Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (194)
- University of Michigan Law School (72)
- University of Richmond (33)
- Fordham Law School (25)
- Columbia Law School (17)
-
- UIC School of Law (17)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (14)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (9)
- Duke Law (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (7)
- Notre Dame Law School (7)
- Pepperdine University (7)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (7)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (6)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- Brooklyn Law School (5)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (5)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- University of Baltimore Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (4)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Elections (82)
- Voting (64)
- Gerrymandering (41)
- Campaign finance (40)
- Democracy (34)
-
- Election (34)
- Redistricting (33)
- Politics (28)
- Election law (26)
- Voting Rights Act (25)
- Constitution (22)
- United States Supreme Court (22)
- Political parties (21)
- Congressional districts (20)
- Voting rights (20)
- Race and law (17)
- First Amendment (16)
- Law (16)
- Law reform (16)
- Vote (16)
- Corruption (15)
- Congress (14)
- Supreme Court (14)
- Discrimination (13)
- Equality (13)
- Citizens United (12)
- Federalism (11)
- Government (11)
- Presidents (11)
- Campaign (10)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (190)
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
- University of Richmond Law Review (32)
- Michigan Law Review (19)
- UIC Law Review (17)
-
- Articles (15)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (14)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Publications (9)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (8)
- Indiana Law Journal (8)
- Journal Articles (7)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (7)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (5)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Fordham Law Review (4)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (4)
- Georgia Law Review (4)
- Law Faculty Reports and Comments (4)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (4)
- Oklahoma Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 511 - 540 of 602
Full-Text Articles in Law and Politics
The Case For Federal Anti-Gerrymandering Legislation, Brian O'Neill
The Case For Federal Anti-Gerrymandering Legislation, Brian O'Neill
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Partisan gerrymandering is a political tradition the United States can no longer afford. Due in part to the effects of partisan gerrymandering, very few congressional elections are meaningfully competitive. This Note argues that partisan gerrymandering damages both the quality of American democracy and the federal system of the United States. This Note concludes that the important federal interests at stake warrant action by Congress to halt partisan gerrymandering. The Note further concludes that any action by Congress should incorporate the principles of federalism by resisting the temptation to micromanage and Congress should instead require state commissions to draft the boundaries …
After Georgia V. Ashcroft: The Primacy Of Proportionality, Felix B. Chang
After Georgia V. Ashcroft: The Primacy Of Proportionality, Felix B. Chang
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Note argues that the majority in Ashcroft have left courts with an unadministerable standard-not so much for reasons that Justice Souter articulated in his dissent, but rather because the Court provided no guidance on navigating around the myriad of factors in the convoluted totality analyses. Part I examines two cases after Ashcroft which represent different degrees of racial vote dilution: Shirt v. Hazeltine and Session v. Perry. Through other post-Ashcroft cases, Part II teases out the differences (i) between influence districts as injury and remedy and (ii) between a jurisdiction's Section 5 and Section 2 obligations--details closely related …
What Is A Tragedy Of The Commons? Overfishing And The Campaign Spending Problem, Shi-Ling Hsu
What Is A Tragedy Of The Commons? Overfishing And The Campaign Spending Problem, Shi-Ling Hsu
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Campaign Finance Reform, Electioneering Communications, And The First Amendment: Resuscitating The Third Exception, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1315 (2005), Daniel B. Roth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Felon Disenfrachisement Laws: Partisan Politics In The Legislatures, Jason Belmont Conn
Felon Disenfrachisement Laws: Partisan Politics In The Legislatures, Jason Belmont Conn
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This examination of the institutional changes to state legislatures, synthesized with an analysis of the handling of felon disenfranchisement laws by state legislatures, presents a troubling realization about the law today: in the twenty-first century, partisan politics moderates decisions about even the most basic and fundamental principles of democracy. This Note suggests that because state legislators follow their party leadership and position, a state's traditional treatment of racial minorities, geographic location, and even ideology are not the strongest indicators of a state's disenfranchisement laws. Rather, partisan politics drives changes to the state laws governing felon voter eligibility.
