Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (256)
- University of Michigan Law School (226)
- Universitas Indonesia (127)
- University of Colorado Law School (125)
- UIC School of Law (120)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (99)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- Georgetown University Law Center (61)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (59)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- BLR (42)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (41)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- St. John's University School of Law (21)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (20)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (15)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- West Virginia University (13)
- Barry University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (166)
- Congress (142)
- Constitution (123)
- Constitutional Law (113)
- Supreme Court (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Constitutional law (67)
- Federalism (62)
- Separation of powers (61)
- First Amendment (60)
- Statutory interpretation (60)
- Judicial review (52)
- United States (42)
- Due process (41)
- Commerce Clause (38)
- Fifth Amendment (38)
- Jurisprudence (37)
- Law (35)
- Regulation (35)
- History (31)
- Law and Society (30)
- Politics (30)
- Public lands (30)
- Courts (29)
- Public land law (27)
- Constitutionality (26)
- United states constitution (24)
- Administrative law (23)
- Colorado (23)
- Discrimination (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Michigan Law Review (141)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (118)
- Faculty Scholarship (66)
-
- Articles (59)
- Touro Law Review (57)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (52)
- Publications (42)
- ExpressO (41)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Indiana Law Journal (31)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (28)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- University of Richmond Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Works (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (16)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (15)
- Journal of Law and Policy (14)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (13)
- Journal of Legislation (13)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1441 - 1470 of 1940
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
The Brady Act: Shot Down By The Tenth Amendment, Patricia Rooney
The Brady Act: Shot Down By The Tenth Amendment, Patricia Rooney
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hopwood, Equal Protection, And Affirmative Action: Can Anyone's Ox Be Gored?, David J. Jannuzzi
Hopwood, Equal Protection, And Affirmative Action: Can Anyone's Ox Be Gored?, David J. Jannuzzi
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: Daxor Corporation V. New York State Department Of Health
Due Process, Court Of Appeals: Daxor Corporation V. New York State Department Of Health
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process, Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Department: Loyal Tire And Auto Center V. New York State Thruway
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection, Court Of Appeals: Trustees Of Union College V. Schenectady City Council
Equal Protection, Court Of Appeals: Trustees Of Union College V. Schenectady City Council
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection, Supreme Court, New York County: Walter V. City Of New York Police Department
Equal Protection, Supreme Court, New York County: Walter V. City Of New York Police Department
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Establishment Of Religion, Court Of Appeals: Grumet V. Cuomo
Establishment Of Religion, Court Of Appeals: Grumet V. Cuomo
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech, Court Of Appeals: People V. Tichenor
Free Speech, Court Of Appeals: People V. Tichenor
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Governmental Takings, Court Of Appeals: Gazza V. New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Right To Jury Trial, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department: Hynes V. Tomei Court
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Suffolk County: People V. Shulman
Self-Incrimination, Supreme Court, Suffolk County: People V. Shulman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Powers, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Dorst V. Pataki
Separation Of Powers, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department: Dorst V. Pataki
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitution, The White House, And The Military Hiv Ban: A New Threshold For Presidential Non-Defense Of Statutes, Chrysanthe Gussis
The Constitution, The White House, And The Military Hiv Ban: A New Threshold For Presidential Non-Defense Of Statutes, Chrysanthe Gussis
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The President's constitutional duty to 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" implies that the President is entrusted with the responsibility to defend those laws against court challenges. On occasion, however, Presidents faced with legislation that they deem unconstitutional have declined to defend that legislation against legal challenges. On February 10, 1996, President Clinton declined to defend a provision included in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 that required discharge from the military of all HIV-positive servicemembers because he believed that the provision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This Note explores whether …
Section 254 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996: A Hidden Tax?, Nichole L. Millard
Section 254 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996: A Hidden Tax?, Nichole L. Millard
Federal Communications Law Journal
Congress has the sole power to levy and collect taxes. The Supreme Court has ruled that Congress may delegate this authority to administrative agencies so long as the will of Congress is clearly defined in the legislation. However, section 254 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 operates as an unconstitutional delegation of Congress' authority to tax. This legislation provides the FCC with unfettered discretion in defining the boundaries of universal service and the authority to mandate that all consumers of telecommunications services subsidize the cost for low-income and rural consumers, as well as schools, libraries, and health care providers.
