Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (256)
- University of Michigan Law School (226)
- Universitas Indonesia (127)
- University of Colorado Law School (125)
- UIC School of Law (120)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (99)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- Georgetown University Law Center (61)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (59)
- Brooklyn Law School (48)
- BLR (42)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (41)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (21)
- St. John's University School of Law (21)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (21)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (21)
- University of Richmond (21)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (20)
- Roger Williams University (16)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (15)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (14)
- Columbia Law School (13)
- West Virginia University (13)
- Barry University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (166)
- Congress (142)
- Constitution (123)
- Constitutional Law (113)
- Supreme Court (81)
-
- United States Supreme Court (75)
- Constitutional law (67)
- Federalism (62)
- Separation of powers (61)
- First Amendment (60)
- Statutory interpretation (60)
- Judicial review (52)
- United States (42)
- Due process (41)
- Commerce Clause (38)
- Fifth Amendment (38)
- Jurisprudence (37)
- Law (35)
- Regulation (35)
- History (31)
- Law and Society (30)
- Politics (30)
- Public lands (30)
- Courts (29)
- Public land law (27)
- Constitutionality (26)
- United states constitution (24)
- Administrative law (23)
- Colorado (23)
- Discrimination (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (227)
- Michigan Law Review (141)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (118)
- Faculty Scholarship (66)
-
- Articles (59)
- Touro Law Review (57)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (52)
- Publications (42)
- ExpressO (41)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (41)
- Pepperdine Law Review (37)
- Indiana Law Journal (31)
- Cardozo Law Review (29)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (28)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (20)
- University of Richmond Law Review (20)
- Scholarly Works (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Faculty Publications (16)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (16)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (15)
- Journal of Law and Policy (14)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (13)
- Journal of Legislation (13)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1381 - 1410 of 1940
Full-Text Articles in Legislation
Congress' Arrogance, Yale Kamisar
Congress' Arrogance, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Does Dickerson v. U.S., reaffirming Miranda and striking down §3501 (the federal statute purporting to "overrule" Miranda), demonstrate judicial arrogance? Or does the legislative history of §3501 demonstrate the arrogance of Congress? Shortly after Dickerson v. U.S. reaffirmed Miranda and invalidated §3501, a number of Supreme Court watchers criticized the Court for its "judicial arrogance" in peremptorily rejecting Congress' test for the admissibility of confessions. The test, pointed out the critics, had been adopted by extensive hearings and debate about Miranda's adverse impact on law enforcement. The Dickerson Court did not discuss the legislative history of §3501 at all. However, …
Private Remedies For Public Wrongs Under Section 5 (Symposium: New Directions In Federalism), Evan H. Caminker
Private Remedies For Public Wrongs Under Section 5 (Symposium: New Directions In Federalism), Evan H. Caminker
Articles
The Supreme Court has ushered in the new millennium with a renewed emphasis on federalism-based limits to Congress's regulatory authority in general, and Congress's Section 5 power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment in particular. In a recent string of cases, the Court has refined and narrowed Section 5's enforcement power in two significant ways.1 First, the Court made clear that Congress lacks the authority to interpret the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment's substantive provisions themselves, and may only "enforce" the judiciary's definition of Fourteenth Amendment violations. 2 Second, the Court embraced a relatively stringent requirement concerning the relationship between means …
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of The Driver’S Privacy Protection Act: A Fork In The Information Access Road, Angela R. Karras
The Constitutionality Of The Driver’S Privacy Protection Act: A Fork In The Information Access Road, Angela R. Karras
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Driver's Privacy Protection Act, instituted in 1997, regulates the disclosure of personal information in motor vehicle records. New controversy surrounds it today as the U.S. Supreme Court evaluates the arguments presented in November 1999 regarding its constitutionality. A split among circuit courts, coupled with the tremendous growth in technology and subsequent new in-roads for information access, draw increased attention toward the Act. The concern for information access in light of the Act, however, reaches beyond the courts' elucidated concerns about dual sovereignty and the public's right to privacy. This Note argues that there is a forgotten argument: the Act's …
Strike Two: An Analysis Of The Child Online Protection Act’S Constitutional Failures, Heather L. Miller
Strike Two: An Analysis Of The Child Online Protection Act’S Constitutional Failures, Heather L. Miller
Federal Communications Law Journal
Congress's first attempt to regulate minors' access to sexually explicit material via the Internet failed. Congress responded with the Child Online Protection Act, which, despite its narrower scope, cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny. This Notes delves into the constitutionality of Congress's second attempt by addressing the difficulty of applying the vague "harmful to minors" definition to the Internet medium and the economic and technological unavailability of the Act's affirmative defenses. This Note concludes with an explanation as to why legislation is an ineffective mechanism to address the problem of minors' access to online pornography.
