Legislation Commons^™

Copy And Paste: Transplanting International Hiv/Aids Model Laws Into African Countries, Maya Berinzon

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

There has been a recent increase in legislative and regulatory frameworks to govern HIV in Africa. This includes rules on when and how a health practitioner may disclose the HIV status of a patient to a spouse or sexual partner. In balancing the right to privacy against a doctor's duty of care, two international model laws have emerged, and have been wholly or partially copied by a number of African countries. This paper questions the usefulness of such model laws as legal transplants in national legislatures through an analysis of the regulations developed in thirty-eight African countries.

The Bomb Keeps The Lights On: The Use Of Final-Offer Arbitration In Failed Retransmission Consent Negotiations, Daniel J. Weiss

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will consider the imposition of binding arbitration in instances of failed retransmission consent negotiations between broadcasters and cable companies. It will first consider the FCC's authority to do so under the Communication Act of 1934 and the ADRA. Central to this discussion will be the debate and legislative history surrounding the 1992 Act and the way that mandatory binding arbitration has been used other contexts by the Commission. Further, this Note will explore the specific type of arbitration to be employed by the FCC in event the Commission finds they have the authority to mandate such a procedure. …

A Legislative Pendency Proposal To Address The Consumer Harm Caused By The Broken Retransmission System, Marla S. Merchut

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

This Book Is Not Yet Rated: Age Ratings In The Literary Market Vs. Minors' First Amendment Right To Receive Information, Nathalie De Choudens Baez

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Future Of Sex Offense Courts: How Expanding Specialized Sex Offense Courts Can Help Reduce Recidivism And Improve Victim Reporting, Catharine Richmond, Melissa Richmond

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

Specialty sex offense courts are a nascent judicial innovation that seek to improve general public safety by reducing recidivism. Decreased recidivism results from swifter, personalized, experienced, and consistent judicial action that encourages sex offenders to take more responsibility and seek rehabilitative assistance. In these specialized courts, communities of stakeholders work collaboratively to prevent future crime. Although somewhat counterintuitive, specialty courts that offer such intensive and specific attention are often more cost effective and efficient than their traditional counterparts are. This Article posits that sex offense courts should be expanded beyond the handful of jurisdictions where they currently exist, not only …

Individualized Injunctions And No-Modification Terms: Challenging "Anti-Reform" Provisions In Arbitration Clauses, Myriam E. Gilles

Articles

The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion and American Express v. Italian Colors have considered only whether class actions for monetary damages may be barred by arbitration clauses requiring individual adjudication. The Justices have not examined the enforceability of arbitration clauses or arbitral rules which explicitly prohibit claimants from seeking or arbitrators from granting broad injunctive relief in an individual dispute. I term these "anti-reform" provisions because they broadly prohibit an individual arbitral claimant from seeking to end a practice, change a rule, or enjoin an act that causes injury to itself and to similarly-situated non-parties. This …

The Current State Of The Consumer Class Action, Myriam E. Gilles, Samuel Issacharoff, Andrew J. Pincus, Theodore D. Rave

Articles

No abstract provided.

Trespass Vi Et Armis, Jonathan Rohr

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Institutional Sexual Assault And The Rights/Trust Dilemma, Francine Banner

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Reasonable Consideration Of Non-Shareholders: Redrafting State Constituency Statutes To Encourage Socially-Minded Business Decisions, Maxwell Silver-Thompson

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Mandatory Life Without Parole Sentences For The Intellectually Disabled: A Violation Of The Eighth Amendment, Nick Bonham

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note argues that mandatory life without parole (LWOP) sentences for intellectually disabled individuals violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. It contends that such sentences fail to account for the diminished culpability and rehabilitative potential of the intellectually disabled, rendering them disproportionate and unconstitutional. The analysis builds on precedents like Atkins v. Virginia, Graham v. Florida, and Miller v. Alabama, which established protections for groups with reduced moral responsibility. The note advocates for individualized sentencing to align with evolving standards of decency and constitutional safeguards.

