Legal Education Commons^™

Vol. 33, No. 15, February 13, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Congressman Crockett Speaks on South Africa •Action On Loan Forgiveness •Picozzi Hearing Begins Monday •Polach Defends Theory Of Comparable Worth •'Sunshine' Meetings Should Be The Rule •Boycott Picketed Theaters •Introspection and Externships •Deroy Fellow Makes Visit •Brown Bag Lunch Hears Local Mediator •Clinic Candidate May Cut Court Contact •Notices •Doctor Fegg Grants Exclusive Interview •Crossword •E. T. With Clothes •'Passage To India, Passes RG Muster •Senate Reviews School Accreditation Self-Study •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 14, February 6, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Haocai Compares Legal Systems •Karate: An Affirmative Defense? •MSA Rep. Schnaufer Opposes the Code •Library Expansion Coming Soon •Public Interest Seeks Redress of Injustice, Not Just Transfer •Give 'Em the Chairs •Capitalist Clients Negate Pro Bono •Martin Clarifies RG Exam Report •Senate Discusses Exams •Notices •Terez: A Public Letter to John Riggins •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 13, January 30, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Committee Rethinks Summer Program •Law Profs Attend China Conference •Campbell Heads For Semi-Final Round •Your Own Time Is Between You and Your Conscience •Ease the Debt •Ours is Not to Question Why •Test More Often for Fair Results •Placement Office Fails Average Student •Israeli Diplomat Blum Teaches At M Law •Senate Studies Exam Re-Use Guidelines •Copiers Phase Out Coins •Tardy Reviews Spark Controversy •Loan Forgiveness Committee Stalls •Trivia Experts Win Big •Too Much Going On In 'Cotton Club' •Talking Heads Make Sense •Law Vocal Performers Find Song Outlet •Jonathan Richman Live- Influential, idiosyncratic •Socrates Method Haunts Hutchins •Crossword •Law in …

Vol. 33, No. 12, January 23, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Margolick Blends Law, Journalism •Law Troupe To Re-enact A ''Murder'' •Jewish Views Vary On Law Issues •Kopel Misinterpreted the Bernhard Goetz Shooting •Take Grades With A Grain of Salt •Kopel Amusing •Poor Bear Brunt •Schnee Stung •Office Space Will Wait •Notices •Admissions Has it All Wrong •Show Of English Masters At Art Museum •Law In the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 11, January 16, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Law School Fake Dupes Aid Office For A Loan •It Ain't Ocean Research But… •Clinic Classes Face Large Enrollment •E.O. Students 'Bic'-er •Profs Re-use Exams Yet Again •In The Real World, The Poor Need Guns •So Stop Re-Using Them Already!!! •Gerstmann Criticizes Public Interest Pan •Lodahl Responds: Mea Culpa, But... •Notices •Picozzi Progress •White, Sax Rank With Students •Senate Addresses Exam Re-Use, Room 100 •Whirr, Click and Shuffle: Copy Center on Schedule •Barnes and Noble Enters the Ring •Law Gold, Magnum Fish Devastate Foes •Bang Gang Grid Champs •Crossword •Hart Broken at Michigan Law •Law In the Raw

Class Of 1985 Fifteen Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This report summarizes the findings of a questionnaire sent to University of Michigan Law School alumni fifteen years after graduation.

Class Of 1985 Fifteen Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This addendum is a compilation of alumni responses to the open-ended comments sections.

Class Of 1985 Five Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This report summarizes the findings of a questionnaire sent to University of Michigan Law School alumni five years after graduation.

Class Of 1985 Five Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This addendum is a compilation of alumni responses to the open-ended comments sections.

Clinical Legal Education: Is Taking Rites Seriously A Fantasy, Folly, Or Failure?, Steven D. Pepe

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article assesses the primary product of law schools-the practicing lawyer-and reviews the criticisms of the adequacy of the initial training for attorneys that law schools provide. After a brief. review of goals of legal education and goals of clinical teaching methods, the article argues that properly structured clinical programs are not based on flawed premises and that the nation's law schools, particularly the leading schools, should not abandon their clinical experiments without further efforts to help clinical legal education achieve its unfulfilled promises. The premises and assertions of this article are not new. Indeed, they are reiterations of a …

Why Would Law Students Benefit From Studying Economics?, Michelle J. White

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Why would law students benefit from studying economics? Three reasons come to mind. First, knowing some economics should enable students to understand more fully the issues encountered in a variety of areas of the law. Second, in a variety of areas of the law, economic analysis constitutes a central component of the legal arguments made in prosecuting and defending the case. Third, many law students will become involved in policy-making, whether because they end up working in the executive branch of government or because they become legislators, lobbyists, or legislative staff.

