Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (256)
- University of Michigan Law School (226)
- Universitas Indonesia (127)
- University of Colorado Law School (125)
- UIC School of Law (120)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (99)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- Georgetown University Law Center (61)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (59)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- BLR (42)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (41)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- St. John's University School of Law (21)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (20)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (15)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- West Virginia University (13)
- Barry University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (166)
- Congress (142)
- Constitution (123)
- Constitutional Law (113)
- Supreme Court (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Constitutional law (67)
- Federalism (62)
- Separation of powers (61)
- First Amendment (60)
- Statutory interpretation (60)
- Judicial review (52)
- United States (42)
- Due process (41)
- Commerce Clause (38)
- Fifth Amendment (38)
- Jurisprudence (37)
- Law (35)
- Regulation (35)
- History (31)
- Law and Society (30)
- Politics (30)
- Public lands (30)
- Courts (29)
- Public land law (27)
- Constitutionality (26)
- United states constitution (24)
- Administrative law (23)
- Colorado (23)
- Discrimination (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Michigan Law Review (141)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (118)
- Faculty Scholarship (66)
-
- Articles (59)
- Touro Law Review (57)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (52)
- Publications (42)
- ExpressO (41)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Indiana Law Journal (31)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (28)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- University of Richmond Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Works (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (16)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (15)
- Journal of Law and Policy (14)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (13)
- Journal of Legislation (13)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1531 - 1560 of 1940
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages.
Contains references.
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
"Rejecting The Parasite And Motivating The Laggard". A Constitutional Analysis Of The District Of Columbia's Aggressive Panhandling Statute, Katherine S. Broderick
"Rejecting The Parasite And Motivating The Laggard". A Constitutional Analysis Of The District Of Columbia's Aggressive Panhandling Statute, Katherine S. Broderick
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Graveyard Robbery In The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act Of 1993: A Modern Look At The Constitutionality Of Retroactive Taxes, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 775 (1994), Andrew G. Schultz
Graveyard Robbery In The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act Of 1993: A Modern Look At The Constitutionality Of Retroactive Taxes, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 775 (1994), Andrew G. Schultz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York's Educational Finance Scheme: Should It Be Declared Unconstitutional?, Janine M. Sarbak
New York's Educational Finance Scheme: Should It Be Declared Unconstitutional?, Janine M. Sarbak
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sotto Voce: The Supreme Court's Low Key But Not Insignificant Criminal Law Rulings During The 1992 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Sotto Voce: The Supreme Court's Low Key But Not Insignificant Criminal Law Rulings During The 1992 Term, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Initiative Enigmas, Richard Collins
Voting Rights Debate, Charles Stephen Ralston, Michael A. Carvin
Voting Rights Debate, Charles Stephen Ralston, Michael A. Carvin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights: People V. Dieppa
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions: Mancuso V. Levitt
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions: Mancuso V. Levitt
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions: Wood V. Irving
Civil Service Appointments And Promotions: Wood V. Irving
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Double Jeopardy: People V. Mitchell
Bi-Partisan Voting: In Re Matthews
Double Jeopardy: People V. Latham
Education: Reform Educational Financing Inequities Today V. Cuomo
Education: Reform Educational Financing Inequities Today V. Cuomo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Home Rule: Hertz V. City Of New York
Home Rule: Walker V. Town Of Hempstead
Legislative Powers: King V. Cuomo
Gift Or Loan Of State Money: Schulz V. State Of New York
Gift Or Loan Of State Money: Schulz V. State Of New York
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel: In Re Jamie Tt.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel: In Re Jamie Tt.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Debt: Schulz V. State Of New York
Takings Clause: Saratoga Water Services, Inc. V. Saratoga County Water Authority
Takings Clause: Saratoga Water Services, Inc. V. Saratoga County Water Authority
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legal Foundations And Institutional Framework Of The Monetary Union In Europe And In The United States, Johan Van Den Cruijce
