Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (256)
- University of Michigan Law School (226)
- Universitas Indonesia (127)
- University of Colorado Law School (125)
- UIC School of Law (120)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (99)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- Georgetown University Law Center (61)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (59)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- BLR (42)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (41)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- St. John's University School of Law (21)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (20)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (15)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- West Virginia University (13)
- Barry University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (166)
- Congress (142)
- Constitution (123)
- Constitutional Law (113)
- Supreme Court (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Constitutional law (67)
- Federalism (62)
- Separation of powers (61)
- First Amendment (60)
- Statutory interpretation (60)
- Judicial review (52)
- United States (42)
- Due process (41)
- Commerce Clause (38)
- Fifth Amendment (38)
- Jurisprudence (37)
- Law (35)
- Regulation (35)
- History (31)
- Law and Society (30)
- Politics (30)
- Public lands (30)
- Courts (29)
- Public land law (27)
- Constitutionality (26)
- United states constitution (24)
- Administrative law (23)
- Colorado (23)
- Discrimination (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Michigan Law Review (141)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (118)
- Faculty Scholarship (66)
-
- Articles (59)
- Touro Law Review (57)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (52)
- Publications (42)
- ExpressO (41)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Indiana Law Journal (31)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (28)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- University of Richmond Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Works (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (16)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (15)
- Journal of Law and Policy (14)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (13)
- Journal of Legislation (13)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1681 - 1710 of 1940
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Administering Water Rights: The Colorado System, Raymond L. Petros
Administering Water Rights: The Colorado System, Raymond L. Petros
Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5)
140 pages (includes illustrations and maps).
Contains bibliography.
The Second Death Of Federalism, William W. Van Alstyne
The Second Death Of Federalism, William W. Van Alstyne
Michigan Law Review
In 1976, in National League of Cities v. Usery, the Supreme Court distinguished acts of Congress regulating commercial relations from acts of Congress commanding the terms of state services. Last Term, in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, the Court abandoned the distinction and held that it was principally for Congress to determine federalism questions. In this Comment, Professor Van Alstyne criticizes the Court on both counts.
Neiman V. Chairman Of The Elections Committee, Meir Shamgar, Miriam Ben-Porat, Aharon Barak, Menachem Elon, Moshe Bejski
Neiman V. Chairman Of The Elections Committee, Meir Shamgar, Miriam Ben-Porat, Aharon Barak, Menachem Elon, Moshe Bejski
Translated Opinions
The Knesset Elections Law establishes a Central Elections Committee, to which are submitted the various proposed candidates lists that wish to participate in the Knesset elections. The Committee reviews the lists to ascertain that they conform to the requirements of the Law, approves such lists as comply and disqualifies any list that does not comply, supervises the conduct of the election campaign and the elections themselves, rules on various issues that arise during the campaign and during the elections and certifies the results of the voting. The Committee is comprised of representatives of the party lists that are represented in …
The Delegation Doctrine: Could The Court Give It Substance?, David Schoenbrod
The Delegation Doctrine: Could The Court Give It Substance?, David Schoenbrod
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Article demonstrates the need for a new approach to the delegation doctrine. It shows that the Court has failed to articulate a coherent test of improper delegation and that the alternative tests offered by commentators are not sufficient. Part II then sets forth a proposed test of improper delegation. The basic principles of an approach prohibiting delegations of legislative power are outlined and illustrated. This Article does not, however, attempt anything so grand as to suggest a final definition of the doctrine or to pass broadly on the validity of statutes. Such an encompassing analysis is …
Jury Trial Right Under Title Vii: The Need For Judicial Reinterpretation, Vincenza G. Aversano, Karen M. Kalikow, Lisa S. Presser
Jury Trial Right Under Title Vii: The Need For Judicial Reinterpretation, Vincenza G. Aversano, Karen M. Kalikow, Lisa S. Presser
