Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (44)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (41)
- Administrative Law (36)
- Law and Society (15)
- First Amendment (14)
-
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (13)
- Contracts (12)
- Disability Law (12)
- Legislation (11)
- Other Law (10)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Law and Gender (8)
- Legal Remedies (8)
- Business Organizations Law (7)
- Health Law and Policy (7)
- Organizations Law (7)
- Courts (6)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Religion Law (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Civil Procedure (5)
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- Insurance Law (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (4)
- Education Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Employment discrimination (17)
- Arbitration (14)
- Employment (13)
- Collective bargaining (12)
- Mediation (12)
-
- Discrimination (11)
- Employers (11)
- Employment law (10)
- Title VII (10)
- California (9)
- Employee (9)
- Labor law (9)
- Employees (8)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (7)
- Employer (7)
- Privacy (7)
- Workplace (7)
- ADA (6)
- Dispute resolution (6)
- EEOC (6)
- Employee dismissals (6)
- Gender (6)
- National Labor Relations Act (6)
- National Labor Relations Board (6)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Disability (5)
- Federal Arbitration Act (5)
- Labor (5)
- Labor arbitration (5)
- Labor relations (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 191
Full-Text Articles in Labor and Employment Law
Attempting To Find Some Common Ground For Illegal Aliens, And The Board's Ability To Award Back Pay: Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. V. Nlrb , Stephen M. Hernandez
Attempting To Find Some Common Ground For Illegal Aliens, And The Board's Ability To Award Back Pay: Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. V. Nlrb , Stephen M. Hernandez
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Paternalistic Discrimination: The Chevron Deference Misplaced In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. V. Echazabal, Tricia M. Patterson
Paternalistic Discrimination: The Chevron Deference Misplaced In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. V. Echazabal, Tricia M. Patterson
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Consider The Source: A Note On Public-Sector Union Expenditure Restrictions Upheld In Davenport V. Washington Education Association, Daniel A. Himebaugh
Consider The Source: A Note On Public-Sector Union Expenditure Restrictions Upheld In Davenport V. Washington Education Association, Daniel A. Himebaugh
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Turning Back The Clock: The California Supreme Court's Decision In Mcclung V. Employment Development Department And The Difficulty Of Determining Legislative Intent In Retroactive Rulemaking , Jeffrey R. Groendal
Turning Back The Clock: The California Supreme Court's Decision In Mcclung V. Employment Development Department And The Difficulty Of Determining Legislative Intent In Retroactive Rulemaking , Jeffrey R. Groendal
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Against the backdrop of McClung, this note will explore the principle of retroactivity, tracing its development at the national level in the U.S. Supreme Court and at the state level with respect to California courts. Part II of this note addresses the history and development of jurisprudence on retroactivity, focusing on the traditional roles of the Judicial and Legislative Branches and the major cases of both the U.S. Supreme Court and California courts on retroactivity. Part III sets out the facts of McClung. Part IV analyzes and critiques the court's opinions in McClung, with a separate analysis of the history …
An Overview Of Whistleblower Protection Claims At The United States Department Of Labor, William Dorsey
An Overview Of Whistleblower Protection Claims At The United States Department Of Labor, William Dorsey
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This article gives an overview of whistleblower protection adjudications at the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Administrative Law Judges. Section I introduces the whistleblower protection statutes that give rise to the complaints adjudicated by the Secretary of Labor. Section II reviews earlier statutes that have protected employees from job retaliation and identifies several whistleblower statutes the Secretary of Labor does not administer, but refers to for guidance in interpreting and applying her employee protection programs; these statutes may permit judicial remedies. Section III familiarizes the reader with key concepts in whistleblower protection litigation. Among these are the need to …
