Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (34)
- International Law (33)
- Political Science (29)
- Human Rights Law (25)
- Constitutional Law (21)
-
- Law and Society (18)
- International Relations (15)
- Legal History (15)
- International Humanitarian Law (14)
- American Politics (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
- Courts (11)
- Judges (11)
- President/Executive Department (10)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (10)
- Election Law (8)
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Law and Philosophy (7)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Defense and Security Studies (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Military, War, and Peace (6)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Institution
-
- University of Denver (15)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (13)
- UIC School of Law (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- University of Richmond (7)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (6)
- Emory University School of Law (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Duke Law (4)
- Duquesne University (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Singapore Management University (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Bemidji State University (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Human rights (16)
- Politics (15)
- United Nations (UN) (13)
- Barack Obama (9)
- Democracy (8)
-
- Religion (8)
- International Criminal Court (ICC) (7)
- Leadership (7)
- Management (7)
- Elections (6)
- Law (6)
- Government (5)
- International law (5)
- Philosophy (5)
- Policy (5)
- Voting (5)
- Constitution (4)
- History (4)
- International Law (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Theology (4)
- United States (4)
- Civil rights (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Judicial independence (3)
- Nongovernmental organizations (3)
- Public opinion (3)
- War (3)
- Advertising (2)
- Biography (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (15)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (13)
- UIC Law Review (8)
- Articles (7)
-
- Faculty Articles (6)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Ledewitz Papers (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Publications (3)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (3)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (3)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Georgetown Law Fiscal Law and Policy Reform Briefing Papers (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Inside UNLV (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Other Publications (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Buffalo Journal of Gender, Law & Social Policy (1)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (1)
- College of Law - Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 148 of 148
Full-Text Articles in Law and Politics
Proposing A Place For Politics In Arbitrary And Capricious Review, Kathryn A. Watts
Proposing A Place For Politics In Arbitrary And Capricious Review, Kathryn A. Watts
Articles
Current conceptions of “arbitrary and capricious” review focus on whether agencies have adequately explained their decisions in statutory, factual, scientific, or otherwise technocratic terms. Courts, agencies, and scholars alike, accordingly, generally have accepted the notion that influences from political actors, including the President and Congress, cannot properly help to explain administrative action for purposes of arbitrary and capricious review. This means that agencies today tend to sweep political influences under the rug even when such influences offer the most rational explanation for the action.
This Article argues that this picture should change. Specifically, this Article argues for expanding current conceptions …
The Taiwan Question And The One-China Policy: Legal Challenges With Renewed Momentum, Pasha L. Hsieh
The Taiwan Question And The One-China Policy: Legal Challenges With Renewed Momentum, Pasha L. Hsieh
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The question of Taiwan’s status has faced legal challenges from the one- China policy under both domestic law and international law. The article argues that the state status of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has never ceased to exist as a result of either the loss of diplomatic recognition or the United Nations Resolution 2758, which transferred the UN seat from the ROC to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). In the past decades, the ROC and the PRC possess separate statehoods and have co-existed under the “de jure roof of China.” The evolvement of state practice of …
A Rhetorician's View Of Religious Speech In Civic Argument, Jack L. Sammors
A Rhetorician's View Of Religious Speech In Civic Argument, Jack L. Sammors
Seattle University Law Review
I first examine and reject liberal political methods of addressing the question of religious speech in civic argument, all of which depend upon norms external to the argument that are then excluded from it. Next, in proposing a method that relies only upon the constitutive norms of civic argument itself, I offer a description of civic argument as rhetoric, examine the risks of religious rhetoric in this civic argument, and examine the constitutive norms of civic argument. I address whether the constitutive norms of civic argument are sufficient restraints upon religious rhetoric such that reliance upon external norms is not …
H.L.A. Hart: A Twentieth-Century Oxford Political Philosopher, John M. Finnis
H.L.A. Hart: A Twentieth-Century Oxford Political Philosopher, John M. Finnis
Journal Articles
This essay offers first a sketch (by a student and colleague) of H.L.A. Hart's life; second an account of the political philosophy which he explicitly articulated in The Concept of Law (1961), and of its relation to the main currents of Oxford political philosophy in the 1950s; and thirdly an exposition and critical assessment of the normative political theory deployed, to widespread acclaim, in his Law, Liberty & Morality (1963).
