Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (818)
- Legal Education (12)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (11)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Business Organizations Law (3)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Evidence (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Public Interest (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legal profession (8)
- Legal education (7)
- Law (6)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Leadership (5)
-
- Practice of law (5)
- American Bar Association (3)
- Ethics (3)
- Law school (3)
- Social media (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- Business law (2)
- Diversity (2)
- Inclusion (2)
- Job market (2)
- Law employment (2)
- Law librarians (2)
- Lawyering (2)
- Legal technology (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Millennials (2)
- Outreach reference services (2)
- Professional responsibility (2)
- Public patrons (2)
- Teaching (2)
- Unauthorized practice of law (2)
- ABA Standard 303(c) (1)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Access to Justice; Feminism; Gender Discrimination; Gender; Leadership; Legal Ethics; Legal Scholarship; Professional Responsibility; Sex Discrimination; Deborah Rhode (1)
- Access to justice (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 855
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
Reconstructing The Past And Our Reconstruction Present: The Long Struggle To Teach Divisive Concepts - Panel 3, Robert D. Bland
Reconstructing The Past And Our Reconstruction Present: The Long Struggle To Teach Divisive Concepts - Panel 3, Robert D. Bland
Tennessee Law Review
"In our present moment, as we see just as many signs of a Third 'Redemption,' as we see of a Third Reconstruction, it is important to remember the previous struggles over history and memory ..."
Histories For Our Present And Future Struggles - Panel 3, Jessica Wilkerson
Histories For Our Present And Future Struggles - Panel 3, Jessica Wilkerson
Tennessee Law Review
"Working out how to build democratic movements and institutions in the South and beyond requires understanding the impact of oppressive systems on people, from those people ..."
Professor Fran Ansley's Comments, Fran Ansley
Professor Fran Ansley's Comments, Fran Ansley
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Van Turner's Comments - Panel 3, Van D. Turner Jr.
Van Turner's Comments - Panel 3, Van D. Turner Jr.
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Social Media On Trial: How The Supreme Court Could Permanently Alter The Future Of The Internet By Limiting Section 230'S Broad Immunity Shield, J. Tyler Wampler
Social Media On Trial: How The Supreme Court Could Permanently Alter The Future Of The Internet By Limiting Section 230'S Broad Immunity Shield, J. Tyler Wampler
Tennessee Law Review
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has allowed the internet to develop and flourish at an unprecedent pace. The law has been interpreted broadly to grant immunity to interactive computer services like social media platforms from liability for content posted by users. Wielding this immunity, internet platforms are empowered to act innovatively without fear of frivolous lawsuits. However, there are ongoing concerns that this broad interpretation shields modern tech companies from liability for actions that were never intended to be protected.
Two companion cases interpreting Section 230 are currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, where the Court is being …
The World The Fire Wrought: A Tribute To Fran Ansley - Part 1, Jennifer Gordon
The World The Fire Wrought: A Tribute To Fran Ansley - Part 1, Jennifer Gordon
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remembering The Bottom: The Street And Feets Exhibit - Panel 3, Enkeshi El-Amin
Remembering The Bottom: The Street And Feets Exhibit - Panel 3, Enkeshi El-Amin
Tennessee Law Review
'Almost seventy years after a neighborhood is destroyed, how is it remembered? ... What I learned in trying to answer this question is that with public memory being a site of contestation, it depends on who you ask ..."
Ethical Implications Of Law Practice Technology, Eliza Boles
Ethical Implications Of Law Practice Technology, Eliza Boles
Scholarly Works
The following CLE materials were prepared by Eliza Boles for presentation on December 6, 2022. Materials were approved by the Tennessee Commission on Continuing Legal Education for two hours of mandated ethics credit.
Don't Get Lost In Translation!, Sherley Cruz
Don't Get Lost In Translation!, Sherley Cruz
Tennessee Law in the News
This piece highlights the importance of creating a language access plan and knowing how to work with interpreters.
A Study Of Tax Lawyers Discussing Duties, Michelle M. Kwon, Michael Hatfield
A Study Of Tax Lawyers Discussing Duties, Michelle M. Kwon, Michael Hatfield
Scholarly Works
This Article reports the first qualitative empirical study of U.S. tax lawyers. We interviewed women lawyers who were tax planning specialists. Though this is the first such study of U.S. tax lawyers, this methodology has been used often to study the professional ethics of other tax practitioners around the world. We had three research questions that we sought to answer through dynamic conversations on topics such as the distinctions between good and bad tax plans and good and bad tax lawyers and also the joys and stresses of tax practice. Our first research question was as to the make-up of …
Strategies And Techniques For Integrating Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Into The Core Law Curriculum : Comprehensive Guide To Dei Pedagogy, Course Planning, And Classroom Practice, Teri A. Mcmurtry-Chubb
Strategies And Techniques For Integrating Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Into The Core Law Curriculum : Comprehensive Guide To Dei Pedagogy, Course Planning, And Classroom Practice, Teri A. Mcmurtry-Chubb
AALL Legal Website of the Month
Professor Teri A. McMurtry-Chubb at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law has authored a book about the strategies to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into classrooms. The focus of this publication is on learning outcomes and assessments, and course planning templates for each course in the core law curriculum, and racial trauma-informed teaching approaches. Each chapter also includes FAQs and discussion questions to work through for the course planning and DEI curricular initiatives to transform the way we think, teach, learn and act such that all experiences and ways of being are handled with fairness and justice.