In the following sections, I treat each of the …

Mediation And Negotiation: Learning To Deal With Psychological Responses, Andrew S. Watson

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

In this essay I analyze some of the emotional events that occur during mediation and negotiation; the analysis may help us understand many of the problems that arise during the development and application of these legal practice skills. Following the analysis I present a few suggestions about how this teaching might best be accomplished.

Reaction To The Arthurs Report, Innis Christie, Janice Dicken Mcginnis, David T. Fraser

Innis Christie Collection

It is now more than two years since the publication of Law and Learning: The Report of The Consultative Group on Research and Education in Law to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, known to all legal academics as "the Arthurs Report". In that time the Canadian Bar Review has published one commentary on the Report and there have been a few comments in academic law journals, but the reaction in print is not commensurate with the importance of the Report or the interest in it among teachers and scholars of law in Canada generally and at …

The Nobel Prize For Law, Alfred F. Conard

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

There is no Nobel prize for law. This lack is not in itself a cause for concern, since the discipline of law is replete with its own rewards. But some cause for concern inheres in the implication that law provides very few examples of the kinds of contributions to humanity that merit Nobel prizes.

The Law School Of The University Of Michigan: 1859-1984: An Intellectual History, Elizabeth Gaspar Brown

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The intellectual history of the University of Michigan Law School is recorded in the titles of contributions to legal literature published from its organization in October 1859 to the present. These writings demonstrate a continued commitment to legal scholarship and illustrate both the changing patterns in the subjects chosen for research and writing, and the methods utilized for treatment of the subjects.

Why I Teach Water Law, Joseph L. Sax

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

I began my first law school job in 1962 and water law is the only subject I have taught every year since then. Though I am enthusiastic about all the courses I teach, I confess that water law remains my favorite. I have often asked myself why, because few subjects are considered more peripheral to the central mission of the law schools. In the East and Midwest the course is rarely taught, and in the West-where it has long been a staple- it is pretty much treated as a "nuts-and-bolts" offering for students who will practice in appropriation doctrine states. …

Vol. 33, No. 10, November 28, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Profs: Ax Summer Term •Sandalow Pulls Down Six Figures Annually •Polarization Politics: Whose Side are You On? •Lodahl Just Disgruntled Over Democratic Outcome •2, 4, 6, 8, Come on, Let's Evaluate •The Comparable Worth Debate: A Recipe for Economic Disaster •Peer Schools Aid Repayment •'Alternative' Careers Explored •HLSA Proposes Office Plan •Law Students to Stage Play •Crossword •'Choose Me' Short on Quality Options •Save a Suit, Draft a Lawyer •Notices •The UPI's Bottom Five List •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 9, November 14, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Debts Hurting Public Interest? •Oil Sheik to Author Yearbook Article •Shapiro Discusses Oral Argument •Reflection on the Election: Is the Great Society Dead? •Get Committed •Eklund: Share Office Space, or Lose It •New Limo Service Begins Airport Price War •Dry Up, Aristocrats •Playoff-Bound Law Gold Stomps Shoes •Group to Discuss Loan Plan •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 8, November 7, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Eklund: RG, LSSS Will Keep Offices •Report Tried 11th Hour Reagan Busting •Kopel Doesn't Equate Democracy and Capitalism •Move Over •Kamisar Willing to Teach First Years to Shepardize •Pub Naming Contest Attracts Bad Puns •Students Start New Review •Notices •Kroger Workers Gave a Union Lesson •No Date Yet for Picozzi Hearing •Law Club Mealtimes Become Bridgetime •Trial Practice Set for Vacation •22 File Moot Court Briefs •Crossword •Surrealism Comes to Ann Arbor •My Kingdom for a Magazine •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 7, October 31, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Davis on Everything but Picozzi •Hutchins Bucks Trend •Author Arca Edits Great Communicator •Reagan No Great Leader •Get it Straight •No Grounds to Presume that Democracy and Capitalism are Inevitable Linked •Reception Story Disappointing •Reception was Significant, Coverage was Inadequate •Barnes Piece Dismays Reader •Litman: Director turns Academic •Magazine Survey Sparks Firm Response •Experimental Clubs Combine Torts, Memo •Tutoring Program Offers Guidance •Senate Focuses on New Office Space •'Teachers' Flunks the Course •Unilateral Contact Drills Molars •Crossword •Notices •Dean Discusses Public Interest Law School •Amadeus Makes Sweet Music •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 6, October 17, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Senate Changes Budget Timing •Reception Honors Women Profs •Hutchins Temps May Even Out •"Busters" Assault Senses •Holcombe Misconstrued Point of Sign Removal Complaint •Peevishness •Some Law Firms Interviewing This Fall are Heavily Involved in Union-Busting •Moody Complains of Complaining Mood •Reagan's Anticommunist Policy Fails for Want of Human Focus •Experts Debate Immigration Bill •Pub Work Waits for Kitchen Planning •Notices •How to Jazz up Your Law Life •Law Sweep of Softball Series •Crossword •What Color is Your Beanie? •How Many C's are There in Success? •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 5, October 10, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Norris Keeps Tabs on Tiger Trials •Office Space Still Empty •No Fee Jump Without Vote •No Haven for Free Speech •Budget Blues •Religious Study in School Okay •LEXIS Changes Location •Beagles' Bite as Big as Bark •Notices •Cubs Rescue Fans' Rights to Cry •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 4, October 3, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Senate Pulls $900 Out of its Shirt •Dozens Vie for Clerk Positions •Pluralism Paramount Here •Let's Talk TV •Anti-Speech Act: Signs Torn Down •Cut the Social Committee More •Candidate Racism Censure Not Evenhanded •Simpson-Mazzoli Short on Facts •Critics Polish and Peel New Apple •U-M Students Get Apple Price Break •Notices •Law Students Form Arms Control Group •Dean Allows SFF to Name Firms •Elections •Waves of Guinness Float Ark to New Spot •Jeopardy II: What is 'Imitation'? •Beeristers Slide Past Righteous Ones, 3-0 •Crossword •Stalking the Trivial Pursuit •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 3, September 26, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Faculty Reviews Summer Session •Rabbi Teaches More Than Torah •LSSS: ''Tried MSA?" •Student Dies in Bike Wreck •Schools Establish Secularism •Way to Go •God Belongs in the Schools •Act Against the Reagan Threat •Cut to the Quick •Notices •Twerski: Teacher, Drafter, Commuter •IM Game of the Week: A Fun Contest •Omission is the Better Part of Valor •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 2, September 19, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Chatting with Another White •Increase in Grants Tightens Loan Program •Panel, Students Probe Choices •Small is Beautiful •That's Not My God He's Talking About •Firms Give Bucks to SFF •Give Midwest a Break, Okay? •Lie Detectors Don't Equal Due Process •Picozzi Hearing Update •Notices •White on Women, Tax and Student Behavior •Sacks: Thoughts on New Methods •LSSS Readies for Budget •City Dancing: Chance Dies, Fruit Grows •Law in the Raw