Confirm Harold Koh As State Department Legal Adviser, Brandt Goldstein
Confirm Harold Koh As State Department Legal Adviser, Brandt Goldstein
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
History In The Hands Of The Politicians: Lustration, Civil Society, And Unfinished Revolutions In Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, And The Czech Republic, David Merryman, Heather Tafel
History In The Hands Of The Politicians: Lustration, Civil Society, And Unfinished Revolutions In Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, And The Czech Republic, David Merryman, Heather Tafel
Student Summer Scholars Manuscripts
No abstract provided.
Mr. Presidential Candidate: Whom Would You Nominate?, Stuart M. Benjamin, Mitu Gulati
Mr. Presidential Candidate: Whom Would You Nominate?, Stuart M. Benjamin, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
Presidential candidates compete on multiple fronts for votes. Who is more likeable? Who will negotiate more effectively with allies and adversaries? Who has the better vice-presidential running mate? Who will make better appointments to the Supreme Court and the cabinet? This last question is often discussed long before the inauguration, for the impact of a secretary of state or a Supreme Court justice can be tremendous. Despite the importance of such appointments, we do not expect candidates to compete on naming the better slates of nominees. For the candidates themselves, avoiding competition over nominees in the pre-election context has personal …
Mechanism Choice, Jonathan B. Wiener, Barak D. Richman
Mechanism Choice, Jonathan B. Wiener, Barak D. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter reviews the literature on the selection of regulatory policy instruments, from both normative and positive perspectives. It first reviews the mechanism design literature to identify normative objectives in selecting among the menu or toolbox of policy instruments. The chapter then discusses the public choice and positive political theory literatures and the variety of models developed to attempt to predict the actual selection of alternative policy instruments. It begins with simpler early models focusing on interest group politics and proceeds to more complicated models that incorporate both supply and demand for policy, the role of policy entrepreneurs, behavioral and …
Pangloss Responds, Daniel A. Crane
Pangloss Responds, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
I am afraid that William Shieber and I are speaking past each other. I agree wholeheartedly with his assertion that anyone who believes that political appointees do not exert a considerable influence over the antitrust agencies is naïve. However, Technocracy and Antitrust does not advance the Panglossian view that the antitrust agencies are apolitical, if by that we mean that robotic machines devoid of human perspective or ideological commitment churn out scientifically predetermined antitrust results.
Davis V. Fec: The Roberts Court's Continuing Attack On Campaign Finance Reform, Richard Briffault
Davis V. Fec: The Roberts Court's Continuing Attack On Campaign Finance Reform, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
In Davis v. FEC, decided on the last day of the October 2007 Term, a closely divided Supreme Court invalidated the so-called Millionaires' Amendment, which was a provision added to the Federal Election Campaign Act ("FECA") as part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("BCRA") of 2002 to make it easier for Senate and House candidates to raise private contributions when they run against an opponent who uses a substantial amount of personal wealth to pay for his or her campaign. From the reform perspective, the loss of the Millionaires' Amendment was not of great moment. The Amendment was …
Politics At The Pulpit: Tax Benefits, Substantial Burdens, And Institutional Free Exercise, Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer
Politics At The Pulpit: Tax Benefits, Substantial Burdens, And Institutional Free Exercise, Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer
Journal Articles
