Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Biography Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Courts

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 301 - 308 of 308

Full-Text Articles in Legal Biography

Chief Justice John Marshall And The Growth Of The Republic, By David Loth, William B. Hesseltine Jan 1950

Chief Justice John Marshall And The Growth Of The Republic, By David Loth, William B. Hesseltine

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Mr. Justice Black: The Man And His Opinions, By John P. Frank, Sherman Minton Jan 1949

Mr. Justice Black: The Man And His Opinions, By John P. Frank, Sherman Minton

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Mr. Chief Justice Stone, Herbert Wechsler Jan 1949

Mr. Chief Justice Stone, Herbert Wechsler

Indiana Law Journal

Remarks at the meeting of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States in memory of Chief Justice Stone, November 12, 1947


Wiley B. Rutledge, 1894-1949, Ralph F. Fuchs Jan 1949

Wiley B. Rutledge, 1894-1949, Ralph F. Fuchs

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Book Review. Mason, A.T., Brandeis, A Free Man's Life, Ralph F. Fuchs Jan 1947

Book Review. Mason, A.T., Brandeis, A Free Man's Life, Ralph F. Fuchs

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


A Solid Chief Justice, Beryl Harold Levy Oct 1941

A Solid Chief Justice, Beryl Harold Levy

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Cardozo And The Supreme Court, Samuel Jackson Jun 1932

Cardozo And The Supreme Court, Samuel Jackson

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Coke-Parliamentary Sovereignty Or The Supremacy Of The Law?, R. A. Mackay Jan 1924

Coke-Parliamentary Sovereignty Or The Supremacy Of The Law?, R. A. Mackay

Michigan Law Review

Few legal authorities have received such conflicting interpretations as Sir Edward Coke. American jurists have turned to him as the legal father of judicial review, English jurists have found in him the authority for Parliamentary Supremacy, The cause of these conflicting interpretations is partly Coke's obscure style. Coke was an encyclopedist rather than a philosopher of the law: his ideas must be dug out and fused together from an heterogeneous mass of apparently unrelated statements. Even his Reports are legal and literary puzzles, a mixture of advocates' pleas, judicial decisions, and probably Sir Edward Coke's personal opinions as well. Hence …