Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (196)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (27)
- University of Rhode Island (19)
- St. Mary's University (15)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- BLR (8)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- Boston University School of Law (5)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- The University of San Francisco (4)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- Claremont Colleges (3)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of New Mexico (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Women (40)
- Abortion (26)
- Gender (25)
- Law (21)
- Discrimination (20)
-
- Politics (20)
- Race (16)
- Prostitution (13)
- Constitution (12)
- Equality (12)
- First Amendment (11)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Diversity (10)
- Feminism (10)
- Judge (10)
- Legislation (10)
- Intersectionality (9)
- Privacy (9)
- Human rights (8)
- LGBTQ (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Regulation (8)
- Affirmative Action (7)
- Courts (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Gender and law (7)
- Immigration (7)
- Judges (7)
- Justice (7)
- New York (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (194)
- Faculty Scholarship (23)
- Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence (19)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (16)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (11)
-
- ExpressO (8)
- Brooklyn Law Review (6)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (5)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (5)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- University of Baltimore Law Review (4)
- University of San Francisco Law Review (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (3)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (2)
- Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 451 - 456 of 456
Full-Text Articles in Law and Gender
The Dialectic Of Rights And Politics: Perspectives From The Women's Movement, Elizabeth M. Schneider
The Dialectic Of Rights And Politics: Perspectives From The Women's Movement, Elizabeth M. Schneider
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.
Abortion, Politics, And The Courts: Roe V. Wade And Its Aftermath, Michigan Law Review
Abortion, Politics, And The Courts: Roe V. Wade And Its Aftermath, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Abortion, Politics, and the Courts: Roe v. Wade and Its Aftermath by Eva R. Rubin
Electoral Folklore: An Empirical Examination Of The Abortion Issue, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Electoral Folklore: An Empirical Examination Of The Abortion Issue, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Though partisans on both sides claim credit for electoral victories and defeats, and politicians treat both groups with deference, few studies have attempted to gauge the impact of the abortion issue in more than an anecdotal manner. In 1976, NARAL noted that of the 13 members of the U.S. Representatives that lost re-election bids, nine were pro-life, and four were pro-choice. A study conducted by the Alan Guttmacher Institute of the 1974 House races found that, in “competitive” districts, 92 percent of the pro-choice candidates studied were re-elected while only 61 percent of the pro-life candidates were returned to Congress, …
National Organization For Women (Now) South Carolina Records - Accession 142, National Organization For Women, South Carolina
National Organization For Women (Now) South Carolina Records - Accession 142, National Organization For Women, South Carolina
Manuscript Collection
The National Organization for Women (NOW) South Carolina Records consist of correspondence, memoranda, minutes, reports, agenda notes, financial records, newsletters, pamphlets and brochures, flyers, handbooks, newspaper clippings, and a tape recording relating to the organization's work to improve the status and life of South Carolina Women and their efforts toward the state ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) , the 1984 Mondale-Ferraro campaign, and other issues concerning the women of South Carolina. Also contains information on the National and Southeast Region NOW organizations.
The Politics Of Abortion In The House Of Representatives In 1976, Maris A. Vinovskis
The Politics Of Abortion In The House Of Representatives In 1976, Maris A. Vinovskis
Michigan Law Review
The battle over federal funds for abortions and the attempts to pass a constitutional amendment to prohibit all abortions have become annual events that most members of Congress privately dread but publicly welcome. As "pro-life" and "pro-choice" constituents descend upon their elected officials each year, representatives are forced to face an issue that has no easy legislative solution. Despite the intensity and disruptiveness of these confrontations, there have been no thorough and independent analyses of this phenomenon. Instead, most information on the abortion controversy in Congress has come from the understandably biased pens of the activists on both sides. Representatives …