Labor and Employment Law Commons^™

Effect Of Virginia Workmen's Compensation Act Upon The Right Of A Third-Party Tortfeasor To Obtain Contribution From An Employer Whose Concurrent Negligence Caused Employee's Death Or Injury, Robert I. Stevenson

University of Richmond Law Review

The Supreme Court of Virginia has never been asked to determine a third party's contribution rights where his negligence has combined with that of an employer to cause personal injury to an employee covered by the Virginia Workmen's Compensation Act [hereinafter referred to as the Act]. Although the question is a novel one in Virginia, courts in other jurisdictions have coped with the problem and have arrived at diverse solutions. At the outset, a brief review of the Act and of the Virginia contribution statute seems appropriate.

Tort Liability Of Labor Unions For Picket Line Assaults, David R. Case

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This article will discuss whether tort actions against unions for picket line assaults are preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, and if not preempted, what forums are available to hear such actions. This article will also examine the theories that have been used to hold unions liable for the assaults committed by their picketers. Included in this discussion will be an analysis of the policy considerations offered in support of the various theories of liability.

Punitive Damages Under Section 102 Of The Labor-Management Reporting And Disclosure Act, S. Thomas Wienner

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

It is firmly established that in a suit brought under section 102, a union member may ordinarily recover compensatory damages for any injury proximately caused by a violation of Title I or section 609. The courts are divided, however, on the question of whether a plaintiff may be awarded punitive damages under section 102. This article will address that question by discussing the language and the legislative history of section 102, the conflicting decisions of the federal courts, and the relevant policy considerations.

A Critique Of The Justifications For Employee Suits In Strict Products Liability Against Third Party Manufacturers, Pierre John Schlag

Publications

No abstract provided.

Admiralty Law - 1972 Amendments To The Longshoremen's And Harbor Workers' Compensation Act - Shipowner's Duty Toward Longshoreman Is Same As Land-Based Employer's Duty Toward Employees Of Independent Contractor, Henry Scott Wallace

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Labor Law-Prima Facie Tort Doctrine Bars Unreasonable Deprivation Of Union Membership-Hurwitz V. Directors Guild Of America, Inc., Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

In July 1965 the officers of the Directors Guild of America (DGA) and the Screen Directors International Guild (SDIG) concluded a merger agreement which provided that DGA was to be the surviving union and SDIG members were to become members of DGA automatically upon signing the DGA non-Communist loyalty oath. Although the SDIG membership ratified the merger agreement by a majority vote, six members steadfastly refused to sign the oath and as a result were not admitted to membership in DGA. They thereupon brought a diversity suit in a New York federal district court: and moved for a preliminary injunction …

Both Ways Test In Negligence Actions

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Employer's Duty To Know Deficiencies Of Employees, Martin R. Loftus

Cleveland State Law Review

In the case of Kendall v. Gore Properties Inc. an employer was held liable for the willful and malicious (criminal) acts of his employee. The employee, a janitor in an apartment house, had murdered a tenant. The employer was held liable on the ground that he, the landlord, had been recklessly ignorant in the selection of the employee. The case illustrates the modern doctrine of allocating to the employer liability for the harm caused by the servant's tortious behavior, based on his negligent selection of the employee, even though the criminal nature of the servant's act is far beyond that …

Employer's Liability For Employee He Was Compelled To Hire, James Balph

Cleveland State Law Review

Should an employer be liable for the torts of his employee if he was compelled to employ him?The master is charged with the obligation of selecting competent workmen. Therefore, if the element of employee selection is removed as a prerogative of the employer, does not this remove the master-servant relationship? If the employer through no fault of his own cannot completely direct and control the employee, is not the necessary privity between master and servant absent? Is it reasonable that the employer be liable for the misconduct of a person whose selection and/or control has been taken out of his …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust Law--Conspiracy To Eliminate Discounters From Automobile Market a Per Se Violation of Sherman Act

===========================

Antitrust Law--Merger of Two Major Competitors in Industry with History of Concentration Violates Section 7 of Clayton Act

===========================

Criminal Law--Future Confessions Will Be Inadmissible Unless Specified Pre-trial Procedures Are Followed

===========================

Juvenile Courts--Juvenile Delinquent Entitled to Hearing On Question of Waiver of Jurisdiction

===========================

Labor Law--Public Carrier Can Make Unnegotiated Unilateral Changes in Collective Agreements When "Reasonably Necessary" To Maintain Service

============================

Labor Law--In Future NLRB Elections, Employer Must Furnish List of Employees' Names and Addresses

=============================

Taxation--Thin Incorporation Not Tantamount to Disqualification …

How F.E.L.A. Became Liability Without Fault, Gaspare A. Corso

Cleveland State Law Review

The Federal Employers' Liability Act supersedes the common and statutory law of the states ("There is no federal common law"), and this is true regardless of where the action is brought. Under common law, the injured employee was faced with the burden of proof and obliged to overcome the defenses of contributory negligence, assumption of risk and the fellowservant rule. But it is apparent that Congress was dissatisfied with the common law approach to the master-servant relation-ship. The practical effect (at the very least) of the F.E.L.A. is to abolish many of the defenses available at common law to an …