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Origins And Original Significance Of The Just Compensation Clause Of The Fifth Amendment, William Michael Treanor
The Origins And Original Significance Of The Just Compensation Clause Of The Fifth Amendment, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The principle that the state necessarily owes compensation when it takes private property was not generally accepted in either colonial or revolutionary America. Uncompensated takings were frequent and found justification first in appeals to the crown and later in republicanism, the ideology of the Revolution. The post-independence movement for just compensation requirements at the state and national level was part of a broader ideological shift away from republicanism, which stressed the primacy of the common good, and toward liberalism. At the time the Bill of Rights was adopted, that shift had not been completed, but the trends of the revolutionary …
The Validity Of Court-Ordered Employment Quotas: A Statutory And Constitutional Analysis, Paul E. Mirengoff
The Validity Of Court-Ordered Employment Quotas: A Statutory And Constitutional Analysis, Paul E. Mirengoff
University of Richmond Law Review
Although Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has produced more than its share of difficult legal and moral issues, none has sparked more controversy than the question of the validity of hiring and promotion quotas. This issue has fueled continuous debate in the popular press and in scholarly journals. It has long divided former allies in the fight for civil rights legislation, and has even divided the two government agencies charged with primary responsibility for enforcing anti-discrimination laws, the Department of Justice and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Cooperative Federalism Under The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act: Is This Any Way To Run A Government?, Mark Squillace
Cooperative Federalism Under The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act: Is This Any Way To Run A Government?, Mark Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.
Second Generation State Takeover Legislation: Maryland Takes A New Tack, Michigan Law Review
Second Generation State Takeover Legislation: Maryland Takes A New Tack, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines the approach recently adopted by the Maryland legislature in special session one year after the Supreme Court's decision in MITE. Maryland has departed radically from the regulatory approach of first generation statutes; however, this Note argues that the statute has failed to escape the constitutional infirmities of its predecessors. Part I outlines the various mechanisms that regulate acquisition of corporate control: the federal tender offer regulatory mechanism known as the Williams Act, state takeover legislation such as the Illinois statute invalidated in MITE, and the new Maryland statute. Part II analyzes the debate concerning the …
Withdrawals Of Public Lands Under The Federal Land Policy And Management Act, David H. Getches
Withdrawals Of Public Lands Under The Federal Land Policy And Management Act, David H. Getches
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
17 pages.
Directions For The Future, Clyde O. Martz
Directions For The Future, Clyde O. Martz
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
11 pages.
Includes the Public Land Law Review Commission's 1970 report, A Program for the Future (7 pages).
Private Use Of The Public Lands – What Is The Appropriate “Fair Market Value”?, Richard L. Stroup
Private Use Of The Public Lands – What Is The Appropriate “Fair Market Value”?, Richard L. Stroup
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
44 pages.
Contains a 4-page outline; one page of references (page 6); and 37 pages of appendices arranged in 11 topical areas.
Access To And Across Public Lands, Rebecca Love Kourlis
Access To And Across Public Lands, Rebecca Love Kourlis
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
16 pages.
Contains list of references (page 1 of text).
Flpma, Pria, And The Western Livestock Industry, George Cameron Coggins
Flpma, Pria, And The Western Livestock Industry, George Cameron Coggins
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
32 pages.
Contains list of research sources (pages 1-3).
Wilderness And The Public Lands, John D. Leshy
Wilderness And The Public Lands, John D. Leshy
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
18 pages (includes chart).
Flpma As It Affects The Mining Industry, William R. Marsh
Flpma As It Affects The Mining Industry, William R. Marsh
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
67 pages.
11 pages of text with appendices.
Public Land Law: The Development Of Federal Policy, Charles F. Wilkinson
Public Land Law: The Development Of Federal Policy, Charles F. Wilkinson
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
19 pages.
Contains annotated list of research sources (pages 2-4).
Federal Land Sales And Exchanges, Jon K. Mulford
Federal Land Sales And Exchanges, Jon K. Mulford
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
140 pages (includes map).
Includes 27 pages of text, 1 page of references, and 17 appendices.
