Law and Politics Commons^™

After Impunity: The Anti-Impunity Norm, The Colombian Special Jurisdiction For Peace, And The Future Of International Criminal Law, Max Pensky

Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal

The predominance of international criminal law as a frontline response to atrocity crimes prioritizes the countering of impunity as an overarching goal. A corresponding “anti-impunity norm” identifies the legal punishment of individual perpetrators as a core requirement in legal responses to atrocities. This anti-impunity norm – the requirement to prosecute and punish – is also a legal obligation for state parties to the International Criminal Court. But the anti-impunity norm equates impunity’s opposite – accountability – with the imposition of legal punishment. This narrow interpretation of impunity places limits on states’ ability to craft context-specific responses to atrocities while also …

The Search For Unenumerated Fundamental Rights, Alina Sluzhyvenkova

Student Theses and Dissertations

There are certain rights that are explicitly enumerated in the Constitution, e.g., right to bear arms, right to free speech, right to a speedy and public trial. There are also rights that aren’t specifically written out but are nevertheless enjoyed by people nationwide. Rights that aren’t explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but which are fundamental to are called the unenumerated rights. Unenumerated rights are just as important and can be derived from natural law, enumerated rights, the Ninth Amendment, precedents, judicial opinions, and substantive due process.

Substantive due process is a principle guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which …

A Constitution Of The Earth, To Save Humanity, Luigi Ferrajoli

Buffalo Law Review

Humanity is facing one of the most dramatic moments in its history. There are several global challenges and problems that are not part of the political agenda of national governments, even though their solution is crucial for the survival of humanity.

The Shaky Democratic Legitimacy Of Cosmopolitan Law And Its Destiny In Times Of Crisis, Sergio Dellavalle

Buffalo Law Review

From its earliest introduction in 1795, the notion of cosmopolitan law has made a long way, to finally become an established reference point in the legal discourse. Nonetheless, the concept still raises four fundamental questions. The first focuses on how it has been developed and which were the fundamental authors and theoretical steps that characterized the emergence of this notion. The second and most essential question refers to the meaning of cosmopolitan law by focusing on what characterizes the legal norms that we call cosmopolitan as well as on what distinguishes them from the broader field of traditional international law. …

Why Law "Beyond The State" Need Not Be A Threat To Democratic Values, Paul Schiff Berman

Buffalo Law Review

Discussions of “law beyond the state” almost inevitably run into objections from those who believe that sub- or supranational legal orders necessarily subvert local democratic governance. Self-proclaimed populists and others express concern that the “will of the people” will be unduly subjected to the dictates of “cosmopolitan elites”1 or local factions, or corporate capture. These objections range across the political spectrum. Those on the right tend to focus on concerns that transnational orders will impose human rights or immigration rules on a national polity, while those on the left worry about trade regimes that might impose local labor or environmental …

Prejudice And Promise In The Early Years Of The Federal Judiciary, George L. Haskins

Maine Law Review

Preserving the dignity of the human individual and protecting individual rights from the excesses of governmental power have been endemic problems for politically organized society in the western world for centuries. From antiquity and the early middle ages comes the thought that "government" became necessary because of he sinfulness or depravity of man. But it was not suggested that rulers should be all-powerful nor that the people who are governed should be entirely at the mercy of government. Indeed, our classic ideal of the democratic state first emerged in Greece, then briefly again in Rome, and later — but for …

Teaching Dobbs: On The Role Of Ideology In Constitutional Interpretation, Steven J. Heyman

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Teaching Constitutional Law In A Crisis Of Judicial Legitimacy, William Baude

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

On Teaching Constitutional Law: Challenges And Opportunities, Christopher W. Schmidt

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Teaching Constitutional Change, Carolyn Shapiro

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

From Constitutional Law To Constitutional Change, Steven D. Schwinn

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Power To The People: Finding Solutions To Partisan Gerrymandering In A Post-Rucho World Through Independent Redistricting Commissions, Paul T. Ansani

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

An Antitrust Tap-In: How The Pga Tour Violated The Sherman Act And Why The Department Of Justice Should Do Something About It, Lyndi Mcvey

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Teaching Law Amidst Convulsive Doctrinal Change, Harold J. Krent

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Can Labor Law Still Protect Concerted Activity?, Charlotte Garden

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Time For A Copyright Remix: Learning From Djs’ Problematic Pandemic Livestreams & Reimagining A More Productive Framework For Music On Social Media, Aaron Thompson

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Defining Law But Not Justice, Franciska Coleman

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

How Not To Teach Criminal Law, Evan D. Bernick

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Will The Supreme Court Ever Help Victims Of Workplace Sexual Harassment Again? Why Adopting A Uniform Reasonableness Standard May Resolve A 20+ Year Circuit Split, Allyson Buchanan

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Consumer Protection Rights Lost In The Undergrowth Of The Amazon: Amazon’S Policies Quietly Facilityating An Anticompetitive E-Commerce Enviornment, Stephen Cruz

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

Symposium Introduction, Jorge Fabra-Zamora

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

"Waves Of Freedom": Kant And The Right To Rescue On The High Seas, Aravind Ganesh

