Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Administrative Law (22)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- Courts (20)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Labor and Employment Law (17)
-
- Communications Law (16)
- State and Local Government Law (16)
- Law and Society (14)
- Litigation (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
- Criminal Law (13)
- Food and Drug Law (13)
- Consumer Protection Law (12)
- Health Law and Policy (12)
- Tax Law (12)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (11)
- Business Organizations Law (9)
- International Law (8)
- Judges (8)
- Law and Economics (8)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (8)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Human Rights Law (7)
- Intellectual Property Law (7)
- Law and Gender (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Taxation-State and Local (7)
- Institution
-
- Louisiana State University (68)
- University of Michigan Law School (31)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (18)
- UIC School of Law (15)
- University of Richmond (14)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (11)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (11)
- Florida State University College of Law (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Santa Clara Law (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Keyword
-
- LSU Student Government (46)
- Legislation (24)
- Law reform (16)
- Martin (12)
- Prestridge (12)
-
- Upton (10)
- Amend (9)
- Palermo (9)
- Gammon (8)
- Hanna (8)
- Sellers (8)
- Statutory interpretation (8)
- Amend Rules of Order (7)
- Congress (7)
- Drugs (7)
- Caffarel (6)
- Free (6)
- Rules (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Children (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Liability (5)
- Pharmaceuticals (5)
- Rules of order (5)
- Act (4)
- Amend Bylaws (4)
- Article 3 (4)
- Article iii (4)
- Bonvillain (4)
- Budget (4)
- Publication
-
- Student Senate Enrolled Legislation (68)
- Articles (16)
- UIC Law Review (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (14)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (13)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Scholarly Publications (6)
- NYLS Law Review (5)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (4)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (3)
- Charts and Summaries of State, U.S., and Foreign Laws and Regulations (3)
- Georgetown Law Fiscal Law and Policy Reform Briefing Papers (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Journal Publications (3)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (3)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Publications (2)
- Animal Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 240
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Trustworthiness As A Limitation On Network Neutrality, Aaron J. Burstein, Fred B. Schneider
Trustworthiness As A Limitation On Network Neutrality, Aaron J. Burstein, Fred B. Schneider
Federal Communications Law Journal
The policy debate over how to govern access to broadband networks has largely ignored the objective of network trustworthiness-a set of properties (including security, survivability, and safety) that guarantee expected behavior. Instead, the terms of the network access debate have focused on whether imposing a nondiscrimination or "network neutrality" obligation on network providers is justified by the condition of competition among last-mile providers. Rules proposed by scholars and policymakers would allow network providers to deviate from network neutrality to protect network trustworthiness, but none of these proposals has explored the implications of such exceptions for either neutrality or trustworthiness.
This …
Adaptive Policymaking: Evolving And Applying Emergent Solutions For U.S. Communications Policy, Richard S. Whitt
Adaptive Policymaking: Evolving And Applying Emergent Solutions For U.S. Communications Policy, Richard S. Whitt
Federal Communications Law Journal
This Article presents some specific ways that U.S. policymakers should use teachings from the latest thinking in economics to create a conceptual framework in order to grapple with current controversies in communications law and regulation. First, it provides a brief overview of Emergence Economics, with an emphasis on the "rough formula" of emergence and the unique role of technological change in creating and furthering innovation and economic growth. Second, this paper explicates the general concept of "Adaptive Policymaking" by governments and includes some proposed guiding principles, an outline of the public policy design space, and an adaptive toolkit to be …
Viewpoint Diversity And Media Ownership, C. Edwin Baker
Viewpoint Diversity And Media Ownership, C. Edwin Baker
Federal Communications Law Journal
A recent technically sophisticated study of the impact of media mergers on viewpoint diversity that found the impact is contextually variable should be entirely irrelevant to proper policy debates about regulation of media ownership. This Article examines the real reasons to oppose concentrated ownership and considers how the recent study went wrong.