The Social Model's Case For Inclusion: "Motivating Factor" And "But For" Standards Of Proof Under The Americans With Disabilities Act And The Impact Of The Social Model Of Disability On Employees With Disabilities, Lisa Schlesinger

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

From Wolves, Lambs (Part Ii): The Fourteenth Amendment Case For Gradual Abolition Of The Death Penalty, Kevin Barry

Cardozo Law Review

Can a state abolish its death penalty for future crimes while retaining it for those already on death row? This turns out to be a novel question in modern death penalty law, one that has not been answered in nearly a century. In 2014, in the case of State v. Santiago, the Connecticut Supreme Court will be the first court in modern times to answer the question. This Article predicts that the answer to the question will be yes.

Although the Connecticut Supreme Court will be the first court to answer this question in almost one hundred years, it …

Unbinding Working Women In A "Binders-Full-Of-Women" Nation: How The United States Can Learn From Swedish, Norwegian And Icelandic Successes In Gender Pay Gap Legislation, Lily Hall

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that the United States can significantly reduce its gender pay gap (GPG) by adopting policies inspired by Nordic countries, such as Sweden, Norway, and Iceland. These nations have achieved remarkable progress in gender equality through measures like generous parental leave, robust childcare systems, and boardroom quotas. The U.S., in contrast, faces persistent challenges due to limited legal protections and cultural resistance. The note advocates for legislative reforms, enhanced enforcement mechanisms, and cultural shifts to address these disparities.

Youth In The Adult Criminal Justice System, Liz Ryan

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Implications Of School Punishment For Cyber Bullying, Raul R. Calvoz, Bradley W. Davis, Mark A. Gooden

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

In this article, we address the scope of student free speech rights as it relates to cyber bullying. We provide a review of legal theories under which school administrators can address cyber bullying while still respecting student free speech rights and the First Amendment. Additionally, we address the jurisdiction of administrators to deal with off-campus bullying conduct.

Liberty And Justice For All? Protecting The Right To Privacy For Incapacitated Individuals: The Need For Comprehensive Sterilization Legislation In All Fifty States, Mindy K. Fersel

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the intersection of disability rights and reproductive rights, highlighting the legal confusion and human rights violations that arise from the lack of comprehensive federal guidance on the sterilization of individuals with disabilities. While landmark Supreme Court decisions like Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade established constitutional protections for reproductive autonomy, the legacy of cases such as Buck v. Bell and inconsistent state statutes continue to undermine the rights of individuals with disabilities. The article argues that the absence of clear legislative frameworks leaves vulnerable populations at risk of exploitation and discrimination, necessitating urgent reform to ensure …

We Are Not Who We Pretend To Be: Odr Alternatives To Online Impersonation Statutes, Kori Clanton

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note focuses on how online dispute resolution ("ODR") processes, as opposed to litigation, offer a more efficient and effective legal solution to resolving online impersonation disputes. The purpose of this Note is to analyze the measures state legislatures and social media websites have implemented to combat online impersonation cases, and to propose a practical ODR solution that will eliminate the burdens of litigation and provide a cost-efficient and time-effective remedy. Section I provides an introduction to the current relevance and rising incidents of online impersonation via social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter. Section II explores the historical …

Panel I: Disclosure And Notice Practices In Private Data Collection, Lorrie Cranor, Brett Frischmann, Ryan Harkins, Helen Nissenbaum

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Flying Into Mecca: When Gender Should Be A Bona Fide Occupational Qualification For Expatriation Assignments In Female-Hostile Host Countries, Richard F. Brueckner

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the tension between preserving cultural identity and navigating the demands of globalization, particularly in the context of employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It focuses on the "bona fide occupational qualification" (BFOQ) exception, which allows employers to discriminate based on certain qualifications essential to the job. The analysis critiques the narrow interpretation of BFOQ by courts and explores its application in religious and gender discrimination cases, proposing a balanced approach to reconcile business needs with anti-discrimination principles.

