Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legislation Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2015

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 211 - 240 of 371

Full-Text Articles in Legislation

S15rs Sgr No. 20 (Stadium Extension), Joan Lyons, Z Holley, Seth Madden, Jacob Phagan, Renzi Terrebone Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 20 (Stadium Extension), Joan Lyons, Z Holley, Seth Madden, Jacob Phagan, Renzi Terrebone

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 26 (Presidential Primary Debate), Z Faircloth, Dunn, Joan Lyons, Jacob Phagan, Hayden Pizzolato Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 26 (Presidential Primary Debate), Z Faircloth, Dunn, Joan Lyons, Jacob Phagan, Hayden Pizzolato

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 18 (Pre-Law Program), Jacob Phagan Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 18 (Pre-Law Program), Jacob Phagan

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 28 (Saturday Finals), Bopp Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 28 (Saturday Finals), Bopp

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 27 (Gubernatorial Debate), Z Faircloth, Helen Frink, Dunn, Joan Lyons, Jacob Phagan, Hayden Pizzolato, Sonnier Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 27 (Gubernatorial Debate), Z Faircloth, Helen Frink, Dunn, Joan Lyons, Jacob Phagan, Hayden Pizzolato, Sonnier

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 30 (Greek Lot Improvements), Helen Frink, Wells Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 30 (Greek Lot Improvements), Helen Frink, Wells

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 29 (Sle Hazing Education), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 29 (Sle Hazing Education), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 31 (Tennis Court Lot Spots), Belleu, Hayden Pizzolato Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 31 (Tennis Court Lot Spots), Belleu, Hayden Pizzolato

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 32 (Dr. Maccio Thank You), Wesley Gore, Hauth Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 32 (Dr. Maccio Thank You), Wesley Gore, Hauth

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 33 (Dr. Kurpius Thank You), Z Faircloth, Joan Lyons Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 33 (Dr. Kurpius Thank You), Z Faircloth, Joan Lyons

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Sgr No. 34 (Dr. Feduccia Thank You), Zerkus Apr 2015

S15rs Sgr No. 34 (Dr. Feduccia Thank You), Zerkus

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 3 (Murphy/Dunn For Development), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 3 (Murphy/Dunn For Development), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 1 (Sullivan For Secretary), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 1 (Sullivan For Secretary), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 4 (Boudreaux For Sgt. At Arms), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 4 (Boudreaux For Sgt. At Arms), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 2 (Bopp/Petit For Programming), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 2 (Bopp/Petit For Programming), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 6 (Fraenckel For Parliamentarian), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 6 (Fraenckel For Parliamentarian), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 7 (Reapportion), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 7 (Reapportion), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 8 (Z. Holley For Communications), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 8 (Z. Holley For Communications), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 11 (Gahagan For Spab), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 11 (Gahagan For Spab), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


S15rs Lo No. 12 (Gilley For Spab), Adam Grashoff Apr 2015

S15rs Lo No. 12 (Gilley For Spab), Adam Grashoff

Student Senate Enrolled Legislation

No abstract provided.


Reviving Fiscal Citizenship, Ajay K. Mehrotra Apr 2015

Reviving Fiscal Citizenship, Ajay K. Mehrotra

Michigan Law Review

April 15 is a day that most Americans dread. That date is, of course, when federal and nearly all state-level individual income tax returns are due. Agonizing over the filing of income tax returns has long been a perennial part of modern American legal culture. Since the mid-1940s, when the United States first adopted a return-based mass income tax, the vast majority of Americans have been legally required to file an annual Form 1040. Over the years, taxpayers have been complaining about, procrastinating over, and generally loathing the filing of their annual tax returns. Indeed, in recent times, April 15 …


Picking Up The Remnants Post-Waller: Properly Limiting The Scope Of Uneconomic Remnant Claims In Wisconsin Eminent Domain Proceedings, Samuel A. Magnuson Apr 2015

Picking Up The Remnants Post-Waller: Properly Limiting The Scope Of Uneconomic Remnant Claims In Wisconsin Eminent Domain Proceedings, Samuel A. Magnuson

Marquette Law Review

Statutory interpretation often requires a court to review the legislative intent behind the statute. However, this task is not always easily undertaken when the intent of the legislature is itself unclear. A recent Wisconsin Supreme Court case illustrates the difficulty in properly interpreting arguably ambiguous statutory language. Nevertheless, this Comment hopes to demonstrate that by examining the history of remnant theory, it should be clear that uneconomic remnant claims in eminent domain proceedings were intended to be limited to situations where the partial taking creates either a physical remnant or a financial remnant. Furthermore, this Comment argues that the Wisconsin …


Why Can't I Know How The Sausage Is Made?: How Ag-Gag Statutes Threaten Animal Welfare Groups And The First Amendment, Daniel L. Sternberg Apr 2015

Why Can't I Know How The Sausage Is Made?: How Ag-Gag Statutes Threaten Animal Welfare Groups And The First Amendment, Daniel L. Sternberg

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.


