Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (231)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (118)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (51)
- University of Michigan Law School (30)
-
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (26)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (22)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (22)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (21)
- Pepperdine University (19)
- University of Colorado Law School (19)
- BLR (18)
- Barry University School of Law (18)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (18)
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (14)
- Georgetown University Law Center (13)
- Notre Dame Law School (13)
- Fordham Law School (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Association of American Law Schools (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (84)
- Jurisprudence (76)
- Statutory interpretation (38)
- Constitutional Law (27)
- Judges (27)
-
- Law (27)
- Courts (22)
- Constitution (20)
- Supreme Court (20)
- Congress (18)
- Regulation (17)
- Litigation (16)
- United States Supreme Court (16)
- First Amendment (15)
- Law and Society (15)
- Textualism (15)
- Constitutional law (14)
- Judicial review (14)
- Legal History (14)
- Legislative history (14)
- General Law (12)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- Politics (12)
- International Law (11)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (11)
- Administrative Law (10)
- Copyright (10)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Remedies (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (229)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (117)
- Cardozo Law Review (30)
- Faculty Scholarship (27)
-
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (23)
- Articles (20)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (20)
- ExpressO (17)
- Northwestern University Law Review (17)
- Michigan Law Review (16)
- Barry Law Review (15)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (13)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (12)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (12)
- Journal of Law and Policy (11)
- Publications (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (9)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (7)
- Indiana Law Journal (6)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (6)
- Arkansas Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- IP Theory (5)
- Journal of Legislation (5)
- Notre Dame Law Review (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (5)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 811 - 840 of 963
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Code Of Manu, And The Art Of Legislation, Roger Berkowitz
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Code Of Manu, And The Art Of Legislation, Roger Berkowitz
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Behind The Words: Interpreting The Hobbs Act Requirement Of "Obtaining Of Property From Another", 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (2003), Kristal S. Stippich
Behind The Words: Interpreting The Hobbs Act Requirement Of "Obtaining Of Property From Another", 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 295 (2003), Kristal S. Stippich
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Why The Constitution Should Be Amended To Grant Congress The Power To Legislate In Furtherance Of The General Welfare, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 327 (2003), Casey L. Westover
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Americans With Disabilities Act (Ada), Seventh Circuit Review, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 953 (2003), Paul Cherner, Abel Leon
Americans With Disabilities Act (Ada), Seventh Circuit Review, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 953 (2003), Paul Cherner, Abel Leon
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
Freedom Of Discrimination?:The Conflict Between Public Accommodations' Freedom Association And State Anti-Discrimination Laws, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 125 (2003), Gregory J. Wartman
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Covering Women And Violence: Media Treatment Of Vawa's Civil Rights Remedy, Sarah F. Russell
Covering Women And Violence: Media Treatment Of Vawa's Civil Rights Remedy, Sarah F. Russell
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
This Article analyzes how newspapers described and characterized the civil rights provision over the past decade and shaped the public discourse about the law. The author examines how lower federal courts, and eventually the Supreme Court, categorized the VAWA remedy when deciding whether Congress had acted within its commerce powers. After considering why there may have been resistance in the press and in the courts to VAWA's categorization of violence against women as a civil rights issue, the author concludes by examining the remedies that have been introduced at the state and local level for victims of gender-motivated violence, and …
The Easy Case Against Tax Simplification, Samuel A. Donaldson
The Easy Case Against Tax Simplification, Samuel A. Donaldson
Faculty Publications By Year
There is growing political momentum to simplify the Internal Revenue Code. While the federal tax laws should be no more complex than necessary, this Article demonstrates that tax complexity is not as bad as political rhetoric leads us to believe. The Article makes four arguments in support of this thesis. First, the forces comprising tax complexity are either inevitable or net beneficial, so calls for simplification are ultimately pointless. Second, the alleged harms of tax complexity are either unproven or overstated, so the need for simplification is questionable. Third, significant proposals for simplification are flawed because they either overcorrect for …
Individual Law: On Some Aspects Of Nietzsche's Juridical And Aesthetic Discourse, Wolfert Von Rahden
Individual Law: On Some Aspects Of Nietzsche's Juridical And Aesthetic Discourse, Wolfert Von Rahden
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of An Executive Spending Plan, Paul E. Salamanca
The Constitutionality Of An Executive Spending Plan, Paul E. Salamanca
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Operation of government in the absence of appropriations has become relatively common in the United States, particularly when projected expenses exceed projected revenue, making adoption of a budget a difficult task for the legislature. This Article focuses on the budget crisis in the Commonwealth of Kentucky from 2002 through 2003. In Part I, this Article recapitulates the history of the spending plan, including the action filed in Franklin Circuit Court to affirm its constitutionality. In Part II, this Article discusses certain theoretical, historical, and legal principles that inform analysis of the plan. In Part III, it considers certain deviations and …
The Legacy Of Buckley V. Valeo, Joel Gora
Our Supermajoritarian Constitution, John O. Mcginnis, Michael B. Rappaport
Our Supermajoritarian Constitution, John O. Mcginnis, Michael B. Rappaport
Articles
No abstract provided.