Restraining False Light: Constitutional And Common Law Limits On A "Troublesome Tort", James B. Lake
Restraining False Light: Constitutional And Common Law Limits On A "Troublesome Tort", James B. Lake
Federal Communications Law Journal
The defamation tort is the common law's established remedy for false speech that causes reputational and emotional injury. That tort is subject to intricate constitutional, legislative, and common law rules that have evolved over decades. The false light invasion of privacy tort also provides a potential cause of action in response to injurious falsehood. False light, however, has been subject to much less judicial and legislative scrutiny than defamation. As a result, courts often are uncertain about the proper limits on false light and, in some cases, have countenanced false light claims that would have failed if filed as defamation …
The Role Of Theory And Evidence In Media Regulation And Law: A Response To Baker And A Defense Of Empirical Legal Studies, Daniel E. Ho, Kevin M. Quinn
The Role Of Theory And Evidence In Media Regulation And Law: A Response To Baker And A Defense Of Empirical Legal Studies, Daniel E. Ho, Kevin M. Quinn
Federal Communications Law Journal
We thank Professor Baker for a stimulating response to an Article in which we offered empirical evidence of editorial viewpoint diversity in the face of media consolidation. We appreciate his praise of the Article as "apply[ing] innovative statistical techniques" and as "far superior methodologically to most empirical studies" he has seen. At the same time, Baker "denies the policy relevance" to our Article because empirical evidence is "entirely irrelevant" to the field of media regulation under his preferred normative theory. Baker argues sweepingly that the legal academy's increased willingness to consider the perspectives of quantitative empiricists and positive theorists is …
Unlocking The Wireless Safe: Opening Up The Wireless World For Consumers, Adam Clay
Unlocking The Wireless Safe: Opening Up The Wireless World For Consumers, Adam Clay
Federal Communications Law Journal
Facing resistance to the use of its Voice-over-Internet Protocol application on mobile phones, in February 2007, Skype Communications filed a petition with the FCC asking for application of the Carterfone standards to the wireless phone industry. This Note discusses Carterfone and the merits of Skype's petition in light of the recent auction of the C Block, which carries open network requirements, and developments in wireless technology. This Note argues that the FCC should require carriers to provide technical standards for access to their networks, whereby individuals will be able to connect any approved device and application of their choosing.
Who Needs Tickets? Examining Problems In The Growing Online Ticket Resale Industry, Clark P. Kirkman
Who Needs Tickets? Examining Problems In The Growing Online Ticket Resale Industry, Clark P. Kirkman
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Internet has dramatically changed the methods by which people purchase tickets to events. In the past decade, the secondary ticket market has grown exponentially, and today the online ticket resale industry is valued at approximately $4 billion. Although there are consumer benefits to this industry growth, some of the industry practices have precipitated a consumer backlash. This was typified in 2007 when many parents, hoping to purchase tickets to the Hannah Montana "Best of Both Worlds Tour," watched as tickets sold out online in only a few minutes or less. Coupled with this episode was the Ticketmaster v. RMG …
The Never-Ending Limits Of § 230: Extending Isp Immunity To The Sexual Exploitation Of Children, Katy Noeth
The Never-Ending Limits Of § 230: Extending Isp Immunity To The Sexual Exploitation Of Children, Katy Noeth
Federal Communications Law Journal
In 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas extended civil liability to Yahoo! under § 230 of the Communications Decency Act so that it could not be sued for knowingly profiting from a Web site where members exchanged sexually explicit pictures of minors. The court found that the reasoning of the seminal § 230 case, Zeran v. AOL, was analogous and that policy considerations mandated its holding.