Punitive Damages: Punishment Of An Insured Defendant?, Carroway V. Johnson, Kenneth Lasson

All Faculty Scholarship

The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries sustained in an automobile collision and was awarded a judgment in the amount of $5,000 actual damages and $1,500 punitive damages. The defendant's insurance company had refused to defend her in that action or to pay the judgment obtained, relying upon an employee exclusion clause in the policy. The plaintiff thereupon sued the defendant on the judgment, this time joining the insurer as a co-defendant, and won a verdict to recover against the insurer the aforesaid amount. The insurance company appealed, questioning its liability for punitive damages.

Agency -- 1964 Tennessee Survey, John S. Beasley

Vanderbilt Law Review

During the period covered by this Survey several cases have raised rather interesting points for consideration under the law of agency. On one occasion the Tennessee Supreme Court declined the opportunity of joining the ranks of the majority of states in moving toward a more modern rule on employer's liability with respect to an employee's child injured negligently by the employee. In this and other decisions, the courts have followed Tennessee precedent rather closely, with the result that there are few changes in the law of agency.

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Attorneys--Interstate Legal Services and the Unauthorized Practice of Law

==============================

Conflict of Laws--New York Public Policy Permits Enforcement of Foreign Gambling Obligation

===============================

Conscientious Objectors--Universal Military Training and Service Act--Supreme Court Test of"Belief In A Relation to A Supreme Being

===============================

Constitutional Law--Abatement of Convictions Occurring Prior to Passage of Civil Rights Act of 1964

===============================

Escheats--Disputes Between States Concerning Unclaimed Corporate Obligations

===============================

Labor Law--Failure To Bargain--Employer Required To Bargain With Respect to His Proposal To Contract Out Work

================================

Professions--Canon Twenty of the Canons of Professional Ethics Interpreted To Ban Statements to News Media

================================

Taxation--Corporate Income Taxation--Merger …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Antitrust--FTC Proceeding Will Not Toll the Statute of Limitations in an Action Under Section 4(b) of the Clayton Act

============================

Conflict of Laws--Where None of the Beneficiaries Reside in Forum State, Limitation on Amount of Recovery Imposed by State Where Tort Occurred Governs

============================

Criminal Law--Double Jeopardy--Conviction of Greater Degree of Offense on Retrial

============================

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--No Requirement that Agent Appointed To Receive Service of Process be Expressly Bound To Give Notice to Principal

============================

Labor Law--NLRA--Union's Duty To Represent Fairly

============================

Labor Law-Walsh--Healey Act--Secretary of Labor Not Authorized To Set More Than One Prevailing Wage

============================= …

Stare Decisis In The F.E.L.A., Harry G. Fuerst

Cleveland State Law Review

The general doctrine on stare decisis is that when a court has once laid down a principle of law as applicable to a certain set of facts, it will adhere to that principle and apply it to all future cases, where the facts are substantially the same. Congress on August 11, 1939, amended the Federal Employers Liability Act, and by the sweep of the President's pen the old and archaic defense of assumption of risk was completely eliminated from the Act.

Advocating The Rights Of The Injured, Benjamin Marcus

Michigan Law Review

When workmen's compensation was first introduced a half century ago, it was felt necessary to cushion the shock in a number of ways. One of these was the idea of a bargain, an exchange, in which the worker, to obtain the new remedy based on liability without fault, gave up his existing remedy, the right to a tort action against his employer for a negligent injury. It is time that the terms of that bargain be re-examined.

Labor Law - Tort Liability - Member May Sue Union For Its Negligent Conduct, Charles Dale Mcclain

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Book Reviews, O. Kahn-Freund, Saul Medlovitz, Charles D. Kelso, J. Francis Paschal, Thomas A. Cowan, Lowell Turrentine, Richard S. Sullivan, G. Robert Ellegaard, Richard Arens, Ilmar Tammelo, J. Myron Jacobstein, Paul O. Proehl

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Employer Immunity In Independent-Contractor Torts In Ohio, Robert Blattner

Cleveland State Law Review

The independent contractor situation differs from most other tort cases in that the employer usually is not the actual tortfeasor. As the contractor is the one who commits the actual wrong, the employer is liable, if at all, only vicariously. One of the main questions becomes not whether the injured party shall recover, but from whom he shall recover. This is the question examined here.

Third Party Actions Against Co-Employees, John E. Martindale

Cleveland State Law Review

Industrial injuries involving intentional torts or situations where the workmen's compensation statute has not been complied with by the employer may, in many cases, relieve the plaintiff of the restrictions placed on his common law rights. It is not our purpose here to explore these exceptions, but to define the extent to which a right of action exists against the coemployee tort-feasor who is clearly within the course and scope of his employment when he inflicts the injury on his fellow worker.