When Public Employees Speak Out On Issues Of Public Concern: The Applicability Of Pickering In Garcetti V. Ceballos, Jayne Chen
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
"Speak, Go Ahead, Speak, Speak": Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown's Effect On Employment Speech Regarding Unionization , Lauren Kadish
"Speak, Go Ahead, Speak, Speak": Chamber Of Commerce V. Brown's Effect On Employment Speech Regarding Unionization , Lauren Kadish
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This case note examines the analysis of the Supreme Court's holding in Chamber of Commerce. v. Brown and the effect the decision will have on the rights of employers to engage in noncoercive speech regarding unionization. Part II discusses the historical lineage of employer free speech guaranteed under the NLRA. Part III denotes the relevant facts and procedural history of the case and issues presented to the Supreme Court. Part IV analyzes both the majority and dissenting opinions regarding NLRA preemption over state regulations prohibiting the expenditure of state funds by employers to deter union organization. Finally, Part V considers …
The Supreme Court Retires Disparate Impact: Kentucky Retirement Systems V. Eeoc Validates The Disparate Treatment Theory Under The Age Discrimination In Employment Act, Molly Horan
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This case note explores the ramifications and effectiveness of the Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC decision. Part II discusses the historical background, progression, and development of the ADEA, as well as the theories used to analyze claims under the Act. Part III outlines the operative facts of Kentucky Retirement. Part IV dissects and analyzes the opinions of the majority and dissent. Part V examines the potential impact the Court's decision in Kentucky Retirement will have on employees, employers, and the judicial system. Finally, Part VI concludes this case note.
Play Ball: What Can Be Done To Prevent Strikes And Lockouts In Professional Sports And Keep The Stadium Lights On, Alexandra Baumann
Play Ball: What Can Be Done To Prevent Strikes And Lockouts In Professional Sports And Keep The Stadium Lights On, Alexandra Baumann
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This comment analyzes the role that the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service play in ending strikes and lockouts caused by collective bargaining in professional sports. It then looks at what can be done to prevent lockouts and strikes in the future, which would not only benefit fans, but also stadium employees, players, and owners, as none of them make money if there are no games.
Trespassory Union Picketing On Private Property: Sears, Roebuck And Co. V. San Diego County District Council Of Carpenters - Bringing State Law To "No-Man's Land"?, Donald S. Jakubowski, Marni E. Byrum
Trespassory Union Picketing On Private Property: Sears, Roebuck And Co. V. San Diego County District Council Of Carpenters - Bringing State Law To "No-Man's Land"?, Donald S. Jakubowski, Marni E. Byrum
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fringe Benefits, Proposed Section 84, And Tax Policy , Gregory M. Fowler
Fringe Benefits, Proposed Section 84, And Tax Policy , Gregory M. Fowler
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
General Knit Revives Hollywood Ceramics; The Nlrb Again Prohibits Campaign Misrepresentations, Dwight Tracy Shaw
General Knit Revives Hollywood Ceramics; The Nlrb Again Prohibits Campaign Misrepresentations, Dwight Tracy Shaw
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nlrb V. Yeshiva University: Teacher Participants In University Policy Formulation Deemed Managerial Under Nlra, Valerie A. Moore
Nlrb V. Yeshiva University: Teacher Participants In University Policy Formulation Deemed Managerial Under Nlra, Valerie A. Moore
Pepperdine Law Review
The development of a "status quo" for teacher bargaining unit certification was brought to an abrupt halt by the recent Supreme Court Yeshiva decision. The author, in agreement with the majority opinion, examines the development of this "status quo" and the cases leading up to and including the Supreme Court's determination that the Yeshiva faculty were managerial employees and thus exempt from coverage under the National Labor Relations Act. Also, the author illustrates the Supreme Court's unfavorable reaction to the National Labor Relations Board's cursory and inconsistent administrative decisions and opinions.