This Note argues that a multifaceted approach is needed to prevent future courts from following that decision, including an amendment to § 230 that would impose civil liability upon …
Supertext And Consistent Meaning, Steve R. Johnson
Supertext And Consistent Meaning, Steve R. Johnson
Scholarly Publications
Opponents of textualism as an approach to statutory interpretation sometimes deride it as myopic. The textualist, those opponents contend, puts on blinders, narrowing the perhaps vast panorama of possible perspectives on meaning to a narrow slice of the whole. Modern textualists beg to differ. They view that criticism as reductionist and are often quick to distinguish textualism from mere literalism. Thus, the leading contemporary textualist jurist – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia – cautions:
Textualism should not be confused with so-called strict constructionism, a degraded form of textualism that brings the whole philosophy into disrepute .... [T]he good textualist …
Bills Introduced In The 111th Congress Regarding Flexible Work Arrangements, Workplace Flexibility 2010, Georgetown University Law Center
Bills Introduced In The 111th Congress Regarding Flexible Work Arrangements, Workplace Flexibility 2010, Georgetown University Law Center
Charts and Summaries of State, U.S., and Foreign Laws and Regulations
Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs) alter the time and/or place that work is conducted on a regular basis -- in a manner that is as manageable and predictable as possible for both employees and employers. This document charts bills introduced in the 111th Congress regarding flexible work arrangements.
Duty Of Fair Representation Jurisprudential Reform: The Need To Adjudicate Disputes In Internal Union Review Tribunals And The Forgotten Remedy Of Re-Arbitration, Mitchell H. Rubinstein
Duty Of Fair Representation Jurisprudential Reform: The Need To Adjudicate Disputes In Internal Union Review Tribunals And The Forgotten Remedy Of Re-Arbitration, Mitchell H. Rubinstein
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
One of the best kept secrets in American labor law is that duty of fair representation jurisprudence simply does not work. It does not work for plaintiff union members because they must satisfy a close-to-impossible burden of proof and have a short statute of limitations window in which to assert their claim. It does not work for defendant unions because they are often forced to file pointless grievances in order to avoid the cost of litigation. It does not work for defendant employers because they are often brought into these lawsuits because they have the "deep pockets."
This Article makes …
Publicity, Pressure, And Environmental Legislation: The Untold Story Of Availability Campaigns, Molly J. Walker Wilson, Megan P. Fuchs
Publicity, Pressure, And Environmental Legislation: The Untold Story Of Availability Campaigns, Molly J. Walker Wilson, Megan P. Fuchs
Cardozo Law Review
The availability heuristic - a cognitive rule of thumb whereby events that are easily brought to mind are judged to be more likely - is employed by decision-makers on a daily basis. Availability campaigns occur when individuals and groups strategically exploit this cognitive tendency in order to generate publicity for a particular issue, creating pressure to effect legislative change. This paper is the first to argue that environmental availability campaigns are more beneficial than they are harmful. Because they result in pressure on Congress, these campaigns serve as a catalyst for the enactment of critical new legislative initiatives. Specifically, these …
The Legislative History Of Fefcwa And Feptcea, Workplace Flexibility 2010, Georgetown University Law Center
The Legislative History Of Fefcwa And Feptcea, Workplace Flexibility 2010, Georgetown University Law Center
Charts and Summaries of State, U.S., and Foreign Laws and Regulations
No abstract provided.