After Georgia V. Ashcroft: The Primacy Of Proportionality, Felix B. Chang
After Georgia V. Ashcroft: The Primacy Of Proportionality, Felix B. Chang
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Note argues that the majority in Ashcroft have left courts with an unadministerable standard-not so much for reasons that Justice Souter articulated in his dissent, but rather because the Court provided no guidance on navigating around the myriad of factors in the convoluted totality analyses. In the face of this uncertainty, lower courts will rely increasingly on the proportionality standard of Johnson v. De Grandy, which marked the midpoint in the judicial shift from Justice Brennan's worldview to Justice O'Connor's world-view. Part I examines two cases after Ashcroft which represent different degrees of racial vote dilution: Shirt v. …
Social Choice, Crypto-Initiaives, And Policymaking By Direct Democracy, Thad Kousser, Mathew D. Mccubbins
Social Choice, Crypto-Initiaives, And Policymaking By Direct Democracy, Thad Kousser, Mathew D. Mccubbins
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Campaign Finance Reform And The Social Inequality Paradox, Yoav Dotan
Campaign Finance Reform And The Social Inequality Paradox, Yoav Dotan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The recent landmark decision by the Supreme Court in McConnell v. FEC opens the way for new and more decisive regulation of the vast amounts of private and corporate money poured into the political system. However, the theoretical grounds for campaign finance regulation - as reflected in the Court's opinion - remain highly perplexing. The purpose of the current article is to tie together the evolving constitutional principle of equality in election with modern process theory and to apply them to the field of campaign finance. The inherent tension between the stringent requirement for political equality on the one hand …
To Elect Or Not To Elect: A Case Study Ofjudicial Selection In New York City 1977-2002, Steven Zeidman
To Elect Or Not To Elect: A Case Study Ofjudicial Selection In New York City 1977-2002, Steven Zeidman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article examines the process of judicial selection in New York State in light of the recent court decisions in White and Spargo, which have paved the way for increased campaign speech in judicial elections. Relying on empirical data to compare judicial elections and appointments in New York City between 1977 and 2002, the Article finds that elections produce a judiciary that is more beholden to interest groups than one generated through appointments. The consequence of this greater special interest involvement is an erosion of public trust and confidence in the judiciary. Moreover while elections arguably have increased diversity in …
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
Rethinking Campaign-Finance Reform: The Pressing Need For Deregulation And Disclosure, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 633 (2004), Cecil C. Kuhne Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Lawfulness Of The Election Decision: A Reply To Professor Tribe, Peter Berkowitz, Benjamin Wittes
The Lawfulness Of The Election Decision: A Reply To Professor Tribe, Peter Berkowitz, Benjamin Wittes
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
John F. Kennedy And West Virginia, 1960-1963, Anthony W. Ponton
John F. Kennedy And West Virginia, 1960-1963, Anthony W. Ponton
Theses, Dissertations and Capstones
In 1960, John F. Kennedy, a wealthy New England Catholic, traveled to a rural, Protestant state to contend in an election that few thought he could win. While many scholars have examined the impact of Kennedy’s victory in the West Virginia primary, few have analyzed the importance that his visit to the state in 1960 and his ensuing administration had on West Virginia. Kennedy enacted a number of policies directed specifically toward relieving the poverty that had plagued West Virginia since statehood. The Kennedy administration funded highway construction, worker training programs, and area development at levels the state had never …
Law, Politics, And Judicial Review: A Comment On Hasen, Guy-Uriel Charles
Law, Politics, And Judicial Review: A Comment On Hasen, Guy-Uriel Charles
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Resurrecting The White Primary, Ellen D. Katz
Resurrecting The White Primary, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
An unprecedented number of noncompetitive or "safe" electoral districts operate in the United States today. Noncompetitive districts elect officials with more extreme political views and foster more polarized legislatures than do competitive districts. More fundamentally, they inhibit meaningful political participation. That is because participating in an election that is decided before it begins is an empty exercise. Voting in a competitive election is not, even though a single vote will virtually never decide the outcome. What a competitive election offers to each voter is the opportunity to be the coveted swing voter, the one whose support candidates most seek, the …
When Does Government Limit The Impact Of Voter Initiatives?, Elisabeth R. Gerber
When Does Government Limit The Impact Of Voter Initiatives?, Elisabeth R. Gerber
Faculty Scholarship
Citizens use the initiative process to make new laws. Many winning initiatives, however, are altered or ignored after Election Day. We examine why this is, paying particular attention to several widely-ignored properties of the post-election phase of the initiative process. One such property is the fact that initiative implementation can require numerous governmental actors to comply with an initiative’s policy instructions. Knowing such properties, the question then becomes: When do governmental actors comply with winning initiatives? We clarify when compliance is full, partial, or not at all. Our findings provide a template for scholars and observers to better distinguish cases …