Losing Sight Of The Utilitarian Forest For The Retributivist Trees: An Analysis Of The Role Of Public Opinion In A Utilitarian Model Of Punishment, Andrew R. Strauss
Losing Sight Of The Utilitarian Forest For The Retributivist Trees: An Analysis Of The Role Of Public Opinion In A Utilitarian Model Of Punishment, Andrew R. Strauss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Genetically Defective: The Judicial Interpretation Of The Americans With Disabilities Act Fails To Protect Against Genetic Discrimination In The Workplace, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 457 (2002), Brian M. Holt
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdictional Gerrymandering - Responding To Holmes Group V. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002), Molly Mosley-Goren
Jurisdictional Gerrymandering - Responding To Holmes Group V. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002), Molly Mosley-Goren
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflecting On The Virtual Child Porn Decision, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 211 (2002), David L. Hudson
Reflecting On The Virtual Child Porn Decision, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 211 (2002), David L. Hudson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lincoln, Marshall And The Judicial Role, David F. Forte
Lincoln, Marshall And The Judicial Role, David F. Forte
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Abraham Lincoln understood judicial activism. For Lincoln, the paradigm of the unrestrained Supreme Court was the decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Lincoln saw the "illegitimacy" of Dred Scott not in that the Supreme Court had overturned an act of Congress. It was, rather, that the Supreme Court, in the guise of making a legal decision, instead made a political decision. Even worse, it was a political decision that sought to redefine the polity in fundamental, constitutional terms. Lincoln's position echoed the most eloquent articulation of judicial review ever made by the Court: in Marbury vs. Madison, Chief Justice Marshall …
The Undersell: An Essay On Duncan Kennedy's A Critique Of Adjudication, Jane B. Baron
The Undersell: An Essay On Duncan Kennedy's A Critique Of Adjudication, Jane B. Baron
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interpretive Communities: The Missing Element In Statutory Interpretation, William S. Blatt
Interpretive Communities: The Missing Element In Statutory Interpretation, William S. Blatt
Articles
No abstract provided.
In The Wake Of Crosby V. National Foreign Trade Council: The Impact Upon Selective Purchasing Legislation Throughout The United States, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 827 (2001), Ako Miyaki-Murphy
In The Wake Of Crosby V. National Foreign Trade Council: The Impact Upon Selective Purchasing Legislation Throughout The United States, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 827 (2001), Ako Miyaki-Murphy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Reforms In Capital Cases Applied To Perjury, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2001), Steven Clark
Procedural Reforms In Capital Cases Applied To Perjury, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2001), Steven Clark
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Righting Illinois' Wrongs: Suggestions For Reform And A Call For Abolition, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 469 (2001), Sharone Levy
Righting Illinois' Wrongs: Suggestions For Reform And A Call For Abolition, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 469 (2001), Sharone Levy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bad Medicine: Erisa's Equitable Remedies And The Preemption Of Fundamental Legal Rights, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2001), Marilyn Lablaiks
Bad Medicine: Erisa's Equitable Remedies And The Preemption Of Fundamental Legal Rights, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2001), Marilyn Lablaiks
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prohibiting The Deduction For Non-Corporate Tax Deficiency Interest: When Treasury Goes Too Far, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 557 (2001), William G. Andreozzi
Prohibiting The Deduction For Non-Corporate Tax Deficiency Interest: When Treasury Goes Too Far, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 557 (2001), William G. Andreozzi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Punishing Thought: A Narrative Deconstructing The Interpretive Dance Of Hate Crime Legislation, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 123 (2001), Anne B. Ryan
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thoughts On Some Potential Appellate And Trial Court Applications Of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Steve Leben
Thoughts On Some Potential Appellate And Trial Court Applications Of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Steve Leben
Seattle University Law Review
To date, the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles has been concentrated mainly on specialized trial courts: drug treatment courts, domestic violence courts, criminal courts, and juvenile and family courts. Its application to trial courts generally, as well as its application to the appellate courts, remains largely unexplored. This Article considers three areas in which trial and appellate courts may want to consider applying therapeutic jurisprudence.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bitch V. Whore: The Current Trend To Define The Requirements Of An Actionable Hostile Environment Claim In Verbal Sexual Harassment Cases, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 465 (2000), Jamie Lynn Cook
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Evolutionary Statutory Interpretation: Mr. Justice Scalia Meets Darwin, Jeffrey G. Miller
Evolutionary Statutory Interpretation: Mr. Justice Scalia Meets Darwin, Jeffrey G. Miller
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This paper examines the seeming contrast between the legal doctrines that the interpretation of statutes can evolve over time and that the interpretation of statutes must be grounded only in their texts, which never change unless amended by Congress. That examination is illuminated by complexity and meme theories. The examination is concluded by applying both doctrines and theories to the question of whether the term “navigable water” in a water pollution control statute includes underground water.
Therapeutic Jurisprudence And The Appellate Courts: Possibilities, Linda M. Mcgee
Therapeutic Jurisprudence And The Appellate Courts: Possibilities, Linda M. Mcgee
Seattle University Law Review
Therapeutic jurisprudence has multiple possibilities, provided it does not add another layer of cost, delay, and time to the process. First, we should see "a reduced number of cases for the appellate court to decide, fewer remands and secondary appeals, the streamlining of appeals through partial resolution of issues, the satisfaction of parties' underlying needs and interests, and the reduction of the time a case spends on appeal." Second, the outcome does not have to become part of the case law that applies to similar cases, possibly establishing negative precedent. Third, mediation allows personal healing and the development of positive, …