Minimalism: An Implication For American Judicial Review Of Legislation In Deciding Over Rights?, Luz Helena Orozco Y Villa
Minimalism: An Implication For American Judicial Review Of Legislation In Deciding Over Rights?, Luz Helena Orozco Y Villa
Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers
The diverse theories of constitutional interpretation in the United States share one strong common purpose: to constrain the adjudicator. Whether is text, tradition, structure or democracy, the prevailing fear behind these reasons is the inescapable empowerment of the “least dangerous branch” that comes with judicial review. This anxiety can be explained through the analysis of the systemic and contextual factors in American constitutionalism. Furthermore, because of the constitutional structure of the United States, there is a permanent tension in judicial activity between certainty and legitimacy. Therefore, I defend a minimalistic approach for judicial review of legislation, particularly in cases dealing …
Comments Of 71 Concerned Economists: Using Procurement Auctions To Allocate Broadband Stimulus Grants, Jonathan Baker, William Baumol, Kenneth Arrow, Susan Athey, Coleman Bazelon, Timothy Brennan, Timothy Bresnahan, Jeremy Bulow, Yeon-Koo Che, Peter Cramton, Daniel Ackerberg, James Alleman, Gregory Crawford, Peter Demarzo, Gerald Faulhaber, Jeremy Fox, Ian Gale, Jacob Goeree, Brent Goldfarb, Shane Greenstein, Robert Hahn, Robert Hall, Ward Hanson, Barry Harris, Robert Harris, Janice Hauge, Jerry Hausman, Thomas Hazlett, Kenneth Hendricks, Heather Hudson, Mark Jamison, John Kagel, Alfred Kahn, Ilan Kremer, Vijay Krishna, William Lehr, Thomas Lenard, Jonathan Levin, Yuanchuan Lien, John Mayo, David Mcadams, Paul Milgrom, Roger Noll, Bruce Owen, Charles Plott, Robert Porter, Philip Reny, Michael Riordan, David Salant, Scott Savage, William Samuelson, Richard Schmalensee, Marius Schwartz, Andrzej Skrzypacz, Vernon Smith, Daniel Vincent, Joel Waldfogel, Scott Wallsten, Robert Weber, Bradley Wimmer, Glenn Woroch, Lixin Ye, John Hayes, Gregory Rosston
Comments Of 71 Concerned Economists: Using Procurement Auctions To Allocate Broadband Stimulus Grants, Jonathan Baker, William Baumol, Kenneth Arrow, Susan Athey, Coleman Bazelon, Timothy Brennan, Timothy Bresnahan, Jeremy Bulow, Yeon-Koo Che, Peter Cramton, Daniel Ackerberg, James Alleman, Gregory Crawford, Peter Demarzo, Gerald Faulhaber, Jeremy Fox, Ian Gale, Jacob Goeree, Brent Goldfarb, Shane Greenstein, Robert Hahn, Robert Hall, Ward Hanson, Barry Harris, Robert Harris, Janice Hauge, Jerry Hausman, Thomas Hazlett, Kenneth Hendricks, Heather Hudson, Mark Jamison, John Kagel, Alfred Kahn, Ilan Kremer, Vijay Krishna, William Lehr, Thomas Lenard, Jonathan Levin, Yuanchuan Lien, John Mayo, David Mcadams, Paul Milgrom, Roger Noll, Bruce Owen, Charles Plott, Robert Porter, Philip Reny, Michael Riordan, David Salant, Scott Savage, William Samuelson, Richard Schmalensee, Marius Schwartz, Andrzej Skrzypacz, Vernon Smith, Daniel Vincent, Joel Waldfogel, Scott Wallsten, Robert Weber, Bradley Wimmer, Glenn Woroch, Lixin Ye, John Hayes, Gregory Rosston
Legislative Testimony & Comments
The signatories to this document are economists who have studied telecommunications, auctions, and competition policy. While we may disagree about the stimulus package, we believe that it is important to implement mechanisms that make stimulus spending as efficient as possible. To that end, we have come together to encourage the National Telecommunications Information Agency (NTIA) and Rural Utilities Service (RUS) to adopt auction mechanisms to allocate broadband stimulus grants. The broadband stimulus NOI asks which mechanisms NTIA and RUS should use to distribute grants and how those mechanisms address shortcomings in traditional grant and loan programs. In this note we …
Evidence Gained From Torture: Wishful Thinking, Checkability, And Extreme Circumstances, James Franklin
Evidence Gained From Torture: Wishful Thinking, Checkability, And Extreme Circumstances, James Franklin
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The article argues that while torture is morally abhorrent, its effectiveness in extracting reliable information should be evaluated separately from ethical considerations. It contends that torture can yield reliable information when the extracted details can be independently verified, challenging the common assumption that torture universally leads to false confessions. The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the factual reliability of torture-derived evidence before addressing its legal admissibility.