Federal Court Jurisdiction Over Private Tcpa Claims: Why The Federal Courts Of Appeals Got It Right, Kevin N. Tharp
Federal Court Jurisdiction Over Private Tcpa Claims: Why The Federal Courts Of Appeals Got It Right, Kevin N. Tharp
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 protects the privacy interests of residential telephone subscribers by placing restrictions on unsolicited, automated telephone calls to the home and facilitates interstate commerce by restricting certain uses of facsimile machines and automatic dialers. Since the statute is silent regarding federal district court jurisdiction over private TCPA claims, federal courts scramble in search for existing law to support their conclusions that the TCPA divests federal district courts of jurisdiction over private TCPA claims. In addition to the reasoning offered by the circuit courts, this Notes discusses the jurisdiction issue and adds an important reason …
Intermediate Questions Of Religious Exemptions - A Research Agenda With Test Suites, Eugene Volokh
Intermediate Questions Of Religious Exemptions - A Research Agenda With Test Suites, Eugene Volokh
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Attacks On Religious Freedom Legislation, And Why They Are Wrong, Thomas C. Berg
The New Attacks On Religious Freedom Legislation, And Why They Are Wrong, Thomas C. Berg
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, Cass R. Sunstein
Is The Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, Cass R. Sunstein
Michigan Law Review
This Article deals with two linked questions. The first involves the future of the Clean Air Act. The particular concern is how the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") might be encouraged, with help from reviewing courts, to issue better ambient air quality standards, and in the process to shift from some of the anachronisms of 1970s environmentalism to a more fruitful approach to environmental protection. The second question involves the role of the nondelegation doctrine in American public law, a doctrine that shows unmistakable signs of revival. I will suggest that improved performance by EPA and agencies in general, operating in …
Betting On The Net: An Analysis Of The Government’S Role In Addressing Internet Gambling, Stevie A. Kish
Betting On The Net: An Analysis Of The Government’S Role In Addressing Internet Gambling, Stevie A. Kish
Federal Communications Law Journal
The Internet Gambling Prohibition Act represents the U.S. Senate’s response to the development of a new online industry—Internet gambling. While this ban could arguably reduce the dangers associated with Internet gambling, such as fraud and addiction, it can only do so by exacting a substantial cost on principles of federalism. Rather than enacting this federal prohibition, Congress should instead leave the issue of whether Internet gambling should be legalized to the states.
Dissecting The State: The Use Of Federal Law To Free State And Local Officials From State Legislatures' Control, Roderick M. Hills Jr.
Dissecting The State: The Use Of Federal Law To Free State And Local Officials From State Legislatures' Control, Roderick M. Hills Jr.
Michigan Law Review
In discussions about American federalism, it is common to speak of a "state government" as if it were a black box, an individual speaking with a single voice. State governments are, of course, no such thing. Rather, a "state" actually incorporates a bundle of different subdivisions, branches, and agencies controlled by politicians who often compete with each other for electoral success and governmental power. In particular, these institutions compete with each other for the power to control federal funds and implement federal programs. This article explores one aspect of this intrastate competition - the extent to which federal law can …
Supermajority Rules As A Constitutional Solution, John O. Mcginnis, Michael B. Rappaport
Supermajority Rules As A Constitutional Solution, John O. Mcginnis, Michael B. Rappaport
Articles
No abstract provided.
Too Much (Legislation) Is Never Enough: Utilizing A Court's Equity Power To Enjoin Lawful Firearm Sales, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1225 (1999), Edward G. Renner
Too Much (Legislation) Is Never Enough: Utilizing A Court's Equity Power To Enjoin Lawful Firearm Sales, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1225 (1999), Edward G. Renner
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Practicing Medicine Without A License: Legislative Attempts To Mandate Chemical Castration For Repeat Sex Offenders, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 381 (1999), Lisa Keesling
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Licensed To Steal: Has Sovereign Immunity Gone Too Far, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 779 (1999), Sulaiman M. Qazi
Licensed To Steal: Has Sovereign Immunity Gone Too Far, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 779 (1999), Sulaiman M. Qazi
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Spending Clause? - (Or The President's Paramour): An Examination Of The Views Of Hamilton, Madison, And Story On Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Of The United States Constitution, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 81 (1999), Jeffrey T. Renz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Bribery Statute And The Ethics Of Purchasing Testimony, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1999), Camille Knight
Federal Bribery Statute And The Ethics Of Purchasing Testimony, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (1999), Camille Knight
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Customary International Law And Human Rights Treaties Are Law Of The United States, Jordan J. Paust
Customary International Law And Human Rights Treaties Are Law Of The United States, Jordan J. Paust
Michigan Journal of International Law
