Legal Profession Commons^™

Vega V. Tekoh, Elizabeth M. Hudson

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Susan Williams's Comments - Panel 1, Susan Williams

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Luvernel Clark's Comments - Panel 1, Luvernel Clark

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Professor Sherley Cruz's Comments - Panel 2, Sherley Cruz

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fran Ansley's Tennessee Posse For Peace And Justice, Charles Lawrence Iii

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Legal Philosophy For Lawyers In The Age Of A Political Supreme Court, Patrick J. Borchers

Tennessee Law Review

Legal Philosophy has long been concerned with the question of what brands a norm as legal, as opposed to a non-legal norm of justice or morality. This central question has occupied the attention of philosophers and lawyers for centuries. Roughly speaking, the Naturalist school contends that legal norms are inextricably intertwined with norms of morality and justice (and in its strongest form contends that law-like pronouncements that are immoral or unjust are not fully laws), while the Positivist school argues that a social construct (often called the Rule of Recognition) brands selected norms as legal, and thus legal norms may …

Jj Rosenbaum's Comments - Panel 2, Jj Rosenbaum

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cecilia Prado's Comments - Phase 2, Cecilia Prado

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dr. Meghan Conley's Comments - Panel 2, Meghan Conley

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Professor Muneer Ahmad's Comments - Panel 2, Muneer Ahmad

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Afterword

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reconstructing The Past And Our Reconstruction Present: The Long Struggle To Teach Divisive Concepts - Panel 3, Robert D. Bland

Tennessee Law Review

"In our present moment, as we see just as many signs of a Third 'Redemption,' as we see of a Third Reconstruction, it is important to remember the previous struggles over history and memory ..."

Histories For Our Present And Future Struggles - Panel 3, Jessica Wilkerson

Tennessee Law Review

"Working out how to build democratic movements and institutions in the South and beyond requires understanding the impact of oppressive systems on people, from those people ..."

Professor Fran Ansley's Comments, Fran Ansley

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Van Turner's Comments - Panel 3, Van D. Turner Jr.

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Social Media On Trial: How The Supreme Court Could Permanently Alter The Future Of The Internet By Limiting Section 230'S Broad Immunity Shield, J. Tyler Wampler

Tennessee Law Review

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has allowed the internet to develop and flourish at an unprecedent pace. The law has been interpreted broadly to grant immunity to interactive computer services like social media platforms from liability for content posted by users. Wielding this immunity, internet platforms are empowered to act innovatively without fear of frivolous lawsuits. However, there are ongoing concerns that this broad interpretation shields modern tech companies from liability for actions that were never intended to be protected.

Two companion cases interpreting Section 230 are currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, where the Court is being …

The World The Fire Wrought: A Tribute To Fran Ansley - Part 1, Jennifer Gordon

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Remembering The Bottom: The Street And Feets Exhibit - Panel 3, Enkeshi El-Amin

Tennessee Law Review

'Almost seventy years after a neighborhood is destroyed, how is it remembered? ... What I learned in trying to answer this question is that with public memory being a site of contestation, it depends on who you ask ..."

Contents

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Choice Of Law And Time, Jeffrey L. Rensberger

Tennessee Law Review

Choice of law is usually thought of as a problem of law across geography, of how laws apply to persons and events not entirely within a state's boundaries. But time is another dimension to the choice of law problem. In cases wholly domestic to a single state, this temporal issue appears when a court considers whether a change in law has retroactive application. But changes in law occur in interstate cases as well. Moreover, the facts relevant to a choice of law analysis may change between the time of the underlying events and the litigation. Does the court consider facts …

Contents

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Opioid Accountability, Daniel G. Aaron

Tennessee Law Review

The opioid crisis has steadily killed Americans for twenty years. In total, we have lost more than 500,000 American lives since the 1990s, and countless more suffer from chronic addiction.

After years of piecemeal efforts to address this massive loss of life and health, the opioid litigation, largely centralized in Ohio federal district court, has brought significant hope for change. But there is a notable divide between the popular sense of the litigation and its reality. A full 57% of Americans believe that opioid companies should be held accountable for precipitating a public health crisis. However, the litigation, has been …

Antitrust's Ai Revolution, Daryl Lim

Tennessee Law Review

Antitrust law operates like an algorithm. Its lodestar, the rule of reason, is a black box. Unlike most other areas of the law, judges, not Congress, write the rules and sometimes in surprisingly capricious ways. These rules govern everything from Google and Facebook's "killer acquisitions" to vaccine development agreements during a pandemic. Injecting artificial intelligence (AI) into antitrust analysis seems prosaic, but in fact, it is revolutionary.

Courts routinely lean on ideology as a heuristic when they must interpret the rule of reason in light of economic theory and evidence. Chicago School conservatism reined in some excesses of earlier populist …

Contents

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Case Index

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dna Exonerations And Stakeholder Responses: A Case Of Cognitive Dissonance, Anne Richardson Oakes, Julian Killingley

Tennessee Law Review

The availability of DNA testing developed in the 1980s transformed the ability of prosecutors to secure convictions while providing Innocence Projects with the tools to overturn them. However, DNA exonerations which establish conclusively that a person convicted of a crime is in fact innocent, can represent a major threat to the value systems and therefore the self-belief of stakeholders who acted in good faith and in the genuine but mistaken belief that the exoneree was guilty. This Article reports on the findings of an investigation into stakeholder responses to DNA exonerations between 1990-1999 when DNA evidence was new and more …

The Not-So-Odd Couple: Specific Personal Jurisdiction And Party Joinder, Haley Palfreyman Jankowski

Tennessee Law Review

Traditionally, scholars and courts alike have thought of joinder of parties and personal jurisdiction as separate questions. Party joinder determined who should be in the lawsuit, whereas personal jurisdiction determined what power courts could exercise over those parties-a question that invariably becomes more complicated when more parties are added to the lawsuit. The Supreme Court's 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court forced a reckoning between these two areas of civil procedure. In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Court irreversibly connected specific personal jurisdiction and party joinder by holding that non-Californian plaintiffs could not be part of a California lawsuit …

Does Motive Also Follow The Bullet? Transferred Intent And Violent Crimes In Aid Of Racketeering, Melvin L. Otey

Tennessee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taxing Creativity, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine

Tennessee Law Review

The recent sell offs of song catalogs by Bob Dylan, Stevie Nicks, Neil Young, and Mick Fleetwood for extraordinarily large sums of money raise questions about the law on creativity. While patent and copyright laws encourage a wide array of creative endeavors, tax laws

governing monetization of creative works do not. The Songwriters Capital Gains Equity Act, in particular, solidifies creativity exceptionalism, exacerbates tax inequities among creators, and perpetuates racial disparities in the tax Code. This Article asserts that the law must encourage creativity from all creators. It is time to eliminate tax exceptionalism for musical compositions or expand its …

How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sb8? Flagrantly Unconstitutional Laws, Procedural Scheming, And The Need For Pre-Enforcement Offensive Litigation, Kimberley Harris

Tennessee Law Review

Reproductive rights are facing multiple existential threats. While the Supreme Court has overturned the constitutional right to pre- viability elective abortions in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, in Texas the ability to obtain a pre-viability abortion vanished almost ten months earlier. With the enactment of S.B. 8, the so-called "Texas Heartbeat Act," abortions after approximately the sixth week of pregnancy, including those that result from rape or incest, were banned months before the Court ruled in Dobbs. Despite being clearly unconstitutional under the then-existing precedent of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the Texas …