Public Financing Of Judicial Campaigns: Practices And Prospects , Michael W. Bowers
Public Financing Of Judicial Campaigns: Practices And Prospects , Michael W. Bowers
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Cheap Talk Citizenship: The Democratic Implications Of Voting With Dollars, Bruce E. Cain
Cheap Talk Citizenship: The Democratic Implications Of Voting With Dollars, Bruce E. Cain
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hybridizing Citizenship, Kathryn Abrams
Hybridizing Citizenship, Kathryn Abrams
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vouchers And Buckley: The Need For "Regime Change", Richard L. Hasan
Vouchers And Buckley: The Need For "Regime Change", Richard L. Hasan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Political Realities And Unintended Consequences: Why Campaign Finance Reform Is Too Important To Be Left To The Lawyers, Kenneth R. Mayer
Political Realities And Unintended Consequences: Why Campaign Finance Reform Is Too Important To Be Left To The Lawyers, Kenneth R. Mayer
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Response To Voting With Dollars: A New Paradigm For Campaign Finance, Fred Wertheimer, Alexandra T.V. Edsall
Response To Voting With Dollars: A New Paradigm For Campaign Finance, Fred Wertheimer, Alexandra T.V. Edsall
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dollars And Sense: A "New Paradigm" For Campaign Finance Reform?, Daniel A. Farber
Dollars And Sense: A "New Paradigm" For Campaign Finance Reform?, Daniel A. Farber
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Voting With Cues, Elizabeth Garrett
Voting With Cues, Elizabeth Garrett
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why A New Paradigm?, Bruce Ackerman, Ian Ayres
Why A New Paradigm?, Bruce Ackerman, Ian Ayres
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Barriers To Participation, Trevor Potter, Marianne H. Viray
Barriers To Participation, Trevor Potter, Marianne H. Viray
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Despite the nation's founding commitment to participatory democracy, many barriers to candidate and public participation in the electoral process are damaging the public's confidence that our elections are fair and open to full participation by candidates and voters.
The nominating processes created by the two major parties mainly serve the goals of party "insiders" and the more politically extreme factions, at the expense of competition and public confidence in the two-party system. At the same time, barriers to minor party and independent candidates-closed primaries, excessive early-voter registration requirements and complicated state primary and general ballot access requirements-operate to foreclose the …
Strategic Voting And African-Americans: True Vote, True Representation, True Power For The Black Community, Maxine Burkett
Strategic Voting And African-Americans: True Vote, True Representation, True Power For The Black Community, Maxine Burkett
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
As long as American politics remain securely bound to the two-party system, Blacks will remain a voting block; a block that may shift, but a block nonetheless. And although this appears to be to our strategic disadvantage, allowing conviction to direct us, as well as a deep respect for the intense struggle for the franchise, will forever be a noble posture.
Reforming Campaign Finance Reform: A Review Of Voting With Dollars, Richard Briffault
Reforming Campaign Finance Reform: A Review Of Voting With Dollars, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
On March 27, 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA") into law. The culmination of a six-year legislative and political struggle, BCRA works the most comprehensive change in federal campaign finance law in nearly three decades. BCRA addresses a broad range of issues, including soft money, issue-advocacy advertising, fundraising on federal property, campaign activities of foreign nationals, and penalties for violation of campaign finance laws. Enacted in the face of intense political opposition, BCRA, if it stands up in court, is a significant reform achievement.
Or is it? BCRA closely follows the main …
Why Is There So Little Money In U.S. Politics?, John M. De Figueiredo, Stephen Ansolabehere, James M. Snyder Jr.
Why Is There So Little Money In U.S. Politics?, John M. De Figueiredo, Stephen Ansolabehere, James M. Snyder Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Vote Cast; A Vote Counted: Quantifying Voting Rights Through Proportional Representation In Congressional Elections, Michael Mccann
A Vote Cast; A Vote Counted: Quantifying Voting Rights Through Proportional Representation In Congressional Elections, Michael Mccann
Law Faculty Scholarship
The current winner-take-all or first-past-the-post system of voting promotes an inefficient market where votes are often wasted. In this system, representatives are selected from a single district in which the candidate with the plurality of votes gains victory. Candidates who appear non-generic can rarely, if ever, expect to receive the most votes in this system. This phenomenon is especially apparent when African-Americans and other minority groups seek elected office. In part because white voters constitute at least a plurality of voters in every state except Hawaii, minorities in the forty-nine other states have had historically little success in gaining election …
Structural Principles And Presidential Succession, Howard M. Wasserman
Structural Principles And Presidential Succession, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.