Legal Profession Commons^™

The Four Discourses Of Law And Arthur Jacobson's Legal Plenum, Jeanne L. Schroeder

Cardozo Law Review

I concentrate on an early work of Arthur Jacobson's that he published just as I started my academic career. Not only did it greatly impress me at the time, but when I reread it recently I was struck with how much it had influenced my thinking. His distinction between correlative and dynamic jurisprudences echo in my Lacanian-based jurisprudential theory of the four discourses of law.

Strangers In The Law: Lawyers' Law And The Other Legal Dimensions, Mauro Bussani

Cardozo Law Review

Political and legal theories have long been takingfor granted the idea that law is the province of government and government recognized authorities, including the judiciary. They have concentrated on the processes and principles, by which the form and substance of State law are determined, implemented, and enforced. This law is what I will call official or State law. By contrast, many non-official sites of legal production have always existed and still exist (outside and) inside the West. These sites produce rules that may flourish indifferent to or in opposition to official law and take the settlement of disputes arising out …

An Empirical Investigation Of Third Party Consumer Litigant Funding, Ronen Avraham, Anthony J. Sebok

Articles

This is the first large-scale empirical study of consumer third-party litigation funding in the United States. Despite being part of the American legal system for more than two decades there has been almost no real data-driven empirical study to date. We analyzed funding requests from American consumers in over 100,000 cases over a twelve year period. This proprietary data set was provided to us by one of the largest consumer litigation funder in the United States.

Our results are striking and important. We find that the funder plays an important role in the American legal system by screening cases. Our …

Civil Rico: An Effective Deterrent To Fraudulent Asbestos Litigation?, Lester Brickman

Cardozo Law Review

In January 2014, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge George Hodges, presiding over the asbestos-related bankruptcy of Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, a manufacturer of gaskets containing asbestos, issued an order estimating Garlock's liability for pending and future mesothelioma cases. Judge Hodges, after hearing evidence discovered by Garlock in a sampling of settled cases, rejected using the usual bankruptcy court recourse to the debtor's historic settlement values as a valid basis for estimating Garlock's total future liability for asbestos-related injuries. He found that Garlock's prior mesothelioma settlements were not a reliable predictor of Garlock's liability because those settlements had been infected by misrepresentations by …

The Sec's Part 205.3(D)(2) And Wadler V. Bio-Rad Labs. Should Be Revisited: The Sec Exceeded Authority In Creating A Reporting Out Provision For In-House Attorneys, Briana Sheridan

Cardozo Law Review

This Note proceeds in three parts. Part I introduces relevant statutory law. Part I discusses federal law, notably Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the SEC's Part 205.3(d)(2), as well as the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules and conflicting state law. Part II first examines case law involving the preemption of state ethics laws, including Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories, which concluded broadly that Part 205 preempts California law.23 Part II then examines the doctrine of federal preemption, which is followed by a preemption analysis of Part 205.3(d)(2). Part III recommends that Part 205.3(d)(2) should be revisited, as the …

Code Of Silence, Melissa Mortazavi

Cardozo Law Review

To read the literature on professional responsibility is to inhabit a world focused on what is said explicitly about what it means to be a lawyer: the aspirations of the canons, the commands of the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility, the clarifications of court and ethics opinions, and the guidance of the Restatement. However, it often neglects what is not said: spaces where silence reigns. This Article takes a different approach; it listens to the taciturn.

This Article draws insight from when the bar chooses to be silent in the face of widely known violations of the law of lawyering. …

The Ethics Of Non-Lawyer Advocacy: Expectations, Rules, And Complications, John F. Wirenius

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The article examines the ethical challenges and legal complexities surrounding nonattorney advocacy in labor relations, particularly under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and similar state statutes. It highlights the tension between holding non-lawyer union representatives to attorney ethical standards and the need for simpler, practical norms. The analysis emphasizes the importance of balancing due process for pro se parties with maintaining the integrity of advocacy roles, suggesting that resorting to fundamental statutory values and reciprocal duties can provide a baseline for ethical conduct.

Tracking Client Outcomes: A Qualitative Assessment Of Civil Legal Aid's Use Of Outcomes Data, With Recommendations, David Udell, Amy Widman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

In virtually all sectors of society, people are using data to improve what they do. Everyone, it seems, is interested in data, and is searching for best strategies to draw on its power. The stakes are high in the civil legal aid community, where strengthened advocacy can enable people to preserve their homes, their relationships with their children, their life savings, their physical and emotional well-being, and even their freedom.