S09rs Sgb No. 3 (Rules Of Order), Martin, Bonvillain, Free, Gammon, Palermo, Prestridge
S09rs Sgb No. 3 (Rules Of Order), Martin, Bonvillain, Free, Gammon, Palermo, Prestridge
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Amend Rule 4.7, Sec. D of the Louisiana State University Student Government Senate Rules of Order
S09rs Sgb No. 4 (Bylaws), Martin
S09rs Sgb No. 4 (Bylaws), Martin
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Amend Article VII, Section 1 of the Louisiana State University A&M Student Government Bylaws
S09rs Sgb No. 1 (Bylaws), Upton, Bourgeois, Jackson, Martin, Palermo
S09rs Sgb No. 1 (Bylaws), Upton, Bourgeois, Jackson, Martin, Palermo
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
No abstract provided.
S09rs Sgb No. 5 (Rules Of Order), Martin, Gammon
S09rs Sgb No. 5 (Rules Of Order), Martin, Gammon
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Amend Rule 3.7 of the Louisiana State University Student Government Senate Rules of Order
S09rs Sgb No. 12 (Bylaws), Martin
S09rs Sgb No. 12 (Bylaws), Martin
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Amend Article VII, Section 1 of the Louisiana State University A&M Student Government Bylaws
S09rs Sgb No. 10 (Bylaws), Upton, Prestridge
S09rs Sgb No. 10 (Bylaws), Upton, Prestridge
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Amend the Student Government By Laws
S09rs Sgb No. 6 (Rules Of Order), Martin, Upton, Prestridge
S09rs Sgb No. 6 (Rules Of Order), Martin, Upton, Prestridge
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Amend the Louisiana State University Student Government Senate Rules of Order by creating Rule 6.8
S09rs Sgb No. 9 (Rules Of Order), Palermo, Gammon, Sellers, Prestridge
S09rs Sgb No. 9 (Rules Of Order), Palermo, Gammon, Sellers, Prestridge
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To amend rules 5.2 and 5.3 of the Student Government Rules of Order to restructure the composition of the Student Senate Committee on Rules.
S09rs Sgb No. 8 (Bylaws), Palermo, Brown
S09rs Sgb No. 8 (Bylaws), Palermo, Brown
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To Add a section 5 of Article IV of the Student Government bylaws.
S09rs Sgb No. 15 (Savma), Palermo
S09rs Sgb No. 15 (Savma), Palermo
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To allocate a maximum of two thousand six hundred dollars ($2,600.00) from the Senate Contingency Account to defer the cost of twenty-eight Veterinary Medicine students attending the Student American Veterinary Medical Association (SAVMA) Symposium.
S09rs Sgb No. 13 (Committee Numbers), Clark
S09rs Sgb No. 13 (Committee Numbers), Clark
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To amend RULE 5.2 of the Senate Rules of Order
S09rs Sgb No. 17 (Service On The Shore), Sellers
S09rs Sgb No. 17 (Service On The Shore), Sellers
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To allocate one thousand nine hundred and eight dollars ($1,908.00) from the Student Senate Contingency Account to Volunteer LSU to help defer the cost of the “Service on the Shore” mission trip.
S09rs Sgb No. 16 (Order Of Business), Hanna, Jackson, Palermo, Prestridge
S09rs Sgb No. 16 (Order Of Business), Hanna, Jackson, Palermo, Prestridge
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To amend Rule 6.1 of the Student Senate Rules of Order to rearrange the Order of Business.
S09rs Sgb No. 20 (Dry Erase Boards), Upton
S09rs Sgb No. 20 (Dry Erase Boards), Upton
Student Senate Enrolled Legislation
A BILL
To allocate a maximum of Three-Thousand Four Hundred fifty Dollars ($3450) to purchase portable Dry Erase Boards for the Union.