Aba Employment Summary Class Of 2022, University Of Tennessee College Of Law
Aba Employment Summary Class Of 2022, University Of Tennessee College Of Law
ABA Disclosures
No abstract provided.
Choice Of Law And Time, Jeffrey L. Rensberger
Choice Of Law And Time, Jeffrey L. Rensberger
Tennessee Law Review
Choice of law is usually thought of as a problem of law across geography, of how laws apply to persons and events not entirely within a state's boundaries. But time is another dimension to the choice of law problem. In cases wholly domestic to a single state, this temporal issue appears when a court considers whether a change in law has retroactive application. But changes in law occur in interstate cases as well. Moreover, the facts relevant to a choice of law analysis may change between the time of the underlying events and the litigation. Does the court consider facts …
Opioid Accountability, Daniel G. Aaron
Opioid Accountability, Daniel G. Aaron
Tennessee Law Review
The opioid crisis has steadily killed Americans for twenty years. In total, we have lost more than 500,000 American lives since the 1990s, and countless more suffer from chronic addiction.
After years of piecemeal efforts to address this massive loss of life and health, the opioid litigation, largely centralized in Ohio federal district court, has brought significant hope for change. But there is a notable divide between the popular sense of the litigation and its reality. A full 57% of Americans believe that opioid companies should be held accountable for precipitating a public health crisis. However, the litigation, has been …
Antitrust's Ai Revolution, Daryl Lim
Antitrust's Ai Revolution, Daryl Lim
Tennessee Law Review
Antitrust law operates like an algorithm. Its lodestar, the rule of reason, is a black box. Unlike most other areas of the law, judges, not Congress, write the rules and sometimes in surprisingly capricious ways. These rules govern everything from Google and Facebook's "killer acquisitions" to vaccine development agreements during a pandemic. Injecting artificial intelligence (AI) into antitrust analysis seems prosaic, but in fact, it is revolutionary.
Courts routinely lean on ideology as a heuristic when they must interpret the rule of reason in light of economic theory and evidence. Chicago School conservatism reined in some excesses of earlier populist …
Dna Exonerations And Stakeholder Responses: A Case Of Cognitive Dissonance, Anne Richardson Oakes, Julian Killingley
Dna Exonerations And Stakeholder Responses: A Case Of Cognitive Dissonance, Anne Richardson Oakes, Julian Killingley
Tennessee Law Review
The availability of DNA testing developed in the 1980s transformed the ability of prosecutors to secure convictions while providing Innocence Projects with the tools to overturn them. However, DNA exonerations which establish conclusively that a person convicted of a crime is in fact innocent, can represent a major threat to the value systems and therefore the self-belief of stakeholders who acted in good faith and in the genuine but mistaken belief that the exoneree was guilty. This Article reports on the findings of an investigation into stakeholder responses to DNA exonerations between 1990-1999 when DNA evidence was new and more …
The Not-So-Odd Couple: Specific Personal Jurisdiction And Party Joinder, Haley Palfreyman Jankowski
The Not-So-Odd Couple: Specific Personal Jurisdiction And Party Joinder, Haley Palfreyman Jankowski
Tennessee Law Review
Traditionally, scholars and courts alike have thought of joinder of parties and personal jurisdiction as separate questions. Party joinder determined who should be in the lawsuit, whereas personal jurisdiction determined what power courts could exercise over those parties-a question that invariably becomes more complicated when more parties are added to the lawsuit. The Supreme Court's 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court forced a reckoning between these two areas of civil procedure. In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Court irreversibly connected specific personal jurisdiction and party joinder by holding that non-Californian plaintiffs could not be part of a California lawsuit …
Does Motive Also Follow The Bullet? Transferred Intent And Violent Crimes In Aid Of Racketeering, Melvin L. Otey
Does Motive Also Follow The Bullet? Transferred Intent And Violent Crimes In Aid Of Racketeering, Melvin L. Otey
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Taxing Creativity, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Taxing Creativity, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Tennessee Law Review
The recent sell offs of song catalogs by Bob Dylan, Stevie Nicks, Neil Young, and Mick Fleetwood for extraordinarily large sums of money raise questions about the law on creativity. While patent and copyright laws encourage a wide array of creative endeavors, tax laws
governing monetization of creative works do not. The Songwriters Capital Gains Equity Act, in particular, solidifies creativity exceptionalism, exacerbates tax inequities among creators, and perpetuates racial disparities in the tax Code. This Article asserts that the law must encourage creativity from all creators. It is time to eliminate tax exceptionalism for musical compositions or expand its …
How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sb8? Flagrantly Unconstitutional Laws, Procedural Scheming, And The Need For Pre-Enforcement Offensive Litigation, Kimberley Harris