Yet, in the civil legal aid community, awareness of the power of data is just beginning to take root. Traditionally, civil legal aid has been thinly funded, with little infrastructure …

2018 Camp Courthouse Colloquy, United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit: The Art Of Mediating Intractable Disputes, George J. Mitchell

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

In 1974, the Civil Appeals Mediation Program ("CAMP") was established in the Second Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals as a pioneering initiative. CAMP is an integral part of the court's appellate process and provides mediation in suitable, counseled civil appeals that are eligible under Local Rule 33.1. In 2017, CAMP inaugurated the Courthouse Mediation Colloquy series to gather members of the judiciary, members of the bar, mediators, academics, and students in an informal, educational setting. The Colloquy features a distinguished guest engaging in a conversation with a representative of the court about aspects of mediation that are …

Cooperative Design Lawyering: How Can Lawyers Prevent Disputes Through Value Innovation?, Jean-François Roberge, Véronique Fraser

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article puts forth processes for preventing disputes based on value innovation, an approach referred to as Cooperative Design Lawyering ("CDL"). It suggests that law firms could take a competitive edge by offering Cooperative Design Lawyering services. It explores how legal designers can redefine the value and predictability of a relationship between parties by creating positive-sum interdependence, managing risk allocation and preventing the escalation of eventual disputes. It argues that CDL has the potential to act as a "blue ocean" strategy by targeting unmet needs and delivering value innovation to reach untapped markets. CDL relationship-oriented services capture value and improve …

Careful Training Does Eliminate Gender-Based Negotiation Differences, Charles B. Craver

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Solving The Problem-Solver Problem: How A Revamp Of Arbitral Ethics Will Encourage Plaintiffs And Benefit Defendants, Lindsey Rubinstein

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note aims to expose the consequences of these ethical deficiencies, including a lack of uniformity in arbitral results, conflicts of interest, and a lack of bargaining power for plaintiffs. This Note will also provide a framework for what an arbitral code of ethics should look like to ensure greater protections for petitioners. It is important to mention that this Note will explore the problems introduced above exclusively in the context of the ethical framework provided by the AAA. Part II will provide background information on the rise of arbitration, the development of the AAA Code of Ethics, and the …

Grounds To Refuse The Enforcement Of Settlement Agreements Under The Singapore Convention On Mediation: Purpose, Scope, And Their Importance For The Success Of The Convention, Héctor Flores Sentíes

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This article will attempt to: (i) explain the purpose behind the drafting of the grounds to refuse enforcement; (ii) describe the scope of these defenses, based on the deliberations of the Working Group that drafted the Singapore Convention; and finally, (iii) briefly comment on the relationship between the scope of the defenses and the likelihood of the success of the Singapore Convention.

Did Five Supreme Court Justices Go "Completely Bonkers"?: Saul Goodman, Legal Advertising, And The First Amendment Since Bates V. State Bar Of Arizona, Eric T. Kasper, Troy A. Kozma

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977), the U.S. Supreme Court held for the first time that the First and Fourteenth Amendments' protection of the freedom of speech extends to truthful advertising of attorneys' services. The ruling set aside decades of ethics rules that had prohibited lawyers from engaging in this type of marketing that bar associations had deemed predatory and beneath the stature of the profession. Saul Goodman from Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul is a pop culture representation of what legal advertising has become, both reflecting and shaping public perception of legal commercial publicity. But are …

Using Restorative Dialogue As An Assimilation Technique For Unaccompanied Children Escaping Gang Violence, Naomi Jawahar

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

This Note will first give background on the Northern Triangle area and background on the asylum process in Part I. Part II of the Note will discuss the negative government response in Section A. Section B will delve into the influence of gangs, Section C will discuss the relation between juvenile stigmatization and crime, and Section D will discuss the current resettlement process for UACs that is in place. Finally, Section E, of Part II, will discuss how ADR will help with the resettlement process. Part IH will offer a solution, with Section A showing how restorative dialogue specifically can …

Long Term Effects Of Involvement In The Criminal Justice System: Mitigating Collateral Consequences & Tackling Voter Disenfranchisement, Symposium Session 1, Wesley Caines, Lucy Cutolo, Kendea Johnson

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The symposium examines the long-term effects of involvement in the criminal justice system, focusing on collateral consequences and voter disenfranchisement. It emphasizes the need for both prosecutors and defense attorneys to address these consequences early in criminal cases, as they significantly impact individuals' lives beyond direct legal penalties. The discussion highlights the importance of holistic approaches to mitigate these effects and advocates for systemic changes to reduce disparities and support successful reintegration into society.

Required, Permissible, And Impermissible Forms Of Federal Judicial Assistance To Self-Represented Litigants: Toward Establishment Of A Judicial Duty Of Reasonable Assistance, Jona Goldschmidt

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article examines the evolving role of judicial assistance to self-represented litigants (SRLs) in federal courts, arguing that while the Supreme Court has maintained a strict no-assistance policy, lower courts have increasingly recognized the need for accommodations to ensure fair trials. The author advocates for a more consistent and expansive approach to judicial assistance, aligning with due process and the constitutional right to self-representation, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining judicial impartiality.

Plus Ça Change: A Century-Old Removal For Cause, Michael E. Herz

Online Publications

Lots of ink has been spilled over when Congress can give federal officials for-cause protection. One would think that a necessary antecedent to that discussion would be a determination of exactly what for-cause protection entails. What is “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office”? Yet no one knows; the debate over the permissibility of that restriction proceeds in blissful uncertainty as to its scope.

