Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legislation (26)
- Supreme Court of the United States (26)
- Administrative Law (21)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (14)
- Courts (13)
-
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Contracts (6)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (4)
- Business (3)
- Education Law (3)
- Election Law (3)
- Labor Relations (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Admiralty (1)
- Agency (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (67)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (25)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
-
- West Virginia University (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- St. Mary's University (3)
- The University of Akron (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Eastern Illinois University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (37)
- Articles (18)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
-
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Akron Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Book Chapters (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- American University Business Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present) (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 169 of 169
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Labor Law- Recognition And Organizational Picketing - Unfair Labor Practice Charge Is A Prerequisite To Initiation Of The Expeditied Election Procedure Of Section 8 (B)(7)(C) Of The Nlra, Steven P. Davis
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff union commenced picketing a previously-unorganized company for the purpose of gaining recognition as the bargaining agent of the employees. The next day the union filed a petition with the NLRB seeking an election. Five days later the individual plaintiffs, Reed and Whitney, filed an unfair labor practice charge under section 8 (b) (7) of the National Labor Relations Act for the express purpose of invoking the expedited election procedure provided by the statute. This charge was prepared by and filed with the sanction of the picketing union. The NLRB refused to grant the expedited election. In an action for …
Labor Law - Appropriate Bargaining Unit Under Section 9(B) Of The Taft-Hartley Act- Determination Requires Nlrb To Exercise Discretion, James N. Adler
Labor Law - Appropriate Bargaining Unit Under Section 9(B) Of The Taft-Hartley Act- Determination Requires Nlrb To Exercise Discretion, James N. Adler
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner union sought to represent maintenance and construction electricians employed by plate glass manufacturer at a new plant. How ever, employer and intervenor union entered into an agreement extending to the new plant an existing contract covering employees at certain of employer's other plants. At hearings upon petitioner's application to determine the "appropriate" bargaining unit under criteria established by section 9 (b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, employer and intervenor urged that the highly integrated nature of the plant and the history of plantwide bargaining at employer's other plants made a single bargaining unit covering all plant's employees the only appropriate …
Self-Determination Vs. Stability Of Labor Relations: The Effect Of American Potash, Dallas L. Jones
Self-Determination Vs. Stability Of Labor Relations: The Effect Of American Potash, Dallas L. Jones
Michigan Law Review
Very early in its history, the Board was confronted with conflicting claims by craft unions and industrial unions for the right to represent craft workers. Generally, the industrial unions sought a broad unit of production and craft workers, whereas the craft unions sought units of their particular skill. The Board's first reaction was to establish broad units where it appeared that one union had a majority throughout the plant. In doing so, the Board relied heavily upon what it considered best for collective bargaining purposes. In many cases, the Board created large units over the protests of small groups on …
Labor Law - National Labor Relations Board - Effect Of The Nlrb's Refusal To Take Jurisdiction, Joseph O. Sullivan, John C. Dowd S.Ed.
Labor Law - National Labor Relations Board - Effect Of The Nlrb's Refusal To Take Jurisdiction, Joseph O. Sullivan, John C. Dowd S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Appellant corporation was charged by the United Steelworkers of America with unfair labor practices in violation of sections 8(a)(1), (3) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act. Although appellant's business affected commerce within the meaning of the act, the acting regional director of the NLRB declined to issue a complaint because the company's volume of business did not meet the Board's revised minimum "jurisdictional" standards. The union then filed substantially the same charges with the Utah Labor Relations Board. The Utah Board's determination that it had jurisdiction was affirmed by the Utah Supreme Court. On certiorari to the Supreme …
Labor Law-Back Pay Awards-Duty Of Discharged Employee To Seek Other Employment, Howard A. Cole S.Ed.
Labor Law-Back Pay Awards-Duty Of Discharged Employee To Seek Other Employment, Howard A. Cole S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The National Labor Relations Board issued a back pay order in favor of the victim of a discriminatory discharge, computing the award on the basis of the earnings of the dischargee's replacement during the period of discrimination less the amount actually earned by the dischargee in other employment during the same period. The dischargee had registered with the state unemployment agency but had earned only $294.20 over a two-year period. On petition for enforcement of the order, held, order set aside and case remanded. Where a dischargee earns only a small amount of money over a long period of …
Labor Law - Federal Procedure - Stay Of State Court Proceedings Involving Matters Within The Exclusive Jurisdiction Of The Nlrb, Arne Hovdesven S.Ed.
Labor Law - Federal Procedure - Stay Of State Court Proceedings Involving Matters Within The Exclusive Jurisdiction Of The Nlrb, Arne Hovdesven S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Richman Brothers sought and was granted a state court injunction against organizational picketing conducted by the union. The complaint alleged acts which were unfair labor practices under section 8 (b) (2) of the amended National Labor Relations Act. The union, after failing to obtain removal of this action, unsuccessfully applied for a federal district court injunction against the state court proceedings. On appeal, held, affirmed. Section 2283 of the Judicial Code prevents a federal court injunction of a state court proceeding, despite the fact that the activities involved are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board. …
Nlrb Control And Administration Of Representation Elections
Nlrb Control And Administration Of Representation Elections
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The National Labor Relations Board, Guy Farmer
The National Labor Relations Board, Guy Farmer
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Labor Law--Labor-Management Relations Act--Encouragement Of Union Membership And Employer's Intent As Elements Of Unlawful Discrimination, George B. Berridge S.Ed.