A Tempered "Yes" To The "Exculpatory No", Scott D. Pomfret
A Tempered "Yes" To The "Exculpatory No", Scott D. Pomfret
Michigan Law Review
What circumstances trigger a person's duty to tell the truth? Immanuel Kant claimed without qualification that all circumstances require truthtelling, even when speaking the truth injures the speaker. John Henry Cardinal Newman made exceptions for lies that achieved some positive end. Hugo Grotius permitted lies to adversaries. The philosophy of twentieth-century common sense largely permits white lies. Perhaps surprisingly, some courts have found that Kant's absolute prohibition of falsehood more accurately characterizes a speaker's duty to tell the truth to the federal government under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 than these other, more relaxed standards. According to this view, the prohibition …
Restoring Rights To Rites: The Religious Motivation Test And The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Steven C. Seeger
Restoring Rights To Rites: The Religious Motivation Test And The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Steven C. Seeger
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that the religious motivation test best secures the religious liberty guaranteed by the Constitution and the RFRA. Part I examines the text and legislative history of the Act and establishes that Congress intended to protect religiously motivated practices. Part II argues that the free exercise case law prior to Smith, to which the RFRA explicitly appeals, did not require litigants to prove centrality or compulsion. Part III demonstrates that the religious motivation test protects the full spectrum of religious practices and religious groups, unlike the centrality test and the compulsion test. Part IV illustrates that the motivation …
Textualism's Selective Canons Of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, And Deference To Executive Agencies, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Article demonstrates that textualist Judges, most notably Justices Scalia, Thomas, and, to a lesser extent, Kennedy, have applied some canons too aggressively, and slighted others. Textualist Judges have overused clear-statement rules that narrow statutory meaning, especially as a means to promote federalism and states' rights. On the other hand, textualists have neglected canons that promote individual liberty or executive authority Because canons must be applied on a case-by-case basis and different canons can conflict, it is impossible to formulate one rule for how they should be applied. Nevertheless, the common textualist approach of selectively favoring some canons at the …
No More Excuses: Closing The Door On The Voluntary Intoxication Defense, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 535 (1997), Chad J. Layton
No More Excuses: Closing The Door On The Voluntary Intoxication Defense, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 535 (1997), Chad J. Layton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Intruders At The Death House: Limiting Third-Party Intervention In Executive Clemency, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1997), Daryl M. Schumacher
Intruders At The Death House: Limiting Third-Party Intervention In Executive Clemency, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 567 (1997), Daryl M. Schumacher
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Women's Powerless Tool: How Congress Overreached The Constitution With The Civil Rights Remedy Of The Violence Against Women Act, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 803 (1997), Lisa A. Carroll
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Buck Stops Here: Illinois Criminalizes Support For International Terrorism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1997), Victoria Meyerov
The Buck Stops Here: Illinois Criminalizes Support For International Terrorism, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 871 (1997), Victoria Meyerov
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal
This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fetal Tissue Research: State Regulation Of The Donation Of Aborted Fetuses Without The Consent Of The Mother, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 277 (1997), Christie A. Seifert
Fetal Tissue Research: State Regulation Of The Donation Of Aborted Fetuses Without The Consent Of The Mother, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 277 (1997), Christie A. Seifert
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On A Quarter-Century Of Constitutional Regulation Of Capital Punishment, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 399 (1997), Joseph Bessetre, Stephen Bright, George Kendall, William Kunkle, Carol Steiker, Jordan Steiker
Reflections On A Quarter-Century Of Constitutional Regulation Of Capital Punishment, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 399 (1997), Joseph Bessetre, Stephen Bright, George Kendall, William Kunkle, Carol Steiker, Jordan Steiker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gacy V. Dahmer: An Informed Response, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 331 (1997), William J. Kunkle Jr.
Gacy V. Dahmer: An Informed Response, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 331 (1997), William J. Kunkle Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Christian Constitutions: Do They Protect Internationally Recognized Human Rights And Minimize The Potential For Violence Within A Society? A Comparative Analysis Of American And Irish Constitutional Law And Their Religious Elements, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
Section II of this Article studies in greater detail the religio-legal debate currently being waged in American courts and legislatures, including a brief discussion of the religio-legal history of the United States. Section II also describes how the United States resembles and differs from Ireland such that subsequent comparisons will be more accurate. Section III compares the two constitutions by analyzing the provisions and policies most influenced by religion. First, general principles of sovereignty and constitutional interpretation are reviewed to understand the general constitutional framework of each nation. Second, the manner in which personal rights are treated by each nation's …
The First Amendment In The Supreme Court: The Future Lies Ahead, Joel Gora
The First Amendment In The Supreme Court: The Future Lies Ahead, Joel Gora
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Toward A South African Administrative Justice Act, Michael Asimow
Toward A South African Administrative Justice Act, Michael Asimow
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Section 33 of South Africa's Constitution provides fundamental principles of administrative justice. It also requires Parliament to adopt an Administrative Justice Act. This Article contends that without enactment of such legislation Section 33 will be ineffective in practice and may prove to be an obstacle to achieving the economic and social objectives of the Constitution. In addition, such legislation is essential to preserving the legitimacy and the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court.
An Analysis Of The Personal Use Principle Under Copyright Law, Hsin-Chih Cheng
An Analysis Of The Personal Use Principle Under Copyright Law, Hsin-Chih Cheng
LLM Theses and Essays
Personal use is when an individual uses a copyrighted work for private purposes, such as learning or entertainment. Personal use is a right given in the Copyright Clause of the U.S. Constitution, however, an issue arises when the individual wants to make a copy of the copyrighted work. New technologies like photocopying and videotaping make this issue more prominent today. Some copyright owners think that the individual’s copying for private use is harmful to their potential market and they argue for compensation. Does the individual have the right under the personal use principle to reproduce the copyrighted work for private …
Federal Reserve: History, Purposes And Functions - An Analysis, Mukunda Lakshamanarao
Federal Reserve: History, Purposes And Functions - An Analysis, Mukunda Lakshamanarao
LLM Theses and Essays
On December 23, 1913, President Woodrow Wilson signed into law the Federal Reserve Act. With this law, Congress established a central banking system which would enable the world’s most powerful industrial nation to manage its money and credit more effectively than ever before. The political and legislative struggle to create the Federal Reserve System was long and often bitter, and this final product in 1913 was the result of a carefully crafted and somewhat tenuous political compromise between national and regional powers. Since its founding, the Federal Reserve System has evolved to meet the needs of a changing financial system …