More than fifty years ago, Congress enacted a prohibition against political campaign intervention for all charities, including churches and other houses of worship, as a condition for receiving tax deductible contributions. Yet the IRS has never taken a house of worship to court for alleged violation of the prohibition through political comments from the pulpit, presumably at least in part because of concerns about the constitutionality of doing so. This decision is surprising, because a careful review of Free Exercise Clause case law - both before and after the landmark Employment Division v. Smith decision - reveals that the prohibition …
The Forgotten Freedom Of Assembly, John D. Inazu
The Forgotten Freedom Of Assembly, John D. Inazu
Scholarship@WashULaw
The freedom of assembly has been at the heart of some of the most important social movements in American history: antebellum abolitionism, women's suffrage in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the labor movement in the Progressive Era and after the New Deal, and the civil rights movement. Claims of assembly stood against the ideological tyranny that exploded during the first Red Scare in the years surrounding the First World War and the second Red Scare of 1950s McCarthyism. Abraham Lincoln once called 'the right of the people peaceably to assemble' part of 'the Constitutional substitute for revolution'. In 1939, the …
Formalism And Realism In Ruins (Mapping The Logics Of Collapse), Pierre Schlag
Formalism And Realism In Ruins (Mapping The Logics Of Collapse), Pierre Schlag
Publications
After laying out a conventional account of the formalism vs. realism debates, this Article argues that formalism and realism are at once impossible and entrenched. To say they are impossible is to say that they are not as represented--that they cannot deliver their promised goods. To say that they are entrenched is to say that these forms of thought are sedimented as thought and practice throughout law's empire. We live thus amidst the ruins of formalism and realism. The disputes between these two great determinations of American law continue today, but usually in more localized or circumscribed forms. We see …
Publicity, Pressure, And Environmental Legislation: The Untold Story Of Availability Campaigns, Molly J. Walker Wilson
Publicity, Pressure, And Environmental Legislation: The Untold Story Of Availability Campaigns, Molly J. Walker Wilson
All Faculty Scholarship
The availability heuristic — a cognitive rule of thumb whereby events that are easily brought to mind are judged to be more likely — is employed by decision-makers on a daily basis. Availability campaigns occur when individuals and groups strategically exploit this cognitive tendency in order to generate publicity for a particular issue, creating pressure to effect legislative change. This paper is the first to argue that environmental availability campaigns are more beneficial than they are harmful. Because they result in pressure on Congress, these campaigns serve as a catalyst for the enactment of critical new legislative initiatives. Specifically, these …
Inter-American System, Diego Rodriguez-Pinzon
Inter-American System, Diego Rodriguez-Pinzon
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Human Rights Hero - President Barack Obama, Stephen Wermiel
Human Rights Hero - President Barack Obama, Stephen Wermiel
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Uncooperative Federalism, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Heather K. Gerken
Uncooperative Federalism, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Heather K. Gerken
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay addresses a gap in the federalism literature. Scholars have offered two distinct visions of federal-state relations. The first depicts states as rivals and challengers to the federal government, roles they play by virtue of being autonomous policymakers outside the federal system. A second vision is offered by scholars of cooperative federalism, who argue that in most areas states serve not as autonomous outsiders, but supportive insiders – servants and allies carrying out federal policy. Legal scholarship has not connected these competing visions to consider how the state's status as servant, insider, and ally might enable it to be …
One Person, One Vote, One Application: District Court Decision In Ray V. Texas Upholds Texas Absentee Voting Law That Disenfranchises Elderly And Disabled Voters, Sean Flynn
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Courts Under President Obama, Scott A. Moss
Inside Unlv, Diane Russell, Michelle Mouton, Cate Weeks, Stephanie Strow
Inside Unlv, Diane Russell, Michelle Mouton, Cate Weeks, Stephanie Strow
Inside UNLV
No abstract provided.