Labor Law--Labor-Management Relations Act--Encouragement Of Union Membership And Employer's Intent As Elements Of Unlawful Discrimination, George B. Berridge S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
ln the first of three cases involving employer encouragement of union membership the National Labor Relations Board held that a union had violated section 8(b)(2) of the amended National Labor Relations Act by inducing an employer to refuse to hire a union member who had failed to comply with the union's rules as to job clearances. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected the union's contention that the employer's action was not such as to encourage union membership and enforced the Board's order. In the second case a union was found by the board to nave violated section …
Disestablishment: Nlrb's Waning Remedy And The International Unions
Disestablishment: Nlrb's Waning Remedy And The International Unions
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Nature Of A Grievance In Labor Relations, George Rose
The Nature Of A Grievance In Labor Relations, George Rose
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Labor Law--Taft-Hartley Act--Right Of Board To Dismiss Unfair Labor Practice Complaints For Policy Reasons, B. J. George, Jr.
Labor Law--Taft-Hartley Act--Right Of Board To Dismiss Unfair Labor Practice Complaints For Policy Reasons, B. J. George, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
In recent months the National Labor Relations Board and its General Counsel, Robert N. Denham, have come to grips over the right of the Board to dismiss unfair labor practice charges on ground that to take jurisdiction would not effectuate the policies of the National Labor Relations Act. After unsuccessfully opposing the Board in several cases, Mr. Denham aired the controversy publicly, charging the Board with application of "their old Wagner Act formulae" when "the principle of the theory has been repudiated by the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act." The Board retaliated by revoking all the General Counsel's independent powers …
Constitutional Law-Freedom Of Speech For Labor Organizers-Registration Requirement Invalid, Francis Powers
Constitutional Law-Freedom Of Speech For Labor Organizers-Registration Requirement Invalid, Francis Powers
Michigan Law Review
Collins v. Thomas decided by the Supreme Court in January is a decision of great practical importance in that it falls at a point where three recently developed constitutional doctrines enmesh or intersect with one another. The case makes it necessary that the Court integrate these doctrines and distinguish the areas in which they are respectively applicable.
The Authority Of The National War Labor Board Over Labor Disputes, Leonard B. Boudin
The Authority Of The National War Labor Board Over Labor Disputes, Leonard B. Boudin
Michigan Law Review
The National War Labor Board has reached the respectable age of two years. Supported originally only by the President's war powers, it has secured compliance with its orders, has weathered a minor congressional investigation, and has built up a body of decisions whose effect will continue after the war. These facts, as well as certain signs of the conservatism which appears to strike all government agencies at one time or another, entitle the board to a short survey of certain aspects of its jurisdiction and authority.
The Evolution Of The "Duty To Bargain" Concept In American Law, Russell A. Smith
The Evolution Of The "Duty To Bargain" Concept In American Law, Russell A. Smith
Michigan Law Review
Promotion of collective bargaining appears to be a governmental policy borne of the travails of economic emergency during World War I, though it was somewhat foreshadowed by the earlier attempt in the Erdman Act of 1898 to outlaw the "yellow-dog'' contract. It first gained recognition by certain of the individual branches of the administration II and was subsequently suggested as an over-all policy, along with recognition of the right of self-organization and other principles, by the War Labor Conference Board. This board was appointed in January, 1918, by the Secretary of Labor and consisted of nominees of the National Industrial …
Labor Law-Reinstatement Of Sit-Down Strikers Not Formally Discharged By The Employer, Walter B. Connolly
Labor Law-Reinstatement Of Sit-Down Strikers Not Formally Discharged By The Employer, Walter B. Connolly
Michigan Law Review
A one-day sit-down strike occurred in the employer's plant on March 16, 1937. A general strike was called on the following day and lasted until June 24, 1937. On March 25, 1937, the employer sent a notice to all employees including the "sit-downers" urging them to return to work. The National Labor Relations Board found the company guilty of various unfair labor practices, all of which occurred during the general strike, and ordered a reinstatement of all employees who were on strike March 23, 1937, with back pay and full seniority rights. Petitioner asserted that the men who engaged in …
Administrative Procedure: National Labor Relations Board, J. Warren Madden
Administrative Procedure: National Labor Relations Board, J. Warren Madden
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Labor Relations Acts-Their Effect On Industrial Warfare, Lennart Larson
The Labor Relations Acts-Their Effect On Industrial Warfare, Lennart Larson
Michigan Law Review
This article is addressed to the query whether the labor relations acts have any effect on the ends and means of labor warfare. During the hey-day of the NIRA, decisions may be found which indicated that industrial warfare for the objects within the regulatory power of the code authorities was unlawful. Strikes and picketing were enjoined where carried on for higher wages and hours, objects which were thought properly to be for code authorities to adjust. Those decisions were of dubious soundness, but they suggest an argument which may be advanced under the labor relations acts. The NIRA was of …