Silent Similarity, Jessica D. Litman Apr 2015

Silent Similarity, Jessica D. Litman

Articles

From 1909 to 1930, U.S. courts grappled with claims by authors of prose works claiming that works in a new art form—silent movies—had infringed their copyrights. These cases laid the groundwork for much of modern copyright law, from their broad expansion of the reproduction right, to their puzzled grappling with the question how to compare works in dissimilar media, to their confusion over what sort of evidence should be relevant to show copyrightability, copying and infringement. Some of those cases—in particular, Nichols v. Universal Pictures—are canonical today. They are not, however, well-understood. In particular, the problem at the heart of …


Sox On Fish: A New Harm Of Overcriminalization, Todd Haugh Apr 2015

Sox On Fish: A New Harm Of Overcriminalization, Todd Haugh

Northwestern University Law Review

The harms of overcriminalization are usually thought of in a particular way—that the proliferation of criminal laws leads to increasing and inconsistent criminal enforcement and adjudication. For example, an offender commits an unethical or illegal act and, because of the overwhelming breadth and depth of the criminal law, becomes subject to too much prosecutorial discretion or faces disparate enforcement or punishment. But there is an additional, possibly more pernicious, harm of overcriminalization. Drawing from the fields of criminology and behavioral ethics, this Essay makes the case that overcriminalization actually increases the commission of criminal acts themselves, particularly by white-collar offenders. …


Developments In Family Law In The District Of Columbia: Three Significant Legislative Changes For Child Support, Meridel Bulle-Vu, Tianna Gibbs, Ashley Mcdowell Mar 2015

Developments In Family Law In The District Of Columbia: Three Significant Legislative Changes For Child Support, Meridel Bulle-Vu, Tianna Gibbs, Ashley Mcdowell

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Over the last decade, the District's child support law has changed in three significant ways: (1) by the enactment of a statute that requires sentencing judges to notify obligors of their right to modify or suspend their child support order during incarceration; (2) by the passage of a law that requires the District of Columbia government to distribute up to the first $150 of child support collected each month to custodial parents who receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families(TANF); and (3) by substantial revisions to how child support orders are calculated under the District's Child Support Guideline (the Guideline).1 These …


Lessons Unlearned: The Effects Of Statutory Ambiguity And The Interpretative Uncertainty It Injects In The Courts, Carolyn Singh Mar 2015

Lessons Unlearned: The Effects Of Statutory Ambiguity And The Interpretative Uncertainty It Injects In The Courts, Carolyn Singh

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

For centuries, courts have dealt with the challenge of imposing penalties for crimes when governing law changes. Applying the new provisions can be a straightforward exercise for courts, but when legislatures are ambiguous with regard to which law applies-forexample, to pending cases-the courts are forced to interpret what legislatures intended. For some judges, the answer is easily found in the plain meaning of the text. For others, legislative intent can become the deciding factor. Throughout United States history, this has been a manageable yet controversial task, but aside from interpretive differences among judges, creating laws with uncertainty is a dangerous …


The Struggle To Rise Above The Shadows Before Sunset: A Critical Discussion On The Need To Lift The Expiration And Renewal Requirements Of Daca And Dapa, Anna Oguntimein Mar 2015

The Struggle To Rise Above The Shadows Before Sunset: A Critical Discussion On The Need To Lift The Expiration And Renewal Requirements Of Daca And Dapa, Anna Oguntimein

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Reasoning that judicial economy is best served when a law enforcement agency determines how to expend its limited enforcemen tresources, the Supreme Court has held that the decision to exercise prosecutorial discretion is presumptively unreviewable.1 In the realm of immigration law, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and the recently announced Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) promote the goal of judicial economy by imposing a freeze on the deportation of eligible noncitizens who either entered the United States as children or who have a child who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident …


Next Generation Tanf: Reconceptualizing Public Assistance As A Vehicle For Financial Inclusion, Aleta Sprague Mar 2015

Next Generation Tanf: Reconceptualizing Public Assistance As A Vehicle For Financial Inclusion, Aleta Sprague

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Fifty years into the War on Poverty, the ability to fully participate in American economic life is predicated on access to basic financial services and mechanisms; yet, public programs designed to support the economic advancement of people in poverty often explicitly excludeinte nded beneficiaries from meaningful engagement with financial institutions. To promote economic opportunity for families accessing public assistance, we need policy reforms that both remove access barriers and create entry points to the financial mainstream. Safe and affordable financial products are foundational to financial inclusion. Unbanked and "underbanked" households-the vast majority of which are low-income---often rely on high-cost credit, …


Civil Protection Orders: Increased Access And Narrowed Enforcement, Courtney Cross Mar 2015

Civil Protection Orders: Increased Access And Narrowed Enforcement, Courtney Cross

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

The statute governing civil protection orders in the District of Columbia is the Intrafamily Offenses Act,1 which has been in effect since 1970.2 This statute has been amended frequently over the past 45 years. While some of these changes have been clerical3 or procedural,4 there have also been substantive amendments which, inter alia,significantly expand both who may file for a protection order and what remedies that petitioner may request and receive. Yet this expansion has coincided with an intense scaling back by the judiciary of who can prosecute alleged violations of protection orders. While the statute continues to enable more …