Muko And Conex: The Third Circuit Responds To Connell , Robert A. King, Melvin L. Moser
Muko And Conex: The Third Circuit Responds To Connell , Robert A. King, Melvin L. Moser
Pepperdine Law Review
The authors discuss the application of federal antitrust laws to organized labor. The article, written for practitioners, defines the elements necessary to obtain a recovery in labor antitrust actions. The authors analyze the standard of review, burden of proof and the elements which the unions must show in order to be exempted from antitrust law. The focal point of the article is the comparison between the Supreme Court's most recent discussion of the labor exemption in Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 100 and the Third Circuit's application of that exemption in Larry V. Muko v. Southwestern …
Bundy V. Jackson: Eliminating The Need To Prove Tangible Economic Job Loss In Sexual Harassment Claims Brought Under Title Vii, Terence J. Bouressa
Bundy V. Jackson: Eliminating The Need To Prove Tangible Economic Job Loss In Sexual Harassment Claims Brought Under Title Vii, Terence J. Bouressa
Pepperdine Law Review
In the case of Bundy v. Jackson, the federal appellate court eliminated the need to prove tangible job loss in claims under Title VII relating to sexual harassment. The holding in Bundy thus promotes the viability of sexual harassment claims under Title VII and deters employers from engaging in subtle sexual harassment as "part of the job." The decision provides a model for the nation to follow in the pursuit of the worthy goal of eliminating sexual harassment in the workplace.
Wengler V. Druggists' Mutual Insurance Company: No More Skirting The Issue Of Sex Discrimination In Workers' Compensation Dependency Statutes, Teresa A. Saggese, Lawson A. Cox Ii
Wengler V. Druggists' Mutual Insurance Company: No More Skirting The Issue Of Sex Discrimination In Workers' Compensation Dependency Statutes, Teresa A. Saggese, Lawson A. Cox Ii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A New Standard Of Review In Free Exercise Cases: Thomas V. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment & Security Division, Lynn Mccutchen Gardner
A New Standard Of Review In Free Exercise Cases: Thomas V. Review Board Of The Indiana Employment & Security Division, Lynn Mccutchen Gardner
Pepperdine Law Review
In Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, the United States Supreme Court was called upon to clarify the appropriate level of review to be applied in cases which examine the first amendment right to free exercise of religion. The Court ruled that the "compelling state interest" test is the proper standard to be used. The Court also accorded first amendment protection to beliefs which are not shared by other members of a religious group and which are instead the unique interpretation of an individual member and not acceptable, logical, consistent or comprehensible to others.
Enjoining Politically Motivated Strikes In Federal Courts: The Jacksonville Bulk Terminals Case, Mark A. Ozzello
Enjoining Politically Motivated Strikes In Federal Courts: The Jacksonville Bulk Terminals Case, Mark A. Ozzello
Pepperdine Law Review
The United States Supreme Court, in Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, acknowledged that a work stoppage entirely motivated by political goals constitutes a "labor dispute" within the Norris-La Guardia Act which is prohibited from injunctive relief by a federal court. In so ruling, the Supreme Court found the Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union and Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO exceptions, which allow an injunction to issue pending arbitration in situations where the dispute underlying the work stoppage is arbitrable, to be inapplicable to the no-strike clause in the collective-bargaining agreement scrutinized. …
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company V. Eeoc: Expanding The Scope Of Title Vii , Mark D. Klein
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company V. Eeoc: Expanding The Scope Of Title Vii , Mark D. Klein
Pepperdine Law Review
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 prohibits sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. In Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. EEOC, the United States Supreme Court extended the scope of the Act to include not only female employees, but also female dependents of male employees. The author examines the Supreme Court's analysis of and the legislative intent behind the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and explores the future impact of the decision.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission V. Wyoming: Appomattox Courthouse Revisited , Richard M. Stephens
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission V. Wyoming: Appomattox Courthouse Revisited , Richard M. Stephens
Pepperdine Law Review
A highly divided Court again addressed the relatively new doctrine in constitutional law: state exemption from federal regulations due to the concept of federalism. Although the Court applied the tests from National League of Cities v. Usury and its progeny, the Court reached a different result which, without expressly overruling that controversial case, severely limited National League of Cities to its facts. The hope of modern states' rights advocates proved to be short lived.