The Founders clearly expected that the customary law of nations was binding, was supreme law, created (among others) private rights and duties, and would be applicable in United States federal courts. For example, at the time of the formation of the Constitution John Jay had written: "Under the national government… the laws of nations, will always be expounded in one sense… [and there is] wisdom… in committing such questions to the jurisdiction and judgment of courts appointed by and responsible only to one national government...” In 1792, the supremacy of the customary law of nations within the United States was …
State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation Of The Equal Protection Clause Of The Fourteenth Amendment, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 353 (1999), Shea Lita Bond
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose
Boggs V. Boggs: Creating Real-Life Cinderellas, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 271 (1999), Heather J. Rose
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Right To Inspect And Test Breath Alcohol Machines: Suspicion Ain't Proof, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1999), Gil Sapir, Mark Giangrande
Right To Inspect And Test Breath Alcohol Machines: Suspicion Ain't Proof, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (1999), Gil Sapir, Mark Giangrande
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Internet Indecency And Impressionable Minds, Gretchen Witte
Internet Indecency And Impressionable Minds, Gretchen Witte
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Mr. Justice Holmes's Constitutionally Crooked Path Part Ii: The State Sovereignty Jurisdictional Stopgap , Mitchell B. Weiss
Mr. Justice Holmes's Constitutionally Crooked Path Part Ii: The State Sovereignty Jurisdictional Stopgap , Mitchell B. Weiss
Cleveland State Law Review
This article analyzes the last turn in Justice Holmes's constitutionally crooked path, largely by penetrating to the very core of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Alden v. Maine. Part I therefore traces the Court's waffling attitude towards the division of regulatory power between the state and federal governments. Then, against this backdrop, Part II takes the jurisdictional turn by analyzing the Court's most recent attempt to resuscitate the Tenth Amendment's check on Congress's Commerce Power. To sharpen the focus, much of this article will focus on the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal statute that always seems to sit …
The Constitutionality Of Taxing Compensatory Damages For Mental Distress When There Was No Accompanying Physical Injury, Douglas A. Kahn
The Constitutionality Of Taxing Compensatory Damages For Mental Distress When There Was No Accompanying Physical Injury, Douglas A. Kahn
Articles
Since 1919, statutory tax law has excluded from gross income compensatory damages received on account of a personal injury or sickness.1 The current version of that exclusion is set forth in section 104 (a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.2 The construction of that exclusion, both by the courts and by the Commissioner, underwent significant alterations over the 80-year period that the provision has existed.3 The statute itself was amended several times, most recently in 1996.4 It is the 1996 amendment that has raised a constitutional issue concerning the validity of a portion of the statute.5
Controlling Chevron-Based Delegations, Ernest Gellhorn, Paul Verkuil
Controlling Chevron-Based Delegations, Ernest Gellhorn, Paul Verkuil
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Art, Distribution & The State: Perspectives On The National Endowment For The Arts, Amy Schwartzman, John Tuskey, Robert W. Peters, Hope O'Keeffe, Roberto Bedoya, David Cole, Marci Hamilton
Art, Distribution & The State: Perspectives On The National Endowment For The Arts, Amy Schwartzman, John Tuskey, Robert W. Peters, Hope O'Keeffe, Roberto Bedoya, David Cole, Marci Hamilton
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Judicial Review Of Initiatives And Referendums In Which Majorities Vote On Minorities’ Citizenship, Sylvia R. Lazos
Scholarly Works
In this Article, Professor Lazos examines initiatives and referendums in which a majority is in a position to vote on the content of a minority's democratic civic standing. Case law fails to set forth a single test for judicial review; consequently, doctrinal and theoretical coherence in this area is nonexistent. Professor Lazos proposes a test that takes into account social dynamics and focuses on the impact of these measures. First, she examines outcomes over the last three decades of approximately eighty such initiatives and referendums, from the anti-integration movement of the sixties to today's ideological and cultural versions, such as …
Democracy And Inclusion: The Role Of The Judge In A Pluralist Polity, Sylvia R. Lazos
Democracy And Inclusion: The Role Of The Judge In A Pluralist Polity, Sylvia R. Lazos
Scholarly Works
The Supreme Court plays a critical role in resolving clashes between majority and minority interests and perspectives. The Equal Protection Clause, and at times the Due Process Clause, have become key vehicles for considering the most problematic intergroup conflicts that divide our society. Prior to this article, the Court heard cases dealing with affirmative action in government procurement programs, legislative districts designed to increase minority representation, state sponsored male-only military schooling, and a state constitutional amendment that would have proscribed antidiscrimination legislation protecting gay men and lesbians. While the Court declined to challenge California's anti-affirmative action referendum (Proposition 209) and …
Representation And Nondelegation: Back To Basics, Marci A. Hamilton
Representation And Nondelegation: Back To Basics, Marci A. Hamilton
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.