Judge Victor Marrero's Challenge To The Legal Profession: A "Little Rebellion Now And Then", John D. Feerick

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Virtues Of Complexity: Judge Marrero's Systemic Account Of Litigation Abuse, Charles M. Yablon

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Narrative Of Costs, The Cost Of Narrative, Alexander A. Reinert

Cardozo Law Review

In this Article, I will highlight some of my concerns, but they boil down to this: in terms of diagnosis, I am simply not convinced that Judge Marrero has compellingly demonstrated that in the run of cases, our procedural rules are being abused in ways that undermine justice and increase cost and inefficiencies. In part, this is a data-driven critique-there is little empirical support for the proposition that our procedural system is too costly in most cases. But my critique is also an attitudinal one. Judge Marrero makes much of the extent to which litigants fail-claims that are dismissed, motions …

The Cost Of Rules, The Rule Of Costs: A Practical Practitioner's Perspective, Sarah L. Cave

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Geopolitical Implications Of The United States Of America's Withdrawal From The Paris Agreement, Christopher Mahoney

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The Trump Administration's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement has significant geopolitical implications, as it creates a leadership vacuum that China is poised to fill, potentially reshaping the global transition to renewable energy. While the U.S. federal government steps back from international climate efforts, non-federal actors like states and cities continue to advance climate initiatives. The withdrawal underscores the importance of domestic innovation in clean energy to counterbalance China's growing influence.

The Cost Of Rules, The Rules Of Costs, Victor Marrero

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Necessity Of The Good Person Prosecutor, Jessica A. Roth

Articles

In a 2001 essay, Professor Abbe Smith asked the question whether a good person—i.e., a person who is committed to social justice—can be a good prosecutor. Although she acknowledged some hope that the answer to her question could be “yes,” Professor Smith concluded that the answer then was “no”—in part because she saw individual prosecutors generally as having very little discretion to “temper the harsh reality of the criminal justice system.” In this Online Symposium revisiting Professor Smith’s question seventeen years later, my answer to her question is “yes”—a good person can be a good prosecutor.

Life After Daca: Immigration Reform In The Age Of Trump, Hasan Shafiqullah, Martin Batalla, Michael Wildes, Anthony Enriquez, Javeria Ahmed

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The symposium examines the revocation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program by the Trump administration, its legal challenges, and the ongoing debate over immigration reform. It highlights the impact on approximately 900,000 DACA recipients and the lawsuits arguing the revocation was arbitrary, capricious, and motivated by racial discrimination. The analysis emphasizes the need for comprehensive immigration reform, advocating for a "clean" Dream Act to provide a pathway to citizenship without compromising the rights of other immigrants or increasing enforcement measures. The discussion also underscores the historical and cultural significance of immigration in the U.S., urging collective action …

Stop That Revolving Door: Analysis Of The Appropriate Application Of The "Cooling-Off' Period Beyond Senior Government Employees, Cecilia Wang

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The cooling-off period-a period of one or two years in which a former public sector employee is prohibited from representing matters involving or appearing before his former agency of employmentexists as a means of regulating immediate departures from public to private sector law enforcement. While normally only applicable to directors or other senior officers of government, recent legal and policy changes have brought midlevel government employees under the scrutiny of lawmakers. An increase in employment liquidity has forced regulators attempting to preserve the policy's inherent purpose propose to include these midlevel employees in the application of the cooling-off period.

Conviction Integrity Units Revisited, Barry Scheck

Articles

“Conviction Integrity Unit” has become a brand name that has good public relations value for an elected official. But what does it really mean? Is it just a fashion accessory, a flashy but empty appellation intended to convey the idea that the office is extremely serious about correcting wrongful convictions and holding its own members accountable for errors or acts of misconduct, but really is not? Is conviction integrity nothing more than a passing fad, a nebulous slogan without real meaning that is good for propaganda purposes, but will not bring about any serious change in the way business is …

Erie Step Zero, Alexander A. Reinert

Articles

Courts and commentators have assumed that the Erie doctrine, while originating in diversity cases, applies in all cases whatever the basis for federal jurisdiction. Thus, when a federal court asserts jurisdiction over pendent state law claims through the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction in a federal question case, courts regularly apply the Erie doctrine to resolve conflict between federal and state law. This Article shows why this common wisdom is wrong.

To understand why, it is necessary to return to Erie’s goals, elaborated over time by the U.S. Supreme Court. Erie and its progeny are steeped in diversity-driven policy concerns: concerns …

Shifting The Landscape On Access To Justice, Jonathan Lippman

Cardozo Law Review

The essay emphasizes the critical need to address the justice gap faced by the poor and vulnerable, advocating for proactive measures by the judiciary, legal profession, and academia. It highlights initiatives in New York, such as increased public funding, expanded pro bono efforts, and innovative programs, to ensure equal access to justice, potentially leading to a right to counsel in civil cases.