Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legal Education (41)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (36)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Law and Society (16)
- Legal History (14)
-
- Courts (12)
- Judges (10)
- Legal Writing and Research (10)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (7)
- Commercial Law (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Legal Studies (6)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (6)
- Arts and Humanities (5)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Education (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (4)
- Intellectual Property Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Legal Biography (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (12)
- UIC School of Law (11)
- BLR (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (8)
- New York Law School (7)
-
- University of San Diego (7)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Association of American Law Schools (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legal Profession (17)
- Professional Ethics (11)
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Courts (6)
- General Law (6)
-
- Law and Society (6)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Legal education (5)
- Legal ethics (5)
- Lawyers (4)
- Law school history (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Legal Ethics (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Legal reasoning (3)
- Client counseling (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Critical legal studies (2)
- David A. Clarke School of Law (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Empirical legal studies (2)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (2)
- History (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- LSAT (2)
- Law (2)
- Law firms (2)
- Law governing lawyers (2)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (9)
- UIC Law Review (9)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Indiana Law Update (7)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (7)
-
- Articles & Chapters (5)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal of Legal Education (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- William Mitchell Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Nebraska Transcript (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- The Advocate (2)
- The Clark Memorandum (2)
- Transcript (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Animal Law Review (1)
- Annual Magazines (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 130
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
Lawyers As Gatekeepers, Fred C. Zacharias
Lawyers As Gatekeepers, Fred C. Zacharias
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Three recent legislative and regulatory initiatives -- the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the 2003 amendments to Model Rules 1.6 and 1.13, and the Gatekeeper Initiative – all seek to enlist the assistance of lawyers in thwarting crime. Outraged opponents have relied on flamboyant rhetoric. They challenge the notion that lawyers should act as gatekeepers – which some of the opponents deem equivalent to operating like the “secret police in Eastern European countries.” This article makes a simple, and ultimately uncontroversial, point. Lawyers are gatekeepers, and always have been. Whatever one’s position on the merits of the specific reforms currently being proposed, it …
Understanding Recent Trends In Federal Regulation Of Lawyers, Fred C. Zacharias
Understanding Recent Trends In Federal Regulation Of Lawyers, Fred C. Zacharias
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Federal lawmakers increasingly have taken actions that contradict, interfere with, or preempt state regulation of lawyers. Most of the commentary regarding the recent federal actions has focused on whether individual regulations are substantively justified. It is, however, worth considering more broadly whether and how the phenomenon of increasing federal regulation is symptomatic of changing views of appropriate professional regulation. This article considers a series of theoretical analyses of the increasing federal regulation -- themes and trends that the increasing regulation might represent or epitomize. Whenever the bar or other commentators criticize developments in professional regulation, it is important to place …
Strategic Judicial Lawmaking: An Empirical Investigation Of Ideology And Publication On The U.S. Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit, David S. Law
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Previous studies have demonstrated that, in a number of contexts, federal appeals court judges divide along ideological lines when deciding cases upon the merits. To date, however, researchers have failed to find evidence that circuit judges take advantage of selective publication rules to further their ideological preferences - for example, by voting more ideologically in published cases that have precedential effect than in unpublished cases that lack binding effect upon future panels. This article evaluates the possibility that judges engage in strategic judicial lawmaking by voting more ideologically in published cases than in unpublished cases. To test this hypothesis, all …
Appointing Federal Judges: The President, The Senate, And The Prisoner's Dilemma, David S. Law
Appointing Federal Judges: The President, The Senate, And The Prisoner's Dilemma, David S. Law
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
This paper argues that the expansion of the White House's role in judicial appointments since the late 1970s, at the expense of the Senate, has contributed to heightened levels of ideological conflict and gridlock over the appointment of federal appeals court judges, by making a cooperative equilibrium difficult to sustain. Presidents have greater electoral incentive to behave ideologically, and less incentive to cooperate with other players in the appointments process, than do senators, who are disciplined to a greater extent in their dealings with each other by the prospect of retaliation over repeat play. The possibility of divided government exacerbates …
Prosecutorial Neutrality, Fred C. Zacharias, Bruce A. Green
Prosecutorial Neutrality, Fred C. Zacharias, Bruce A. Green
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