Is The Constitution Libertarian?, Randy E. Barnett
Is The Constitution Libertarian?, Randy E. Barnett
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Ever since Justice Holmes famously asserted that “the Constitution does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer’s Social Statics,” academics have denied that the Constitution is libertarian. In this essay, I explain that the Constitution is libertarian to the extent that its original meaning respects and protects the five fundamental rights that are at the core of both classical liberalism and modern libertarianism. These rights can be protected both directly by judicial decisions and indirectly by structural constraints. While the original Constitution and Bill of Rights provided both forms of constraints, primarily on federal power, it left states free to violate the …
The Politics Of Administrative Law: New York's Anti-Bureaucracy Clause And The O'Brian-Wagner Campaign Of 1938, Daniel R. Ernst
The Politics Of Administrative Law: New York's Anti-Bureaucracy Clause And The O'Brian-Wagner Campaign Of 1938, Daniel R. Ernst
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The controversy over administrative law in New York in 1938 was a decisive moment in the emergence of procedural Diceyism in the United States. On a stage crowded with partisan and legal performers, the politics of administrative law played out in two acts. In the first, the state's trial lawyers mounted a campaign to heighten judicial review of the state's administrative agencies. Their efforts culminated in the adoption of the anti-bureaucracy clause at the state constitutional convention when regular factions in the state's two major parties decided it would serve their purposes. New Yorkers rejected the measure after liberal politicians …
Meese, Edwin Iii (1931 - ), Gary L. Mcdowell
Meese, Edwin Iii (1931 - ), Gary L. Mcdowell
Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications
U.S. attorney general. Born in Oakland, Calif., Meese received a B.A. from Yale (1953) and an LL.B. from the University of California, Berkeley (1956). After working at the Piedmont, Calif., Recreation Department, he became deputy district attorney in Alameda county, Calif., in 1959. In 1967, he joined the staff of Governor Ronald Reagan as legal affairs secretary, holding this post until 1969, when he became Reagan's executive assistant and chief of staff. He also served as the chairman of the Governor's Emergency Operations council during the urban and campus disorders of the 1960s and early 1970s.
Do We Care Enough About Racial Inequality? Reflections On The River Runs Dry, Guy-Uriel Charles
Do We Care Enough About Racial Inequality? Reflections On The River Runs Dry, Guy-Uriel Charles
Faculty Scholarship
In response to Kimberly West-Faulcon, The River Runs Dry: When Title VI Trumps State Anti–Affirmative Action Laws, 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1075 (2009)
Estimating The Effect Of Damages Caps In Medical Malpractice Cases: Evidence From Texas, David A. Hyman, Bernard Black, Charles Silver, William M. Sage
Estimating The Effect Of Damages Caps In Medical Malpractice Cases: Evidence From Texas, David A. Hyman, Bernard Black, Charles Silver, William M. Sage
Faculty Scholarship
Using claim-level data, we estimate the effect of Texas's 2003 cap on non-economic damages on jury verdicts, post-verdict payouts, and settlements in medical malpractice cases closed during 1988–2004. For pro-plaintiff jury verdicts, the cap affects 47-percent of verdicts and reduces mean allowed non-economic damages, mean allowed verdict, and mean total payout by 73-percent, 38-percent, and 27-percent, respectively. In total, the non-econ cap reduces adjusted verdicts by $156M, but predicted payouts by only $60M. The impact on payouts is smaller because a substantial portion of the above-cap damage awards were not being paid to begin with. In cases settled without trial, …
Pregnancy And Sex-Role Stereotyping, From 'Struck' To 'Carhart', Neil S. Siegel, Reva B. Siegel
Pregnancy And Sex-Role Stereotyping, From 'Struck' To 'Carhart', Neil S. Siegel, Reva B. Siegel
Faculty Scholarship
The guarantee of equal protection of the laws extends to women as well as men. Yet for the first 100 years of the Fourteenth Amendment’s life, the Supreme Court never found a law unconstitutional on the grounds that it discriminated on the basis of sex. Between 1970 and 1980, social movement advocacy and brilliant litigation by Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others changed our constitutional law. Over the course of the decade, the Court extended the anti-stereotyping principle from discrimination on the basis of race to discrimination on the basis of sex. But fidelity to the principle had its limits. In …
Judicial Independence And Party Politics In The Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case Of Portugal, Sofia Amaral-Garcia, Nuno M. Garoupa, Veronica Grembi
Judicial Independence And Party Politics In The Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case Of Portugal, Sofia Amaral-Garcia, Nuno M. Garoupa, Veronica Grembi
Faculty Scholarship
In this paper we test to what extent the Kelsenian-type of constitutional judges are independent from political parties by studying of the Portuguese Constitutional Court. The results yield three main conclusions. First, constitutional judges in Portugal are quite sensitive to their political affiliations and their political party's presence in government when voting. Second, peer pressure is very relevant. Third, the 1997 reform that was enacted to increase judicial independence has had no robust statistically significant effect.
Political Responses To Supreme Court Decisions, Marci A. Hamilton
Political Responses To Supreme Court Decisions, Marci A. Hamilton
Articles
No abstract provided.