Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Labor and Employment Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

NLRB

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 91 - 99 of 99

Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law

Availability Of Labor Injunction Where Employer Fails To Comply With Requirements Of Indiana Anti-Injunction Act Oct 1948

Availability Of Labor Injunction Where Employer Fails To Comply With Requirements Of Indiana Anti-Injunction Act

Indiana Law Journal

Recent Cases: Labor Law

Go to article

Labor Law - "Channeling" The Duty To Bargain - Effect Of Violation Of "No-Strike" Clause In Existing Agreement, John F. Buchman S.Ed. May 1948

Labor Law - "Channeling" The Duty To Bargain - Effect Of Violation Of "No-Strike" Clause In Existing Agreement, John F. Buchman S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Employer and union had an existing collective agreement which provided detailed procedures for adjusting grievances, including arbitration as the final step, and contained a no-strike clause. Disputes arose concerning action taken by the employer affecting working schedules, overtime work, and other conditions of employment without consulting the union; and disciplinary measures were taken against certain employees in pursuance of the new working rules. The union finally called a strike, without filing grievances according to the contract procedure on the disputes which were the immediate causes of the strike. The employer discontinued hearings on two pending grievances and refused to negotiate …

Go to article

The Taft-Hartley Act And State Jurisdiction Over Labor Relations, Russell A. Smith Mar 1948

The Taft-Hartley Act And State Jurisdiction Over Labor Relations, Russell A. Smith

Michigan Law Review

Of the many problems arising out of the Taft-Hartley Act, not the least perplexing is the determination of its impact upon state jurisdiction over labor relations. The importance of the question is obvious, and is illustrated by Judge Shepard's reaction. Administrators of state labor relations acts and state courts, like the California court, must determine what position to take with respect to their jurisdiction. Employers and unions must make a like determination, and must also come to some conclusion as to the applicability of state law as reflected in other statutes and in judicial decisions. Those charged with the administration …

Go to article

The Divided Supreme Court, 1944-1945, C. Herman Pritchett Dec 1945

The Divided Supreme Court, 1944-1945, C. Herman Pritchett

Michigan Law Review

The United States Supreme Court has in recent years been supplying fascinating material for students interested in the interplay of personal and institutional factors in the judicial decision-making process. Contrary to the more restrictive practices of some other legal systems, the traditions of the American judiciary have never insisted that justices sitting en banc should hide the existence of division among themselves behind a facade of pretended unanimity. Justices who dissent from a decision of their brethren have been permitted to say so, and to give their reasons. This practice has had an immeasurably great effect in facilitating the growth …

Go to article

Speech As Conditional Privilege In National Labor Relations Board Cases, Reynolds C. Seitz Jan 1943

Speech As Conditional Privilege In National Labor Relations Board Cases, Reynolds C. Seitz

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Assignments - Injunctions - Enforceability In Equity Of Partial Wage Assignments, Michigan Law Review Jan 1942

Assignments - Injunctions - Enforceability In Equity Of Partial Wage Assignments, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The complainant, a milling and textile company employing about 2,000 men, brought this action to enjoin certain wage assignments made by 1,100 of its employees. The assignments, voluntarily made to the respondent union (certified by the National Labor Relations Board), directed the company to deduct from each laborer's pay at the end of every month the amount of his union dues. The complainant had previously refused to sign a contract with the union which embodied a "check-off" provision. Held, the mass assignment being prejudicial to the rights of the complainant, the injunction should be granted. Pacific Mills v. Textile …

Go to article

National Labor Relations Act: Power Of Nlrb To Award Back Pay To Employees And To Provide Reimbursement For Wpa Payments, Howard E. Trent Jr. Jan 1941

National Labor Relations Act: Power Of Nlrb To Award Back Pay To Employees And To Provide Reimbursement For Wpa Payments, Howard E. Trent Jr.

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Labor Law - Picketing To Compel Breach Of A Statutory Duty - Conflict Between Norris-Laguardia Act And National Labor Relations Act, Michigan Law Review Jun 1940

Labor Law - Picketing To Compel Breach Of A Statutory Duty - Conflict Between Norris-Laguardia Act And National Labor Relations Act, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Petitioners, a corporate employer and an A. F. of L. union whose membership included all the company's active employees, brought suit in a federal court against a C. I. O. union, whose membership included two of petitioner's employees on strike, to enjoin respondents' picketing. The purpose of the picketing was to coerce the employer and employees to violate the agreement entered into with the petitioner union as exclusive bargaining agency and to cause the employer to rescind its recognition of that union. The trial court granted an injunction against all picketing on findings that the agreement between the employer and …

Go to article

Labor Law - Rights And Duties Under The National Labor Relations Act- Effect Of Norris-Laguardia Act, Lennart V. Larson Mar 1938

Labor Law - Rights And Duties Under The National Labor Relations Act- Effect Of Norris-Laguardia Act, Lennart V. Larson

Michigan Law Review

Defendants, members of a C.I.O. organization, petitioned for an election in plaintiff corporation's factory in order to determine the representatives of the employees for the purposes of collective bargaining. An employees' association, a union the members of which were restricted to employees of the corporation, received a majority of votes and was certified by the National Labor Relations Board as bargaining representative. Nevertheless, the C.I.O. union called a strike, demanding sole bargaining privileges and a closed shop. Picketing, violence and intimidation are alleged, as a result of which plaintiff's factory has had to shut down. Held, plaintiff is entitled …

Go to article

First Prev