Labor Union Tort Liability, William J. Hotes

Cleveland State Law Review

One of the major problems in determination of labor union tort liability is the extent of federal pre-emption of labor law matters-does it preclude either state legislation or court action where interstate commerce is affected?

Agency--1958 Tennessee Survey, Edward R. Hayes

Vanderbilt Law Review

Establishing that Tortfeasor is a Servant of Defendant: Negligent operation of motor vehicles probably is the most prolific source of tort liability today. Within this area an important cause of litigation has been negligent operation by someone other than the owner of the vehicle. The initial common law approach to such cases was to hold the owner responsible if he himself were negligent, as by entrusting his car to a known incompetent driver, or if the negligent driver were the owner's servant acting within the course and scope of his employment.'

=================

In Smith v. Phillips a pick-up truck, registered …

Agency - Liability Of Principal For Termination Of Agents Employment, William G. Mateer S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In the summer of 1949, appellant entered into an oral contract for an indefinite time with the appellee whereby the former was granted an exclusive wholesale distributorship of appellee's farm and garden equipment. A four-year period followed in which appellant increased the number of dealers in appellee's product from four or five in 1949 to over one hundred in 1953. In the latter part of 1952 appellant contemplated an enlargement of its facilities which would require it to enter upon a fifteen-year lease. Since the lessor desired some assurances as to the duration of appellant's franchise, appellant wrote to appellee …

Labor Law - Federal Pre-Emption - An Inroad Through The Violence Doctrine, Richard E. Day

Michigan Law Review

The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's enforcement of an order obtained by the Kohler Company from the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board enjoining the appellant union, as a violation of the "Wisconsin Employment Peace Act, from further engaging in mass picketing, coercion, and other activities, which were also unfair labor practices under the amended National Labor Relations Act, to which the Kohler Company was subject. On appeal to the United States Supreme Court, held, affirmed, three justices dissenting. While, as a general matter, a state may not, in furtherance of its public policy, enjoin conduct which has been …

Administrative Officers' Tort Liability, Kenneth Culp Davis

Michigan Law Review

Case law on tort liability of public officers and employees is much more interesting than one might expect on the basis of abstract contemplation. The traditional common-law notion that an employee should, as against the employer, bear the ultimate responsibility for his negligence has been exposed as seriously unrealistic in a holding by a unanimous Supreme Court; the decision concerning the government employee is potentially applicable to corporate employees. The many holdings that officers are not liable for deliberate and malicious torts are based on the intriguing view that justice cannot be done when malice is proved, without opening the …

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Constitutional Law--Congressional Investigations --Relevancy of Required Testimony

========================

Constitutional Law--State Taxation of Interstate Commerce--Sales Taxation of Income from Trans-Shipment of Goods within State

========================

Criminal Law--Felony Murder Doctrine--Co-Felon Killed by Victim of Crime

========================

Evidence--Judicial Admissions--Testimony as to Objective Facts

========================

Federal Tort Claims Act--"Private Individual" Clause--Uniquely Governmental Activity

========================

Income Taxation--Capital Gains and Losses--Business Purpose for Contracting in Commodity Futures

========================

Labor Law--Taft-Hartley Act--Discharge of Employees because of Union Membership

========================

Negligence--High Tension Power Lines--Duty to Warn of Dangerous Condition

========================

Real Property--Joint Tenancy--Severance of Estate by Murder of Co-Tenant

========================

Torts--Landowner--Duty to Social Guest

========================

Wills--Pretermitted Heir Statue--Sole …

Maritime Lien Priorities: Cross-Currents Of Theory, Roger G. Connor

Michigan Law Review

The purpose of this article is not to develop a synthesis, for no synthesis is possible, but to give an account of the general theories governing maritime lien priorities, together with a discussion of the concrete issues which arise in their application.

Federal Procedure - Venue - Interpretation Of Section 1404(A) In Cases Arising Under The Federal Employers' Liability Act, Charles G. Williamson, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Three petitioners instituted separate suits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania under the provisions of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, for injuries received in the derailment of a train in South Carolina. The cases were transferred to the Eastern District of South Carolina under the provisions of section 1404 (a), title 28, U.S.C. Because of a court of appeals ruling that orders for transfer were not appealable, petitioners sought mandamus to compel the district judge to set aside his orders for transfer. The court of appeals denied the applications. On certiorari to the United …

Workmen's Compensation - Injuries Arising Out Of And In The Course Of Employment - Employer Furnishing Transportation And Employee Carrying Work To Do At Home As Exceptions To Coming And Going Rule, James W. Beatty S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Decedent, a member of the Public Service Commission, was fatally injured in an accident while traveling between his place of employment and his home. He was driving an automobile furnished by the state, which bore the expenses of maintenance and operation. Decedent had with him certain files to work on at his home, his custom being to devote a part of each weekend to matters connected with his employment. Plaintiff as widow brought an action for death benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Workmen's Compensation Commission entered an award for the plaintiff. On appeal by the state, held, …