This Article examines the ideal of prosecutorial neutrality in an effort to determine its value as a measure of prosecutorial conduct. Commentators often have assumed that prosecutors should be “neutral” in making discretionary decisions or have criticized prosecutors for decisions that purportedly demonstrate a lack of neutrality. The notion of prosecutorial neutrality recalls the traditional conception of prosecutors as “quasi-judicial” officers and emphasizes the distinction between prosecutors and lawyers for private parties. But the specific meaning attributed to prosecutorial neutrality has varied depending on the context. The term refers to diverse, and potentially inconsistent, views of appropriate prosecutorial conduct. The …
A Response To The Society Of American Law Teachers Statement On The Bar Exam, Suzanne Darrow-Kleinhaus
A Response To The Society Of American Law Teachers Statement On The Bar Exam, Suzanne Darrow-Kleinhaus
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Rational Standard Setting In Lawyer Qualification: A Critical Look At The Proposal Of The New York Board Of Law Examiners To Increase The Passing Score On The Bar Examination, Frederick Link
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Riner V. Newbraugh: The Role Of Mediator Testimony In The Enforcement Of Mediated Agreements, Joshua S. Rogers
Riner V. Newbraugh: The Role Of Mediator Testimony In The Enforcement Of Mediated Agreements, Joshua S. Rogers
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Model Definition Of The Practice Of Law: If Not Now, When? An Alternative Approach To Defining The Practice Of Law, Soha F. Turfler
A Model Definition Of The Practice Of Law: If Not Now, When? An Alternative Approach To Defining The Practice Of Law, Soha F. Turfler
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Will The Ninth Circuit Be Reversed In Banaitis V. Commissioner?, Richard Mason
Will The Ninth Circuit Be Reversed In Banaitis V. Commissioner?, Richard Mason
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
'You'd Better Be Good': Congressional Threats Of Removal Against Federal Judges, Marc O. Degirolami
'You'd Better Be Good': Congressional Threats Of Removal Against Federal Judges, Marc O. Degirolami
ExpressO
In the attached article, I argue that congressional threats of removal against federal judges are increasing in prevalence and forcefulness and that as a result the strained relationship between the judiciary and Congress – a topic of recent attention and debate – will continue to deteriorate in the coming years. I examine two bills, the Feeney Amendment to the PROTECT Act and House of Representatives Resolution 568 (in which Congress would disavow citation in judicial decisions to foreign law), to demonstrate this thesis.
I next ask what explains the phenomenon of congressional threats of removal, deploying first Thomas Hobbes’ state-of-nature …
Quid Pro Whoa!: An Exponential Fee Structure For Patent Applications, Peter L. Giunta
Quid Pro Whoa!: An Exponential Fee Structure For Patent Applications, Peter L. Giunta
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Assessment Of Clinical Skills In Medicine And Law, Jayne W. Barnard
Assessment Of Clinical Skills In Medicine And Law, Jayne W. Barnard
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Reading/Teaching Lawyer Films, James R. Elkins
Reading/Teaching Lawyer Films, James R. Elkins
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Implicit Racial Attitudes Of Death Penalty Lawyers, Theodore Eisenberg, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Implicit Racial Attitudes Of Death Penalty Lawyers, Theodore Eisenberg, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Defense attorneys commonly suspect that the defendant's race plays a role in prosecutors' decisions to seek the death penalty, especially when the victim of the crime was white. When the defendant is convicted of the crime and sentenced to death, it is equally common for such attorneys to question the racial attitudes of the jury. These suspicions are not merely partisan conjectures; ample historical, statistical, and anecdotal evidence supports the inference that race matters in capital cases. Even the General Accounting Office of the United States concludes as much. Despite McCleskey v. Kemp, in which the United States Supreme Court …
Making Lawyers Compete, Lester Brickman
Making Lawyers Compete, Lester Brickman
Articles
The article argues that the market for contingent-fee-financed tort litigation is not price competitive, primarily due to uniform contingency fees charged by lawyers regardless of case-specific factors such as risk or effort required. This lack of competition leads to excessive costs for claimants and contributes to the expansion of tort liability. The author contends that the legal profession maintains this system through various barriers, including ethical rules and entry restrictions, which prevent competitive market forces from functioning effectively.
Vol. 2, No. 07/08 (June/July 2004)
The Higher Calling: Regulation Of Lawyers Post-Enron, Keith R. Fisher
The Higher Calling: Regulation Of Lawyers Post-Enron, Keith R. Fisher
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article discusses some of the inadequacies in the current ethical regulation of the legal system and proposes a new approach to crafting and contextualizing rules of legal ethics. The proliferation of specialties and subspecialties in law practice, together with the inadequacies of prevailing ethics regulation and the vagaries of ethics rules formulations from state to state have not served either the public or the legal profession well. Manipulation, motivated by politics and self-interest, of the ideology of the organized bar to adhere to ethical rules predicated on an antiquated and unrealistic model of a unified legal profession has likewise …
Can Law Firms Spam?, Kevin Michael
Can Law Firms Spam?, Kevin Michael
Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 presents a compliance problem for law firms that issue periodic newsletters to clients or prospective clients. While the Act does not expressly include such newsletters, nor define commercial advertisement in a manner that suggests newsletters will be included, the advisory opinions from state ethics boards suggest that newsletters are advertisements. Arguments can be made that newsletters to current clients are not advertisements. However, given the low cost of compliance with the Act, firms should treat these newsletters as commercial advertisements and adhere to the provisions of the Act.