Vol. 33, No. 1, September 12, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Former Student Sues U-M •Five First-Years Fail •Sam the Scholar Speaks •Wanted: Anyone to Help Fill Space •No Snap Judgments •Myths: Close the Gap Now •Letters policy •SFF Thanks •Furniture Displaces Recruitees As Placement Loses Perspective •Prof. Marcus Plant Dies •Regents Appoint Three New Deans •First-years: Much Like Forerunners •Placement Office Changes Policies •Students Log On With Prof. Park •Dean Weighs 14th Amendment Claim •Notices •How I Spent My Summer Vacation •A One Way Ticket to Palookaville •Law in the Raw

Vol. 32, No. 22, April 11, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Hoopster Ready to Handle Hutchins •Participants Call C.L.S. Seminar A Success •Smith Responds to Racist •Piling On •Poster Apology •Moot Court •Christianity Deserves a Second Look •SFF Thanks •Harvard Initiates New Loan Program •Notices •Senate Okays Public Interest Loan Letter •Conference to Examine First Amendment in Reagan Era •Fiction- Episode IV: Divide and Conquer •Marvin Gaye Leaves Complex Legacy •Mombo Continues •WLSA Gets No Action on Women 's Course •Nightmares for McStudent in Wonderland •Mombo the Mongoose and Assorted Tales •Law in the Raw

Vol. 32, No. 21, April 4, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Case Club to Start Reform •Students to Get New Lounge; Pub Dries Up •Lancaster Wins Seat •Prez Gets Equal Time •Lest We Forget •Campaign Posters Offend •NCAA Poll •Lawyers Debate Human Rights Role •Silkwood Lawyer to Speak •Notices •Law in the Raw

Vol. 32, No. 21, April 1, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•The Indi Gestae •Hacker Deletes Grades •Prodigy Accepted •Bat Attacks Pooley on Sub-1 •Senators Brawl over Joy Sticks •Where's The Whip? •Listen Up! •Guards a Pain •SFF Buys Mink Farm •Law Review Starts Bathing Suit Contest •Westen Finds Tests In Legal Research •Gunning Makes You Go Bald •Sandalow Dries Out •Notices •Crossword •Cops Raid Peoria

Vol. 32, No. 20, March 28, 1984, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Three Hopefuls Try For L.S.S.S. Top Spot •Law Making and Law Schooling •Abrams: Media a Special Group •Code Would Violate Rights •We Have Met the Enemy... •Setting the Story Straight: Mondale Had Advantage •Senate •Senate OKs New Policies; Drafts Letter •NCAA Poll Results •Notices •Crossword •Remember, Every Little Bat Helps •Law in the Raw