Buffalo Law Review

This Article draws upon the legal philosophy of Immanuel Kant to argue that all seafarers—from stateless migrants to billionaires on mega-yachts—possess legal rights to rescue on the high seas. These rights are of the kind legal practitioners call “human rights,” and correspond to obligations enforceable against the flag state of any Coast Guard, naval, or other “public” vessel receiving the seafarers’ distress signals. A second, corollary claim is that we must abandon the “Grotian” model of the seas as commons and view them instead as “global public goods” that the international legal order always already maintains through institutions for the …

Legality Beyond The State, David Lefkowitz

Buffalo Law Review

Inquiry into law beyond the state, or indeed within it, necessarily presupposes a concept of law. Consider, for example, H.L.A.’s account of international law.1 Hart famously characterizes law in terms of a union of primary and secondary rules.2 Understood in functional terms, primary rules govern actions, while secondary rules govern rules. Hart also pays particular attention to a special class of secondary rules, namely those that create specific offices whose occupants are empowered to identify, alter, apply, and enforce a society’s rules. An advanced legal system, then, is a practice of holding accountable constituted by both a hierarchy of norms—primary …

The Rule Of Interlegality, Nicole Roughan

Buffalo Law Review

A “recognition model of legality” grounds legality upon the normative significance of recognition of the role of the official of law, and the requirements of a moral relation of recognition between law’s officials and subjects. On this model, plural overlapping claims to legality can undermine the rule of law by disrupting recognition of both the role of the official and the moral relation of legality between officials and subjects. This Essay examines the legality deficits that arise from conflicting recognitions of officiality and subjection in contexts of overlapping state and Indigenous legal orders. In such contexts of plural overlapping claims …

The Workings Of Legal Exceptionalism: Arbitration As A Portal To Stateless Law-In-Action Regimes, Thomas Schultz

Buffalo Law Review

This Essay seeks to explores the fertility of thinking about arbitration as a portal to stateless legal regimes. Using the distinction between law in books and law in action, as well as the concepts of social and political disembeddedness and quiet politics, it argues that under the current paradigm of arbitration, it operates as a porous portal, getting corporate and natural citizens to escape into stateless law-in-action legal regimes (though in practice not into a law-in-books stateless legal regime). This raises questions of control of and accountability for the political effects of such stateless law-inaction legal regimes on the rest …

The Postnational Aspirations Of European Law, Paul Linden-Retek

Buffalo Law Review

This Essay begins from a particular quarrel over the interpretation of the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP judgment of May 2020 to open onto questions of how to conceive political freedom beyond the nation-state, about the structure of postnational constitutionalism and its purposes, and, finally, about the role of courts within that structure and in light of those aspirations. In arguments defending the Court, an influential strand of constitutional theory, in this Essay represented by the intervention of Ulrich Haltern, continues to channel assumptions that constrain thinking about Europe as a postnational legal order. Assuming that political freedom is essentially …

Is International Law Progressive, Cormac Macamhlaigh

Buffalo Law Review

The rise of authoritarian populism in recent years has raised the question of whether international law can be coopted for authoritarian purposes. Tom Ginsburg has recently argued for the rise of what he calls “authoritarian international law” which, he claims, is undermining the hitherto progressive ethos of international law since the foundation of the United Nations. This paper critically examines this category of authoritarian international law. Adopting a Dworkinian interpretive methodology to the question of the normativity of international law, it argues that a putative authoritarian international law is incompatible with the normativity of international law as currently understood. This …

When European State Courts Face Post-Colonial Legality: A Private International Law Approach Inspired By Decolonial Theory, Sandrine Brachotte

Buffalo Law Review

This Essay develops avenues for private international law (PIL) to deal with cases involving the interaction between Western state law and distinctive forms of law that citizens from post-colonial states, especially African states, bring with them to Europe. Laws of the second type, which I call “postcolonial legality,” incorporate both traditional forms of legality usually dubbed “religious” and “customary” law along with state law that originates from colonial law. Drawing on some lessons from decolonial theory, I try to apply to this particular context a “less colonial” PIL theory and subsequent PIL rules and reasoning. The argument builds on the …

The Priority Of International Law, Pavlos Eleftheriadis

Buffalo Law Review

What is international law? Any theory of international law must explain both its technical nature and its moral force and must also show how the two come together in practice in order to give it the priority that it claims. For example, the genocide cases before the International Court of Justice exhibit a puzzling dedication to procedure. The Court is invited to examine the war in Gaza strictly on the basis of the Genocide Convention, without assessing any allegations of war crimes or other alleged violations of international law. The reason is a well-known procedural rule—namely that states have to …

The Right To Inequality: Conservative Politics And Precedent Collide, Jonathan Feingold

Faculty Scholarship

The “end of affirmative action” is the beginning of this story. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA), the Supreme Court struck a near fatal blow to race-consciousness. Many institutions have since pivoted to “race neutral alternatives.” This is a natural turn. But one that faces immediate headwinds.

The same entities that demanded Harvard pursue racial diversity through colorblind means have sued public high schools for doing just that. These litigants assert a “right to inequality”—a theory that would pit the equal protection clause against equality itself. Even if normatively jarring, a right to inequality might seem a …