Mandatory Ultrasound Statutes And The First Amendment, Shifting The Constitutional Perspective, Cheri D. Smith

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The jurisprudence of abortion law is replete with instances in which the concerns of the woman seeking the procedure have taken a back seat. The newest battleground in abortion regulation involves mandatory ultrasound statutes touted as informed consent regulations. The analysis of courts confronting these statutes has turned on whether the mandatory disclosures violate the physician's First Amendment right to be free from compelled speech. The particular breed of statute at issue in this paper requires a physician not only to perform an ultrasound, but also to make the images visible to the woman, to make audible the heartbeat, and …

Moment Of Clarity: A Centrist Approach To Mortgage Lending, Yusuf Yusuf

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Congressional Policy For Work Product Protection In Congressional Investigations, Jay Brody

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note examines the conflict between congressional investigative powers and the work product doctrine, advocating for a balanced approach that considers the nature of the investigation. It argues that the type of congressional investigation—legislative, oversight, or investigative—should determine the level of work product protection applied, ensuring both effective governance and legal fairness.

Divorce And Domestic Violence In The United States: A Focus On New York State's Adoption Of No-Fault Legislation And Its Impact On The Incidence Of Domestic Violence, Ali Kunen

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that the adoption of no-fault divorce legislation in New York, particularly the 2010 law allowing divorce based on the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage, has significantly improved the ability of individuals, especially women, to exit unhappy or abusive marriages without the need to prove fault. The author contends that this legislation has equalized the playing field for men and women in divorce proceedings and has provided a safer and more dignified way for victims of domestic violence to leave dangerous relationships.

Was The Graphe Paranomon A Form Of Judicial Review?, Melissa Schwartzberg

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tyrant-Killing Legislation And The Political Foundation Of Ancient Greek Democracy, David A. Teegarden

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Resale Royalties For Visual Artists: The United States Taking Cues From Europe, Toni Mione

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note argues that visual artists in the U.S. are economically disadvantaged compared to authors and composers under U.S. copyright law, as their works do not generate royalties through reproduction. It advocates for federal resale rights legislation to align U.S. policy with international standards, particularly the EU Resale Right Directive, and address the disparity in artists' economic rights.

A Tale Of Two Lawyers: How Arbitrators And Advocates Can Avoid The Dangerous Convergence Of Arbitration And Litigation, Neal M. Eiseman, John E. Bulman, R. Thomas Dunn

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

When modern arbitration became popular in the United States in the 18th and 19th centuries, courts viewed it as a threat to their exclusive powers. Over time, that mindset has changed dramatically. The passage of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") in 1926 embraced a federal policy strongly favoring arbitration as a method of relieving court congestion and providing parties with a speedier, less costly means of resolving disputes. Thereafter, agreements to arbitrate found their way into many standard form agreements and business contracts as arbitration became accepted as a bona fide alternative to litigating in court. Today, as litigators can …

The Right To Palimony: Why New York Should Change Its Law To Enforce Claims Between Unmarried Cohabitants, Ashley Frankel

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note advocates for legal reform in New York to align its palimony laws with New Jersey's approach, emphasizing the need for written and attorney-reviewed agreements to reduce ambiguity and litigation. It highlights the growing trend of unmarried cohabitation and the urgency of establishing clear legal frameworks to address the needs of such couples.

Republican Study Committee Policy Brief: Three Myths About Copyright Law And Where To Start To Fix It, Derek Khanna

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The following report was written by Derek S. Khanna, at the time a congressional staffer with the House Republican Study Committee ("RSC"), and was published by the RSC on November 17, 2012. The RSC placed the report on their website and an e-mail was sent to approximately 165 Members of Congress and their staff with this official report. Within twenty-four hours of its publication, the RSC removed the report from its website but did not issue a formal retraction. As a result of the events following publication of the report, Mr. Khanna no longer works for the RSC. What follows …