Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law (13)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- Kamisar (Yale) (6)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Biography (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Courts (5)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (5)
- Diversity (5)
- International Law (5)
- Miranda v. Arizona (5)
- Politics (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Antitrust (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Communications Law (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Corporations (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Labor Law (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (188)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- ExpressO (4)
- Articles (3)
- Publications (2)
-
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog) (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 212 of 212
Full-Text Articles in Legal Biography
Fred E. Inbau: 'The Importance Of Being Guilty', Yale Kamisar
Fred E. Inbau: 'The Importance Of Being Guilty', Yale Kamisar
Articles
As fate would have it, Fred Inbau graduated from law school in 1932, the very year that, "for practical purposes the modern law of constitutional criminal procedure [began], with the decision in the great case of Powell v. Alabama."1 In "the 'stone age' of American criminal procedure,"2 Inbau began his long fight to shape or to retain rules that "make sense in the light of a policeman's task,"3 more aware than most that so long as the rules do so, "we will be in a stronger position to insist that [the officer] obey them."4
Mr. Justice Murphy And Civil Rights, Thurgood Marshall
Mr. Justice Murphy And Civil Rights, Thurgood Marshall
Michigan Law Review
There is constant danger that the unpopularity of an individual, or of the group of which he is a member, will be reflected in dealings with his rights by his neighbors or by the organized community. In America today this bias is most likely to stern from differences of race, origin, nationality, or religious or political belief. Prejudice may victimize an entire group or any of its members. Any charge of shocking or anti-social conduct against one who is already thus unpopular increases the likelihood of unfair treatment. Not only private citizens, but legislators, judges and administrative officers of government …