Legal Foundations And Institutional Framework Of The Monetary Union In Europe And In The United States, Johan Van Den Cruijce
LLM Theses and Essays
An economic and monetary union (EMU) is an area where there is complete freedom of movement of persons, goods, services, and capital. The financial markets in an EMU are completely integrated while the national currencies are conventional and have fixed exchange rates. Ultimately the national currencies may be replaced by a common currency and there will be one monetary policy. The EMU is considered to be the highest form of economic integration. This paper examines two examples of a monetary union; the first part focuses on the blueprint for a European monetary union as laid out in the Treaty on …
The Case Of The Prisoners And The Origins Of Judicial Review, William Michael Treanor
The Case Of The Prisoners And The Origins Of Judicial Review, William Michael Treanor
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
For over one hundred years, scholars have closely studied the handful of cases in which state courts, in the years before the Federal Constitutional Convention, confronted the question whether they had the power to declare laws invalid. Interest in these early cases began in the late nineteenth century as one aspect of the larger debate about the legitimacy of judicial review, a debate triggered by the increasing frequency with which the Supreme Court and state courts were invalidating economic and social legislation. The lawyers, political scientists, and historians who initially unearthed the case law from the 1770s and 1780s used …
Advising The President: Separation Of Powers And The Federal Advisory Committee Act, Jay S. Bybee
Advising The President: Separation Of Powers And The Federal Advisory Committee Act, Jay S. Bybee
Scholarly Works
This Article examines the tensions between Congress, the judiciary, and the President over presidential use of advisory committees. It argues that courts, in attempting to avoid difficult constitutional questions, have misread the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”). Properly construed, FACA violates separation of powers by limiting the terms on which the President can acquire information from nongovernmental advisory committees.
The author argues that the President does have the power to consult with outside advisers, and that FACA unconstitutionally infringes upon that power. FACA fails to draw a distinction between congressionally created advisory committees and presidentially created advisory committees, and assumes …
The Right To Privacy And The Public's Right To Know: The "Central Purpose" Of The Freedom Of Information Act, Fred H. Cate, D. Annette Fields, James K. Mcbain
The Right To Privacy And The Public's Right To Know: The "Central Purpose" Of The Freedom Of Information Act, Fred H. Cate, D. Annette Fields, James K. Mcbain
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Executive Autonomy, Judicial Authority And The Rule Of Law: Reflections On Constitutional Interpretation And The Separation Of Powers, Michel Rosenfeld
Executive Autonomy, Judicial Authority And The Rule Of Law: Reflections On Constitutional Interpretation And The Separation Of Powers, Michel Rosenfeld
Cardozo Law Review
The United States Constitution is remarkably silent on the subject of ultimate responsibility for constitutional interpretation, despite its elaborate prescriptions for a scheme of separation of powers that interweaves elements of independence and of interdependence among the distinct branches of the federal government. It is hardly surprising, therefore, that there have been several disputes between the President and the Supreme Court concerning the scope of executive autonomy in constitutional interpretation. In recent years, moreover, the conflict between judicial authority and executive autonomy has been exacerbated by efforts to legitimize presidential interpretations of the Constitution that are inconsistent with Supreme Court …
Continuing Criminal Enterprise, Conspiracy, And The Multiple Punishment Doctrine, Kenneth G. Schuler
Continuing Criminal Enterprise, Conspiracy, And The Multiple Punishment Doctrine, Kenneth G. Schuler
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that the Multiple Punishment Doctrine prohibits the imposition of concurrent convictions and sentences upon criminal defendants found guilty of engaging in a CCE and conspiring to violate narcotics laws. Part I surveys the values underlying the Multiple Punishment Doctrine and traces the evolution of the Supreme Court's application of the doctrine to modern criminal law. Part II examines the various methods employed by the circuit courts of appeals to deal with simultaneous convictions and sentences for CCE and conspiracy. Part III reviews the test, identified in Part I, that the Supreme Court has implicitly utilized to analyze …
Legal Developments: Ethics In Government Federal Advisory Committees, Foreign Conflicts Of Interest, The Constitution, And Dr. Franklin's Snuff Box, Gerald S. Schatz
Legal Developments: Ethics In Government Federal Advisory Committees, Foreign Conflicts Of Interest, The Constitution, And Dr. Franklin's Snuff Box, Gerald S. Schatz
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is There A Twenty-Seventh Amendment - The Unconstitutionality Of A New 203-Year-Old Amendment, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 977 (1993), Christopher M. Kennedy
Is There A Twenty-Seventh Amendment - The Unconstitutionality Of A New 203-Year-Old Amendment, 26 J. Marshall L. Rev. 977 (1993), Christopher M. Kennedy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.