Clark Memorandum: Spring 2004, J. Reuben Clark Law Society, J. Reuben Clark Law School
Clark Memorandum: Spring 2004, J. Reuben Clark Law Society, J. Reuben Clark Law School
The Clark Memorandum
- Unto This Very Purpose (Elder Neal A. Maxwell)
- Safe Passage (Scott W. Cameron)
- And With All Thy Mind (John W. Welch)
- The Men Who Created the Market (Jane Wise)
Volume 28, Issue 1 (Spring 2004)
Lawyers, Gats, And The Wto Accountancy Disciplines: The History Of The Wto's Consultation, The Iba Gats Forum And The September 2003 Iba Resolutions, Laurel S. Terry
Lawyers, Gats, And The Wto Accountancy Disciplines: The History Of The Wto's Consultation, The Iba Gats Forum And The September 2003 Iba Resolutions, Laurel S. Terry
Faculty Scholarly Works
The article addresses issues related to legal services and the General Agreement on Trade in Services or GATS. The article begins by focusing on "Track #2" of the GATS and the obligation under GATS Article VI:4 to develop "any necessary disciplines." In 1998, WTO Members implemented GATS Article VI:4 by adopting "Disciplines" that apply to the accoutnancy sector. WTO Members currently are in the process of deciding whether to extend the WTO Accountancy Disciplines, S/L/64, to other service sectors, including legal services. In December 2002, the WTO sent the International Bar Association (IBA) and other non-governmental organizations a "consultation letter" …
Actions Founded On Statutory Liability: Adopting A Limitations Period For Attorneys' Fees Actions Brought Under The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Darren A. Craig
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Culture Of Quiescence, Carl Bogus
Client Counseling, Mediation, And Alternative Narratives Of Dispute Resolution, Robert Rubinson
Client Counseling, Mediation, And Alternative Narratives Of Dispute Resolution, Robert Rubinson
All Faculty Scholarship
This article examines how litigation and mediation have distinct narrative structures and what these narratives say about counseling clients about mediation. In the narrative of litigation, parties struggle against one another in order to convince a decision maker of the truth of "what happened." This struggle is about more than designating liability; it is about enabling the decision-maker to restore social order and vindicate morality. In contrast, the narrative of mediation does not call upon the mediator to designate "truth" or "right" and "wrong." Rather, the mediator acts to enable parties to overcome and transform conflict through collaboration. In the …
Legal Malpractice Insurance: Surviving The Perfect Storm, Susan Saab Fortney
Legal Malpractice Insurance: Surviving The Perfect Storm, Susan Saab Fortney
Faculty Scholarship
This article serves as a practical guide to legal malpractice insurance. Part I introduces the topic of legal malpractice insurance with a brief overview of the changes that occurred in market conditions in 2000 and the subsequent effect on insurance premiums and coverage. Part II outlines the different types of insurance coverage that are available to legal professionals by describing common policy terms, exclusions, and conditions that affect coverage. Part III describes changes in law firms that may affect coverage. Part IV provides legal professionals with useful advice to consider when choosing an insurance policy. Part V reveals important factors …
Gentleman's Agreement: The Antisemitic Origins Of Restrictions On Stockholder Litigation, Lawrence E. Mitchell
Gentleman's Agreement: The Antisemitic Origins Of Restrictions On Stockholder Litigation, Lawrence E. Mitchell
ExpressO
A deeply ingrained, seemingly ineradicable, hostility to plaintiffs’ lawyers and especially to plaintiffs’ lawyers in stockholder suits seems to have existed for most of the past century. This hostility is manifest not only in the tone of judicial opinions but in law review articles, the popular press, and, often, in legislation. This article analyzes the circumstances under which the first security-for-expense statute was adopted in New York in 1944, including the contemporaneous justification for the statute, focusing on the demographics of the New York bar at the time and the ethnic sociology of New York. In so doing, it concludes …
Courts As Forums For Protest, Jules Lobel
Courts As Forums For Protest, Jules Lobel
ExpressO
For almost half a century, scholars, judges and politicians have debated two competing models of the judiciary’s role in a democratic society. The mainstream model views courts as arbiters of disputes between private individuals asserting particular rights. The public law or structural reform litigation emphasized the judiciary’s role in implementing social change and not simply ordering private relationships.
The ongoing debate between these two views of the judicial role has obscured a third model of the role of courts in a democratic society; a model that has been ignored by legal scholars and viewed as illegitimate by some courts. That …
Are You Experienced?: Examining The Need For Specialized Ethics Rules In Patent Litigation, Benjamin J. Sodey
Are You Experienced?: Examining The Need For Specialized Ethics Rules In Patent Litigation, Benjamin J. Sodey
ExpressO
Any attorney licensed to practice before a federal district court, regardless or his or her area of specialization, may file a patent infringement suit on behalf of a client in that court. The possibility exists, therefore, for an attorney having little or no intellectual property experience to represent clients in complex patent litigation matters. Due to this, infringement defendants and their counsel may find themselves on the receiving end of a dubious patent claim brought by attorneys lacking patent law experience. This article discusses whether the existing rules governing attorney conduct, such as professional responsibility, procedural, or statutory rules, are …