How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sb8? Flagrantly Unconstitutional Laws, Procedural Scheming, And The Need For Pre-Enforcement Offensive Litigation, Kimberley Harris
Tennessee Law Review
Reproductive rights are facing multiple existential threats. While the Supreme Court has overturned the constitutional right to pre- viability elective abortions in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, in Texas the ability to obtain a pre-viability abortion vanished almost ten months earlier. With the enactment of S.B. 8, the so-called "Texas Heartbeat Act," abortions after approximately the sixth week of pregnancy, including those that result from rape or incest, were banned months before the Court ruled in Dobbs. Despite being clearly unconstitutional under the then-existing precedent of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the Texas …
The Present Public Meaning Approach To Constitutional Interpretation, Michael L. Smith
The Present Public Meaning Approach To Constitutional Interpretation, Michael L. Smith
Tennessee Law Review
Originalists often respond to critics by claiming that originalism is worth pursuing because there are no feasible alternatives. The thinking goes that even the most scathing critiques of originalism fall flat if critics fail to propose a preferable alternative to originalism. After all, it takes a theory to beat a theory. This Article proposes such a theory. While most variations of originalism require that the Constitution be interpreted based on its original public meaning, this Article proposes that the Constitution should instead be interpreted based on its present public meaning. This alternative has attracted surprisingly little discussion in the originalist …
Workplace Harasser Liability: Assailing Moral Hazards And Rehabilitating The Individualist Approach, Ryan H. Nelson
Workplace Harasser Liability: Assailing Moral Hazards And Rehabilitating The Individualist Approach, Ryan H. Nelson
Tennessee Law Review
The focus of recent workplace harassment scholarship has been on irreproachable workplaces. Without detracting from that literature, this Article seeks to rehabilitate the individualist approach as a worthy supplement to institutional liability. It explicates, contextualizes, and outlines solutions to the moral hazards that would shelter workplace harassers from the risks of individual harasser liability if such liability ever comes to pass, thereby reclaiming the deterrent potential of the individualist approach. This Article begins by exploring how, without additional law reform, individual harasser liability would fail to optimally deter workplace harassment in two regards. First, it presents and analyzes original empirical …
Teaching Theranos, Priya Baskaran
Teaching Theranos, Priya Baskaran
Tennessee Law Review
The story of Theranos and disgraced CEO Elizabeth Holmes highlights numerous missed opportunities for effective intervention by corporate counsel. In particular, the lawyers at Theranos served as weak gate-keepers who were easily steamrolled by a power-drunk entrepreneur. The dominant business law pedagogy contributes to this problem by emphasizing litigation mitigation as the primary function of corporate lawyers. This framing improperly minimizes the role and influence of transactional attorneys to the detriment of all involved. Law Professors can change this narrative through much needed pedagogical innovation. Currently, any innovation in business law courses centers on the incorporation of drafting and other …
How Rhetoric Reveals Judicial Motives In Employment Discrimination Cases, Susan E. Provenzano
How Rhetoric Reveals Judicial Motives In Employment Discrimination Cases, Susan E. Provenzano
Tennessee Law Review
Employment discrimination plaintiffs tend to lose on summary judgment. In these cases, judges are acting like juries and undermining anti-discrimination legislation while paying lip service to the law and the judicial role. How and why are courts doing this? Legal scholars blame bad doctrine and biased judging. But neither one tells the full story. The tell is in the opinions' strategic use of language, which shows how the court, as an institution, "sized up" the case and the motives of key actors the parties, the lawmakers, other courts, and the court itself. Conducting the first-ever rhetorical analysis of this problem, …
The Rulification Of General Personal Jurisdiction And The Search For The Exceptional Case, Judy M. Cornett
The Rulification Of General Personal Jurisdiction And The Search For The Exceptional Case, Judy M. Cornett
Tennessee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trauma As Inclusion, Raquel Aldana, Patrick M. Koga, Thomas O'Donnell, Alea Skwara, Caroline Perris
Trauma As Inclusion, Raquel Aldana, Patrick M. Koga, Thomas O'Donnell, Alea Skwara, Caroline Perris
Tennessee Law Review
This article brings together a historian and law, public health, psychiatry, psychology, and neuroscience faculty and researchers to document how trauma is understood across disciplines and how it has developed in U.S. immigration law largely to exclude but increasingly to include migrants whose lives have been uprooted or otherwise impacted by borders. Our aim is to document and assess the progress and the gaps in immigration law's embrace and understanding of trauma through metrics that include the science of trauma, compassion, and fairness. This analysis is made urgent by the travesty we are witnessing of borders completely shut to desperate …