Agenda: The Federal Land Policy And Management Act, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: The Federal Land Policy And Management Act, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors James N. Corbridge, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, David H. Getches and Charles F. Wilkinson.
This important piece of legislation, passed by Congress in 1976 following many years of extensive study and debate, directs the activities of the nation's major land manager--the Bureau of Land Management. The FLPMA conference will bring together a distinguished group of experts to review the law itself, to consider the effectiveness with which it has been implemented, and to discuss the key issues which have arisen under its implementation.
Flpma From The Perspective Of The Bureau Of Land Management, H. Robert Moore
Flpma From The Perspective Of The Bureau Of Land Management, H. Robert Moore
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
14 pages.
The Blm Planning Process: Chasing The Rabbit, H. Paul Friesema, Paul J. Culhane
The Blm Planning Process: Chasing The Rabbit, H. Paul Friesema, Paul J. Culhane
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
11 pages.
State And Local Involvement In Bureau Of Land Management Planning Under The Federal Land Policy Act Of 1976, Tom Glass
The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
8 pages.
The Severability Of Legislative Veto Provisions: An Examination Of The Congressional Budget And Impoundment Control Act Of 1974, Steven W. Pelak
The Severability Of Legislative Veto Provisions: An Examination Of The Congressional Budget And Impoundment Control Act Of 1974, Steven W. Pelak
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note examines the constitutionality of the legislative veto provision (section 1013(b)) in the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, and discusses section 1013(b)'s and Title X's severability from the Act. Part I demonstrates that Chadha invalidates section 1013(b). Part II outlines the traditional severability doctrine. Part III proposes a refined model of the severability doctrine with which to resolve severability conflicts involving legislative veto provisions. Part IV applies the proposed severability model to the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, and concludes that section 1O13(b)'s unconstitutionality requires that the entire Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act fall.
Legislative Delegation Of Powers: A Hobson's Choice, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 279 (1984), Rodolfe J.A. De Siefe
Legislative Delegation Of Powers: A Hobson's Choice, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 279 (1984), Rodolfe J.A. De Siefe
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fee Awards Act Of 1976: Examining The Foundation For Legislative Reform Of Attorney's Fees Shifting, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 77 (1984), Randall R. Rader
The Fee Awards Act Of 1976: Examining The Foundation For Legislative Reform Of Attorney's Fees Shifting, 18 J. Marshall L. Rev. 77 (1984), Randall R. Rader
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Re-Separating The Powers: The Legislative Veto And Congressional Oversight After Chadha, Kim I. Moses
Re-Separating The Powers: The Legislative Veto And Congressional Oversight After Chadha, Kim I. Moses
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will initially trace the historical setting in which Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service was decided. In light of the staunch defense of and radical opposition to the veto, the Court's decision will then be analyzed in terms of its scope as well as its potential ramifications. The major focus will concern the future of existing laws which presently embody legislative vetoes, whether they are valid despite these provisions, and how the future of congressional oversight may be affected by the potential demise of the legislative veto. Finally, this Note will recommend a proposal by which the legislature …
Legislative Formality, Administrative Rationality, Harold H. Bruff
Legislative Formality, Administrative Rationality, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Indefinite Detention Of Excluded Aliens: Statutory And Constitutional Justifications And Limitations, Michigan Law Review
The Indefinite Detention Of Excluded Aliens: Statutory And Constitutional Justifications And Limitations, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Note examines the statutory authority for the indefinite detention of excluded aliens. It concludes that although the INA does not explicitly authorize such detention, the statute's purposes and specific provisions imply that Congress intended to establish a statutory preference for the detention of excluded aliens. The Note then argues in Part II that indefinite detention is constitutionally permissible when it is necessary to vindicate the government's sovereign right to exclude aliens. The Note concludes, however, that the Constitution requires the government to make a continuing good faith effort to deport a detained, excluded alien.
Constitutional, Teresa Morris
Confessions, Steven P. Mcgowan