Up Or Out And Into The Supreme Court: A Forecast For Hishon V. King And Spalding , Linda Randlett Kollar
Up Or Out And Into The Supreme Court: A Forecast For Hishon V. King And Spalding , Linda Randlett Kollar
Pepperdine Law Review
The author presents an extensive analysis of Title VII in an effort to forecast the forthcoming Supreme Court decision of Hishon v. King and Spalding. Included are the issues presented to the Court, the legislative history of Title VII, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision, and a historical inquiry of the applicable decisions of the Burger Court. Although the outcome of the case has yet to be decided, the author's informed prediction will guide commentaries in the future.
N.L.R.B. Campaign Propaganda: A Call For Congressional Reform, Susan Gardner
N.L.R.B. Campaign Propaganda: A Call For Congressional Reform, Susan Gardner
Pepperdine Law Review
With its decision in Midland National Life Insurance Company, the National Labor Relations Board no longer probes into the truth or falsity of statements made during he course of preelection campaigns. The decision marks the third policy reversal in regulating campaign propaganda during the last five years. Of concern to employers and unions is the uncertainty of Board resolutions in this area, particularly when each policy reversal was preceded immediately by Presidential appointments to the Board. This article traces the shifting Board policy of regulating campaign misrepresentations and calls for Congressional intervention to stabilize the preelection process.
Striking A Balance Among Illegal Aliens, The Ina, And The Nlra: Sure-Tan V. Nlrb, Carl M. Howard
Striking A Balance Among Illegal Aliens, The Ina, And The Nlra: Sure-Tan V. Nlrb, Carl M. Howard
Pepperdine Law Review
Since 1943, the National Labor Relations Board has extended rights guaranteed to employees under the National Labor Relations Act to illegal aliens. In Sure-Tan v. NLRB, the United States Supreme Court for the first time reviewed this practice, approving it and noting that reporting illegal alien employees to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) might constitute an unfair labor practice. Awarding a remedy of back pay was, however, improper as speculative. The author examines the Supreme Court's analysis of the decision and explores its future impact.
Right To Restrain Versus Right To Refrain: An Examination Of Pattern Makers' League Of North America V. Nlrb, Lawrence M. Burek
Right To Restrain Versus Right To Refrain: An Examination Of Pattern Makers' League Of North America V. Nlrb, Lawrence M. Burek
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nlra Preemption Of State Common Law Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Bhopal Brigade Goes Home , Joseph R. Weeks
Nlra Preemption Of State Common Law Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Bhopal Brigade Goes Home , Joseph R. Weeks
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Advice To California Employers: An Overview Of Wrongful Discharge Law And How To Avoid Potential Liability, Teresa Howell Sharp
Advice To California Employers: An Overview Of Wrongful Discharge Law And How To Avoid Potential Liability, Teresa Howell Sharp
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Egaps - Arbitration Plans For Nonunion Employees , Charles J. Morris
Egaps - Arbitration Plans For Nonunion Employees , Charles J. Morris
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Sector Labor Arbitration: Differences, Problems, Cures , Dennis R. Nolan
Federal Sector Labor Arbitration: Differences, Problems, Cures , Dennis R. Nolan
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Evolving Doctrine Of Union Liability For Health And Safety In The Workplace. Warning: Collective Bargaining Can Be Hazardous To Your Union's Health, Jeffrey S. Wohlner
The Evolving Doctrine Of Union Liability For Health And Safety In The Workplace. Warning: Collective Bargaining Can Be Hazardous To Your Union's Health, Jeffrey S. Wohlner
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Technology, Robotics, And The Work Preservation Doctrine: Future Considerations For Labor And Management, Christie A. Moon
Technology, Robotics, And The Work Preservation Doctrine: Future Considerations For Labor And Management, Christie A. Moon
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.