the jurors' minds from the very outset to a psychological acceptance of this type of litigation. Far too many veniremen, before they have been selected as trial jurors in a malpractice suit, have the attitude that (1) a "malpractice" suit connotes conduct either criminal, quasi-criminal or unethical on the part of the doctor or hospital; …
Doctor, Lawyer, And Hosptial Administrator: A New Triangle, Howard L. Oleck
Doctor, Lawyer, And Hosptial Administrator: A New Triangle, Howard L. Oleck
Cleveland State Law Review
Hospitals are deeply invovled in the great majority of medicolegal case problems. Yet surprisingly little attention has been given to the relation of the hospital to doctor lawyer-patient situations as a factor in itself. Most discussions of hospitals and law deal generally with hospital liability for negligence of hospital agents-as though the hospital were a monolithic entity in itself. Lawyers seldom look further into the relation of the doctor to the hospital administration and vice versa; deeming this to be a matter of small concern to them. Doctors, of course, know well the importance of hospital politics and procedures to …
Medical Evidence And Testimony, Robert V. Lamppert
Medical Evidence And Testimony, Robert V. Lamppert
Cleveland State Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to explain the various ways in which medicine becomes involved in the law and to point out the problems and difficulties involved. Since this article is written for both medical doctors and attorneys, the detailed explanations and terminology of each profession will necessarily be kept at a basic level. It is hoped that a forthright demonstration of the basic factors involved, along with an attempt to explain the problems complicating the points of controversy and misunderstanding, will help somewhat in creating a better understanding between the two professions and enable them to better …
A Cure For Doctor-Lawyer Frictions, Howard L. Oleck
A Cure For Doctor-Lawyer Frictions, Howard L. Oleck
Cleveland State Law Review
A committee of bar association "elder statesmen," from NACCA, cooperating with a like committee from the major insurance lawyers association, should approach the American Medical Association and suggest appointment of a national committee of doctors and lawyers, to establish mutually approved policies and procedures. Failing action by the most affected personal-injury bar associations, the American Bar Association might be the logical moving force. It already has recommended (in1957) the adoption of the impartial medical expert system used in New York City and Baltimore; but has not managed to effectuate the idea. Either way, the plans for establishing principles of participation …
Court Dictation Of Choice Of Anesthesia, Carl E. Wasmuth
Court Dictation Of Choice Of Anesthesia, Carl E. Wasmuth
Cleveland State Law Review
The Supreme Court of California has extended the interpretation of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in malpractice cases so that the physician must now be nearly a guarantor of results. And a review of a few recent, specific cases involving anesthesia makes it increasingly evident that they may have far-reaching influence on the practice of anesthesiology.